Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Scherzo beta 1.31
|
|
|
|
 Re: Scherzo beta 1.31 [message #101486 is a reply to message #101484] |
Sun, 07 December 2008 02:52   |
Mike Audet
Messages: 294
Registered: December 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Tom,
I'm really not sure in the new driver would be ideal on a single core system.
If there was a problem, like ADAT cards not working, it might be worth a
try. The original is more efficient on a single core machine because it
isn't protecting its variables.
On the other had, the new Scherzo is compiled with a more modern version
of the driver DDK, and it puts the second half of interrupt handling at the
front of the list of DPCs to be processed. So, it could still work better
with the ASIO that I'm about to start on.
I guess if everything is working fine on a single core machine, don't fix
what isn't broken. But, there aren't going to be any new single core machines,
which is why I felt this driver was so important.
I'm just stoked that I can use PARIS on my quad core. :) Thirteen years
ago, I worked six days a week all summer at Jenny Craig to make enough money
to buy a Session 8. Then, Digidesign screwed me by not updating the driver
properly for Windows 95. Well, not this time. :)
All the best,
Mike
"Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote:
>Hi Mike,
>
>Your effort here is beyond what anyone expects.
>
>I have a question for you on this new Scherzo driver.
>Will 1.31 work efficiently with a single core system? Is
>there any benefit for those older boxes? Just curious.
>
>Next week I will give it all a go. I can't wait to dive into
>a crazy fast computer and make it work flawlessly.
>Your work will make it all possible.
>
>Thank you so much,
>Tom
>
>
>
>
>"Mike Audet" <mike@...> wrote in message news:493b36f8$1@linux...
>>
>> Someone said that "We've seen the enemy, and he is us."
>>
>> I'm pretty sure I found the cause of the buffer allocation errors. When
>> I was working on the PSCL, I increased some buffers as part of my trying
>> to figure out why the app was locking up on a multi cpu machine. I
>> increased
>> them a lot and never turned them back down. Sorry. :(
>>
>> I recompiled the PSCL with the original buffer settings, which I think
>> will
>> solve this once and for all.
>>
>> Thanks everyone who tests these betas. I'm running the latest builds
>> right
>> now, and all seems well.
>>
>> Cheers!
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: Scherzo beta 1.31 [message #101490 is a reply to message #101486] |
Sun, 07 December 2008 13:50 |
Don Nafe
Messages: 1206
Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
We're not worthy
"Mike Audet" <mike@...> wrote in message news:493b9cc9$1@linux...
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> I'm really not sure in the new driver would be ideal on a single core
> system.
> If there was a problem, like ADAT cards not working, it might be worth a
> try. The original is more efficient on a single core machine because it
> isn't protecting its variables.
>
> On the other had, the new Scherzo is compiled with a more modern version
> of the driver DDK, and it puts the second half of interrupt handling at
> the
> front of the list of DPCs to be processed. So, it could still work better
> with the ASIO that I'm about to start on.
>
> I guess if everything is working fine on a single core machine, don't fix
> what isn't broken. But, there aren't going to be any new single core
> machines,
> which is why I felt this driver was so important.
>
> I'm just stoked that I can use PARIS on my quad core. :) Thirteen years
> ago, I worked six days a week all summer at Jenny Craig to make enough
> money
> to buy a Session 8. Then, Digidesign screwed me by not updating the
> driver
> properly for Windows 95. Well, not this time. :)
>
> All the best,
>
> Mike
>
>
> "Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote:
>>Hi Mike,
>>
>>Your effort here is beyond what anyone expects.
>>
>>I have a question for you on this new Scherzo driver.
>>Will 1.31 work efficiently with a single core system? Is
>>there any benefit for those older boxes? Just curious.
>>
>>Next week I will give it all a go. I can't wait to dive into
>>a crazy fast computer and make it work flawlessly.
>>Your work will make it all possible.
>>
>>Thank you so much,
>>Tom
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>"Mike Audet" <mike@...> wrote in message news:493b36f8$1@linux...
>>>
>>> Someone said that "We've seen the enemy, and he is us."
>>>
>>> I'm pretty sure I found the cause of the buffer allocation errors. When
>>> I was working on the PSCL, I increased some buffers as part of my trying
>>> to figure out why the app was locking up on a multi cpu machine. I
>>> increased
>>> them a lot and never turned them back down. Sorry. :(
>>>
>>> I recompiled the PSCL with the original buffer settings, which I think
>
>>> will
>>> solve this once and for all.
>>>
>>> Thanks everyone who tests these betas. I'm running the latest builds
>
>>> right
>>> now, and all seems well.
>>>
>>> Cheers!
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: Scherzo beta 1.31 [message #102064 is a reply to message #101490] |
Mon, 12 January 2009 09:36 |
scott h
Messages: 27
Registered: July 2005
Location: Detroit
|
Junior Member |
|
|
aloha....
long time no post on here...
I have a question regarding this.... I saw the actual release, but i want
to make sure all is kosher with my system before I purchase the new driver.
will this beta still work to get up and running just to make sure everything
will work with the system before I purchase?
I would like to take the paris system out of mothballs for a couple projects
I am currently working on...
"Don Nafe" <dnafe@rogers.com> wrote:
>We're not worthy
>
>
>"Mike Audet" <mike@...> wrote in message news:493b9cc9$1@linux...
>>
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> I'm really not sure in the new driver would be ideal on a single core
>> system.
