The PARIS Forums


Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Why we need the 2nd Amendment
Re: Why we need the 2nd Amendment [message #84266 is a reply to message #84265] Thu, 10 May 2007 13:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Deej [4] is currently offline  Deej [4]   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1292
Registered: January 2007
Senior Member
I'm gonna do it as soon as I regroup from the Denver tour.

;o)

"DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote in message news:46437ac8$1@linux...
>
> "DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote:
>>We need to get together again and chew the fat............barking
>>moonbat???...I like that.
>>
>>;o)
>
>
> Micelis. yessss
>
> Oh, and some great music would be fun...
>
> Come on out.
>
> DC
Re: Why we need the 2nd Amendment [message #84268 is a reply to message #84260] Thu, 10 May 2007 14:07 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Carl Amburn is currently offline  Carl Amburn   UNITED STATES
Messages: 214
Registered: July 2005
Senior Member
I like your argument DJ - Our will and instinct to survive is going to kill
us ! Oh, I'm laughing.... sort of...

-Carl

"DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote in message news:46433b62@linux...
> Don,
>
> This article down to and including the sentence:
>
> "It's a train that carries all the earth's species as unwilling passengers
> with humans as the manically insane engineers unwilling to use the brake
> pedal."
>
> ........appears to be deadly accurate. The remainder is simply a pragmatic
> argument based on statistics. Do you dispute the statistics? If so, can
you
> disprove them. Has anyone even tried? Is there even any point in it? If
not,
> why would you dismiss this as being Hitlerian? He's not advocating the
> survival of one group of *superhumans* over another group of *subhumans*.
> I'd say he's pretty egalitarian for a Nazi. I personally don't think
there's
> a chance in hell that things are going to change for the better here
unless
> we drasticall reduce the number of *us* somehow and I also believe that
our
> biological imperative to breed and survive will eventually be the end of
us
> but I think that this will be taken out of our hands if we don't take some
> steps that, by virtue of our very instinct to survive at all costs, we
will
> never be willing to take.
>
> Beware the microbe.
>
> ;o)
>
>
>
> "DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote in message news:4642aa36$1@linux...
> >
> > Chris Ludwig <chrisl@adkproaudio.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> I don't think the person that is attacking me our that I'm attacking is
> >
> >>evil. If they are directly mine or someone else's life and the only way
> >
> >>I have to stop them is to kill or injure them I think is perfectly
> >>except able and a normal reaction pf our species. We are hoarding
> >>pack/tribal creatures that have been lucky enough to our brains become
> >>our main survival tools. snip...
> >
> > We will not agree on solutions because we utterly disagree on these
> > premises. I reject this view of life on its face, as you surely do
mine.
> >
> >
> >>A radical group of people that feel that the dominant government/society
> >
> >>is destroying their beliefs and way of life. They believe that the only
> >
> >>way to stop this is by committing terrorists acts on a large scale
> >>against their protagonists killing thousand if not millions of their
> >>enemies to bring about their vision of the world.
> >>Luckily Clancy did not write the Turner Diaries because would probably
> >>be influential on enough actually make a difference. It has only
> >>influenced fringe groups so we've only had a Oklahoma city bombing so
> >>far. The book is poorly written almost as bad a Mein Kampf. Another book
> >
> >>that I'm glad Clancy didn't write. :)
> >
> >
> > Even using Clancy in the same sentence is silly. Does doing so, strike
> > you as clever?
> > You should read Rainbow 6, you have got it totally wrong. In this case
> > it is the radicals who are planning a giant die off in the name of Gaia,
> > not
> > the government.
> >
> > The closest thing to Mein Kampf in this whole discussion is right here:
> >
> > http://www.seashepherd.org/editorials/editorial_070504_1.htm l
> >
> >
> >>>> Without the second amendment, all the other amendments
> >>>> are just suggestions.
> >
> >>And very good ones at that. but like the 10 commandments they should
> >>have been more detailed.
> >
> > And of course, you know better than the author of either... Amazing.
> >
> >
> >>Thankfully we didn't make our right to bare arms the same as England's.
> >
> >>They only allowed Protestants the right.
> >
> > I'm sure there is a point in here somewhere...
> >
> >
> > DC
> >
>
>
Re: Why we need the 2nd Amendment [message #84269 is a reply to message #84268] Thu, 10 May 2007 14:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Deej [4] is currently offline  Deej [4]   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1292
Registered: January 2007
Senior Member
one heck of a conundrum all right

where are the evil aliens when we need them?

