Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » OT Wireless Mic Buying Tips?
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT Wireless Mic Buying Tips? [message #84042 is a reply to message #84039] |
Sat, 05 May 2007 20:01   |
Bill L
Messages: 766
Registered: August 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
It's for my wife, actually and she uses an EV N/D257.
As to budget, I'm thinking $500-700 or so. Is that realistic?
Bill
Morgan wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> Do you have a budget for this ?
> Also - what mic are you singing with presently ?
>
> Morgan :)
>
> "Bill L" <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote in message news:463ce845@linux...
>> I need to get a wireless mic for club and event gigs (weddings, corporate).
>> I'm familiar with all the manufacturers and in many cases the mics
>> themselves, but I know just about nothing about features to look for in a
>> wireless system.
>>
>> My tendency would be to look at Shure, AT, Audix first, but are there any
>> clear winners in the not expensive category? I may well be looking for
>> something used on EBay so it does not need to be a current model,
>> necessarily.
>>
>> Bill
>
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT Wireless Mic Buying Tips? [message #84043 is a reply to message #84042] |
Sat, 05 May 2007 22:41 |
JeffH
Messages: 307
Registered: October 2007
Location: Wamic, OR
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Bill,
I've been using a set of the Shure SLX's, the handheld with the SM58
head (Beta 58 also available). It's been rock solid for my wife (we
also use four packs for two headsets and two guitars). Had them for
nearly three years and using most weekends. They've work great and
they're defninitely in the price range.
If you want to go a little more you can get a ulxs with the Beta 87A
head, more channels, some say better mic, $769 at Geetar Center.
Hope this helps
Hoov
> It's for my wife, actually and she uses an EV N/D257.
>
> As to budget, I'm thinking $500-700 or so. Is that realistic?
>
> Bill
>
> Morgan wrote:
>
>> Hi Bill,
>>
>> Do you have a budget for this ?
>> Also - what mic are you singing with presently ?
>>
>> Morgan :)
>>
>> "Bill L" <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote in message news:463ce845@linux...
>>
>>> I need to get a wireless mic for club and event gigs (weddings,
>>> corporate). I'm familiar with all the manufacturers and in many cases
>>> the mics themselves, but I know just about nothing about features to
>>> look for in a wireless system.
>>>
>>> My tendency would be to look at Shure, AT, Audix first, but are there
>>> any clear winners in the not expensive category? I may well be
>>> looking for something used on EBay so it does not need to be a
>>> current model, necessarily.
>>>
>>> Bill
>>
>>
>>
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT Wireless Mic Buying Tips? [message #84044 is a reply to message #84043] |
Sat, 05 May 2007 23:53 |
dc[3]
Messages: 895
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
What he said.
We sell and install the Shure wireless and are very happy with the line.
DC
Jeff Hoover <jkhoover@excite.com> wrote:
>Bill,
>
>I've been using a set of the Shure SLX's, the handheld with the SM58
>head (Beta 58 also available). It's been rock solid for my wife (we
>also use four packs for two headsets and two guitars). Had them for
>nearly three years and using most weekends. They've work great and
>they're defninitely in the price range.
>
>If you want to go a little more you can get a ulxs with the Beta 87A
>head, more channels, some say better mic, $769 at Geetar Center.
>
>Hope this helps
>
>Hoov
>> It's for my wife, actually and she uses an EV N/D257.
>>
>> As to budget, I'm thinking $500-700 or so. Is that realistic?
>>
>> Bill
>>
>> Morgan wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Bill,
>>>
>>> Do you have a budget for this ?
>>> Also - what mic are you singing with presently ?
>>>
>>> Morgan :)
>>>
>>> "Bill L" <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote in message news:463ce845@linux...
>>>
>>>> I need to get a wireless mic for club and event gigs (weddings,
>>>> corporate). I'm familiar with all the manufacturers and in many cases
>>>> the mics themselves, but I know just about nothing about features to
>>>> look for in a wireless system.
>>>>
>>>> My tendency would be to look at Shure, AT, Audix first, but are there
>>>> any clear winners in the not expensive category? I may well be
>>>> looking for something used on EBay so it does not need to be a
>>>> current model, necessarily.
>>>>
>>>> Bill
>>>
>>>
>>>
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT Wireless Mic Buying Tips? [message #84045 is a reply to message #84044] |
Sun, 06 May 2007 01:52 |
Tom Bruhl
Messages: 1368
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_005D_01C78F9A.4EF36CE0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Bill,
I use a Sennheiser and it kicks too. Tone is very clear
compared to a 58 but still a dynamic.
