OT: Olympic coverage [message #64823] |
Wed, 22 February 2006 21:22 |
Dedric Terry
Messages: 788 Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Apparently tomorrow night, "Canada clashes with Norway in curling".
Ummm...I'm not a curling expert, but have seen it in the Olympics
before...shouldn't that be something like "Canada bumps into Norway in
curling"?
Or maybe "Norway brushes with Canada", or "Canada slides and collides with
Norway"?
Maybe the announcer has never seen curling. Seems to me "clashing" would be
the one move guaranteed to lose the match.
DT
|
|
|
|
Re: OT: Olympic coverage [message #64842 is a reply to message #64832] |
Thu, 23 February 2006 08:25 |
Dedric Terry
Messages: 788 Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
I didn't know you could body check in curling. And why don't the goalies
wear padding?
And really, how bad could a 42lb piece of rock hurt sliding 0.01 miles an
hour on ice? ;-)
I think you have it backwards. Hockey is curly divided by pi, with the
bristles removed from the brushes.
On 2/23/06 2:47 AM, in article ts0rv1hh4fgdl0l50m8g650e5sagif0n4a@4ax.com,
"rick" <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
> ever been hit with a big ass piece of rock mister??? huh huh huh???
> curling is hockey times 10...no make that a bajillion!
>
> On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 22:22:46 -0700, Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Apparently tomorrow night, "Canada clashes with Norway in curling".
>>
>> Ummm...I'm not a curling expert, but have seen it in the Olympics
>> before...shouldn't that be something like "Canada bumps into Norway in
>> curling"?
>>
>> Or maybe "Norway brushes with Canada", or "Canada slides and collides with
>> Norway"?
>>
>> Maybe the announcer has never seen curling. Seems to me "clashing" would be
>> the one move guaranteed to lose the match.
>>
>> DT
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: OT: Olympic coverage [message #64858 is a reply to message #64842] |
Thu, 23 February 2006 11:25 |
rick
Messages: 1976 Registered: February 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
"And why don't the goalies wear padding?"...no lifting in curling.
"I think you have it backwards."...you've been taking to my wife
haven't you.
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 09:25:05 -0700, Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net>
wrote:
>I didn't know you could body check in curling. And why don't the goalies
>wear padding?
>
>And really, how bad could a 42lb piece of rock hurt sliding 0.01 miles an
>hour on ice? ;-)
>
>I think you have it backwards. Hockey is curly divided by pi, with the
>bristles removed from the brushes.
>
>On 2/23/06 2:47 AM, in article ts0rv1hh4fgdl0l50m8g650e5sagif0n4a@4ax.com,
>"rick" <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> ever been hit with a big ass piece of rock mister??? huh huh huh???
>> curling is hockey times 10...no make that a bajillion!
>>
>> On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 22:22:46 -0700, Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Apparently tomorrow night, "Canada clashes with Norway in curling".
>>>
>>> Ummm...I'm not a curling expert, but have seen it in the Olympics
>>> before...shouldn't that be something like "Canada bumps into Norway in
>>> curling"?
>>>
>>> Or maybe "Norway brushes with Canada", or "Canada slides and collides with
>>> Norway"?
>>>
>>> Maybe the announcer has never seen curling. Seems to me "clashing" would be
>>> the one move guaranteed to lose the match.
>>>
>>> DT
>>
|
|
|