"Carl Amburn" <carlamburn@hotNOSPAMmail.com> wrote in message
news:46438b16@linux...
>I like your argument DJ - Our will and instinct to survive is going to kill
> us ! Oh, I'm laughing.... sort of...
>
> -Carl
>
> "DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote in message news:46433b62@linux...
>> Don,
>>
>> This article down to and including the sentence:
>>
>> "It's a train that carries all the earth's species as unwilling
>> passengers
>> with humans as the manically insane engineers unwilling to use the brake
>> pedal."
>>
>> ........appears to be deadly accurate. The remainder is simply a
>> pragmatic
>> argument based on statistics. Do you dispute the statistics? If so, can
> you
>> disprove them. Has anyone even tried? Is there even any point in it? If
> not,
>> why would you dismiss this as being Hitlerian? He's not advocating the
>> survival of one group of *superhumans* over another group of *subhumans*.
>> I'd say he's pretty egalitarian for a Nazi. I personally don't think
> there's
>> a chance in hell that things are going to change for the better here
> unless
>> we drasticall reduce the number of *us* somehow and I also believe that
> our
>> biological imperative to breed and survive will eventually be the end of
> us
>> but I think that this will be taken out of our hands if we don't take
>> some
>> steps that, by virtue of our very instinct to survive at all costs, we
> will
>> never be willing to take.
>>
>> Beware the microbe.
>>
>> ;o)
>>
>>
>>
>> "DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote in message news:4642aa36$1@linux...
>> >
>> > Chris Ludwig <chrisl@adkproaudio.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >> I don't think the person that is attacking me our that I'm attacking
>> >> is
>> >
>> >>evil. If they are directly mine or someone else's life and the only way
>> >
>> >>I have to stop them is to kill or injure them I think is perfectly
>> >>except able and a normal reaction pf our species. We are hoarding
>> >>pack/tribal creatures that have been lucky enough to our brains become
>> >>our main survival tools. snip...
>> >
>> > We will not agree on solutions because we utterly disagree on these
>> > premises. I reject this view of life on its face, as you surely do
> mine.
>> >
>> >
>> >>A radical group of people that feel that the dominant
>> >>government/society
>> >
>> >>is destroying their beliefs and way of life. They believe that the only
>> >
>> >>way to stop this is by committing terrorists acts on a large scale
>> >>against their protagonists killing thousand if not millions of their
>> >>enemies to bring about their vision of the world.
>> >>Luckily Clancy did not write the Turner Diaries because would probably
>> >>be influential on enough actually make a difference. It has only
>> >>influenced fringe groups so we've only had a Oklahoma city bombing so
>> >>far. The book is poorly written almost as bad a Mein Kampf. Another
>> >>book
>> >
>> >>that I'm glad Clancy didn't write. :)
>> >
>> >
>> > Even using Clancy in the same sentence is silly. Does doing so,
>> > strike
>> > you as clever?
>> > You should read Rainbow 6, you have got it totally wrong. In this
>> > case
>> > it is the radicals who are planning a giant die off in the name of
>> > Gaia,
>> > not
>> > the government.
>> >
>> > The closest thing to Mein Kampf in this whole discussion is right here:
>> >
>> > http://www.seashepherd.org/editorials/editorial_070504_1.htm l
>> >
>> >
>> >>>> Without the second amendment, all the other amendments
>> >>>> are just suggestions.
>> >
>> >>And very good ones at that. but like the 10 commandments they should
>> >>have been more detailed.
>> >
>> > And of course, you know better than the author of either... Amazing.
>> >
>> >
>> >>Thankfully we didn't make our right to bare arms the same as England's.
>> >
>> >>They only allowed Protestants the right.
>> >
>> > I'm sure there is a point in here somewhere...
>> >
>> >
>> > DC
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
Re: Why we need the 2nd Amendment [message #84272 is a reply to message #84262] Thu, 10 May 2007 16:19 Go to previous messageGo to next message
JeffH is currently offline  JeffH   UNITED STATES
Messages: 307
Registered: October 2007
Location: Wamic, OR
Senior Member
DJ wrote:
> "DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote in message news:464360f7$1@linux...
>
>>"DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Don,
>>>
>>>This article down to and including the sentence:
>>>
>>>"It's a train that carries all the earth's species as unwilling passengers
>>
>>>with humans as the manically insane engineers unwilling to use the brake
>>
>>>pedal."
>>
>>No it doesn't. That is the part you extract because you care so much
>>about this issue. In reality, the article boils down to this
>>
>>There is NO way to implement the recommendations of Watson
>>without a regime that would make the Nazi's look polite.
>
>
> Assuming that a *regime* is necessary to pull thias off instead of coming
