The PARIS Forums


Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Firefox on Mac
Firefox on Mac [message #60939] Sun, 04 December 2005 21:21 Go to next message
DC is currently offline  DC
Messages: 722
Registered: July 2005
Senior Member
ef="mailto:musurgio@otenet.gr" target="_blank">musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote in message =3D3D3D
> >> >>news:43906b78$1@linux...
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks for your suggestions.
> >> >>
Re: Firefox on Mac [message #60942 is a reply to message #60939] Sun, 04 December 2005 22:17 Go to previous messageGo to next message
gene lennon is currently offline  gene lennon
Messages: 565
Registered: July 2006
Senior Member

>>>
>>>
>>>>For everyone that doesn't want a Mac, it's great that you don't have to
>>>
>>>
>>>>have one. I wasn't completely sold on Macs in the 80s when the Atari
>>>>offered better MIDI features at a lower price and the Amiga offered a
>
>
>>>>more exciting computing vision, although the Mac of that time still had
>>>
>>>
>>>>some advantages in available software.
>>>>
>>>>Fast forward to the 90s. OS7-8-9 were careening off the tracks
Re: Firefox on Mac [message #60943 is a reply to message #60942] Sun, 04 December 2005 22:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kim is currently offline  Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
Senior Member
- stuck
>
>
>>>>in decisions and mistakes of the 80's. No preemptive multitasking, no
>
>
>>>>clean protected memory design, band-aid on top of band-aid to wire
>>>>around obsolete legacy code. And after years of unsuccessfully
>>>>attempting to rewrite their way out of the bag, scrapping the whole mess
>>>
>>>
>>>>and starting over with OSX was the salvation of the company.
>>>>
>>>>You could argue that the GUI and some operating specs should have
>>>>changed less. I would agree in some ways and disagree in others. For
>>>>example, requiring a ".xxx" extention in the name for file
>>>>identification was a step backwards. But for the most part the changes
>
>
>>>>were for the better. For example, core audio is great.
>>>>
>>>>The transition wasn't cheap. But it did capitalize on the experience of
>>>
>>>
>>>>NeXT and the engineering talent they acquired with the buyout.
>>>>Reportedly it was either that or buy BeOS, the other major option on the
>>>
Re: Firefox on Mac [message #60944 is a reply to message #60942] Sun, 04 December 2005 22:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
DC is currently offline  DC
Messages: 722
Registered: July 2005
Senior Member
/> >>>
>>>>table. Both were good choices with advantages and disadvantages.
>>>>
>>>>At this point the dual G5 boxes out now have plenty of muscle and
>>>>available software for audio production, with the ability to do amazing
>>>
>>>
>>>>amounts of real time tracks, virtual instruments and effects.
>>>>
>>>>Speaking of desktop hardware speed, at times Motorola has been faster,
>
>
>>>>at times, Intel, at times AMD and at times IBM. Motorola's
>>>>slower-than-expected rollout of improved G4 chips and then IBM's
>>>>slower-than-expected rollout of G5 upgrades the
Re: Firefox on Mac [message #60945 is a reply to message #60944] Sun, 04 December 2005 23:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
steve the artguy is currently offline  steve the artguy
Messages: 308
Registered: June 2005
Senior Member
last few years have put
>>>
>>>
>>>>Apple trailing more often than not on the muscle car front, but to say
>
>
>>>>"extremely slow" is innaccurate. At the moment, the quad G5 has a pretty
>>>
>>>
>>>>good claim for leader of the desktop pack and the duals are no slouches.
>>>>
>>>>Offering Intel chips will put OSX head to head with MSWindows and it
>>>>will be interesting to see that comparison.
>>>>
>>>>Price wise, Apple has been a bit more expensive, about the same or a bit
>>>
>>>
>>>>less than comparable offerings from similar turnkey computer companies
>
>
>>>>depending on the product range or how you compare. The downward trend
>
> on
>
>>>
>>>>prices overall has not exempted Apple, Mac prices have come down over
>
>
>>>>the last few years (despite th
Re: Firefox on Mac [message #60947 is a reply to message #60945] Mon, 05 December 2005 00:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
dc[3] is currently offline  dc[3]
Messages: 895
Registered: September 2005
Senior Member
f="mailto:4392fb60@linux..." target="_blank">4392fb60@linux...
Hi Cujo,
Unfortunately, I was not able to save it. Paris would not let me do
anything at all until I responded to the error window and then it =
was all
gone! I tried to pull up the project window or do anything but it =
was a
hard freeze.
Since I only had a single submix going and was only using a couple =
effects
in the aux module on one channel, I was surpris
Re: Firefox on Mac [message #60953 is a reply to message #60939] Mon, 05 December 2005 06:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Doug Wellington is currently offline  Doug Wellington   UNITED STATES
Messages: 251
Registered: June 2005
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA
Senior Member
core CPU system right now? If so, I'd be
>>> mighty
>>> interested to hear your experiences before I once again descend into
>>> computer building hell.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Deej
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>Edna, I just reviewed your question and I see no one really answered the question..
what is it... First, you can do quite a f


