The PARIS Forums


Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » More on Reaper and track count info.
More on Reaper and track count info. [message #92680] Tue, 13 November 2007 18:09 Go to next message
emarenot is currently offline  emarenot   UNITED STATES
Messages: 345
Registered: June 2005
Senior Member
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C82639.89EA8AA0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I thought some of you might be interested in this info. I spent some more
time with a buddy of mine who has been running Reaper. I was very impressed
with Reaper's feature set and wickedly impressed with the track counts his
computer was delivering. For me, it seems an ITB solution has arrived.
He's running the following configuration (with a tricked out MSI vid card)

Intel E4500 Core 2 Duo 2.2Ghz 800fsb, DDR2 2 gig Biostar p4M890-M7 TE mATX
motherboard, VIA P4M890 Chipset. The mobo has 2 pci slots and 2 pcie slots.

Here's the counts:

12 audio tracks, 30 tracks with vsti's (the majority of these were running
Garritan's Personal Orchestra -Kompakt LE -most instances had three to four
instruments, though we also had a smattering of tarus pedal emulations and
stienberg's vb1 thingy) and the following fx: 4 band eq's on all tracks, 14
compressors, 13 delays, 13 choruses, and three convolution verbs on sends.
For me, this is a fairly typical track count on a song. The CPU was running
at around 55%. Nice.

So we doubled the audio tracks, and kept, on each of these new tracks an eq,
delay, chorus and compressor. And, we added three more sends, each with a
convolution verb (that's SIX con-verbs ((vs lawabiding-nouns)) ). We had a
total of onehundredandfourteen fx running. The CPU was running around 75%.
That's 24 audio tracks and 30 vsti tracks and plenty of fx to go around.
For me, this would be a unusually large project. With all these tracks, his
screen redraws were slightly sluggish, but not enough to slow the work flow.

This strikes me as pretty freakin' amazing. For a project studio guy with
delusions of sub par grandure, my finger's on the trigger and gettin' pretty
itchy.

MR

------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C82639.89EA8AA0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1555" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I thought some of you might be =
interested in this=20
info.&nbsp; I spent some more time with a buddy of mine who has been =
running=20
Reaper.&nbsp; I was very impressed with Reaper's feature set and =
wickedly=20
impressed with the track counts his computer was delivering.&nbsp; For =
me, it=20
seems an ITB solution has arrived.&nbsp; He's running the following=20
configuration (with a tricked out MSI vid card)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Intel E4500 Core 2 Duo 2.2Ghz 800fsb, =
DDR2&nbsp;2=20
gig&nbsp;Biostar p4M890-M7 TE mATX motherboard, VIA P4M890 Chipset. =
<FONT=20
face=3DArial size=3D2>The mobo has 2 pci slots and 2 pcie slots.&nbsp;=20
</FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Here's the counts:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>12 audio tracks, 30 tracks with vsti's =
(the=20
majority of these were running Garritan's Personal Orchestra -Kompakt LE =
-most=20
instances had three to four instruments, though we also had a smattering =
of=20
tarus pedal emulations and stienberg's vb1 thingy) and the following fx: =
4 band=20
eq's on all tracks, 14 compressors, 13 delays, 13 choruses, and three=20
convolution verbs on sends.&nbsp; For me, this is a fairly typical track =
count=20
on a song.&nbsp; The CPU was running at around 55%.&nbsp; Nice.&nbsp;=20
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>So we doubled the audio tracks, and =
kept, on each=20
of these new tracks an eq, delay, chorus and compressor.&nbsp; And, we =
added=20
three more sends, each with a convolution verb (that's SIX con-verbs =
((vs=20
lawabiding-nouns)) ).&nbsp; We had a total of=20
<EM>onehundredandfourteen</EM>&nbsp;fx running.&nbsp; The CPU was =
running around=20
75%.&nbsp; That's 24 audio tracks and 30 vsti tracks and plenty of fx to =
go=20
around.&nbsp; For me, this would be a unusually large project.&nbsp; =
With all=20
these tracks, his screen redraws were slightly sluggish, but not enough =
to slow=20
the work flow.&nbsp; </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>This strikes me as pretty freakin' =
amazing.&nbsp;=20
For a project studio guy with delusions of sub par grandure, my finger's =
on the=20
trigger and gettin' pretty itchy.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>MR</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C82639.89EA8AA0--
Re: More on Reaper and track count info. [message #92692 is a reply to message #92680] Wed, 14 November 2007 07:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
John [1] is currently offline  John [1]
Messages: 2229
Registered: September 2005
Senior Member
If you think that's amazing just wait till you try Cubase 4.1 ;-)
Re: More on Reaper and track count info. [message #92696 is a reply to message #92692] Wed, 14 November 2007 08:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Erling is currently offline  Erling   NORWAY
Messages: 156
Registered: October 2008
Senior Member
....it lookes nice to cost only 50$ for a homeuser licence....

On 15 Nov 2007 01:23:44 +1000, "John" <no@no.com> wrote:

>
>If you think that's amazing just wait till you try Cubase 4.1 ;-)
Re: More on Reaper and track count info. [message #92714 is a reply to message #92696] Wed, 14 November 2007 18:16 Go to previous messageGo to next message
emarenot is currently offline  emarenot   UNITED STATES
Messages: 345
Registered: June 2005
Senior Member
Yeah, the price is definately right on Reaper ...and the updates keep
comin'.
MR


"erlilo" <erling.lovik@lyse.net> wrote in message
news:ko9mj314c6mvr41cdup9gp2ka0n178ruku@4ax.com...
> ...it lookes nice to cost only 50$ for a homeuser licence....
>
> On 15 Nov 2007 01:23:44 +1000, "John" <no@no.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >If you think that's amazing just wait till you try Cubase 4.1 ;-)
Re: More on Reaper and track count info. [message #92715 is a reply to message #92692] Wed, 14 November 2007 18:18 Go to previous message
emarenot is currently offline  emarenot   UNITED STATES
Messages: 345
Registered: June 2005
Senior Member
I'll bet its awesome, and as far as I know Reaper doesn't have score
editing. I've been using this feature for years in Logic 4.0 and have
gotten real fond of it.
MR

"John" <no@no.com> wrote in message news:473b04f0$1@linux...
>
> If you think that's amazing just wait till you try Cubase 4.1 ;-)
Previous Topic: Neil - Da finger?
Next Topic: Source for 19" rack rails?
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed Nov 27 12:03:41 PST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01744 seconds