|
|
|
Re: Would this system work with Paris? [message #56961 is a reply to message #56954] |
Tue, 16 August 2005 16:17 |
Martin Harrington
Messages: 560 Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
brandon_goodwin@REMOVETHISsbcglobal.net> wrote in message
>> news:43026d39$1@linux...
>>>
There used to be a website that had "current" resale value for just about
>>> any pro audio gear...
>>> Anyone know it?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>That's a disturbing image!
Damn that Mutt Lange! Damn him to hell!
John <no@no.com> wrote:
>While Zep 1 has great depth, it does not have any of the imaging found
>on The Woman In Me.
>
>Cujo wrote:
>> I may sound like a luddite(iI am occused of this often by friends) here,
>> but old Glynn Johns for instance had a left right and center pan control,
>> sounds like Ememrick did too. annd some tape delays, springs and plates.
>> Ok, they probably had some real chambers. I still think Zep 1 and Who's
Next
>> sound amazing. and have "depth"
>> Of course the general public probably thinks they sound old..so what the
>> hell do I know?
>>
>>
>> "Neil" <OIUOIU@OIU.com> wrote:
>>
>>>I don't believe that getting this analytical about something
>>>will necessarly make it sound better. Why do you feel you have
>>>to create a specific space (unless you're trying to match it to
>>>an existing specific space like in Foley work, ADR, replacment
>>>tracks for a live multitrack performance, etc).
>>>
>>>How about this... Imagine what kind of space you'd like to hear
>>>that particular song in, pick one that's close to that in one of
>>>your verb units, then tweak as necessary to your heart's
>>>content - and that's the key, use your heart (emotional
>>>response), not your brain.
>>>
>>>Neil
>>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|