|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Synth sounds [message #60386 is a reply to message #60381] |
Thu, 17 November 2005 19:10  |
![Deej [1] is currently offline](/theme/PARIS_Forum_Template/images/offline.png "Deej [1] is currently offline")
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
br />
> > >> >both the c16 and the transport. Nothing seems to be able to start =
> > >> >it again=20
> > >> >w/o shutting down paris. ??</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>hehe... the old "blue flash" when the guitar player steps up
to the mic... I've seen that a few times, usually from old
Fenders.
Churches are the one group who far too often cut corners
they shouldn't... all in the name of saving money. Can't
remember how many times I've seen clear and present Danger
in Church wiring jobs. We have actually declined to work on
some of them if they won't go for our "minimum spec".
David.
DC wrote:
> It's amazing. I took a look at the discussion group they talked
> about in the piece and I have never heard so much misinformation...
>
> There is one brave soul on that group trying to straighten out all
> these poor volunteers who are trying to keep the pastor from the
> same fate...
>
> The one that got me was the discussion about how wireless wouldn't
> solve the problem because you would still get shocked by the
> battery. Oh and the one about how you would be ok with turning
> off the phantom and using a dynamic...
>
> arrggHHHHHH!!!
>
> It's no wonder people get shocked. The worst danger I have ever
> seen is the old 1950's guitar amps with a non-polarized 2-prong
> power cord. You have a 50-50 chance, at any given time you
> plug the amp in, of having 117 volts on your fingers....
>
> You won't notice until you grab something that is grounded...
>
>
> zzzZZZTTTTT
>
> Not a very romantic way to die for your art...
>
> EK Sound <spamnot.info@eksoundNO.com> wrote:
>
>>We have had calls about this from local churches...
>>
>>David.
>>
>>DC wrote:
>>
>>>Seen this?
>>>
>>> http://svconline.com/enewsletters/church_safety_concerns_111 72005/
>
>Just got it set up. Strangely, due to a bungle in the account of my previous
house, my phone got cut off...
....but not really, because just half an hour earlier I'd punched in the
config for the VOIP! I still had a phone where I could call everyone and
pay the bills to get the phone reconnected! :o)
I haven't been able to notice any quality difference at all as of yet, but
I am using the world's cheapest worst quality wireless handset to do the
tests. ;o) Still, the fact that the delay isn't noticable is a start.
I'm stoked! :o)
Cheers,
Kim.I didn't know.... thanks Dimitrios!
Craig
in article 437bd352$1@linux, Dimitrios at musurgio@otenet.gr wrote on
11/16/05 8:48 PM:
>
> So most of you knew that ...
> In my manual there is nothing related to it...
> I have read some posts that were saying that in copy process you cannot copy
> the native or eds effects but only the mixer status.
> So some I guess did not know that...
> Well for those, like me, I think this still counts, right ?
> Regards,
> Diimitrios
>
> "Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote:
>>
>> Please don't say that you knew that because I will be dissapointed :)
>> You can copy the native and eds effects from one submix to another or on
>> same submix either all channel settings or one channel setting !!!
>> Isn't that amazing.
>> Now I will not say how because if someone tells me he knew that I please
>> him to say how !!
>> For those who didn't think that Paris could do that I will follow post with
>> how to do it !!!
>> So f* simple
>> Regards,
>> Dimitrios
>did you find that big ben made the noticable difference that they claim?
Jeremy Luzier wrote:
>weeee heeeeee!!!!
>
>;-)
>
>jer
>
>
>
>About 6 months on it over here. Only a couple of outages so far. Worth the
600.00 I saved for sure.
"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>Just got it set up. Strangely, due to a bungle in the account of my previous
>house, my phone got cut off...
>
>...but not really, because just half an hour earlier I'd punched in the
>config for the VOIP! I still had a phone where I could call everyone and
>pay the bills to get the phone reconnected! :o)
>
>I haven't been able to notice any quality difference at all as of yet, but
>I am using the world's cheapest worst quality wireless handset to do the
>tests. ;o) Still, the fact that the delay isn't noticable is a start.
>
>I'm stoked! :o)
>
>Cheers,
>Kim.I talked to Erling on VOIP a few months ago. The signal was strong and clear
with no problematidc latency between Colorado and Norway.
"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote i
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