Re: Firefox on Mac [message #60954 is a reply to message #60953] Mon, 05 December 2005 08:32 Go to previous messageGo to next message
DC is currently offline  DC
Messages: 722
Registered: July 2005
Senior Member
ew possible tricks (as some offered),
but not all work perfect. If you had it once, you'll have it again. From
my understanding of computers, programming and using Paris (which I have
gotten the error)... I believe it basically something within the computer
is either going too fast or hardware or visa-vera. I haven't seen what your
settings are... but have you followed any guidelines to editing your paris.cfg
file for the i/o? Another possibility is something *could* be conflicting
and basically hanging when Paris is trying to process... if you don't use
midi, there is a command line to add in the paris.cfg to turn that off.
I don't use midi and make it a habit of putting that in the cfg. The bad
thing about that error is that it is really hard to find the culprit. I would
first make sure that your appropriate settings are in the paris.cfg, of course
be sure your drives are set for DMA, and also be sure to turn off background
services that hog the processor.. such as task scheduler, etc. Hope this
helps and G
Re: Firefox on Mac [message #60975 is a reply to message #60939] Mon, 05 December 2005 20:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Paul Braun is currently offline  Paul Braun   UNITED STATES
Messages: 391
Registered: September 2005
Senior Member
ng=20
out?&nbsp; I'm</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>not sure what to make of it but it =
might lead you=20
to a solution.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Good luck with your =
search!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT:
Re: Firefox on Mac [message #60993 is a reply to message #60944] Tue, 06 December 2005 08:34 Go to previous message
Greg Bratton is currently offline  Greg Bratton   UNITED STATES
Messages: 8
Registered: September 2007
Junior Member
lots* of videos so it's got the makings of being
>one of those situations that I've been hoping for with steady work. I just
>got the call about this last night. I'm glad I haven't yet ordered the parts
>for the new computer. I may be needing to upgrade to Nuendo and to build
>something with a bit more horsepower if this becomes a reality.
>
>
>touche mon ami but fence crashing can be quite invigorating.

On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 06:45:57 -0700, DTerry <dterry@no_spamkeyofd.net>
wrote:

>Oh, no, I don't fence. Skiing is more my sport. And yes, I've busted my
>butt a few times. But fortunately I've never crashed into any fences.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------
>Disclaimer: This email was typed on a Mac and edited on a PC, but could very
>easily have been done the other way around in the same amount of time.
> ------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------
>
>On 12/6/05 3:15 AM, in article 84pap1dg2s03o0aki2oihrei8fpcmmdcrj@4ax.com,
>"rick" <

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic: assertion failure
Next Topic: Ahhh... Macs vs. PC's again
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Dec 24 20:32:29 PST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03542 seconds