The PARIS Forums: PARIS: Main

Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Altiverb?

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Altiverb? [message #90221]

Sun, 23 September 2007 10:12

Messages: 1124
Registered: July 2005

Senior Member

So what's up with this? I'm currently using the following Lexi PCM-91,
Roland R-880, Quantec Yardstick, Sony V-77 and have invested quite a bit in
integrating them into my rig. I like 'em or I wouldn't have done it. Will
Altiverb compare to/surpass my hardware units?What's the damage CPU-wise?
Efficient??.......hog'esque??? Would 3 or 4 different instances cause CPU
death?

will I die if I don't have it?

Tell me baby.....tell me now........I gotta' know for sure.........

;o)

Report message to a moderator

Re: Altiverb? [message #90223 is a reply to message #90221]

Sun, 23 September 2007 10:22

Aaron Allen

Messages: 1988
Registered: May 2008

Senior Member

regardless of sound, it looks kinda Mac-centric to me man.
How's support on the windows side might be a pretty important issue?
http://www.audioease.com/Pages/Altiverb/AltiverbMain.html

AA

"DJ" <animix _ at _ animas _ dot _ net> wrote in message
news:46f6a042@linux...
> So what's up with this? I'm currently using the following Lexi PCM-91,
> Roland R-880, Quantec Yardstick, Sony V-77 and have invested quite a bit
> in integrating them into my rig. I like 'em or I wouldn't have done it.
> Will Altiverb compare to/surpass my hardware units?What's the damage
> CPU-wise? Efficient??.......hog'esque??? Would 3 or 4 different instances
> cause CPU death?
>
> will I die if I don't have it?
>
> Tell me baby.....tell me now........I gotta' know for sure.........
>
> ;o)
>

Report message to a moderator

Re: Altiverb? [message #90224 is a reply to message #90221]

Sun, 23 September 2007 10:23

JeffH

Messages: 307
Registered: October 2007
Location: Wamic, OR

Senior Member

DJ wrote:
> So what's up with this? I'm currently using the following Lexi PCM-91,
> Roland R-880, Quantec Yardstick, Sony V-77 and have invested quite a bit in
> integrating them into my rig. I like 'em or I wouldn't have done it. Will
> Altiverb compare to/surpass my hardware units?What's the damage CPU-wise?
> Efficient??.......hog'esque??? Would 3 or 4 different instances cause CPU
> death?
>
> will I die if I don't have it?
>
> Tell me baby.....tell me now........I gotta' know for sure.........
>
If you haven't purchsed three neww "killer" upgrades to your studio
since the last session, it's a must (isn't that your usual ratio?)

;-)

Jeff

Report message to a moderator

Re: Altiverb? [message #90226 is a reply to message #90221]

Sun, 23 September 2007 10:38

gene lennon
Messages: 565
Registered: July 2006

Senior Member

Altiverb is very nice and not really that heavy on modern processors. I can
easily run a dozen instances on my quad with Logic (not that I ever would).

Altiverb�s best strength is acoustic spaces like studios and concert halls.
Your reverb collection covers the other types better. I always reach for
hardware first, but generally find some useful application for convolution
reverbs.

I think Nebula will soon out-perform all standard convolution reverbs, although
the current technology is not well suited for use with percussive sources
(this may change soon).

Gene

"DJ" <animix _ at _ animas _ dot _ net> wrote:
>So what's up with this? I'm currently using the following Lexi PCM-91,
>Roland R-880, Quantec Yardstick, Sony V-77 and have invested quite a bit
in
>integrating them into my rig. I like 'em or I wouldn't have done it. Will

>Altiverb compare to/surpass my hardware units?What's the damage CPU-wise?

>Efficient??.......hog'esque??? Would 3 or 4 different instances cause CPU

>death?
>
>will I die if I don't have it?
>
>Tell me baby.....tell me now........I gotta' know for sure.........
>
>;o)
>
>

Report message to a moderator

Re: Altiverb? [message #90227 is a reply to message #90223]

Sun, 23 September 2007 10:39

Messages: 1124
Registered: July 2005

Senior Member

"Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote in message
news:46f6a24b$1@linux...
> regardless of sound, it looks kinda Mac-centric to me man.
> How's support on the windows side might be a pretty important issue?
> http://www.audioease.com/Pages/Altiverb/AltiverbMain.html
>
> AA
>

So it's AltiVerb?

Arrrggghhhh!!! I gotta' stop this now!!!!

;o)

Report message to a moderator

Re: Altiverb? [message #90228 is a reply to message #90224]

Sun, 23 September 2007 10:41

Messages: 1124
Registered: July 2005

Senior Member

"Jeff Hoover" <jkhoover@excite.com> wrote in message
news:46f6a2ac$1@linux...
> DJ wrote:
>> So what's up with this? I'm currently using the following Lexi PCM-91,
>> Roland R-880, Quantec Yardstick, Sony V-77 and have invested quite a bit
>> in integrating them into my rig. I like 'em or I wouldn't have done it.
>> Will Altiverb compare to/surpass my hardware units?What's the damage
>> CPU-wise? Efficient??.......hog'esque??? Would 3 or 4 different instances
>> cause CPU death?
>>
>> will I die if I don't have it?
>>
>> Tell me baby.....tell me now........I gotta' know for sure.........
>>
> If you haven't purchsed three neww "killer" upgrades to your studio since
> the last session, it's a must (isn't that your usual ratio?)
>
> ;-)
>
> Jeff

By the time you get here, it's gonna be quite a bit different than it is
now. RME MADI system with AES 32 card being spec'ed as we speak.

