Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » OT:John Macy...thoughts on Shiny Box Mics now
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT:John Macy...thoughts on Shiny Box Mics now [message #57184 is a reply to message #57183] |
Tue, 23 August 2005 13:00   |
John Macy
Messages: 242
Registered: April 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
br />
However, $25 a month for 500mb is cheap, IMO, to send files securely with
reasonably fast download speeds. Considering it can scale up or down to your
needs at the moment, it's not a bad deal....
by the way, that is a 500mb file size at a time you can load onto the
server, That is not a monthly use limit.
However, If you guys come across something cheaper, faster, more reliable
and easier to use, I'd love to know about it. Seriously.
Craig
in article 430be5df@linux, Rod Lincoln at rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com wrote on
8/23/05 11:13 PM:
>
> so.....you got any???
> Rod
> John <no@no.com> wrote:
>> yes they are
>>
>> Rod Lincoln wrote:
>>> suggestions are always welcome
>>> rod
>>> John <no@no.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> 10mb is too small for me personally and $75/year is not cheap
>>>>
>>>> Rod Lincoln wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> thanks!
>>>>> Craig Mitchell <camitchell@cfl.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> in article 430774d1$1@linux, Rod Lincoln at rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com
>>>
>>> wrote
>>>
>>>>&g
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT:John Macy...thoughts on Shiny Box Mics now [message #57189 is a reply to message #57184] |
Tue, 23 August 2005 16:41 |
Rod Lincoln
Messages: 883
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
/>
news:BF3166B4.150D3%camitchell@cfl.rr.com...
>
> Opps, I didn't catch the free part. Sorry.
>
> However, $25 a month for 500mb is cheap, IMO, to send files securely with
> reasonably fast download speeds. Considering it can scale up or down to
> your
> needs at the moment, it's not a bad deal....
>
> by the way, that is a 500mb file size at a time you can load onto the
> server, That is not a monthly use limit.
>
> However, If you guys come across something cheaper, faster, more reliable
> and easier to use, I'd love to know about it. Seriously.
>
> Craig
>
>
>
> in article 430be5df@linux, Rod Lincoln at rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com wrote
> on
> 8/23/05 11:13 PM:
>
>>
>> so.....you got any???
>> Rod
>> John <no@no.com> wrote:
>>> yes they are
>>>
>>> Rod Lincoln wrote:
>>>> suggestions are always welcome
>>>> rod
>>>> John <no@no.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> 10mb is too small for me personally and $75/year is not cheap
>>>>>
>>>>> Rod Lincoln wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks!
>>>>>> Craig Mitchell <camitchell@cfl.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> in article 430774d1$1@linux, Rod Lincoln at
>>>>>>> rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com
>>>>
>>>> wrote
>>>>
>>>>>>> on 8/20/05 2:22 PM:
>>>>>>>
>>
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT:John Macy...thoughts on Shiny Box Mics now [message #57207 is a reply to message #57189] |
Wed, 24 August 2005 06:26 |
cujo
Messages: 285
Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ly as
> an
>>>
>>>>observer, not user
>>>>--
>>>>Martin Harrington
>>>>www.lendanear-sound.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>"Louis Guarino Jr." <Kateeba@snet.net> wrote:
> I guess this question is for Doug Wellington, if he is still around.
Funny, I must have heard your call.. ;-) I've been amazingly busy this
summer, plus I had a couple computer failures, so I haven't checked in here
for some time. I did manage to hit the chat a couple times, but nobody else
was around when I was there...
> Just wondering if this change to Intel for Apple makes anything easier
> should
> you ever get time to work on that transfer.
Well, I've been working with Darwin for a couple years, so this won't really
change much for me. Basically, it just takes a recompile. I'm actually
hoping that I'll be able to pick up a G5 for cheap when the intel stuff
ships...
> Also, I am wondering if Paris might work on Apples new Intel machines
> like
> it works on the newer Windows machines as is?
The PC version? Interesting thought... Rumors abound. We'll have to wait
and see...
--
-Doug
http://www.parisfaqs.comNot on Marshalls, but a pair a screaming Deluxe
Reverbs and also a pair of AC30's. Sounds great :)
These have been going mostly through Vintech X73's...
"cujo" <chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com> wrote:
>
>
>I too would love to know, have you used em on crunchy marshall?
>
>Hpoefully I can swing for a pair of 46's before my sext big session.
