Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » PARIS plays slow and then speeds up
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: PARIS plays slow and then speeds up [message #54836 is a reply to message #54829] |
Thu, 23 June 2005 11:01   |
Brandon
Messages: 49
Registered: June 2005
|
Member |
|
|
benefits their agenda.
;o(
"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:42bae8c0$1@linux...
>
> I'm a relatively conservative guy, but I have got to say this current
government
> has gone nuts with the corporate greed shit. Talk about repressive
regimes!!!!
> This sucks!!! It is time WE THE PEOPLE ARE HEARD!!!!!
>
> READ THIS!
>
> http://apnews.excite.com/article/20050623/D8ATDSD80.htmlJames,
This isn't about*our government*. this is about *our Supreme Court* and the
liberal agenda which is all about destroying private property rights for the
*good of the people* Lots of liberals are rich fat cats.
Deej
..
"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:42bae8c0$1@linux...
>
> I'm a relatively conservative guy, but I have got to say this current
government
> has gone nuts with the corporate greed shit. Talk about repressive
regimes!!!!
> This sucks!!! It is time WE THE PEOPLE ARE HEARD!!!!!
>
> READ THIS!
>
> http://apnews.excite.com/article/20050623/D8ATDSD80.htmlDoug, have you looked at this:
http://www.yamaha.com/yamahavgn/CDA/ContentDetail/ModelSerie sDetail/0,6373,C
NTID%253D21410%2526CTID%253D228600,00.html
erlilo
"Mr Simplicity" <animix_spamless_@animas.net> skrev i en meddelelse
news:42baf622@linux...
> Gene,
>
> There a reason for this madness. I've been following your posts carefully
> and it's pretty obvious as I have more time to get into this why you have
> been doing your mix moves and automation in the native app and pans in
Paris
> (no way to pan otherwise if the native tracks aren't feeding a stereo
buss,
> now is there, plus, if a track in the native app is being sent to a reverb
> or other effect and the effects are being physically bussed to an aux in
> Paris, lowering the fader on the Paris track doesn't reduce the amount of
> reverb being sent-it's a prefader scenaio which can only be solved by
using
> inserts on the
|
|
|
|
| Re: PARIS plays slow and then speeds up [message #54838 is a reply to message #54829] |
Thu, 23 June 2005 11:29 |
Deej [3]
Messages: 181
Registered: June 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
br />
> >
> >
>
>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>I'm a relatively conservative guy, but I have got to say this current government
>has gone nuts with the corporate greed shit. Talk about repressive regimes!!!!
> This sucks!!! It is time WE THE PEOPLE ARE HEARD!!!!!
>
>READ THIS!
>
>http://apnews.excite.com/article/20050623/D8ATDSD80.html
To understand this situation better lets look at a little of George Bush’s
personal history.
In 1989 a group of investors formed to purchase the Texas Rangers baseball
franchise and wanted to build a new stadium as a central part of their business
plan. To accomplish this without spending any money, they offered GW a full
partnership for $600.000 (about 5% of it value). In exchange, George was
to help with “political issues” and be the “Public Face” for the team. The
“political issues’ … to help influence the seizure of the privately owned
property that the stadium was built on and, help secure taxpayer guaranteed
bonds to finance the purchase. The land was foreclosed and the owners were
paid a very low price, later judged by a jury to be only 1/6th of its actual
value. This is now considered a textbook case of inappropriate use of eminent
domain. George sold his stake for $14 million - while Texas governor -- to
a Texas millionaire with lots of businesses regulated by his administration.
While campaigning for Gov, George said,
"I will do everything I can to defend the power of private property and private
property rights when I am the governor of this state."
The original landowners eventually received some help through the courts,
but it was on the back of the local taxpayers who received a property tax
increase.
GW is not directly responsible for the rulings of the Supreme Court, but
the White House has set standards that seem to emanate throughout our government.
This is indeed a sad day for all defenders of the US Constitution.
GeneHey, your e-mail on?
David.
Mr Simplicity wrote:
> I was thinking about this after posting to Gene on another thread about
> buying a Houston controller and thinking it
> might be appropriate for this place since so much of my stuff is
> discontinued/unsupported. It's pretty amazing how much of this stuff I have
> (and still use depending on what's happening)
>
> Paris system-3MECS
> Matrox G450 dual head video cards-2xPCI, 2xAGP
> Lexicon Core 32 PCI card
> Power Technology DSP ISA card
> Panasonic SV 3800 DAT recorder
> Alesis ADAT LX 20 x 2
> Alesis ADATXT 20
> NHT A-20 reference mo
|
|
|
|
| Re: PARIS plays slow and then speeds up [message #54851 is a reply to message #54838] |
Fri, 24 June 2005 01:39 |
rick
Messages: 1976
Registered: February 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
4;animas.net> wrote:
>Gene,
>
>I too am familiar with this boondoggle, but the one in Connecticutt is more
>about throwing private citizens under the train to create a source of tax
>revenue.
>
>Regards,
>
>Deej
>
No doubt … many democratic politicians have abused Eminent Domain to line
their own pockets or to help developers that have made substantial contributions
to them. This is not specifically a “right” or “left” issue, but I still
hate to see our president having this history. Even worse, it is considered
his only “successful” attempt at private industry.
This makes it particularly difficult to argue these cases in the courts or
to achieve any meaningful legislative changes that would secure the constitutional
intent.
