The PARIS Forums


Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Paris transfer
Paris transfer [message #55488] Sat, 09 July 2005 20:05 Go to next message
Ricardo Gomez is currently offline  Ricardo Gomez
Messages: 2
Registered: July 2005
Junior Member
ression.
>
> Second, who are these people that blame everyone but Saddam? I think
> it's widely recognized that Iraq had problems due to many sources. I
>
Re: Paris transfer [message #55490 is a reply to message #55488] Sat, 09 July 2005 21:32 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Deej [3] is currently offline  Deej [3]   UNITED STATES
Messages: 181
Registered: June 2005
Senior Member
ation should be looked at.
>
> We can hold ourselves to our professed high standard, and if we fall
> short, admit our own mistakes. Of course, that does not mean we should
> ignore mistakes from others in the world.
>
> It doesn't make our policies better to pretend it's all about "hating"
> this or that administration. It's really all about creating policies
> that help us move toward goals we all agree are important.
>
>
>> Certainly France, Germany and Russia were perfectly right to defy those
>> sanctions to turn a profit in Iraq. Oh, that's right they aren't the US, so
>> they can get aw
Re: Paris transfer [message #55498 is a reply to message #55490] Sun, 10 July 2005 07:02 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ricardo Gomez is currently offline  Ricardo Gomez
Messages: 2
Registered: July 2005
Junior Member
vert your Paris
>>> audio files to.wav files. thing is, if your .paf's aren't linear from
>>> 00:00:00 to the end, you will have to reposition the audio files on the
>>> timeline manually.
>>>
>>> Deej
>>>
>>> "Ricardo Gomez" <rcgs@tutopia.com> wrote in message
>>> news:42d09090$1@linux...
>>>>
>>>> Hi all.
>>>> I have and old Paris sesion, but actually don't have the hardware. It's
>>> possible
>>>> to transfer those session to somother software?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Ricardo
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>Hey Dedric, thanks for the thoughtful response.

