|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: A Cubase question for the Paris group [message #83104 is a reply to message #83069] |
Sun, 15 April 2007 07:32 |
Bill L
Messages: 766 Registered: August 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
DJ wrote:
> So they're not trying to single me out and humiliate me??........you
> sure??.......after reading some of the crap in the Cubase manual, I'm
> startin' to take this personally.
>
> ;o)
>
> "Neil" <IOUOIU@OIU.com> wrote in message news:4620fc0f$1@linux...
>> Unless v4 is different than v3, you do not HAVE to associate
>> anything MIDI with external EFX it's just an option if you have
>> any EFX with MIDI that can allow you to change the program or
>> parameters, or whatever on the fly, automatically.
>>
>> Neil
>>
>>
>>
>> "DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote:
>>> In the Cubase 4 manual, there is some confusing mumbo jumbo about
>>> creating/associating midi devices with external FX processors. the wording
>>> would lead one to believe that it is necessary to either or create or
>>> associate a midi device with an external fx processor in order for Cubase
>> 4
>>> to ping for hardware latency in order to for delay compensation to be
>>> measured. WTF??? Sorry, but my Distressor doesn't seem to have a midi
>>> port.
>>> My reverbs do, but they are interfaced digitally and there is no audible
>>> delay with them anyway. Is this some kind of bullshit specifically placed
>> in
>>> the Cubase 4 manual because they know I hate jacking around with midi and
>>> they are monitoring all of my posts on the internet, just waiting for me
>> to
>>> post about this so they can get a good laugh?
>>>
>>> where's my coffee ??? I need something to wash down my meds!!!
>>>
>>>
>
>
Sorry Deej, no one else needs to single you out and humiliate you. You
manage that quite well on your own. ;-)
|
|
|
|