|
|
| Re: 3.0 vs 2.1 [message #103390 is a reply to message #103388] |
Mon, 11 May 2009 21:01   |
|
|
Hehehehe, I liked the rant, I got what you were saying. Some stuff just doesn't really need a whole lot of "improving on" - I have a Hammond M3 here I'm going to be fixing up someday soon.
3.0 definitely bounces in 24 bit, not so sure about rendering but I assume yes.
You can download Paris 3.0 (and earlier) directly from the EMU link and then you get a 7-day grace period to authorize it before it expires. The last I heard, ID sets one day a week aside to process authorizations, so you probably want to time it strategically - ie grab it and request your serial from ID on a Sunday evening so they get the request Monday AM, thus in time for whichever day they do it. PACE wasn't much of a dilemma for me on Mac, it just tended to work.
And yeah - PC is where the PARIS action's going to be, going forward - and I say that as a former die-hard Mac OS9 PARIS user myself.
- K
"... being bitter is like swallowing poison and waiting for the other guy to die..." - anon
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: 3.0 vs 2.1 [message #103392 is a reply to message #103390] |
Mon, 11 May 2009 21:28 |
John Houston
Messages: 79
Registered: May 2009
Location: Hurricane Utah
|
Member |
|
|
|
Oh, by the way, I got my first Hammond, an M3, in 1978. I loved it and used it for years. Iv'e also had the B3, the Porta B, and currently still have the C2, w/ TrekII percussion, a BC (very cool) a 21H Leslie, an 825 Leslie, a Cordovox Leslie powered by Sovtek Mig 100 amp and Electrovoice Speaker, and a Hammond XK3, for my over the road ERIC DODGE gig. I love this stuff, and the M3 is one of my favorites. Adding FOLDBACK I would guess? Anyway have fun, cause they're AWESOME. John
|
|
|
|
| Re: 3.0 vs 2.1 [message #103404 is a reply to message #103392] |
Fri, 15 May 2009 21:10 |
|
|
Nice collection! Yeah, I've heard great things about the M3. Mine's "motorboating", making a chopped-up sound like insanely heavy vibrato - I've been advised by our local Hammond wiz to try "zapping" it with a 9v battery to fry off the dendrites, ever tried that? If that doesn't work, it may effectively be a write-off. But if it does, I'm going to see what other sorts of trouble I can get into with it - maybe the foldback mod, *definitely* the Leslie mod.
"... being bitter is like swallowing poison and waiting for the other guy to die..." - anon
[Updated on: Fri, 15 May 2009 21:13] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: 3.0 vs 2.1 [message #103426 is a reply to message #103390] |
Mon, 18 May 2009 20:26 |
Wayne
Messages: 206
Registered: July 2008
Location: Las Vegas
|
Senior Member |
|
|
So far I've only rendered one track at a time so I don't know about stereo files.
So, Yes. v3.0 can render 16 or 24bit files to same right in the Editor window. It can also render a 24bit mono file to a 16bit mono file. And vice versa. I render up to 24bit when I've previously recorded a 16bit vocal track and I need a 24bit file to use in Melodyne.
wayne
[Updated on: Mon, 18 May 2009 20:29] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