The newest wireless setups have a muting circuit to eliminate
the squeal/squelch that can kill your speakers/mood if=20
you leave the mic off and the receiver on by accident.
There will also less frequencies available in the future
so multiple frequency transmission/reception is going to become
more important from what I've read. Maybe something that
hasn't been dealt with presently in hardware.
Tom
"DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com> wrote in message news:463d7b62$1@linux...
What he said.
We sell and install the Shure wireless and are very happy with the =
line.
DC
Jeff Hoover <jkhoover@excite.com> wrote:
>Bill,
>
>I've been using a set of the Shure SLX's, the handheld with the SM58=20
>head (Beta 58 also available). It's been rock solid for my wife (we=20
>also use four packs for two headsets and two guitars). Had them for=20
>nearly three years and using most weekends. They've work great and=20
>they're defninitely in the price range.
>
>If you want to go a little more you can get a ulxs with the Beta 87A=20
>head, more channels, some say better mic, $769 at Geetar Center.
>
>Hope this helps
>
>Hoov
>> It's for my wife, actually and she uses an EV N/D257.
>>=20
>> As to budget, I'm thinking $500-700 or so. Is that realistic?
>>=20
>> Bill
>>=20
>> Morgan wrote:
>>=20
>>> Hi Bill,
>>>
>>> Do you have a budget for this ?
>>> Also - what mic are you singing with presently ?
>>>
>>> Morgan :)
>>>
>>> "Bill L" <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote in message =
news:463ce845@linux...
>>>
>>>> I need to get a wireless mic for club and event gigs (weddings,=20
>>>> corporate). I'm familiar with all the manufacturers and in many =
cases
>>>> the mics themselves, but I know just about nothing about features =
to
>>>> look for in a wireless system.
>>>>
>>>> My tendency would be to look at Shure, AT, Audix first, but are =
there
>>>> any clear winners in the not expensive category? I may well be=20
>>>> looking for something used on EBay so it does not need to be a=20
>>>> current model, necessarily.
>>>>
>>>> Bill=20
>>>
>>>
>>>
I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
------=_NextPart_000_005D_01C78F9A.4EF36CE0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Bill,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I use a Sennheiser and it kicks =
too. Tone is=20
very clear</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>compared to a 58 but still a =
dynamic.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>The =
newest wireless setups have a=20
muting circuit to eliminate</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>the squeal/squelch that can kill your =
speakers/mood=20
if </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>you leave </FONT><FONT face=3DArial =
size=3D2>the mic=20
off and the receiver on by accident.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>There will also less frequencies =
available in=20
the future</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>so multiple frequency =
transmission/reception is=20
going to become</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>more important from what I've =
read. Maybe=20
something that</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>hasn't been dealt with presently in=20
hardware.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"DC" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:dc@spammersinhell.com">dc@spammersinhell.com</A>> =
wrote in=20
message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:463d7b62$1@linux">news:463d7b62$1@linux</A>...</DIV><BR>What=
he=20
said.<BR><BR>We sell and install the Shure wireless and are very happy =
with=20
the line.<BR><BR>DC<BR><BR><BR>Jeff Hoover <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:jkhoover@excite.com">jkhoover@excite.com</A>>=20
wrote:<BR>>Bill,<BR>><BR>>I've been using a set of the Shure =
SLX's,=20
the handheld with the SM58 <BR>>head (Beta 58 also =
available). It's=20
been rock solid for my wife (we <BR>>also use four packs for two =
headsets=20
and two guitars). Had them for <BR>>nearly three years and =
using most=20
weekends. They've work great and <BR>>they're defninitely in =
the=20
price range.<BR>><BR>>If you want to go a little more you can =
get a ulxs=20
with the Beta 87A <BR>>head, more channels, some say better mic, =
$769 at=20
Geetar Center.<BR>><BR>>Hope this =
helps<BR>><BR>>Hoov<BR>>>=20
It's for my wife, actually and she uses an EV N/D257.<BR>>> =
<BR>>>=20
As to budget, I'm thinking $500-700 or so. Is that =
realistic?<BR>>>=20
<BR>>> Bill<BR>>> <BR>>> Morgan wrote:<BR>>>=20
<BR>>>> Hi Bill,<BR>>>><BR>>>> Do you have =
a budget=20
for this ?<BR>>>> Also - what mic are you singing with =
presently=20
?<BR>>>><BR>>>> Morgan =
:)<BR>>>><BR>>>>=20
"Bill L" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:bill@billlorentzen.com">bill@billlorentzen.com</A>> =
wrote in=20
message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:463ce845@linux">news:463ce845@linux</A>...<BR>>>><B=
R>>>>>=20
I need to get a wireless mic for club and event gigs (weddings,=20
<BR>>>>> corporate). I'm familiar with all the =
manufacturers and=20
in many cases<BR><BR>>>>> the mics themselves, but I know =
just=20
about nothing about features to<BR><BR>>>>> look for in a =
wireless=20
system.<BR>>>>><BR>>>>> My tendency would be =
to look=20
at Shure, AT, Audix first, but are there<BR><BR>>>>> any =
clear=20
winners in the not expensive category? I may well be =
<BR>>>>>=20
looking for something used on EBay so it does not need to be a=20
<BR>>>>> current model,=20
necessarily.<BR>>>>><BR>>>>> Bill=20
<BR>>>><BR>>>><BR >>>><BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, =
and=20
you?<BR><A=20
href=3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer=
..html</A> </FONT></DIV></BODY ></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_005D_01C78F9A.4EF36CE0--
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT Wireless Mic Buying Tips? [message #84047 is a reply to message #84045] |
Sun, 06 May 2007 06:17 |
Bill L
Messages: 766
Registered: August 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
I had not considered a condenser because I thought they would be too
pricey, plus I didn't think a condenser element is really necessary for
live sound, however I found a couple on ebay that are not too expensive.
