The PARIS Forums: PARIS: Main » OT: Waster CPU Cycles when tracking @ 44.1/48k?

Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » OT: Waster CPU Cycles when tracking @ 44.1/48k?

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

OT: Waster CPU Cycles when tracking @ 44.1/48k? [message #93095]

Mon, 26 November 2007 21:50

LaMontt

Messages: 424
Registered: January 2007

Senior Member

Guys, I just read (Sound on Sound DEC 07 ) that those of us who track @ 44.1
& 48k are actually using "More" CPU cycles than those who track & Mix at
88.2/96/192..WOW!!

Meaning (If I'm getting this right) The computer works Harder to track and
mix sessions at those low rates (44.1/48k)..

If this is correcxt, then starting fresh in 08(after this last mixing session)
, all of my session will be @ 88.2.

Since hard driver are going for very little theses days (500 gig seagate
ATA 3.0 $99.00 bucks everywhere, this makes going to the higher rates a must..

Please (all) chime in..DJ, Neil, Thad, John,Chris, Bill, Kim, Don, Sarah,
Chuck, Doug W etc..

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		OT: Waster CPU Cycles when tracking @ 44.1/48k? By: LaMontt on Mon, 26 November 2007 21:50
		Re: OT: Wasted CPU Cycles when tracking @ 44.1/48k? By: LaMontt on Mon, 26 November 2007 21:52
		Re: OT: Wasted CPU Cycles when tracking @ 44.1/48k? By: EK Sound on Tue, 27 November 2007 08:53
		Re: Waster CPU Cycles when tracking @ 44.1/48k? By: Aaron Allen on Mon, 26 November 2007 21:01
		Re: Waster CPU Cycles when tracking @ 44.1/48k? By: DJ on Mon, 26 November 2007 21:09
		Re: OT: Waster CPU Cycles when tracking @ 44.1/48k? By: Kim on Mon, 26 November 2007 23:59
		Re: OT: Waster CPU Cycles when tracking @ 44.1/48k? By: DJ on Tue, 27 November 2007 01:21
		Re: OT: Waster CPU Cycles when tracking @ 44.1/48k? By: Kim on Tue, 27 November 2007 03:06
		Re: OT: Waster CPU Cycles when tracking @ 44.1/48k? By: Kim on Tue, 27 November 2007 03:48
		Re: OT: Waster CPU Cycles when tracking @ 44.1/48k? By: TCB on Tue, 27 November 2007 16:30
		Re: OT: Waster CPU Cycles when tracking @ 44.1/48k? By: Neil on Tue, 27 November 2007 16:53
		Re: OT: Waster CPU Cycles when tracking @ 44.1/48k? By: Kim on Tue, 27 November 2007 17:08
		Re: OT: Waster CPU Cycles when tracking @ 44.1/48k? By: Dedric Terry on Tue, 27 November 2007 07:09
		Re: OT: Waster CPU Cycles when tracking @ 44.1/48k? By: LaMontt on Tue, 27 November 2007 09:40
		Re: OT: Waster CPU Cycles when tracking @ 44.1/48k? By: Neil on Tue, 27 November 2007 09:42
		Re: OT: Waster CPU Cycles when tracking @ 44.1/48k? By: rick on Tue, 27 November 2007 12:17
		Re: OT: Waster CPU Cycles when tracking @ 44.1/48k? By: EK Sound on Tue, 27 November 2007 08:52
		Re: OT: Wasted CPU Cycles when tracking @ 44.1/48k? By: LaMont on Tue, 27 November 2007 10:24
		Re: OT: Wasted CPU Cycles when tracking @ 44.1/48k? By: DJ on Tue, 27 November 2007 12:08
		Re: OT: Wasted CPU Cycles when tracking @ 44.1/48k? By: Chris Ludwig on Tue, 27 November 2007 13:11
		Re: OT: Wasted CPU Cycles when tracking @ 44.1/48k? By: DJ on Tue, 27 November 2007 13:40
		Re: OT: Wasted CPU Cycles when tracking @ 44.1/48k? By: TCB on Tue, 27 November 2007 16:38
		Re: OT: Wasted CPU Cycles when tracking @ 44.1/48k? By: Paul Artola on Wed, 28 November 2007 08:56
		Re: OT: Wasted CPU Cycles when tracking @ 44.1/48k? By: DJ on Wed, 28 November 2007 09:18
		Re: OT: Wasted CPU Cycles when tracking @ 44.1/48k? By: LaMontt on Wed, 28 November 2007 12:46

Previous Topic:	SATA Mobile Racks
Next Topic:	Nuendo on OSX vs. XP

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Mon Apr 21 11:39:27 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02282 seconds