Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Nothing surprises me anymore
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Nothing surprises me anymore [message #61741 is a reply to message #61723] |
Thu, 22 December 2005 06:52 |
cujo
Messages: 285 Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
om> wrote:
>>>
>>>FYI, some interesting info about Mac OSX running on a PC.
>>>
>>> http://www.wired.com/news/mac/0,2125,68501,00.html?tw=wn_sto ry_related
>>>
>>>http://osx86project.org/
>>
>Hook the up as Paris sees them. If I'm understanding you correctly, however,
it will be the same hookup , assuming cards C and D are in order below B,
with A on the Bottom.
Rod
"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote:
>
>Hi,
>Merry Christmas to all of you although a little bit early...
>Regarding the intrconnection of 4 cards .
>I connected from like in the manual from first card (slot1) to the last
one
>(slot 5)
>I detect though that card 1 (slot1) is identified as card B, card 4 (slot
>5) is identified as card A (main card)
>So due to someone's last post here should I connect as Paris sees the cards
>or as I see them inside my computer?
>Paris works ok but maybe I am risking or could have more stable setup (nothing
>major though)
>Regards,
>DimitriosYou REBEL!
;-)
"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>The 2400 is a good idea because it's got the same chip form factor. The
2800
>would require a new mobo and the whole point of this is to get this working
>on my existing mobo that isn't meant to be used with the
>Opteron..........first of all, so I don't have to reformat and reload all
ov
>my programs/drivers, second of all, so that I can be
|
|
|
Re: Nothing surprises me anymore [message #61742 is a reply to message #61741] |
Thu, 22 December 2005 06:00 |
justcron
Messages: 330 Registered: May 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
doing something totally
>inappropriate.
>
>
>;o)
>
>
>"erlilo" <erlilo@online.no> wrote in message news:43aa5f43$1@linux...
>> .....what so?-o).... ....if you're first thinking these thoughts, why
not
>> think bigger? Opteron have a 2400 MHz too for socket 939, named 180. For
>the
>> socket 940 you can get a 2800 MHz for about 1500 boxes to use with a cheap
>> Asus SK8N 70$ board, so the brain will have big problems to follow it
up
>> when it comes to speed;-).......
>>
> http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/ProductInformation/0,,30 _118_8825,00.htm
>l
>>
>> Erling
>>
>>
>> "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> skrev i melding
>> news:43aa1971$1@linux...
>> > ...............drop one of these into my ASUS A8V-Deluxe 939 mobo and
>see
>> > what happens?
>> >
>> >
> http://www.mwave.com/mwave/skusearch.hmx?SCriteria=BA22051&a mp;CartID=done&nextl
>> > oc=
>> >
>> > .............I mean, the AMD 64 4200 x 2 is also a socket 939 and, of
>> > course, so is the mobo socket, so barring a bios snafu (entirely
>possible)
>> > mighn't this be possible? It would seem that the AMD 64 4200 X2 would
be
>> > faster since the cores are running at 2200 MHz per processor, but the
>> > Opteron has 2 x 1MB L2 cache and an unlocked multiplier (if accessable
>> > from
>> > the bios) and from what I hear, a better formulation of silicon.
>> >
>> > Hmmmmmm............man I'm tempted. Why don't y'all pass the plate and
>> > send
>> > me one of these?
>> >
>> > ;oD
>> >
>> >
>>
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sun Jan 19 04:20:53 PST 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00908 seconds
|