|
|
|
|
| Re: Opinions on RNP? [message #58690 is a reply to message #58681] |
Sun, 02 October 2005 17:09   |
Cujjo
Messages: 325
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
d removable rack tray
>that
>>>I spent several hours chasing down :-( Havn't installed cubase yet. I'm
>>going
>>>to try Paris and see how that goes. I've already ghosted so it's play
time
>>>:-)
>>>I'll post on the results. Kim, how's your experience going?
>>>One thing I noticed on some benchmark tests (HD tack) is the MSI neo-platinium
>>>looks to be a bit faster on the benchmarks, given the same memory, cpu,
>>and
>>>drives.
>>>If I remember right. Chris L. also recommended that mobo.
>>>I'll post after I try the Paris thing.
>>>Rod
>>>
>>
>Well, I got the Gigabyte K8NS with an amd64 3500 cpu going with Paris. I got
6 eds (in a 13 slot magma) and 2 native submixes filled (32 tracks in record
at a time)for a total of 128 tracks, doing some silly stuff like moving windows,
open and close windows, open paint and draw a nice picture, save it and open
it, all while playing the 128 tracks. I didn't bother with any plugs, but
I'd say this set up is at least pretty stable with Paris. After I did this,
I noticed that 4 of my eds cards were sharing an irq with the matrox 650.....so
I'd say that was pretty good that it could do that much while sharing with
the agp.
Rod
"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote:
>
>Deej, the PCI IRQ's are totally steerable, as long as you don't go above
Bios
>version 6. Kind of weird.
>I couldn't find any documentation that mentioned compabiliyt with dual core
>CPU's, but I guess Kim did (in later versions...see his post below)
>So far, I havn't been able to get Paris to work with it though.
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Opinions on RNP? [message #58751 is a reply to message #58729] |
Tue, 04 October 2005 19:27 |
Neil
Messages: 1645
Registered: April 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
r
>>>> >>>them.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>Regards,
>>>> >>>Dedric
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>On 9/24/05 3:46 PM, in article 4335c918$1@linux, "Kim Glanville"
>>>> >>><kgdrumz@telusplanet.com> wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> I hear you! And you're giving food for thought. From my little
>>>> >>>> perspective, though, I also wax a bit philosophic about it:
>>>> >>>> Paris lost the war w. Pro-tools, kinda like Sony's Betamax VCR
lost
>>>> the
>>>> >> war
>>>> >>>> to VHS. The 'better' formats lost--and investment stopped...but
>>>you're
>>>> >> right,
>>>> >>>> those who spent the $$$ should not
>>>> >>>> have been abandoned by Emu. Maybe Creative just wanted Paris
>>>> >>>> so they could steal some of the great A/D converter stuff for
>>>> >>>> Audigy!
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> I'm also considering the portable convenience of a Tascam 2488,
>>>> >>>> tho' pretty sure it won't sound as good Paris.
>>>> >>>> Thanks,
>>>> >>>> Kim
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> "nobody" <no@no.com> wrote:
|
|
|
|
| Re: Opinions on RNP? [message #58757 is a reply to message #58729] |
Wed, 05 October 2005 00:13 |
Dimitrios
Messages: 1056
Registered: August 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
g 4 partitions on a harddisk, or using Bootit's
> own
>>system with up to 255 partitions on one harddisk. I don't know if this is
>
>>correct at all after reading this.
>>Cheers
>>Erling
>>
>>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> skrev i melding news:434308e5$1@linux...
>>>
>>> One other thing I've noticed is that it seems while you can have up to
> 255
>>> primary partitions on a drive, you can only actually see 4 at any one
> time
>>> from any given OS, because WinXP refuses to see more than 4. I beleive
>
>>> I've
>>> pretty much sussed how to deal with all that side of things though. >
>>> Cheers,
>>> Kim.
>>
>>
>Hmm, I was thinking that they were not all that much $$$ at 675 per mono
unit and 455 for a lunch box.. (could be a shit lunch box) Their price on
antother pre I was looking at is cheaper than elswhere.
However, I appreciate the heads up. And will step forward with undue caution
"Neil" <OIUOIU@OIU.com> wrote:
>
>"cujo" <chris@applemanstudio.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>Ok, One more pre question
>>Anyone here own any Shadow Hill stuff?
>>They look wonderfull, But looks aint everything, I have heard they are
more
>>special than say the Great Rivers.
>>I'd love more opinions
>>It looks well made..and by grabbing an API rack, it will be more cost effective
>>in the long run, as API modules are relatively inexpensive..
>>Hm.
>
>Firstly, I would tend to shy away fro
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