> together and trying to work some sort of common-sense solution.
>
>>And this is the subtext of all these ideas: the individual behind them is
>>unbalanced, seeing humans as "no more intrinsically valuable than
>>earthworms".
>
>
> I'll bet that an earthworm would differ with you. I think that we place far
> too much importance on ourselves, which is natural to us since we have
> evolved to the point that we have invented God in our own image..
>
> This is, of course, absurd. Ironically it takes a human,
>
>>with all the benefits of our big brains, our schools, our science, and our
>>reasoning and writing skills, to say such stupid shit.
>
>
> We say lots of stupid shit besides this Don.
>
> The statement
>
>>itself proves him to be wrong and a fool since the earthworm cannot
>>assent to it, nor dispute it. Watson is a moron and a misanthrope.
>>
>> http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?ind id=1217
>>
>>http://www.activistcash.com/biography.cfm/bid/3370
>>
>>There's lots more.
>>
>>If you would like a serious discussion of these important issues, we
>>will have to find a different starting point, one informed by rational
>>beliefs and willing to examine contradictory evidence.
>
>
> I'd certainly be willing. I'd say the larger question is why does it take
> someone with such extremist views to rattle our cages to the point where the
> problem is discussed in a serious manner.
> >
>
>>>........appears to be deadly accurate. The remainder is simply a pragmatic
>>
>>>argument based on statistics. Do you dispute the statistics?
>>
>>Abso-fuggin-lutely. I dispute anything out of Watson's mouth.
>>
>>
>>>If so, can you
>>>disprove them. Has anyone even tried?
>>
>>I looked around. There is no specific scientific refutation of the piece
>>out
>>there yet. It is too new. There will be one.
>
>
> Well.....it could also be that ther reason there is no refutation
> is..........?
>
>
>
>>>but I think that this will be taken out of our hands if we don't take some
>>
>>>steps that, by virtue of our very instinct to survive at all costs, we
>>>will
>>
>>>never be willing to take.
>>
>>I, of course have a different view of the future of humanity.
>>
>>But even within your perspective, we would have to commit genocide on
>>all the people who will never accept the brave new world you try to
>>convince them of. Do you have no love for those billions of souls?
>>Is love and respect reserved only for animals? Can you not see how
>>psychotic Watson's ideas are?
>>
>
> I don't advocate genocide. I do advocate a refocus on what is good for the
> survival of the ecosphere, which happens to include us, and I think there
> are ways to start changing this stuff....but we need to start taking this
> very seriously
>
>
>>>Beware the microbe.
>>
>>Yes, and the rest of the seven deadly plagues as well....
>>
>>DC
>
>
> I think a good start would be a bit of common sense as far as our breeding
> and end-of-life thinking goes. Our religions tell us to "be fruitful and
> multiply". These religions were born of a time when we weren't necessarily
> at the top of the food chain. This philosophy is utter insanity nowadays.
> Also, on a more personal note, something that really sticks in my craw is
> the strange affinity we have for prolonging life when it isn't desired by
> the living (and yes, I have experienced suicides and know the devastation
> this causes). As I get older, I often wonder when I will get to the point
> when I'm so damn miserable I'll be ready to move on. I'm only 57 but I have
> lived a lot in those years and I have already decided that the living death
> that is a nursing home route isn't for me. It just ain't gonna happen, nor
> would I desire to inflict my decline on a family by being set in a hospital
> bed in their living room (which I have seen happen as an alternative to
> nursing homes) . I'll likely choose my own way if it isn't chosen for me. My
> mom is to that point right now. We have had some open and frank discussions
> about this but her religion tells her that to end her life on her own terms
> is a sin and she will burn in hell. She is 85, still active and she is
> praying for a swift and merciful end when it comes so she won't be required
> to experience thie final indignity of losing all control over her body as
> she becomes an total invalid. I doubt I'll have these reservations. I really
> don't think it's *humane* to force elderly and sick folks to carry on if
> they are ready to leave this life. It has been stigmatized though by certain
> religions to the point where there is the certainty that eternal life in a
> burning hell is waiting for us unless we eke every last bit of misery out of
> this life, and by doing so, prolong the misery of our loved ones as they try
> to mitigate it, which they cannot do. Maybe I will just move to Oregon when
> it comes time
Go ahead and cart your studio with you... I got room for those pretty
little boxes...

