|
|
| Re: Simple beat generator [message #61689 is a reply to message #61687] |
Tue, 20 December 2005 19:59   |
cujo
Messages: 285
Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ahoo.copm" target="_blank">emarenot@yahoo.copm> wrote in message =
>>news:43a8aed6$1@linux...
>>
>> Hey STA,
>> If you're going to be in the city proper, you really shouldn't need a
>=
>>car.
>> Their version of a subway (the "T") is pretty inexpensive, and for a
>=
>>visitor,
>> a gas to ride. Definately check out Fanuel Hall (spelling is off I'm
>=
>>sure).
>> I'd second Bill's recommendation on the Christian SM globe, its =
>>pretty cool.
>> The Museum of Fine Art is wonderful, as is the Isabella Stewart =
>>Gardiner
>> art museum (google for more info). As I recall, they moved the =
>>villa/museum
>> from Italy. The science museum is also a nifty experience. They have
>=
>>a
>> show on electricity that's "hair raising." Oh yeah, and the aquarium.
>=
>> In
>> fact, I'd recommend the aquarium over the science museum. In the =
>>center
>> of the place is this three or four story (you guessed it) aquarium. =
>>Quite
>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Simple beat generator [message #61709 is a reply to message #61699] |
Wed, 21 December 2005 06:57 |
cujo
Messages: 285
Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
is pimping SX as the best software for
> use with mLan products, that the 01X might be a good idea.
>
> http://www.zzounds.com/item--YAM01X
>
> Any experiences, good or bad? I don't think I'd be using the mixer much,
> it would mostly just be an audio interface and a remote control device.
>
> Thanks,
>
> TCBFWIW, Yamaha now owns Steinberg and they have been collaborating for a
few years on the Studio Manager software portion.
http://www.studioconnections.org/
David.
erlilo wrote:
> It seems to be more of that kind of stuff out there but as said, Yamaha and
> SX are going hand in hand in these days. But I think all three is using the
> Mackie protocol, just to be compatible with most of the audio software out
> there.
>
> http://www.m-audio.com/products/en_us/ProjectMixIO-main.html
>
> http://www.mackie.com/products/mcu/index.html
>
> Erling
>
>
> "TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> skrev i melding news:43a95e64$1@linux...
>
>>Hey all,
>>
>>I've been looking for a new audio interface, as my Aardvark Q10 has no
>>continuing
>>driver support. I'm kind of out of the loop these days, but a friend
>>suggested
>>that since I'm a SX boy and Yamaha is pimping SX as the best software for
>>use with mLan products, that the 01X might be a good idea.
>>
>>http://www.zzounds.com/item--YAM01X
>>
>>Any experiences, good or bad? I don't think I'd be using the mixer much,
>>it would mostly just be an audio interface and a remote control device.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>TCB
>
>
>As far as I know, if it's muted it will still stream as long as
the file display continues.
Neil
John <no@no.com> wrote:
>how about automated mutes
>
>Neil wrote:
>> I am 99.99998% sure that if th
|
|
|
|
| Re: Simple beat generator [message #61731 is a reply to message #61709] |
Wed, 21 December 2005 13:37 |
Rob Arsenault
Messages: 152
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ighn't this be possible? It would seem that the AMD 64 4200 X2 would be
faster since the cores are running at 2200 MHz per processor, but the
Opteron has 2 x 1MB L2 cache and an unlocked multiplier (if accessable from
the bios) and from what I hear, a better formulation of silicon.
Hmmmmmm............man I'm tempted. Why don't y'all pass the plate and send
me one of these?
;oDThad, you're setting ideas in my head but I've buyed my Christmas presents
for this year;-o. I've looked at the M-Audio plenty of times the last couple
of months but I have some different sizes mixers here to couple up to my
E-MU 1820M, so maybe I'll end up "only" with a Frontier. But have thoughts
about how clean and easy it will be, only with an all in one box, so the
idea is still living.
Erling
"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> skrev i melding news:43a9f162$1@linux...
>
> Hey guys,
>
> Thanks for all of the tips. I didn't know the options were so much more
> varied.
> I think I'll probably go for the M-Audio. Not too expensive, uses the
> Mackie
> protocol (should be more software/hardware agnostic) and very nicely is
> from
> the company that distributes Live so I'd guess support for my new most
> beloved
> app will be good. Tascam is a close second though, but thanks to everyone.
>
>
> TCB
>
> "TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>
>>Hey all,
>>
>>I've been looking for a new audio interface, as my Aardvark Q10 has no
>>continuing
>>driver support. I'm kind of out of the loop these days, but a friend
>>suggested
>>that since I'm a SX boy and Yamaha is pimping SX as the best software for
>>use with mLan products, that the 01X might be a good idea.
>>
>>http://www.zzounds.com/item--YAM01X
>>
>>Any experiences, good or bad? I don't think I'd be using the mixer much,
>>it would mostly just be an audio interface and a remote control device.
>
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>TCB
>......what so?-o).... ....if you're first thinking these thoughts, why not
think bigger? Opteron have a 2400 MHz too for socket 939, named 180. For the
socket 940 you can get a 2800 MHz for about 1500 boxes to use with a cheap
Asus SK8N 70$ board, so the brain will have big problems to follow it up
when it comes to speed;-).......
http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/ProductInformation/0,,30 _118_8825,00.html
Erling
"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> skrev i melding
news:43aa1971$1@linux...
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