>> If there was a problem, like ADAT cards not working, it might be worth
a
>> try. The original is more efficient on a single core machine because
it
>> isn't protecting its variables.
>>
>> On the other had, the new Scherzo is compiled with a more modern version
>> of the driver DDK, and it puts the second half of interrupt handling at
>> the
>> front of the list of DPCs to be processed. So, it could still work better
>> with the ASIO that I'm about to start on.
>>
>> I guess if everything is working fine on a single core machine, don't
fix
>> what isn't broken. But, there aren't going to be any new single core
>> machines,
>> which is why I felt this driver was so important.
>>
>> I'm just stoked that I can use PARIS on my quad core. :) Thirteen years
>> ago, I worked six days a week all summer at Jenny Craig to make enough
>> money
>> to buy a Session 8. Then, Digidesign screwed me by not updating the
>> driver
>> properly for Windows 95. Well, not this time. :)
>>
>> All the best,
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> "Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>Hi Mike,
>>>
>>>Your effort here is beyond what anyone expects.
>>>
>>>I have a question for you on this new Scherzo driver.
>>>Will 1.31 work efficiently with a single core system? Is
>>>there any benefit for those older boxes? Just curious.
>>>
>>>Next week I will give it all a go. I can't wait to dive into
>>>a crazy fast computer and make it work flawlessly.
>>>Your work will make it all possible.
>>>
>>>Thank you so much,
>>>Tom
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"Mike Audet" <mike@...> wrote in message news:493b36f8$1@linux...
>>>>
>>>> Someone said that "We've seen the enemy, and he is us."
>>>>
>>>> I'm pretty sure I found the cause of the buffer allocation errors.
When
>>>> I was working on the PSCL, I increased some buffers as part of my trying
>>>> to figure out why the app was locking up on a multi cpu machine. I
>>>> increased
>>>> them a lot and never turned them back down. Sorry. :(
>>>>
>>>> I recompiled the PSCL with the original buffer settings, which I think
>>
>>>> will
>>>> solve this once and for all.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks everyone who tests these betas. I'm running the latest builds
>>
>>>> right
>>>> now, and all seems well.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers!
>>>>
>>>> Mike
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: Scherzo beta 1.31 [message #102067 is a reply to message #102064] |
Mon, 12 January 2009 13:06 |
Mike Audet
Messages: 294
Registered: December 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Scott,
There are some bugs in 1.31, but it generally works. I had my system lock
up once with it.
All the best,
Mike
"scott h" <fresnelmusic@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>aloha....
>
> long time no post on here...
>
> I have a question regarding this.... I saw the actual release, but i want
>to make sure all is kosher with my system before I purchase the new driver.
>
>
> will this beta still work to get up and running just to make sure everything
>will work with the system before I purchase?
>
>I would like to take the paris system out of mothballs for a couple projects
>I am currently working on...
>
>
>
>"Don Nafe" <dnafe@rogers.com> wrote:
>>We're not worthy
>>
>>
>>"Mike Audet" <mike@...> wrote in message news:493b9cc9$1@linux...
>>>
>>> Hi Tom,
>>>
>>> I'm really not sure in the new driver would be ideal on a single core
>
>>> system.
>>> If there was a problem, like ADAT cards not working, it might be worth
>a
>>> try. The original is more efficient on a single core machine because
>it
>>> isn't protecting its variables.
>>>
>>> On the other had, the new Scherzo is compiled with a more modern version
>>> of the driver DDK, and it puts the second half of interrupt handling
at
>
>>> the
>>> front of the list of DPCs to be processed. So, it could still work better
>>> with the ASIO that I'm about to start on.
>>>
>>> I guess if everything is working fine on a single core machine, don't
>fix
>>> what isn't broken. But, there aren't going to be any new single core
>
>>> machines,
>>> which is why I felt this driver was so important.
>>>
>>> I'm just stoked that I can use PARIS on my quad core. :) Thirteen years
>>> ago, I worked six days a week all summer at Jenny Craig to make enough
>
>>> money
>>> to buy a Session 8. Then, Digidesign screwed me by not updating the
>>> driver
>>> properly for Windows 95. Well, not this time. :)
>>>
>>> All the best,
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>>
>>> "Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>Hi Mike,
>>>>
>>>>Your effort here is beyond what anyone expects.
>>>>
>>>>I have a question for you on this new Scherzo driver.
>>>>Will 1.31 work efficiently with a single core system? Is
>>>>there any benefit for those older boxes? Just curious.
>>>>
>>>>Next week I will give it all a go. I can't wait to dive into
>>>>a crazy fast computer and make it work flawlessly.
>>>>Your work will make it all possible.
>>>>
>>>>Thank you so much,
>>>>Tom
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Mike Audet" <mike@...> wrote in message news:493b36f8$1@linux...
>>>>>
>>>>> Someone said that "We've seen the enemy, and he is us."
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm pretty sure I found the cause of the buffer allocation errors.
>When
>>>>> I was working on the PSCL, I increased some buffers as part of my trying
>>>>> to figure out why the app was locking up on a multi cpu machine. I
>>>>> increased
>>>>> them a lot and never turned them back down. Sorry. :(
>>>>>
>>>>> I recompiled the PSCL with the original buffer settings, which I think
>>>
>>>>> will
>>>>> solve this once and for all.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks everyone who tests these betas. I'm running the latest builds
>>>
>>>>> right
>>>>> now, and all seems well.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers!
>>>>>
>>>>> Mike
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Wed Mar 05 23:55:24 PST 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02585 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