The vocalist (my wife) who will be using it has a very clear voice,
medium volume. She sings all styles and also a lot of jazz. A condenser
could be a good choice for her. Any recommendations as to when a
condenser is a good idea and when not?
Bill L
Tom Bruhl wrote:
> Bill,
> I use a Sennheiser and it kicks too. Tone is very clear
> compared to a 58 but still a dynamic.
>
> The newest wireless setups have a muting circuit to eliminate
> the squeal/squelch that can kill your speakers/mood if
> you leave the mic off and the receiver on by accident.
>
> There will also less frequencies available in the future
> so multiple frequency transmission/reception is going to become
> more important from what I've read. Maybe something that
> hasn't been dealt with presently in hardware.
> Tom
>
>
>
> "DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com <mailto:dc@spammersinhell.com>> wrote in
> message news:463d7b62$1@linux...
>
> What he said.
>
> We sell and install the Shure wireless and are very happy with the line.
>
> DC
>
>
> Jeff Hoover <jkhoover@excite.com <mailto:jkhoover@excite.com>> wrote:
> >Bill,
> >
> >I've been using a set of the Shure SLX's, the handheld with the SM58
> >head (Beta 58 also available). It's been rock solid for my wife (we
> >also use four packs for two headsets and two guitars). Had them for
> >nearly three years and using most weekends. They've work great and
> >they're defninitely in the price range.
> >
> >If you want to go a little more you can get a ulxs with the Beta 87A
> >head, more channels, some say better mic, $769 at Geetar Center.
> >
> >Hope this helps
> >
> >Hoov
> >> It's for my wife, actually and she uses an EV N/D257.
> >>
> >> As to budget, I'm thinking $500-700 or so. Is that realistic?
> >>
> >> Bill
> >>
> >> Morgan wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Bill,
> >>>
> >>> Do you have a budget for this ?
> >>> Also - what mic are you singing with presently ?
> >>>
> >>> Morgan :)
> >>>
> >>> "Bill L" <bill@billlorentzen.com
> <mailto:bill@billlorentzen.com>> wrote in message news:463ce845@linux...
> >>>
> >>>> I need to get a wireless mic for club and event gigs (weddings,
> >>>> corporate). I'm familiar with all the manufacturers and in
> many cases
>
> >>>> the mics themselves, but I know just about nothing about
> features to
>
> >>>> look for in a wireless system.
> >>>>
> >>>> My tendency would be to look at Shure, AT, Audix first, but
> are there
>
> >>>> any clear winners in the not expensive category? I may well be
> >>>> looking for something used on EBay so it does not need to be a
> >>>> current model, necessarily.
> >>>>
> >>>> Bill
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
>
>
>
> I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
> http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT Wireless Mic Buying Tips? [message #84048 is a reply to message #84047] |
Sun, 06 May 2007 07:17 |
aaron allen[3]
Messages: 5
Registered: May 2007
|
Junior Member |
|
|
It's a good idea when you have a female vocalist with nuance.
It's a really bad idea when you have a small stage and a drummer right
behind her. Picks up everything around her. I personally will never touch
another 87a for a typical club date... feedback and bleed aren't worth it.
