|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Best dirt cheap near fields? [message #93285 is a reply to message #93218] |
Sun, 02 December 2007 19:04   |
DJ
Messages: 1124
Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_079A_01C8351E.7F46B350
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
"Neil" <OIU@OI.com> wrote in message news:4750b364$1@linux...
>=20
> I'd still be curious to hear from Deej as to what his mastering
> guy pal had to say negatively about the ADAM's & the problems
> he'd enocuntered with mixes done on them.
>=20
> If anything, I'd have to take a wild guess and say: "too much
> high end" - the few times I've heard the ADAM stuff, the high
> end was so smooth & clear, & with imaging so preceise, that I'd
> be inclined to believe that it might want to make you push more
> of it. IOW, it'd still translate well over the ribbons, but
> over regular tweets, it might be too much.
>=20
> Deej, is my wild guess right?
>=20
> Neil
>=20
>=20
Neil,
Here's his take on them......
.........normally mixes from ADAMS are notorious for being "polite" in =
the 1 to 4KHZ range and lacking authentic vocal sound character.
Also, the bottom around 80hz is sometimes thin on the mix. I simply =
have heard a "sound signature" of thin bass punch,
polite sounding snares and rolled off top on mixes.
;o)
Deej
------=_NextPart_000_079A_01C8351E.7F46B350
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.6000.16544" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>"Neil" <</FONT><A =
href=3D"mailto:OIU@OI.com"><FONT=20
face=3DArial size=3D2>OIU@OI.com</FONT></A><FONT face=3DArial =
size=3D2>> wrote in=20
message </FONT><A href=3D"news:4750b364$1@linux"><FONT face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>news:4750b364$1@linux</FONT></A><FONT face=3DArial =
size=3D2>...</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>> <BR>> I'd still be curious to =
hear from=20
Deej as to what his mastering<BR>> guy pal had to say negatively =
about the=20
ADAM's & the problems<BR>> he'd enocuntered with mixes done on=20
them.<BR>> <BR>> If anything, I'd have to take a wild guess and =
say: "too=20
much<BR>> high end" - the few times I've heard the ADAM stuff, the=20
high<BR>> end was so smooth & clear, & with imaging so =
preceise, that=20
I'd<BR>> be inclined to believe that it might want to make you push=20
more<BR>> of it. IOW, it'd still translate well over the ribbons, =
but<BR>>=20
over regular tweets, it might be too much.<BR>> <BR>> Deej, is my =
wild=20
guess right?<BR>> <BR>> Neil<BR>> <BR>> <BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Neil,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Here's his take on =
them......</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><EM><STRONG>........normally mixes from =
ADAMS are=20
notorious for being "polite" in the 1 to 4KHZ range and lacking =
authentic=20
vocal sound character.<BR>Also, the bottom around 80hz is sometimes thin =
on the=20
mix. I simply have heard a "sound signature" of thin bass =
punch,<BR>polite=20
sounding snares and rolled off top on mixes.</STRONG></EM></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><EM><FONT face=3DArial =
size=3D2></FONT></EM></STRONG> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>;o)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Deej</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_079A_01C8351E.7F46B350--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
