The PARIS Forums


Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Wordclock question
Wordclock question [message #105813] Fri, 05 November 2010 06:28 Go to next message
dnafe is currently offline  dnafe   CANADA
Messages: 390
Registered: February 2009
Senior Member
Without getting into details we have discovered out two MOTU 828's will no longer sync via firewire.

Were looking at buying an RME 9652 to get the audio from the two MOTU converters and a presonus digimax into the computer vial lightpipe

Question is will the master wordclock in the 9652 be able to sync the two MOTUs and the Digimax or will I need to get a master wordclock OR a wordclock splitter / distribution amp box .

If anyone is familiar with this please contact me at dnafe@rogers.com ASAP because this little glitch caught us totally unprepared and as these converters are central to our studio's operation we need a fix ASAP

Thanks
Re: Wordclock question [message #105814 is a reply to message #105813] Fri, 05 November 2010 08:26 Go to previous messageGo to next message
drfrankencopter is currently offline  drfrankencopter   CANADA
Messages: 137
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Don,

I just got a 9652 for my setup. I don't know much about what it can or cannot do, but you're welcome to bring your Motu & digimax to my place and see if they will sync from the 9652's clock.

Cheers

Kris
Re: Wordclock question [message #105815 is a reply to message #105814] Fri, 05 November 2010 09:17 Go to previous message
dnafe is currently offline  dnafe   CANADA
Messages: 390
Registered: February 2009
Senior Member
Hi Kris

According to tech support at RME / MOTU and Presonus they will sync via BNC wordclock possibly without a WC splitter / generator...but more importantly they will also sync via ADAT optical so need for word clock.

Halleluya there is a digital god

hehehe
Previous Topic: Best way to adjust improper gain between two mono tracksn
Next Topic: Looking for an RME 9652
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Nov 22 15:12:26 PST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01615 seconds