But if you want to talk about people using high governmental position to
line their own pockets, perhaps we should be talking about Dick Chaney …don’t
get me started.
When Oliver Stone wrote the line “Greed is Good” for Wall Street, he couldn’t
possibly have known that his sarcasm would be taken as gospel by so many.
G"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Still, like I said, I wouldn't make anyone move for a shopping mall.
In my city, there have recently been two fairly well-publicized
instances of this sort of thing... the seizures weren't for
shopping malls or anything like that - one was due to an
elementary school that was pretty old, in need of expansion and
either renovation or rebuilding (if I remember right, they
ended up deciding it's going to be a complete teardown &
rebuild), so in that case, four or five people had to give up
their homes to allow for the expansion part of it. In the other
instance, there's a somewhat run-down area of town that's been
earmarked as an "enterprise zone", and I'm not sure how that
whole thing works, but as a result of that, the city can get
some kind of federal funding to rebuild/renew that area. They
want to put a medical school there (there've been talks with
Texas Tech - they already have a nusing school here - and our
civic leaders have been lobbying at the state level for
assistance in funding this for the past couple of years), and
that would cause a much larger amount of people to lose their
homes & businesses - I can't recall the exact estimates, but I
saw a map of the area with the proposed land for the medical
school highlighted, and it seemed to be quite a bit of land.
Part of the reason that t's going to affect quite a few people
is that the houses in that part of town are older & smaller, so
you've got more houses crammed into a given city block, small
mom & pop storefronts, things like that.
Anyway, regardless of who's driving this recent decision,
seizures for "blighted areas" have been around forever -
doesn't have to be for public use, as long as it's being done to
remove "blight" - the bad thing about that is that those areas
are always poorer areas, and even if you someone in those areas
gets 10% or 15% higher than market value for their house, where
are they going to go? Where is someone going to go who owns a
house in a run-down part of town, and they get $100k for it
from the city, but the prevailing value for a house in the
market a
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: PARIS plays slow and then speeds up [message #54872 is a reply to message #54871] |
Fri, 24 June 2005 08:25 |
rick
Messages: 1976
Registered: February 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Sound" <spamnot.info@eksoundNO.com> wrote in message
>> news:42bc1aa7$1@linux...
>>
>>>We have a Roland MC-500 here... does that count? ;-)
>>>
>>>David.
>>
>>
>> Most definitely and you get extra points if it's hooked up to a Korg Poly
>> 800
>>
>> Don
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Russ wrote:
>>>
>>>>2 atari st with unitor and emagic notator -1 488 portastudio -1 teac x7
>>>>4trk 2 ch -1 really old 60s recorder with a bunch of beatles reels on
>>>>it.....
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Don Nafe" <dnafe@magma.ca> wrote in message news:42bb3cf8$1@linux...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>I'll raise you an Atari 1040 ST with a copy of Cubase 1.1 and an Atari
>>>>>MegaSt with Cubase 3.0 both with 8" Black and White Monitors
>>>>>
>>>>>Don
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Tyrone Corbett" <tyronecorbett@comcast.net> wrote in message
>>>>>news:42bb38a1$1@linux...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Ok Deej & Nappy, I'll see your Ensoniq MR & Opcode and raise you a
>>>>>>Voyetra
>>>>>>Sequencer Plus Gold (including tethered manual)as well as an EMU Emax
>>>>>>HDSE.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Tyrone
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>Kim,
The question here is "eminent domain". A new freeway is one thing, a
waterfront hotel and shopping outlet is another. We're all on the same page,
just saying it differently.
Tony
"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:42bbd6c7$1@linux...
>
>
> Yes, that is nuts.
>
> Much as I hate George and friends, this wasn't a government decision
> though.
>
> Of course it's a hard nut to crack. Much as individual property is
> important,
> there is some form of stupidity when, in a city of 2 million people, you
> can't have that ideal freeway because 4 people don't want to sell their
> house.
> Of course many would say we have enough freeways, and a large part of me
> very much agrees with that pretty strongly...
>
> I am to some degree torn between the greater good, and the cherished
> private
> property.
>
> That being said, I wouldn't for a moment count a shopping mall as that
> important.
> I think you can fit the shopping malls in between everything else. A
> freeway,
> or a train line, or something like that, sometimes there's no choice, but
> a friggin' shopping mall, or a hotel complex? I mean what's with that.
> That
> does sound impressively like somebody wanting to make money.
>
> There are times though when a very small number of people can
> inconvenience
> a very large number of people in ways that I don't necessarily think are
> morally right. As I said, I don't think the desperate consumer need for
> shopping
> malls fits into this though.
>
> It is also possible that I don't understand the desire/need some people
> have
> to stay in one place. Indeed I'd openly say that I don't understand that
> at all. I tend to think it's refreshing to move, and I tend to think
> people
> who don't move would probably be pleasantly surprised and refreshed if
> they
> were forced to move (assuming they moved somewhere nice). Maybe I just
> don't
> understand people who don't want to move for whatever reason.
>
> Still, like I said, I wouldn't make anyone move for a shopping mall.
>
> Cheers,
> Kim.
>
> "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>I'm a relatively conservative guy, but I have got to say thiscurrent
>>government
>>ha
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Nov 25 06:45:56 PST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01180 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