Gimme a larger stage or a solo/jazz gig and we'll talk. Take this advice
with the fact that I use about 7000w on the mains in clubs, understanding
relation to your situation.
If she's used to the sound/pattern of a N/D 257, the Beta 58 will be your
best choice for least learning curve anyway. And unlike a standard 58, the
Beta won't pick up everything within 15 cardiod feet of her.
AA
"Bill L" <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote in message news:463dd641@linux...
>I had not considered a condenser because I thought they would be too
>pricey, plus I didn't think a condenser element is really necessary for
>live sound, however I found a couple on ebay that are not too expensive.
>The vocalist (my wife) who will be using it has a very clear voice, medium
>volume. She sings all styles and also a lot of jazz. A condenser could be a
>good choice for her. Any recommendations as to when a condenser is a good
>idea and when not?
>
> Bill L
>
> Tom Bruhl wrote:
>> Bill,
>> I use a Sennheiser and it kicks too. Tone is very clear
>> compared to a 58 but still a dynamic.
>> The newest wireless setups have a muting circuit to eliminate
>> the squeal/squelch that can kill your speakers/mood if
>> you leave the mic off and the receiver on by accident.
>> There will also less frequencies available in the future
>> so multiple frequency transmission/reception is going to become
>> more important from what I've read. Maybe something that
>> hasn't been dealt with presently in hardware.
>> Tom
>> "DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com <mailto:dc@spammersinhell.com>> wrote in
>> message news:463d7b62$1@linux...
>>
>> What he said.
>>
>> We sell and install the Shure wireless and are very happy with the
>> line.
>>
>> DC
>>
>>
>> Jeff Hoover <jkhoover@excite.com <mailto:jkhoover@excite.com>> wrote:
>> >Bill,
>> >
>> >I've been using a set of the Shure SLX's, the handheld with the
>> SM58
>> >head (Beta 58 also available). It's been rock solid for my wife
>> (we
>> >also use four packs for two headsets and two guitars). Had them
>> for
>> >nearly three years and using most weekends. They've work great and
>> >they're defninitely in the price range.
>> >
>> >If you want to go a little more you can get a ulxs with the Beta
>> 87A
>> >head, more channels, some say better mic, $769 at Geetar Center.
>> >
>> >Hope this helps
>> >
>> >Hoov
>> >> It's for my wife, actually and she uses an EV N/D257.
>> >>
>> >> As to budget, I'm thinking $500-700 or so. Is that realistic?
>> >>
>> >> Bill
>> >>
>> >> Morgan wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi Bill,
>> >>>
>> >>> Do you have a budget for this ?
>> >>> Also - what mic are you singing with presently ?
>> >>>
>> >>> Morgan :)
>> >>>
>> >>> "Bill L" <bill@billlorentzen.com
>> <mailto:bill@billlorentzen.com>> wrote in message
>> news:463ce845@linux...
>> >>>
>> >>>> I need to get a wireless mic for club and event gigs (weddings,
>> >>>> corporate). I'm familiar with all the manufacturers and in
>> many cases
>>
>> >>>> the mics themselves, but I know just about nothing about
>> features to
>>
>> >>>> look for in a wireless system.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> My tendency would be to look at Shure, AT, Audix first, but
>> are there
>>
>> >>>> any clear winners in the not expensive category? I may well be
>> >>>> looking for something used on EBay so it does not need to be a
>> >>>> current model, necessarily.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Bill
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
>> http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT Wireless Mic Buying Tips? [message #84050 is a reply to message #84048] |
Sun, 06 May 2007 08:17 |
Bill L
Messages: 766
Registered: August 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
That's useful info. You never know how little space you may have in
casual dates and all too often you have the singer right in front of the
drummer, with the band spread out to either side.
Bill
aaron allen wrote:
> It's a good idea when you have a female vocalist with nuance.
>
> It's a really bad idea when you have a small stage and a drummer right
> behind her. Picks up everything around her. I personally will never touch
> another 87a for a typical club date... feedback and bleed aren't worth it.
> Gimme a larger stage or a solo/jazz gig and we'll talk. Take this advice
> with the fact that I use about 7000w on the mains in clubs, understanding
> relation to your situation.
>
> If she's used to the sound/pattern of a N/D 257, the Beta 58 will be your
> best choice for least learning curve anyway. And unlike a standard 58, the
> Beta won't pick up everything within 15 cardiod feet of her.
>
> AA
>
> "Bill L" <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote in message news:463dd641@linux...
>> I had not considered a condenser because I thought they would be too
>> pricey, plus I didn't think a condenser element is really necessary for
>> live sound, however I found a couple on ebay that are not too expensive.
