| What's a cheap protable way to RECORD multitrack digital audio? ;o) [message #57015] |
Wed, 17 August 2005 18:30  |
Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
gt;><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC =
"-//W3C//DTD=20
HTML 4.0=20
=
Transitional//EN"><BR>><HTML><HEAD> <BR>><META=20
http-equiv=3D3DContent-Type content=3D3D"text/html;=20
=3D<BR>>charset=3D3Diso-8859-1"><BR>><META =
content=3D3D"MSHTML=20
6.00.2800.1400"=20
=
name=3D3DGENERATOR><BR>><STYLE></STYLE> <BR>></HEA=
D><BR>><BODY=20
bgColor=3D3D#ffffff&g
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: What's a cheap protable way to RECORD multitrack digital audio? ;o) [message #57021 is a reply to message #57016] |
Thu, 18 August 2005 00:06  |
Aaron Allen
Messages: 1988
Registered: May 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
href="mailto:nospam@not_here.dude" target="_blank">nospam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>..... so I threw it out on one of my servers for everyone to dig.
>
>http://smirk.bjenterprise.com/PianoBalls.wmv
>
>Enjoy,
>AA
>
>16 of those recordable greeting cards.
On 18 Aug 2005 11:30:46 +1000, "Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>I'm thinking of picking up a Roland VS-880EX or something.
>
>Surely by now though somebody has a simpler box. I mean lets face it, all
>the average user needs is a little box with a HDD and some A/D convertors...
> and something that allows to two to talk. Those roland boxes with built
>in mixers and the like, while they're great if you want all that, are really
>overkill for many, who like me, probably just want to turn audio in to wav
>files and worry about effects and mixing later on a computer DAW.
>
>I figure I need a minimum of 8 tracks, probably preferably more like 16,
>but cost is a factor...
>
>Cheers,
>Kim.have you tried new ram ?
Paul Braun wrote:
> The motherboard in my non-paris Athlon 2400xp box is starting to flake
> out - it will freeze up solid for no damn reason, even if it's just
> sitting there with nothing running. The price was right when I got it
> about a year and a half ago, but it's time to replace
>
> So,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: What's a cheap protable way to RECORD multitrack digital audio? ;o) [message #57035 is a reply to message #57021] |
Thu, 18 August 2005 08:34 |
Paul Artola
Messages: 161
Registered: November 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ast
month was only 700 short of the total American fatalities in Iraq since April
of 2003. Of the dead, 963 were men - many with their hands bound, their eyes
taped and bullets in their heads - and 137 women. The statistics are as shameful
as they are horrifying. For these are the men and women we supposedly came
to "liberate" - and about whose fate we do not care.
The figures for this month cannot, of course, yet be calculated. But
last Sunday, the mortuary received the bodies of 36 men and women, all killed
by violence. By 8am on Monday, nine more human remains had been received.
By midday, the figure had reached 25.
"I consider this a quiet day," one of the mortuary officials said to
me as we stood close to the dead. So in just 36 hours - from dawn on Sunday
to midday on Monday, 62 Baghdad civilians had been killed. No Western official,
no Iraqi government minister, no civil servant, no press release from the
authorities, no newspaper, mentioned this terrible statistic. The dead of
Iraq - as they have from the beginning of our illegal invasion - were simply
written out of the script. Officially they do not exist.
Thus there has been no disclosure of the fact that in July 2003 - three
months after the invasion - 700 corpses were brought to the mortuary in Baghdad.
In July of 2004, this rose to around 800. The mortuary records the violent
death toll for June of this year as 879 - 764 of them male, 115 female. Of
the men, 480 had been killed by firearms, along with 25 of the women. By
comparison, equivalent figures for July 1997, 1998 and 1999 were all below
200.
Between 10 and 20 per cent of all bodies are never identified - the medical
authorities have had to bury 500 of them since January of this year, unidentified
and unclaimed. In many cases, the remains have been shattered by explosions
- possibly by suicide bombers - or by deliberate disfigurement by their killers.
Mortuary officials have been appalled at the sadism visited on the victims.
"We have many who have obviously been tortured - mostly men," one said. "They
have terrible burn marks on hands and feet and other parts of their bodies.
Many have their hands fast
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