;-)

JH
to take a powder...of course, I'll have to make it look
> accidental so my life insurance company will still pay off. Maybe a nice
> coctail of Oxy and Succinylcholine would do the trick.
>
> Regards,
>
> Deej
>
>
>
>
Re: Why we need the 2nd Amendment [message #84299 is a reply to message #84269] Fri, 11 May 2007 02:00 Go to previous messageGo to next message
rick is currently offline  rick   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1976
Registered: February 2006
Senior Member
400 years ago...we were the aliens. ya know, there are days i'm proud
to be shallower than a footprint on a rock.

mr. footballhead



On Thu, 10 May 2007 15:10:14 -0600, "DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com>
wrote:

>one heck of a conundrum all right
>
>where are the evil aliens when we need them?
>
>"Carl Amburn" <carlamburn@hotNOSPAMmail.com> wrote in message
>news:46438b16@linux...
>>I like your argument DJ - Our will and instinct to survive is going to kill
>> us ! Oh, I'm laughing.... sort of...
>>
>> -Carl
>>
>> "DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote in message news:46433b62@linux...
>>> Don,
>>>
>>> This article down to and including the sentence:
>>>
>>> "It's a train that carries all the earth's species as unwilling
>>> passengers
>>> with humans as the manically insane engineers unwilling to use the brake
>>> pedal."
>>>
>>> ........appears to be deadly accurate. The remainder is simply a
>>> pragmatic
>>> argument based on statistics. Do you dispute the statistics? If so, can
>> you
>>> disprove them. Has anyone even tried? Is there even any point in it? If
>> not,
>>> why would you dismiss this as being Hitlerian? He's not advocating the
>>> survival of one group of *superhumans* over another group of *subhumans*.
>>> I'd say he's pretty egalitarian for a Nazi. I personally don't think
>> there's
>>> a chance in hell that things are going to change for the better here
>> unless
>>> we drasticall reduce the number of *us* somehow and I also believe that
>> our
>>> biological imperative to breed and survive will eventually be the end of
>> us
>>> but I think that this will be taken out of our hands if we don't take
>>> some
>>> steps that, by virtue of our very instinct to survive at all costs, we
>> will
>>> never be willing to take.
>>>
>>> Beware the microbe.
>>>
>>> ;o)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote in message news:4642aa36$1@linux...
>>> >
>>> > Chris Ludwig <chrisl@adkproaudio.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >> I don't think the person that is attacking me our that I'm attacking
>>> >> is
>>> >
>>> >>evil. If they are directly mine or someone else's life and the only way
>>> >
>>> >>I have to stop them is to kill or injure them I think is perfectly
>>> >>except able and a normal reaction pf our species. We are hoarding
>>> >>pack/tribal creatures that have been lucky enough to our brains become
>>> >>our main survival tools. snip...
>>> >
>>> > We will not agree on solutions because we utterly disagree on these
>>> > premises. I reject this view of life on its face, as you surely do
>> mine.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >>A radical group of people that feel that the dominant
>>> >>government/society
>>> >
>>> >>is destroying their beliefs and way of life. They believe that the only
>>> >
>>> >>way to stop this is by committing terrorists acts on a large scale
>>> >>against their protagonists killing thousand if not millions of their
>>> >>enemies to bring about their vision of the world.
>>> >>Luckily Clancy did not write the Turner Diaries because would probably
>>> >>be influential on enough actually make a difference. It has only
>>> >>influenced fringe groups so we've only had a Oklahoma city bombing so
>>> >>far. The book is poorly written almost as bad a Mein Kampf. Another
>>> >>book
>>> >
>>> >>that I'm glad Clancy didn't write. :)
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Even using Clancy in the same sentence is silly. Does doing so,
>>> > strike
>>> > you as clever?
>>> > You should read Rainbow 6, you have got it totally wrong. In this
>>> > case
>>> > it is the radicals who are planning a giant die off in the name of
>>> > Gaia,
>>> > not
>>> > the government.
>>> >
>>> > The closest thing to Mein Kampf in this whole discussion is right here:
>>> >
>>> > http://www.seashepherd.org/editorials/editorial_070504_1.htm l
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >>>> Without the second amendment, all the other amendments
>>> >>>> are just suggestions.
>>> >
>>> >>And very good ones at that. but like the 10 commandments they should
>>> >>have been more detailed.
>>> >
>>> > And of course, you know better than the author of either... Amazing.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >>Thankfully we didn't make our right to bare arms the same as England's.
>>> >
>>> >>They only allowed Protestants the right.
>>> >
>>> > I'm sure there is a point in here somewhere...
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > DC
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Why we need the 2nd Amendment [message #84311 is a reply to message #84299] Fri, 11 May 2007 09:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Deej [4] is currently offline  Deej [4]   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1292
Registered: January 2007
Senior Member
"rick" <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:q0c843tkr5gikj67omkvg7ts3ne34617p8@4ax.com...
> 400 years ago...we were the aliens. ya know, there are days i'm proud
> to be shallower than a footprint on a rock.
>
> mr. footballhead
>