>> The vocalist (my wife) who will be using it has a very clear voice, medium
>> volume. She sings all styles and also a lot of jazz. A condenser could be a
>> good choice for her. Any recommendations as to when a condenser is a good
>> idea and when not?
>>
>> Bill L
>>
>> Tom Bruhl wrote:
>>> Bill,
>>> I use a Sennheiser and it kicks too. Tone is very clear
>>> compared to a 58 but still a dynamic.
>>> The newest wireless setups have a muting circuit to eliminate
>>> the squeal/squelch that can kill your speakers/mood if
>>> you leave the mic off and the receiver on by accident.
>>> There will also less frequencies available in the future
>>> so multiple frequency transmission/reception is going to become
>>> more important from what I've read. Maybe something that
>>> hasn't been dealt with presently in hardware.
>>> Tom
>>> "DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com <mailto:dc@spammersinhell.com>> wrote in
>>> message news:463d7b62$1@linux...
>>>
>>> What he said.
>>>
>>> We sell and install the Shure wireless and are very happy with the
>>> line.
>>>
>>> DC
>>>
>>>
>>> Jeff Hoover <jkhoover@excite.com <mailto:jkhoover@excite.com>> wrote:
>>> >Bill,
>>> >
>>> >I've been using a set of the Shure SLX's, the handheld with the
>>> SM58
>>> >head (Beta 58 also available). It's been rock solid for my wife
>>> (we
>>> >also use four packs for two headsets and two guitars). Had them
>>> for
>>> >nearly three years and using most weekends. They've work great and
>>> >they're defninitely in the price range.
>>> >
>>> >If you want to go a little more you can get a ulxs with the Beta
>>> 87A
>>> >head, more channels, some say better mic, $769 at Geetar Center.
>>> >
>>> >Hope this helps
>>> >
>>> >Hoov
>>> >> It's for my wife, actually and she uses an EV N/D257.
>>> >>
>>> >> As to budget, I'm thinking $500-700 or so. Is that realistic?
>>> >>
>>> >> Bill
>>> >>
>>> >> Morgan wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> Hi Bill,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Do you have a budget for this ?
>>> >>> Also - what mic are you singing with presently ?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Morgan :)
>>> >>>
>>> >>> "Bill L" <bill@billlorentzen.com
>>> <mailto:bill@billlorentzen.com>> wrote in message
>>> news:463ce845@linux...
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> I need to get a wireless mic for club and event gigs (weddings,
>>> >>>> corporate). I'm familiar with all the manufacturers and in
>>> many cases
>>>
>>> >>>> the mics themselves, but I know just about nothing about
>>> features to
>>>
>>> >>>> look for in a wireless system.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> My tendency would be to look at Shure, AT, Audix first, but
>>> are there
>>>
>>> >>>> any clear winners in the not expensive category? I may well be
>>> >>>> looking for something used on EBay so it does not need to be a
>>> >>>> current model, necessarily.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Bill
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
>>> http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
>
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT Wireless Mic Buying Tips? [message #84073 is a reply to message #84045] |
Mon, 07 May 2007 07:55 |
EK Sound
Messages: 939
Registered: June 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Yup... EW135G2... 1300 selectable frequencies, 4 frequency groups
available, pilot tone squelch, 30mW output (twice Shures) metal body
and chassis etc etc etc... we have 60 of them in rentals and we are a
Shure dealer.
David.
Tom Bruhl wrote:
> Bill,
> I use a Sennheiser and it kicks too. Tone is very clear
> compared to a 58 but still a dynamic.
>
> The newest wireless setups have a muting circuit to eliminate
> the squeal/squelch that can kill your speakers/mood if
> you leave the mic off and the receiver on by accident.
>
> There will also less frequencies available in the future
> so multiple frequency transmission/reception is going to become
> more important from what I've read. Maybe something that
> hasn't been dealt with presently in hardware.
> Tom
>
>
>
> "DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com <mailto:dc@spammersinhell.com>> wrote in
> message news:463d7b62$1@linux...
>
> What he said.
>
> We sell and install the Shure wireless and are very happy with the line.
>
> DC
>
>
> Jeff Hoover <jkhoover@excite.com <mailto:jkhoover@excite.com>> wrote:
> >Bill,
> >
> >I've been using a set of the Shure SLX's, the handheld with the SM58
> >head (Beta 58 also available). It's been rock solid for my wife (we
> >also use four packs for two headsets and two guitars). Had them for
> >nearly three years and using most weekends. They've work great and
> >they're defninitely in the price range.
