The PARIS Forums: PARIS: Main » master external loop

Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » master external loop

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

master external loop [message #56871]

Sun, 14 August 2005 17:10

Brandon

Messages: 49
Registered: June 2005

Member

hortcuts that is
making it a bit easier and I'm absolutely loving the sound I'm getting
mixing on both DAWs simultaneously. Is it any better than just mixing in
SX???.......Well, I think I could probably achieve something very close to
what I'm getting now with a different approach. There is a sonic advantage
in summing to Paris. The thing that's happening is being able to get certain
tracks plenty hot (around +6dBfs if desired) at 32bit float in SX, then
sending this hot stuff to Paris and letting the Paris mix bus do it's thing.
Too much gets a bit gnarly,

Report message to a moderator

Re: master external loop [message #56872 is a reply to message #56871]

Sat, 13 August 2005 17:33

Aaron Allen

Messages: 1988
Registered: May 2008

Senior Member

but there's the same kinda' *glue* that is
reminiscent of *you know what*.

;o)

"Martin Harrington" <lendan@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message
news:42fe79a8$1@linux...
> Deej,
> It's getting closer to the time to migrate to SX for you, my old mate.
> --
> Martin Harrington
> www.lendanear-sound.com
>
> "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote in message
> news:42fe54a0@linux...
> > ..........sorta' suck actually. I'
> > I'm getting ready to do my first ful album mix using this technique. I'm
> > batch processing a 14 song project, song by song across a network using
> > Wavelab 5.0.
> >
> > what this involves is:
> >
> > 1. Editing the tracks and then rendering all .paf's in each song to have
> > 00:00:00 start points.
> >
> > 2. Batch processing them to .wav files in WL
> >
> > 3. Importing each .wav file into the appropriate track in a Cubase SX
> > project so that it's playing back through the Paris submix I want so
that

Report message to a moderator

Re: master external loop [message #56874 is a reply to message #56872]

Sat, 13 August 2005 21:05

Deej [1]

Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006

Senior Member

e.
> >> >>
> >> >> DC
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> "W. Mark Wilson" <wmarkwilson@verizon.net> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>>Markertek's got the L4E6S Canare Quad Star at almost half the price
> of
> >> the
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>>W2549 Mogami; priced by the foot.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>Dubya
> >> >>>
> >> >>>"DC" <DC@steenkingbadgers.com> wrote in message
> >news:42f86edd$1@linux...
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>The source, receiving unit, and input/output impedance are
> >> >>>>much more important than the cable. With mics, with proper
> >> >>>>termination, cables don't make as big a difference as with guitars.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>Having said that, recording orchestras will show you quickly that
> >> >>>>even a little change can make a difference.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>I like Cardas, Zaolla, and Mogami mic cables, but I would look at
> the
> >> >>>>whole signal chain before buying an expensive cable. (the Mogami
> >> >>>>W2549 is not expensive and is very good, the others are good but
> >> >>>>very expensive)
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>Where can I find good Greek food in Los Angeles??
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>:-]
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>DC
> >> >>>>
> >> >>&

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:	Violet mics?
Next Topic:	Losing FX presets on XP // FX presets

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Nov 22 06:32:48 PST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01298 seconds