Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or markeing hype?
Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or markeing hype? [message #96280] |
Mon, 25 February 2008 15:46 |
Dedric Terry
Messages: 788 Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0338_01C877CE.04A3C870
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=3D6693909 #6693909 =
(should take you to the next to last post on that page)
Apparently Apogee's numbers are only while tracking. Sounds like they =
only posted part of the story with their great low latency figures.
It is hard to say if this is the case for everyone though, except for =
Apogee's response when the user called, but since I brought it up in the =
Vista thread, I thought I would pass it along to try and sort through =
marketing myth and real world facts. I was actually kind of hoping the =
Apogee Symphony would smoke at low latency with Core audio and any app, =
just because it would be cool to have such a breakthrough, but this =
really just shows that ASIO is pushing the limits of current OSs =
already, and we haven't really exceeded it yet.
The reports on Nuendo performance is quite a bit faster on XP and ASIO2, =
but it's running fine at low latency on
OSX/core audio - just about 20-30% higher (my adjusted estimate) plugin =
load on the same hardware, same latency: it's really 76 Nuendo multiband =
comps at 64 samples on XP/ASIO, vs 45 on OSX/core audio at 64, which is =
almost 50% more, but I'm assuming there are other plugins in that =
benchmark test to compensate for, and vary part of that loading (I'll =
have to find out for sure when I have more time) - same dual quad =
hardware configs in both cases. I don't know for sure if some of this =
is Nuendo not being optimized for the lower level OSX code base (maybe =
already), or still on Cocoa or whatever - or if it is truly a limitation =
of OSX and core audio. Based on the Logic thread, the latter seems to =
have a bit more weight than it being a Nuendo-only performance issue.
Fwiw,
Dedric
------=_NextPart_000_0338_01C877CE.04A3C870
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.6000.16587" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><A=20
href=3D" http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=3D6693909 #6693=
909"> http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=3D6693909 #6693909=
</A> (should=20
take you to the next to last post on that page)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Apparently Apogee's numbers =
are only=20
while tracking. Sounds like they only posted part of the story =
with their=20
great low latency figures.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>It is hard to say if this is the case =
for everyone=20
though, except for Apogee's response when the user called, but since I =
brought=20
it up in the Vista thread, I thought I would pass it along to try and =
sort=20
through marketing myth and real world facts. I was actually kind =
of hoping=20
the Apogee Symphony would smoke at low latency with </FONT><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>Core audio and any app, just because it would be cool to have =
such a=20
breakthrough, but this really </FONT><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>just =
shows that=20
ASIO is pushing the limits of current OSs already, and we haven't really =
exceeded it yet.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>The reports on Nuendo performance is =
quite a bit=20
faster on XP and ASIO2, but it's running fine at low latency =
on</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>OSX/core audio - just about 20-30% =
higher (my=20
adjusted estimate) plugin load on the same hardware, same=20
latency: it's really 76 Nuendo multiband comps at 64 samples on =
XP/ASIO, vs=20
45 on OSX/core audio at 64, which is almost 50% more, </FONT><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>but I'm assuming there are other plugins in that =
benchmark test to=20
compensate for, and vary part of that loading (I'll have to find =
out for=20
sure when I have more time) - same dual quad hardware configs in =
both=20
cases. I don't know for sure if some of this is Nuendo not being =
optimized=20
for the lower level OSX code base (maybe already), or still on Cocoa or =
whatever=20
- or if it is truly a limitation of OSX and core audio. Based on =
the Logic=20
thread, the latter seems to have a bit more weight than it being a =
Nuendo-only=20
performance issue.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Fwiw,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Dedric</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><BR clear=3Dleft><BR></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0338_01C877CE.04A3C870--
|
|
|
|
|
Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or markeing hype?
|
|
|
Re: Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or markeing hype?
By: excelav on Mon, 25 February 2008 17:30
|
|
|
Re: Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or marketing hype?
|
|
|
Re: Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or marketing hype?
By: excelav on Mon, 25 February 2008 19:15
|
|
|
Re: Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or marketing hype?
|
|
|
Re: Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or marketing hype?
By: excelav on Mon, 25 February 2008 20:14
|
|
|
Re: Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or markeinghype?
|
|
|
Re: Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or markeing hype?
By: Deej [5] on Mon, 25 February 2008 21:38
|
|
|
Re: Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or markeing hype?
By: Deej [5] on Mon, 25 February 2008 21:39
|
|
|
Re: Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or markeinghype?
|
|
|
Re: Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or markeing
By: LaMontt on Tue, 26 February 2008 18:22
|
|
|
Re: Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or markeing
|
|
|
Re: Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or markeing
|
|
|
Re: Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or markeing
By: Neil on Wed, 27 February 2008 00:58
|
|
|
Re: Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or markeing
By: LaMontt on Wed, 27 February 2008 09:40
|
|
|
Re: Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or markeing
By: Neil on Wed, 27 February 2008 10:33
|
|
|
Re: Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or markeing
By: LaMontt on Wed, 27 February 2008 10:48
|
|
|
Re: Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or markeing
By: Deej [5] on Wed, 27 February 2008 09:25
|
|
|
Re: Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or markeing
By: LaMontt on Wed, 27 February 2008 10:56
|
|
|
Re: Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or markeing
By: Bill L on Wed, 27 February 2008 11:50
|
|
|
Re: Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or markeing
By: LaMontt on Wed, 27 February 2008 13:58
|
|
|
Re: Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or markeing
By: TCB on Wed, 27 February 2008 16:23
|
|
|
Re: Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or markeing
By: LaMont on Thu, 28 February 2008 08:41
|
|
|
Re: Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or markeing
|
|
|
Re: Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or markeing
By: LaMontt on Thu, 28 February 2008 10:46
|
|
|
Re: Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or markeing
By: TCB on Thu, 28 February 2008 11:34
|
|
|
Re: Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or markeing
By: excelav on Tue, 26 February 2008 21:46
|
|
|
Re: Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or markeing
By: TCB on Wed, 27 February 2008 07:57
|
|
|
Re: Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or markeing
|
|
|
Re: Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or markeing
By: LaMontt on Thu, 28 February 2008 12:35
|
|
|
Re: Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or markeing
|
|
|
Re: Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or markeing
By: LaMontt on Thu, 28 February 2008 17:22
|
|
|
Re: Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or markeing
|
|
|
Re: Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or markeing
By: LaMontt on Fri, 29 February 2008 09:14
|
|
|
Re: Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or markeing
|
|
|
Re: Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or markeing
By: Neil on Fri, 29 February 2008 17:17
|
|
|
Re: Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or markeing
|
|
|
Re: Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or markeing
By: LaMontt on Fri, 29 February 2008 20:23
|
|
|
Re: Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or markeing
By: LaMontt on Fri, 29 February 2008 19:44
|
|
|
Re: Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or markeing
|
|
|
Re: Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or markeing
By: LaMontt on Thu, 28 February 2008 17:24
|
|
|
Re: Apogee with Core audio - low latency breakthrough or markeing
By: LaMontt on Thu, 28 February 2008 17:34
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat Dec 21 00:33:46 PST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02231 seconds
|