> >
> >If you want to go a little more you can get a ulxs with the Beta 87A
> >head, more channels, some say better mic, $769 at Geetar Center.
> >
> >Hope this helps
> >
> >Hoov
> >> It's for my wife, actually and she uses an EV N/D257.
> >>
> >> As to budget, I'm thinking $500-700 or so. Is that realistic?
> >>
> >> Bill
> >>
> >> Morgan wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Bill,
> >>>
> >>> Do you have a budget for this ?
> >>> Also - what mic are you singing with presently ?
> >>>
> >>> Morgan :)
> >>>
> >>> "Bill L" <bill@billlorentzen.com
> <mailto:bill@billlorentzen.com>> wrote in message news:463ce845@linux...
> >>>
> >>>> I need to get a wireless mic for club and event gigs (weddings,
> >>>> corporate). I'm familiar with all the manufacturers and in
> many cases
>
> >>>> the mics themselves, but I know just about nothing about
> features to
>
> >>>> look for in a wireless system.
> >>>>
> >>>> My tendency would be to look at Shure, AT, Audix first, but
> are there
>
> >>>> any clear winners in the not expensive category? I may well be
> >>>> looking for something used on EBay so it does not need to be a
> >>>> current model, necessarily.
> >>>>
> >>>> Bill
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
>
>
>
> I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
> http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT Wireless Mic Buying Tips? [message #84075 is a reply to message #84073] |
Mon, 07 May 2007 08:28 |
Tom Bruhl
Messages: 1368
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_007E_01C7909A.CD6489F0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
David,
Looks like the Senn I'm using. It's a trouper and sounds good too.
I think I paid $400 back a few years.
Tom
"EK Sound" <askme@nospam.com> wrote in message =
news:463f3f00$1@linux...
Yup... EW135G2... 1300 selectable frequencies, 4 frequency groups=20
available, pilot tone squelch, 30mW output (twice Shures) metal body=20
and chassis etc etc etc... we have 60 of them in rentals and we are a =
Shure dealer.
David.
Tom Bruhl wrote:
> Bill,
> I use a Sennheiser and it kicks too. Tone is very clear
> compared to a 58 but still a dynamic.
> =20
> The newest wireless setups have a muting circuit to eliminate
> the squeal/squelch that can kill your speakers/mood if
> you leave the mic off and the receiver on by accident.
> =20
> There will also less frequencies available in the future
> so multiple frequency transmission/reception is going to become
> more important from what I've read. Maybe something that
> hasn't been dealt with presently in hardware.
> Tom
> =20
> =20
>=20
> "DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com <mailto:dc@spammersinhell.com>> =
wrote in
> message news:463d7b62$1@linux...
>=20
> What he said.
>=20
> We sell and install the Shure wireless and are very happy with =
the line.
>=20
> DC
>=20
>=20
> Jeff Hoover <jkhoover@excite.com <mailto:jkhoover@excite.com>> =
wrote:
> >Bill,
> >
> >I've been using a set of the Shure SLX's, the handheld with =
the SM58
> >head (Beta 58 also available). It's been rock solid for my =
wife (we
> >also use four packs for two headsets and two guitars). Had =
them for
> >nearly three years and using most weekends. They've work =
great and
> >they're defninitely in the price range.
> >
> >If you want to go a little more you can get a ulxs with the =
Beta 87A
> >head, more channels, some say better mic, $769 at Geetar =
Center.
> >
> >Hope this helps
> >
> >Hoov
> >> It's for my wife, actually and she uses an EV N/D257.
> >>
> >> As to budget, I'm thinking $500-700 or so. Is that =
realistic?
> >>
> >> Bill
> >>
> >> Morgan wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Bill,
> >>>
> >>> Do you have a budget for this ?
> >>> Also - what mic are you singing with presently ?
> >>>
> >>> Morgan :)
> >>>
> >>> "Bill L" <bill@billlorentzen.com
> <mailto:bill@billlorentzen.com>> wrote in message =
news:463ce845@linux...
> >>>
> >>>> I need to get a wireless mic for club and event gigs =
(weddings,
> >>>> corporate). I'm familiar with all the manufacturers and in
> many cases
>=20
> >>>> the mics themselves, but I know just about nothing about
> features to
>=20
> >>>> look for in a wireless system.
> >>>>
> >>>> My tendency would be to look at Shure, AT, Audix first, =
but
> are there
>=20
> >>>> any clear winners in the not expensive category? I may =
well be
> >>>> looking for something used on EBay so it does not need to =
be a
> >>>> current model, necessarily.