>
>
>"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>>I'mn trying to decide whether to get the 23c or the stock 23.
>>What would you say the difference between the 23's and 46's are..sound
wise.
>>rod
>>"ohn Macy" <spamlessjohn@johnmacy.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>I have the 121's...
>>>
>>>"Pete Ruthenburg" <ruthenburg@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Hi John,
>>>> Just
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT:John Macy...thoughts on Shiny Box Mics now [message #57209 is a reply to message #57207] |
Wed, 24 August 2005 06:33 |
DT
Messages: 42
Registered: July 2005
|
Member |
|
|
<rlincoln@kc.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>John, I was wondering what you thought of the Shiny Box ribbon mics
>now,
>>>>>after
>>>>>>you've had a chance to work with them for a while. Do you have the
23
>>>and
>>>>>>the 23c??? I'm pretty interested in getting a ribbon mic, and at these
>>>>prices,
>>>>>>I just may be able to get a pair.
>>>>>>Rod
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>Pretty much what he says on the website, the 46's
seem a little brighter and a little more output.
I will order a Cinemag this week and put it in the
23 and report in :)
"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote:
>
>I'mn trying to decide whether to get the 23c or the stock 23.
>What would you say the difference between the 23's and 46's are..sound wise.
>rod
>"ohn Macy" <spamlessjohn@johnmacy.com> wrote:
>>
>>I have the 121's...
>>
>>"Pete Ruthenburg" <ruthenburg@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>Hi John,
>>> Just curious which Royers your comparing them to.I've got an
>>>SF-12.Comparing them to Royers is pretty impressive especially at
>>>that price.
>>>
>>>Pete
>>>
>>>"John Macy" <spamlessjohn@johnmacy.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>I have a pair of the new 46's and a stock
>>>>23. I am loving the 46's--have used them
>>>>on electric guitars (sound great, equally
>>>>as good as my Royers), acoustic guitars
>>>>(a very nice wood sound), and just used
>>>>them as room mics on a drum kit and they
>>>>killed. I have used the 23 on all of the
>>>>above with similar results. My next step
>>>>is to get the Cinemag transformer for the
>>>>23 and see what that does. I'll leave the
>>>>46's stock.
>>>>
>>>>For that kind of money, they are a steal...
>>>>
>>>>Be sure and tell him you heard of them though
>>>>me :).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@kc.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>John, I was wondering what you thought of the Shiny Box ribbon mics
now,
>>>>after
>>>>>you've had a chance to work with them for a while. Do you have the 23
>>and
>>>>>the 23c??? I'm pretty interested in getting a ribbon mic, and at these
>>>prices,
>>>>>I just may be able to get a pair.
>>>>>Rod
>>>>
>>>
>>
>Hi Kim,
Sounds like you're really having to really arm wrestle t
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT:John Macy...thoughts on Shiny Box Mics now [message #57212 is a reply to message #57207] |
Wed, 24 August 2005 10:50 |
John Macy
Messages: 242
Registered: April 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
r />
in article 430c6fd6$1@linux, Rod Lincoln at rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com wrote
on 8/24/05 9:02 AM:
>
> Most of my files are in the 300-400 meg range...zipped. (multi track drums)and
> I typically have 4 or 5 at a time. So I'm probably looking at 2 gig of
> storage.
> Yousendit is great for that, and totally free, but the upload times are pretty
> slow and it doesn't always work. Hence the reason for my question.
> Rod
>
> Craig Mitchell <camitchell@cfl.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>> Opps, I didn't catch the free part. Sorry.
>>
>> However, $25 a month for 500mb is cheap, IMO, to send files securely with
>> reasonably fast download speeds. Considering it can scale up or down to
> your
>> needs at the moment, it's not a bad deal....
>>
>> by the way, that is a 500mb file size at a time you can load onto the
>> server, That is not a monthly use limit.
>>
>> However, If you guys come across something cheaper, faster, more reliable
>> and easier to use, I'd love to know about it. Seriously.
>>
>> Craig
>>
>>
>>
>> in article 430be5df@linux, Rod Lincoln at rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com wrote
> on
>> 8/23/05 11:13 PM:
>>
>>>
>>> so.....you got any???
>>> Rod
>>> John <no@no.com> wrote:
>>>> yes they are
>>>>
>>>> Rod Lincoln wrote:
>>>>> suggestions are always welcome
>>>>> rod
>>>>> John <no@no.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> 10mb is too small for me personally and $75/year is not cheap
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rod Lincoln wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thanks!
