OT: Waster CPU Cycles when tracking @ 44.1/48k? [message #93095] |
Mon, 26 November 2007 21:50 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/021e1/021e197d56d1cb040cdb75978a499a5189758755" alt="Go to next message Go to previous message" |
|
Guys, I just read (Sound on Sound DEC 07 ) that those of us who track @ 44.1
& 48k are actually using "More" CPU cycles than those who track & Mix at
88.2/96/192..WOW!!
Meaning (If I'm getting this right) The computer works Harder to track and
mix sessions at those low rates (44.1/48k)..
If this is correcxt, then starting fresh in 08(after this last mixing session)
, all of my session will be @ 88.2.
Since hard driver are going for very little theses days (500 gig seagate
ATA 3.0 $99.00 bucks everywhere, this makes going to the higher rates a must..
Please (all) chime in..DJ, Neil, Thad, John,Chris, Bill, Kim, Don, Sarah,
Chuck, Doug W etc..
|
|
|