> >>>>
> >>>> Bill
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
>=20
>=20
>=20
> I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
> http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
------=_NextPart_000_007E_01C7909A.CD6489F0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>David,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Looks like the Senn I'm using. =
It's a trouper=20
and sounds good too.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I think I paid $400 back a few =
years.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"EK Sound" <<A =
href=3D"mailto:askme@nospam.com">askme@nospam.com</A>>=20
wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:463f3f00$1@linux">news:463f3f00$1@linux</A>...</DIV>Yup...=20
EW135G2... 1300 selectable frequencies, 4 frequency groups =
<BR>available,=20
pilot tone squelch, 30mW output (twice Shures) metal body <BR>and =
chassis etc=20
etc etc... we have 60 of them in rentals and we are a <BR>Shure=20
dealer.<BR><BR>David.<BR><BR>Tom Bruhl wrote:<BR>> Bill,<BR>> I =
use a=20
Sennheiser and it kicks too. Tone is very clear<BR>> compared =
to a 58=20
but still a dynamic.<BR>> <BR>> The newest wireless setups =
have a=20
muting circuit to eliminate<BR>> the squeal/squelch that can kill =
your=20
speakers/mood if<BR>> you leave the mic off and the receiver on by=20
accident.<BR>> <BR>> There will also less frequencies =
available in=20
the future<BR>> so multiple frequency transmission/reception is =
going to=20
become<BR>> more important from what I've read. Maybe =
something=20
that<BR>> hasn't been dealt with presently in hardware.<BR>>=20
Tom<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> =
<BR>> =20
"DC" <<A =
href=3D"mailto:dc@spammersinhell.com">dc@spammersinhell.com</A>=20
<<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:dc@spammersinhell.com">mailto:dc@spammersinhell.com</A>>=
;>=20
wrote in<BR>> message <A=20
href=3D"news:463d7b62$1@linux">news:463d7b62$1@linux</A>...<BR>>=20
<BR>> What he said.<BR>>=20
<BR>> We sell and install the Shure =
wireless and=20
are very happy with the line.<BR>> <BR>> =
DC<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> Jeff Hoover =
<<A=20
href=3D"mailto:jkhoover@excite.com">jkhoover@excite.com</A> <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:jkhoover@excite.com">mailto:jkhoover@excite.com</A>>>=
;=20
wrote:<BR> > =2 0
>Bill,<BR> > =2 0
><BR>> >I've been using a set =
of the=20
Shure SLX's, the handheld with the =
SM58<BR> > =2 0
>head (Beta 58 also available). It's been rock solid for my =
wife=20
(we<BR>> >also use four packs for =
two=20
headsets and two guitars). Had them=20
for<BR>> >nearly three years and =
using=20
most weekends. They've work great=20
and<BR>> >they're defninitely in =
the price=20
range.<BR> > =2 0
><BR>> >If you want to go a =
little more=20
you can get a ulxs with the Beta =
87A<BR> > =2 0
>head, more channels, some say better mic, $769 at Geetar=20
Center.<BR> > =2 0
><BR>> >Hope this=20
helps<BR> > =2 0
><BR> > =2 0
>Hoov<BR>> >> It's for my =
wife,=20
actually and she uses an EV =
N/D257.<BR> > =2 0
>><BR>> >> As to budget, =
I'm=20
thinking $500-700 or so. Is that=20
realistic?<BR> > =2 0
>><BR>> >>=20
Bill<BR> > =2 0
>><BR>> >> Morgan=20
wrote:<BR> > =2 0
>><BR>> >>> Hi=20
Bill,<BR> > =2 0
>>><BR>> >>> Do you =
have a=20
budget for this ?<BR>> >>> =
Also -=20
what mic are you singing with presently=20
?<BR> > =2 0
>>><BR>> >>> Morgan =
:)<BR> > =2 0
>>><BR>> >>> "Bill =
L"=20
<<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:bill@billlorentzen.com">bill@billlorentzen.com</A><BR>>=
=20
<<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:bill@billlorentzen.com">mailto:bill@billlorentzen.com</A>&=
gt;>=20
wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:463ce845@linux">news:463ce845@linux</A>...<BR>> &nbs=
p; =20
>>><BR>> >>>> I =
need to=20
get a wireless mic for club and event gigs=20
(weddings,<BR>> >>>> =
corporate).=20
I'm familiar with all the manufacturers and =
in<BR>> =20
many cases<BR>> <BR>> =
>>>> the=20
mics themselves, but I know just about nothing=20
about<BR>> features to<BR>>=20
<BR>> >>>> look for in a =
wireless=20
system.<BR> > =2 0
>>>><BR>> =
>>>> My=20
tendency would be to look at Shure, AT, Audix first,=20
but<BR>> are there<BR>>=20
<BR>> >>>> any clear =
winners in=20
the not expensive category? I may well=20
be<BR>> >>>> looking for=20
something used on EBay so it does not need to be=20
a<BR>> >>>> current =
model,=20
necessarily.<BR> > =2 0
>>>><BR>> =
>>>>=20
Bill<BR> > =2 0
>>><BR> > =2 0
>>><BR>> =
>>><BR>>=20
<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, =
and=20
you?<BR>> <A=20
=
href=3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer=
..html</A></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_007E_01C7909A.CD6489F0--
|
|
|
|
| Re: OT Wireless Mic Buying Tips? [message #84077 is a reply to message #84075] |
Mon, 07 May 2007 08:50 |
Jamie K
Messages: 1115
Registered: July 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
I've had good luck with a Sennheiser wireless lav for video production.