>>>>>>> Craig Mitchell <camitchell@cfl.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> in article 430774d1$1@linux, Rod Lincoln at rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com
>>>>>
>>>>> wrote
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> on 8/20/05 2:22 PM:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Does anyone know of an online (free) ftp sight to post files??
>>>>>>>>> It need to have around 300 to 400 meg per file capability.
>>>>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT:John Macy...thoughts on Shiny Box Mics now [message #57262 is a reply to message #57251] |
Thu, 25 August 2005 20:01 |
Tom Bruhl
Messages: 1368
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
resses are configured on the computers?
>
> Let's nail this one down!
>
> Mark
>
> "Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote:
> >Thanks all,
> >
> >I try to answer about my configuration.
> >
> >1. PC's are connected via CAT5 cable
> >2.Becuase I had some problems at 1000 speed I lowered both lan cards at
> 100
> >speed and now is working.
> >3. Speed is very slow, reminds me of USB1.1
> >needs around 6 minutes to transfer a 734 MB wavefile.
> >4.On Me I have installed Client for Microsoft Networks.
> >TCP/IP and File and printer sharing and of course Planet ENW 9606 Gigabit
> >card
> >On XP pc I have
> >Client for microsoft networks
> >File anprinter sharing
> >Qos Packet scheduler
> >TCP/IP
> >Same cable works fine with two XP PC's...
> >Thank you
> >Dimitrios
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Mark McDermott" <mark@stateofwail.com>
> >Newsgroups: IDEA.EMUEnsoniqPARIS
> >Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 6:47 PM
> >Subject: Re: XP-Me ethernet slow transfer !
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Hi Dimitrios,
> >>
> >> Many factors can cause this issue. Here are a few questions:
> >>
> >> 1. What is the physical connection between PC's? Crossover cable, hub,
> >switch?
> >> If hub or switch, is it a 100BASE-TX device?
> >>
> >> 2. What network protocols are installed? NetBEUI, TCP/IP, other?
> >>
> >> 3. Have you tried a different cable and is the cable you're using Cat-5
> or
> >> better?
> >>
> >> Please let me know how you're configured and I'll try to help.
> >>
> >> Good luck!
> >>
> >> Mark
> >>
> >> "Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote:
> >> >I wonder why there is an extremely slow transfer beetween XP and Me
via
> >> lan.
> >> >I use ethernet cards at 100 and at 1000 but same results.
> >> >I tried to make either one master and or slave but same results...
> >> >Any tip ?
> >> >Regards,
> >> >Dimitrios
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >"Mark McDermott" <mark@stateofwail.com> wrote in message
> >news:430de82d$1@linux...
> >>
> >> Hi Dimitrios,
> >>
> >> Many factors can cause this issue. Here are a few questions:
> >>
> >> 1. What is the physical connection between PC's? Crossover cable, hub,
> >switch?
> >> If hub or switch, is it a 100BASE-TX device?
> >>
> >> 2. What network protocols are installed? NetBEUI, TCP/IP, other?
> >>
> >> 3. Have you tried a different cable and is the cable you're using Cat-5
> or
> >> better?
> >>
> >> Please let me know how you're configured and I'll try to help.
> >>
> >> Good luck!
> >>
> >> Mark
> >>
> >> "Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote:
> >> >I wonder why there is an extremely slow transfer beetween XP and Me
via
> >> lan.
> >> >I use ethernet cards at 100 and at 1000 but same results.
> >> >I tried to make either one master and or slave but same results...
> >> >Any tip ?
> >> >Regards,
> >> >Dimitrios
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>Hi,
There is a Pitch shifter realtime one for Waves ,don't know though if your
processor can keep up with 48 live instances !
Well Time factory is a nice program for that.
Regards,
Dimitrios
"Tyrone Corbett" <tyronecorbett@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:430e79b8$1@linux...
>
> All suggestions welcomed!
>
> TyroneI have one in an old computer that is running Win 98 (first edition). this
computer is also running a Lexicon Core 32. I use this computer as a
standalone FX processor with the digital and analog I/O of both cards routed
to digital/analog patchbays which can be routed to either Paris or my DAW
running Cubase SX. The DSP/FX card works ni
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sun Nov 24 00:28:52 PST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01168 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
