|
|
Re: Edmund appears to be looking at CWP9 this past year [message #55711 is a reply to message #55710] |
Thu, 14 July 2005 09:22 |
justcron
Messages: 330 Registered: May 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
> *cool*, at least in Texas.
>
> There was this war going on and lots of my friends were headed over there.
> This country was being torn apart by dissention and I became more and more
> involved in the anti-war movement and the increasingly emerging
philosophy
> of non-judgmentalism and defiance of the rule of law/politial anarchism.
>
> While I was in school, I ran into a few old acquaintances. They were the
> rich children of some of the people my dad had been doing business with in
> Mexico. They were going to universtity in the states and were, like me,
> angry, into the counterculture and we renewed our friendships. I started
> going down to Mexico with them on school holidays and we would travel to
> places which were pretty unbelievable. Like paradises which were mostly
> untouched by human beings (except of course, the local Indians, who were
not
> really considered to be human by anyone, including these *enlightened*
young
> Mexican revolutionaries-the Indians weren't cool. They were
traditionalists
> and not into drugs, socialism and free love). A lot of the friends of my
> Mexican friends were going to Europea
|
|
|
Re: Edmund appears to be looking at CWP9 this past year [message #55722 is a reply to message #55711] |
Thu, 14 July 2005 11:03 |
Deej [3]
Messages: 181 Registered: June 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
avians were a bit aloof from the rest of the Europeans and Americans.
>The Texans weren't really considered to be Americans by the Europeans or
the
>Mexicans and got along better with the Mexicans than with anyone else there.
>There were lots of other things like this that they were noticing. The
>really telling thing about it all was that every nationality eventually
>ended up at their own posada (sort of like an outdoor hotel on the beach).
>There was the German, French, Spanish, Swiss, American......etc. posada.
>Just like all of these people who were willing to pay lip service to the
>idea of one big happy worle, were totally unable to practice this and their
>preconceptions and stereotypes where easy to recognize by a group of people
>who were totally unfamiliar with world history and politics............so
>they saw the stereotypic BS that you ascribe to me. Once I heard this, I
>started paying attention to it and there is a lot more ugly stuff I could
>say about it, but it would do no good and despite your anger at me, I am
>basing my opinions on real experience, not theories of how things ought
to
>be.
>
>During the 70's and 80's this was a good jumping off place for travelling
>further down into central and south america. It was pretty awful down there
>because there was a lot of killing going on, boith over politics and drugs
>(which were pretty much the same). The Hollywood movies like Salvador only
>show one side of this *freedom fighter* picture. It was awful, but I saw
>some stuff down there that was done by Cuban agents and their bloodthirsty
>guerilla allies that was as bad as anyth
|
|
|
Re: Edmund appears to be looking at CWP9 this past year [message #55723 is a reply to message #55722] |
Thu, 14 July 2005 12:02 |
rick
Messages: 1976 Registered: February 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ing you can possibly imagine in
your
>worst nightmares. None of this kind of stuff is good, but I can assure you
>that Americans weren't the only ones associated with death squads. It was
>just reported that way in the press.
>
>As far as my comments which apparently have convinced you that I am
>unrecoginzable, perhaps I am. People change. We have been attacked. We know
>how long it takes the UN do anything. In the meantime.....millions of people
>can die. Sadaam had been in violation of the UN sanctions for years and
was
>in a position to do us a lot of harm. I don't buy the idea that he was some
>non-threat. Saying that we should have waited longer after we had waited
for
>10 years while the French, Russians and the UN bureaucrats had supported
>Sadaam against the same resolutions they had approved gives me little faith
>in the UN doing anything right or in a timely manner and given this
>experience.
>
>I think the European people should be supporting us and they are very
>divided about this. My opinions are mixed about them as well so yes......I
>have changed. I'm tryly sorry that you now see me as some kind of evil
>person, but I'll get over it.
>
>Regards,
>
>Doug
>
>
>
>
>
>"Mr Simplicity" <animix_spamless_@animas.net> wrote in message
>news:42d54f92@linux...
>> Ok Derek,
>>
>> >maybe im missing the irony or some linguistic fineprint,
>> but as far as im concerned, doug, no i dont understand you. reading the
>> stereotype BS you spread<
>>
>> I'm not spouting stereotypes for the sake of trying to make someone *bad*
>> and someone else *good*. I am relating the truth I have seen based on
real
>> world experience. If it's ugly to you, then that's good. It's ugly to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Edmund appears to be looking at CWP9 this past year [message #56426 is a reply to message #55969] |
Sat, 30 July 2005 17:06 |
zornwil
Messages: 19 Registered: July 2005
|
Junior Member |
|
|
>> > >> DJ wrote:
>> > >> > I've been working for about 6 months with 3 EDS cards which are
>> hooked
>> > >up to
>> > >> > three MECs. The last MEC doesn't have any analog I/O cards, just
>ADAT
>> > >cards.
>> > >> > I usually track to the first two MECs.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Well, for some reason I can't fathom, suddenly MEC 3 stopped
>> > >> > sycing.........lots of digital hash. switching WC on and off would
>> sync
>> > >it
>> > >> > back up. Then that stopped working. The switching the EDS card on
>> Submix
>> > >3
>> > >> > in the global window to virtual and then back to card worked. Now
>> that
>> > >has
>> > >> > stopped working. I thought it might be a bad cable so I switched
>the
>> > >SCSI
>> > >> > cable from MEC 3 to Card B and attached the cable from MEC 2 to
>card
>> > C
>> > >> > figuring that if it was either a card or cable, I could trace the
>> > >problem.,
>> > >> > Well, I found that that hooking this MEC #3 (which was previously
>> > >attached
>> > >> > Card C) to Card B and attaching Card C to MEC #2 (which was
>> previously
>> > >> > attached MEC #3) totlly solves the problem.
>> > >> > Rock solid, no sync problems and absolutely no discernable reason
>for
>> > >this
>> > >> > behaviour. However, I did add an RME multiface to my Cubase SX
>system
>> > >> > yesterday and all of these devices are sharing a common clock so
>I'm
>> > >> > wondering if, by some cursed digital happenstance, this might have
>> > >caused
>> > >> > the problem. I sort of doubt it though because the system was
>> starting
>> > >to
>> > >> > act erratic before I hooked up the Multiface to the SX DAW.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > I've got project in the works here that has 12 songs with lots of
>> tracks
>> > >on
>> > >> > each. There's still lots more tracking/dubs to do on this project
>and
>> > >I've
>> > >> > got a producer coming in tomorrow to discuss a label project. I'm
>> going
>> > >be
>> > >> > jacking around with reconfiguring my patchbay presets tonight to
>> reflect
>> > >the
>> > >> > new MEC/Card assignments. Right now every %$#^&*%^#$%'ing song on
>the
>> > >> > project I'm working on is playing back from the wrong
>&^$#^&^%&^&^%$
>> > >submix.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > This stuff pisses me off to no en
|
|
|