>shallower than a footprint on a rock.

there's a song in there somewhere.....Bob Seeger??

;o)
Re: Why we need the 2nd Amendment [message #84316 is a reply to message #84262] Fri, 11 May 2007 10:56 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Aaron Allen is currently offline  Aaron Allen   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1988
Registered: May 2008
Senior Member
"DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote in message news:464368be@linux...
>
scchhhnip!

Assuming that a *regime* is necessary to pull thias off instead of coming
together and trying to work some sort of common-sense solution.

scchhhnip!

Let's start with the welfare state. No job? No income? No kids !! Stop
milling out more ill-parented losers !
If ya want kids, earn them by proving you'll actually take care of them
through responsible actions. This will solve a gigantic portion of our
upcoming problems. Overpopluation. Overtaxation to support dead beats. Crime
on the overall, created mostly in my mind by poverty imbalance and lack of
proper upbringing (aka, parenting). Less broken homes.

Now.. just getting everyone to realize the benefits socially of this over
*what can I do to make people depend on/vote for me* or *how do I get free
"assistance" so I can be a baby machine and never have to work or lay here
and sell my food stamps for dope, or etc...*

AA
Re: Why we need the 2nd Amendment [message #84317 is a reply to message #84316] Fri, 11 May 2007 11:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jamie K is currently offline  Jamie K   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1115
Registered: July 2006
Senior Member
Aaron Allen wrote:
> Crime on the overall, created mostly in my mind...

I see the problem, Aaron. Quit creating crime in your mind!! ;^)

Hey, when you get a crime free moment, can you email me that
construction info we were talking about? TNX!

Cheers,
-Jamie
www.JamieKrutz.com
Re: Why we need the 2nd Amendment [message #84318 is a reply to message #84317] Fri, 11 May 2007 11:11 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Aaron Allen is currently offline  Aaron Allen   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1988
Registered: May 2008
Senior Member
http://www.polysteel.com/

The insulation factor of this stuff is (depending on what you set up) up to
R50! They say you can literally heat a room with a decent sized incandescent
lamp... crazy man.
I heard a story that someone ran a semi truck into one of these houses and
it basically demo'd the truck and the house required little to no repairing
afterward. Try that with standard wooden construction!

