cheap good cable wire [message #68408] |
Fri, 19 May 2006 19:32 |
John [1]
Messages: 2229 Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
I'm gonna need 12 stereo channels about 15 feet long for line level signals.
180 feet times $2.20 a foot for mogami would be OUCH ! Are there any other
good cables and connectors I can buy like maybe I could buy 2 8 conductor
(trs) cables for $50 a piece ? hmmm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: cheap good cable wire [message #68481 is a reply to message #68439] |
Mon, 22 May 2006 06:01 |
Aaron Allen
Messages: 1988 Registered: May 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
I smell Zappa in this somewhere.
AA
"Paul Artola" <artola@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:jftv625jki1h4hipgutkkfgi6d03efsa1f@4ax.com...
>I prefer baby snakes. They live by a code, that is usually SMPTE!
>
> - Paul Artola
> Ellicott City, Maryland
>
> On 20 May 2006 16:00:23 +1000, "gene lennon"
> <glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>>>Gene......do you not use snakes in your studio? 99% of my cabling is
>>>Mogami
>>>sankes and I'm noticing no crosstalk at all. Am I missing something here?
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>
>>>DJ
>>>
>>I also use Mogami snakes. Its good cable and the snakes give a neat
>>appearance
>>and are convenient.but even though most studios use snakes, you still get
>>better x-talk with individual pairs. You never notice the crosstalk. It is
>>typically 80-90 db down in cable, but you wont find any top classical
>>engineers
>>using snakes. You only hear a difference if you can do a direct a/b. I try
>>to run individual high-end cable for critical recordings. I just don't do
>>many critical recordings these days. If your track includes drum samples
>>and loops, it's a little silly to be sweating cable nuances, but I would
>>stay away from cheap snakes at all costs.
>>gene
>
I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
|
|
|