Cheers,
-Jamie
www.JamieKrutz.com
Tom Bruhl wrote:
> David,
> Looks like the Senn I'm using. It's a trouper and sounds good too.
> I think I paid $400 back a few years.
> Tom
>
>
> "EK Sound" <askme@nospam.com <mailto:askme@nospam.com>> wrote in
> message news:463f3f00$1@linux...
> Yup... EW135G2... 1300 selectable frequencies, 4 frequency groups
> available, pilot tone squelch, 30mW output (twice Shures) metal body
> and chassis etc etc etc... we have 60 of them in rentals and we are a
> Shure dealer.
>
> David.
>
> Tom Bruhl wrote:
> > Bill,
> > I use a Sennheiser and it kicks too. Tone is very clear
> > compared to a 58 but still a dynamic.
> >
> > The newest wireless setups have a muting circuit to eliminate
> > the squeal/squelch that can kill your speakers/mood if
> > you leave the mic off and the receiver on by accident.
> >
> > There will also less frequencies available in the future
> > so multiple frequency transmission/reception is going to become
> > more important from what I've read. Maybe something that
> > hasn't been dealt with presently in hardware.
> > Tom
> >
> >
> >
> > "DC" <dc@spammersinhell.com <mailto:dc@spammersinhell.com>
> <mailto:dc@spammersinhell.com>> wrote in
> > message news:463d7b62$1@linux...
> >
> > What he said.
> >
> > We sell and install the Shure wireless and are very happy
> with the line.
> >
> > DC
> >
> >
> > Jeff Hoover <jkhoover@excite.com <mailto:jkhoover@excite.com>
> <mailto:jkhoover@excite.com>> wrote:
> > >Bill,
> > >
> > >I've been using a set of the Shure SLX's, the handheld with
> the SM58
> > >head (Beta 58 also available). It's been rock solid for my
> wife (we
> > >also use four packs for two headsets and two guitars). Had
> them for
> > >nearly three years and using most weekends. They've work
> great and
> > >they're defninitely in the price range.
> > >
> > >If you want to go a little more you can get a ulxs with the
> Beta 87A
> > >head, more channels, some say better mic, $769 at Geetar
> Center.
> > >
> > >Hope this helps
> > >
> > >Hoov
> > >> It's for my wife, actually and she uses an EV N/D257.
> > >>
> > >> As to budget, I'm thinking $500-700 or so. Is that realistic?
> > >>
> > >> Bill
> > >>
> > >> Morgan wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi Bill,
> > >>>
> > >>> Do you have a budget for this ?
> > >>> Also - what mic are you singing with presently ?
> > >>>
> > >>> Morgan :)
> > >>>
> > >>> "Bill L" <bill@billlorentzen.com
> <mailto:bill@billlorentzen.com>
> > <mailto:bill@billlorentzen.com>> wrote in message
> news:463ce845@linux...
> > >>>
> > >>>> I need to get a wireless mic for club and event gigs
> (weddings,
> > >>>> corporate). I'm familiar with all the manufacturers and in
> > many cases
> >
> > >>>> the mics themselves, but I know just about nothing about
> > features to
> >
> > >>>> look for in a wireless system.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> My tendency would be to look at Shure, AT, Audix first, but
> > are there
> >
> > >>>> any clear winners in the not expensive category? I may
> well be
> > >>>> looking for something used on EBay so it does not need
> to be a
> > >>>> current model, necessarily.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Bill
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> >
> >
> >
> > I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
> > http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Thu Nov 21 14:33:26 PST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01941 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
