The PARIS Forums


Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » 3.0 vs 2.1
3.0 vs 2.1 [message #103388] Mon, 11 May 2009 20:37 Go to next message
John Houston is currently offline  John Houston   UNITED STATES
Messages: 79
Registered: May 2009
Location: Hurricane Utah
Member
Does 3.0 render in 24 bit WAV files? Second, where can I get 3.0, and what about the PACE dilema? I'm still running an old G4 Mac, but I think if I found the right PC, and could get a working 3.0, I would jump ship, so I could take advantage of all the cool new things from Mike Audit. Thanx. ps. sorry about the May 5th rant, my wife says I can't drink and type ever again!
Re: 3.0 vs 2.1 [message #103390 is a reply to message #103388] Mon, 11 May 2009 21:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
kerryg is currently offline  kerryg   CANADA
Messages: 1529
Registered: February 2009
Senior Member
Administrator
Hehehehe, I liked the rant, I got what you were saying. Some stuff just doesn't really need a whole lot of "improving on" - I have a Hammond M3 here I'm going to be fixing up someday soon.

3.0 definitely bounces in 24 bit, not so sure about rendering but I assume yes.

You can download Paris 3.0 (and earlier) directly from the EMU link and then you get a 7-day grace period to authorize it before it expires. The last I heard, ID sets one day a week aside to process authorizations, so you probably want to time it strategically - ie grab it and request your serial from ID on a Sunday evening so they get the request Monday AM, thus in time for whichever day they do it. PACE wasn't much of a dilemma for me on Mac, it just tended to work.

And yeah - PC is where the PARIS action's going to be, going forward - and I say that as a former die-hard Mac OS9 PARIS user myself.

- K


"... being bitter is like swallowing poison and waiting for the other guy to die..." - anon
Re: 3.0 vs 2.1 [message #103391 is a reply to message #103390] Mon, 11 May 2009 21:21 Go to previous messageGo to next message
John Houston is currently offline  John Houston   UNITED STATES
Messages: 79
Registered: May 2009
Location: Hurricane Utah
Member
Thanx for your help Kerry. I was glad to see that Brian T turned up as well, kind of makes a guy feel warm and fuzzy inside! Later
Re: 3.0 vs 2.1 [message #103392 is a reply to message #103390] Mon, 11 May 2009 21:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
John Houston is currently offline  John Houston   UNITED STATES
Messages: 79
Registered: May 2009
Location: Hurricane Utah
Member
Oh, by the way, I got my first Hammond, an M3, in 1978. I loved it and used it for years. Iv'e also had the B3, the Porta B, and currently still have the C2, w/ TrekII percussion, a BC (very cool) a 21H Leslie, an 825 Leslie, a Cordovox Leslie powered by Sovtek Mig 100 amp and Electrovoice Speaker, and a Hammond XK3, for my over the road ERIC DODGE gig. I love this stuff, and the M3 is one of my favorites. Adding FOLDBACK I would guess? Anyway have fun, cause they're AWESOME. John
Re: 3.0 vs 2.1 [message #103404 is a reply to message #103392] Fri, 15 May 2009 21:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
kerryg is currently offline  kerryg   CANADA
Messages: 1529
Registered: February 2009
Senior Member
Administrator
Nice collection! Yeah, I've heard great things about the M3. Mine's "motorboating", making a chopped-up sound like insanely heavy vibrato - I've been advised by our local Hammond wiz to try "zapping" it with a 9v battery to fry off the dendrites, ever tried that? If that doesn't work, it may effectively be a write-off. But if it does, I'm going to see what other sorts of trouble I can get into with it - maybe the foldback mod, *definitely* the Leslie mod.

"... being bitter is like swallowing poison and waiting for the other guy to die..." - anon

[Updated on: Fri, 15 May 2009 21:13]

Report message to a moderator

Re: 3.0 vs 2.1 [message #103422 is a reply to message #103404] Sun, 17 May 2009 23:26 Go to previous messageGo to next message
John Houston is currently offline  John Houston   UNITED STATES
Messages: 79
Registered: May 2009
Location: Hurricane Utah
Member
I've never had any troubles (knock on wood) with any of my Hammonds other than bad tubes. I'm going to change all the caps in the tonewheel generator, and preamp this summer on the old C2, and my Leslie 21H could use caps and new resistors as well. Hope you can get the M3 working right. I do recall on my M3 I could get it to do somthing of a motor boat sound by putting the vibrato knob in between the C3 and C2 settings, but beyond that, have no experience in this particular area, sorry man! Anyhow, best of luck, and get that Leslie wired up!
Re: 3.0 vs 2.1 [message #103426 is a reply to message #103390] Mon, 18 May 2009 20:26 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Wayne is currently offline  Wayne   UNITED STATES
Messages: 206
Registered: July 2008
Location: Las Vegas
Senior Member
So far I've only rendered one track at a time so I don't know about stereo files.

So, Yes. v3.0 can render 16 or 24bit files to same right in the Editor window. It can also render a 24bit mono file to a 16bit mono file. And vice versa. I render up to 24bit when I've previously recorded a 16bit vocal track and I need a 24bit file to use in Melodyne.

wayne

[Updated on: Mon, 18 May 2009 20:29]

Report message to a moderator

Re: 3.0 vs 2.1 [message #103427 is a reply to message #103426] Tue, 19 May 2009 07:41 Go to previous message
John Houston is currently offline  John Houston   UNITED STATES
Messages: 79
Registered: May 2009
Location: Hurricane Utah
Member
Thank you Wayne, thats what I needed to know.
Previous Topic: OT: Help! Calling all computer whizzes . . .
Next Topic: ANNOUNCING: Wiki competition [CLOSED]
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Dec 16 07:05:15 PST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01930 seconds