Lots of stuff getting ready to be posted to the FS group pre-EBay.

;o)

Report message to a moderator

Re: Altiverb? [message #90229 is a reply to message #90226]

Sun, 23 September 2007 10:47

Messages: 1124
Registered: July 2005

Senior Member

"Gene Lennon" <glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com> wrote in message
news:46f6a495$1@linux...
>
> Altiverb is very nice and not really that heavy on modern processors. I
> can
> easily run a dozen instances on my quad with Logic (not that I ever
> would).
>
>
> Altiverb's best strength is acoustic spaces like studios and concert
> halls.
> Your reverb collection covers the other types better. I always reach for
> hardware first, but generally find some useful application for convolution
> reverbs.
>
> I think Nebula will soon out-perform all standard convolution reverbs,
> although
> the current technology is not well suited for use with percussive sources
> (this may change soon).
>
> Gene
>

Thanks Gene,

That was helpful. I'm going to be moing to 88.2 sample rates. I really
didn't think I would hear enough of a difference to make it worth my while
but there's something nice happening in the top end that is definitely
noticable,.especially on up front things like vocal tracks. The resource hit
for "ITB" stuff is getting ready to double around here and I'm looking to
integrate hardware more frequently than I already do to save resources.

Regards,

DJ

Report message to a moderator

Re: Altiverb? [message #90258 is a reply to message #90221]

Sun, 23 September 2007 20:59

laMont [1]
Messages: 33
Registered: September 2007

Member

hey DJ,
I use altverb on Pc-vst and Mac/TDM &RTAS and we (I) have a great impulse
library of all of the hardware you use:

-Lex 480L
-Lex 960L
-TC 5000
-TC3000
-TC 6000
-Yard Stick
-EMT140
-EMT 250** My Favorite
-StraightGate Church's Sanctuary* My other fav.
-Yammy'sPCM(80,81,90)
-Eventide H3000
-And a host of fantastic Cathedrals, Halls, Theaters form around the world.
Although we have a nice asortment of hardware verbs, since altiverb and the
Waves IR1, we don'tuse them at all..maybe for tracking.
They (Impulses) are that good.

"DJ" <animix _ at _ animas _ dot _ net> wrote:
>So what's up with this? I'm currently using the following Lexi PCM-91,
>Roland R-880, Quantec Yardstick, Sony V-77 and have invested quite a bit
in
>integrating them into my rig. I like 'em or I wouldn't have done it. Will

>Altiverb compare to/surpass my hardware units?What's the damage CPU-wise?

>Efficient??.......hog'esque??? Would 3 or 4 different instances cause CPU

>death?
>
>will I die if I don't have it?
>
>Tell me baby.....tell me now........I gotta' know for sure.........
>
>;o)
>
>

Report message to a moderator

Re: Altiverb? [message #90284 is a reply to message #90229]

Mon, 24 September 2007 08:56

Gary Flanigan
Messages: 181
Registered: June 2006

Senior Member

"DJ" <animix _ at _ animas _ dot _ net> wrote:

>
>That was helpful. I'm going to be moing to 88.2 sample rates. I really
>didn't think I would hear enough of a difference to make it worth my while

>but there's something nice happening in the top end that is definitely
>noticable,.especially on up front things like vocal tracks. The resource
hit
>for "ITB" stuff is getting ready to double around here and I'm looking to

>integrate hardware more frequently than I already do to save resources.
>
So does this mean you won't be able to use the UAD 33609, since it doesn't
work about 48K?

Report message to a moderator

Re: Altiverb? [message #90305 is a reply to message #90284]

Mon, 24 September 2007 11:50

Messages: 1124
Registered: July 2005

Senior Member

I seldom use this anyway. It's nice, but just too big a resource hog.

;o)

"Gary Flanigan" <gary_flanigan@ce9.uscourts.gov> wrote in message
news:46f7de22$1@linux...
>
> "DJ" <animix _ at _ animas _ dot _ net> wrote:
>
>>
>>That was helpful. I'm going to be moing to 88.2 sample rates. I really
>>didn't think I would hear enough of a difference to make it worth my while
>
>>but there's something nice happening in the top end that is definitely
>>noticable,.especially on up front things like vocal tracks. The resource
> hit
>>for "ITB" stuff is getting ready to double around here and I'm looking to
>
>>integrate hardware more frequently than I already do to save resources.
>>
> So does this mean you won't be able to use the UAD 33609, since it doesn't
> work about 48K?

Report message to a moderator

Re: Altiverb? [message #90368 is a reply to message #90284]

Mon, 24 September 2007 11:50

Messages: 1124
Registered: July 2005

Senior Member

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:	More MacDonalds
Next Topic:	(no subject)

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Nov 09 11:23:30 PST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02550 seconds