Haven't been able to get the water reclamation system info yet, but I'll pop
that out for you soon as I do

AA

"Jamie K" <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote in message news:4644b0d9@linux...
>
> Aaron Allen wrote:
> > Crime on the overall, created mostly in my mind...
>
> I see the problem, Aaron. Quit creating crime in your mind!! ;^)
>
> Hey, when you get a crime free moment, can you email me that construction
> info we were talking about? TNX!
>
> Cheers,
> -Jamie
> www.JamieKrutz.com
Re: Why we need the 2nd Amendment [message #84321 is a reply to message #84318] Fri, 11 May 2007 12:18 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jamie K is currently offline  Jamie K   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1115
Registered: July 2006
Senior Member
Cool, thanks Aaron!

If people are going to ram semi trucks into it we'd better install air
bags...

Cheers,
-Jamie
www.JamieKrutz.com


Aaron Allen wrote:
> http://www.polysteel.com/
>
> The insulation factor of this stuff is (depending on what you set up) up to
> R50! They say you can literally heat a room with a decent sized incandescent
> lamp... crazy man.
> I heard a story that someone ran a semi truck into one of these houses and
> it basically demo'd the truck and the house required little to no repairing
> afterward. Try that with standard wooden construction!
>
> Haven't been able to get the water reclamation system info yet, but I'll pop
> that out for you soon as I do
>
> AA
>
> "Jamie K" <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote in message news:4644b0d9@linux...
>> Aaron Allen wrote:
>>> Crime on the overall, created mostly in my mind...
>> I see the problem, Aaron. Quit creating crime in your mind!! ;^)
>>
>> Hey, when you get a crime free moment, can you email me that construction
>> info we were talking about? TNX!
>>
>> Cheers,
>> -Jamie
>> www.JamieKrutz.com
>
>
Re: Why we need the 2nd Amendment [message #84322 is a reply to message #84311] Fri, 11 May 2007 12:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
rick is currently offline  rick   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1976
Registered: February 2006
Senior Member
so are you saying i'm plagiarizing?

On Fri, 11 May 2007 10:34:12 -0600, "DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com>
wrote:

>
>"rick" <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:q0c843tkr5gikj67omkvg7ts3ne34617p8@4ax.com...
>> 400 years ago...we were the aliens. ya know, there are days i'm proud
>> to be shallower than a footprint on a rock.
>>
>> mr. footballhead
>>
>
>>shallower than a footprint on a rock.
>
>there's a song in there somewhere.....Bob Seeger??
>
>;o)
>
Re: Why we need the 2nd Amendment [message #84327 is a reply to message #84322] Fri, 11 May 2007 13:07 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Deej [4] is currently offline  Deej [4]   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1292
Registered: January 2007
Senior Member
"rick" <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:dtg9431r209haviqfn6bebf928eblg6v78@4ax.com...
> so are you saying i'm plagiarizing?
>

nawwww.........but if the lyrics referred to a cow and a flat rock, I'd say
that you were plagarizing Garth Seeger.......
Re: Why we need the 2nd Amendment [message #84390 is a reply to message #84327] Sat, 12 May 2007 02:18 Go to previous messageGo to next message
rick is currently offline  rick   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1976
Registered: February 2006
Senior Member
how 'bout these for a starter

i wasn't born dumb
but i'll die dumb
if i spend another minute with you

On Fri, 11 May 2007 14:07:55 -0600, "DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com>
wrote:

>
>"rick" <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:dtg9431r209haviqfn6bebf928eblg6v78@4ax.com...
>> so are you saying i'm plagiarizing?
>>
>
>nawwww.........but if the lyrics referred to a cow and a flat rock, I'd say
>that you were plagarizing Garth Seeger.......
>
>
Re: Why we need the 2nd Amendment [message #84394 is a reply to message #84390] Sat, 12 May 2007 06:50 Go to previous message
Deej [4] is currently offline  Deej [4]   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1292
Registered: January 2007
Senior Member
"rick" <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:rh1b431rpsnit75a22c43guhvcu08bgtcr@4ax.com...
> how 'bout these for a starter
>
> i wasn't born dumb
> but i'll die dumb
> if i spend another minute with you
>

I smell a single
;o)
Previous Topic: Selena
Next Topic: I hate 12-strings!
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Dec 06 13:34:58 PST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01757 seconds