Most importantly, hiking a 14er would be g
Re: Paris transfer [message #55500 is a reply to message #55490] Sun, 10 July 2005 07:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Don Nafe is currently offline  Don Nafe   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1206
Registered: July 2005
Senior Member
ible question to answer from a personal perspective,
> and well grounded broad/global perspective is quite difficult to come by,
> and quite unpopular when it is there.
>
> Well, that's about enough philosophizing for me.
>
> Hey - sorry I haven't made it out your way yet - I'm in Co. Springs now. If
> you have a free afternoon after the first of August, drop me a line. Ever
> hike any 14'ers? I'm thinking of doing one before the summer ends.
>
> Regards,
> Dedric
>
>
> On 7/9/05 9:06 AM, in article 42cfd9a1@linux, "Jamie K"
> <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Dedric Terry wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Clinton started the air strikes, not GWB. He talked about it publicly after
>>>his term ended - his reason again was enforcing the no-fly zone.
>>>
>>>Did you go to Iraq to see what life was like there before UN sanctions to
>>>say that they destroyed the country? Interestin
Re: Paris transfer [message #55501 is a reply to message #55500] Sun, 10 July 2005 08:06 Go to previous messageGo to next message
justcron is currently offline  justcron   UNITED STATES
Messages: 330
Registered: May 2006
Senior Member
g how Bush-haters
>>>conveniently blame everyone but Saddam for Iraq's problems.
>>
>>Dedric, that's a straw man argument. First, who are "Bush haters"? I
>>think people here are interested in smart and effective policy
>>decisions. It's not about personalities, per se, that's a digression.
>>
>>Second, who are these people that blame everyone but Saddam? I think
>>it's widely recognized that Iraq had problems due to many sources. I
>>haven't heard anyone praising Saddam for enlightened leadership, except
>>that his repressions kept the competing fundamentalists and ethnic
>>groups in check. Another problem echoed around the world was the cold
>>war and how it played out in regional conflicts over the years. Then
>>there's oil, religious fundamentalism, competition between local
>>countries, corporate interests, the list goes on. A lot of things
>>happened to create the Iraq of Saddam.
>>
>>You should know that bringing up Clinton does not innoculate the
>>following administration. Mistakes can and are propogated across
>>multiple administrations. The allegation is that the current
>>administration took advantage of the no-fly policy to try to provoke a
>>war. If the previous administration was part of that, then so be it. If
>>not, so be it. Either way, the allegation should be looked at.
>>
>>We can hold ourselves to our professed high standard, and if we fall
>>short, admit our own mistakes. Of course, that does not mean we should
>>ignore mistakes from others in the world.
>>
>>It doesn't make our policies bett
Re: Paris transfer [message #55502 is a reply to message #55501] Sun, 10 July 2005 08:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Don Nafe is currently offline  Don Nafe   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1206
Registered: July 2005
Senior Member
er to pretend it's all about "hating"
>>this or that administration. It's really all about creating policies
>>that help us move toward goals we all agree are important.
>>
>>
>>
>>>Certainly France, Germany and Russia were perfectly right to defy those
>>>sanctions to turn a profit in Iraq. Oh, that's right they aren't the US, so
>>>they can get away with it - they are politically correct by birthright - the
>>>US isn't.
>>
>>If we criticize one country, that does not make every other country
>>perfect. The current situation, and situations previous, came about due
>>to actions from people all over the world and in Iraq. Finding faults in
>>others, easy as that is, does not make our mistakes go away. Recognizing
>>the entire range of contributing factors and acting on that information
>>is the only way to improve our success rate in the future.
>>
>>Cheers,
>>-Jamie K
>>http://www.JamieKrutz.com
>>
>>
>>
>>>On 7/8/05 1:38 PM, in article 42ced6d1$1@linux, "justcron"
>>><justcron@hydrorecords.compound> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>"Mr Simplicity" <animix_spamless_@animas.net> wrote in message
>>>>news:42cebcb2@linux...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Dear Uncle Ricky and Brother Bud,
>>>>>
>>>>>Please go back and read my posts carefully. They are not defending an
>>>>>attack
>>>>>due to WMD. I do think that it's possible that WMD did exist before we
>>>>>went
>>>>>in, but my posts are talking about violation of UN sanctions.
>>>>
>&
Re: Paris transfer [message #55508 is a reply to message #55488] Sun, 10 July 2005 11:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Splico is currently offline  Splico
Messages: 1
Registered: July 2005
Junior Member
gt;>>>
>>>>> "Mr Simplicity" <animix_spamless_@animas.net> wrote:
>>>>> >and it's a shame that they are apparently the only ones on earth who
>>>saw
>>>>> any
>>>>> >merit in enforcing UN resolutions
>>>>>
>>>>> That annoys me too. I'm still anti-bush because I *hate* the way they
>>>went
>>>>> a
Re: Paris transfer [message #55544 is a reply to message #55498] Mon, 11 July 2005 06:59 Go to previous message
Paul is currently offline  Paul
Messages: 14
Registered: June 2005
Junior Member

> >>>
> >>>Both sides of the circumstances sadden me - tyrannical rule is more
than
> >>>anyone should have to endure, and certainly would be more than most
> >>>Americans could bear in our desire to have no one guide, much less
> >
> > restrict
> >
> >>>our personal decisions; and if war is the only way to be free (as our
> >>>predecessors found in the 1700's), freedom comes at a high price. As a
> >>>country we've paid such a price many times - Rev. War, Civil War, WWI,
> >
> > WWII,
> >
> >>>Korea, Veitnam, etc. It never gets easy. It is never glorious. My
> >
> > hope
> >
> >>>now is that the outcome for the Iraqi people is freedom to make their
> >
> > own
> >
> >>>decisions about who governs them and how - free from tyranny, and free
> >
> > from
> >
> >>>anarchist insurgents. I'm just not sure many people think there is any
> >
> > cost
> >
> >>>worth paying anymore. After all, $2.39 a gallon or which movie to go
> >
> > see is
> >
> >>>about the highest cost most people have to weigh out here in the US (by
Previous Topic: OT (well, at least it's about music) Nice VST Reverb for you to try
Next Topic: BIG PROBLEM
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Dec 05 11:09:14 PST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01358 seconds