Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » XP-Me ethernet slow transfer !
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: XP-Me ethernet slow transfer ! [message #57247 is a reply to message #57244] |
Thu, 25 August 2005 09:37   |
Dimitrios
Messages: 1056
Registered: August 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
gt;
>"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@kc.rr.com> wrote in message news:430b42b9$1@linux...
>>
>> John, I was wondering what you thought of the Shiny Box ribbon mics now,
>> after
>> you've had a chance to work with them for a while. Do you have the 23
and
>> the 23c??? I'm pretty interested in getting a ribbon mic, and at these
>> prices,
>> I just may be able to get a pair.
>> Rod
>
>I look forward to your review!
All the best,
Mike
"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote:
>Thank you.
>I have tried DSPFX as plugins and I quite like them, but I am a firmly
>believer that hardware always sounds better than software alone and I have
>read somewhere some time ago that this hardware sounds better than the
>software only.
>Thank you
>Dimitrios
>
>"Mike Audet" <mike@....> wrote in message news:430de2f5$1@linux...
>>
>> Hi Dimitrios,
>>
>> I think this card has the same sound as their DX effects.
>>
>> The "Studio Verb" is smoother than my MPX1, but not as wide sounding.
>There
>> is "motion" in the Lexicon verb that the DSP/FX algo doesn't have.
>>
>> The DSP/FX plugs use very little CPU time. I'd get them instead if you
>want
>> their sound.
>>
>> All the best,
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> "Martin Harrington" <lendan@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>> >Deej used to use one, I think.
>> >--
>> >Martin Harrington
>> >www.lendanear-sound.com
>> >
>> >"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote in message news:430da9b3@linux...
>> >> This in 1997 was a better than PCM-80 sounding reverb, anyone ever
>worked
>> >> with it ?
>> >> Does this work in Me ?
>> >> Regards,
>> >> Dimitrios
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>"David Stadalnik" <Stadalnik@aol.com> wrote:
>
>Does anyone know where I can get my hands on a Instrutional DVD by Nashville
>producer Brian Tankersely? Have looked all around without any luck. Thanks
>David Stadalnik@aol.com
David-
I got your e-mail, and was just about to post right here in the Newsgroup
-- you beat me to it!
I suspect someone here with both a DVD burner and the DVD will be a
|
|
|
|
| Re: XP-Me ethernet slow transfer ! [message #57250 is a reply to message #57247] |
Thu, 25 August 2005 10:15 |
JeffH
Messages: 307
Registered: October 2007
Location: Wamic, OR
|
Senior Member |
|
|
/>
>TCP/IP
>Same cable works fine with two XP PC's...
>Thank you
>Dimitrios
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Mark McDermott" <mark@stateofwail.com>
>Newsgroups: IDEA.EMUEnsoniqPARIS
>Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 6:47 PM
>Subject: Re: XP-Me ethernet slow transfer !
>
>
>>
>> Hi Dimitrios,
>>
>> Many factors can cause this issue. Here are a few questions:
>>
>> 1. What is the physical connection between PC's? Crossover cable, hub,
>switch?
>> If hub or switch, is it a 100BASE-TX device?
>>
>> 2. What network protocols are installed? NetBEUI, TCP/IP, other?
>>
>> 3. Have you tried a different cable and is the cable you're using Cat-5
or
>> better?
>>
>> Please let me know how you're configured and I'll try to help.
>>
>> Good luck!
>>
>> Mark
>>
>> "Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote:
>> >I wonder why there is an extremely slow transfer beetween XP and Me via
>> lan.
>> >I use ethernet cards at 100 and at 1000 but same results.
>> >I tried to make either one master and or slave but same results...
>> >Any tip ?
>> >Regards,
>> >Dimitrios
>> >
>> >
>>
>"Mark McDermott" <mark@stateofwail.com> wrote in message
>news:430de82d$1@linux...
>>
>> Hi Dimitrios,
>>
>> Many factors can cause this issue. Here are a few questions:
>>
>> 1. What is the physical connection between PC's? Crossover cable, hub,
>switch?
>> If hub or switch, is it a 100BASE-TX device?
>>
>> 2. What network protocols are installed? NetBEUI, TCP/IP, other?
>>
>> 3. Have you tried a different cable and is the cable you're using Cat-5
or
>> better?
>>
>> Please let me know how you're configured and I'll try to help.
>>
>> Good luck!
>>
>> Mark
>>
>> "Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote:
>> >I wonder why there is an extremely slow transfer beetween XP and Me via
>> lan.
>> >I use ethernet cards at 100 and at 1000 but same results.
>> >I tried to make either one master and or slave but same results...
>> >Any tip ?
>> >Regards,
>> >Dimitrios
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>I can.. shoot me an email:
aaron AT allen dOt net
AA
"David Stadalnik" <Stadalnik@aol.com> wrote in message
news:430df3cd$1@linux...
>
> Does anyone know where I can get my hands on a Instrutional DVD by
> Nashville
> producer Brian Tankersely? Have looked all around without any luck.
> Thanks
> David Stadalnik@aol.comDoug had one of these and maybe still uses it. I'm sure he'll answer your
post when he get's back from Scottsdale later this week or has the chance
to check in
Mike.
"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote:
>This in 1997 was a better than PCM-80 sounding reverb,
|
|
|
|
| Re: XP-Me ethernet slow transfer ! [message #57256 is a reply to message #57247] |
Thu, 25 August 2005 15:55 |
Mark McDermott
Messages: 204
Registered: February 2006
Location: Portland, OR
|
Senior Member |
|
|
A href=3D"mailto:y@s">y@s</A> t a n d i n g h a m p =
t o n.c o=20
m> wrote:<BR>>John,<BR>><BR>>How much gain do these seem =
to=20
require? I'm wondering if my existing pre<BR><BR>>amps would work =
or if I'd=20
need to get some super high gain=20
=
units.<BR>><BR>>Thanks,<BR>><BR>>Tony <BR>><BR>><BR>>=
"Rod=20
Lincoln" <<A =
href=3D"mailto:rlincoln@kc.rr.com">rlincoln@kc.rr.com</A>>=20
wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:430b42b9$1@linux">news:430b42b9$1@linux</A>...<BR>>><B=
R>>>=20
John, I was wondering what you thought of the Shiny Box ribbon mics=20
now,<BR><BR>>> after<BR>>> you've had a chance to work =
with them=20
for a while. Do you have the 23<BR>and<BR>>> the 23c??? I'm =
pretty=20
interested in getting a ribbon mic, and at these<BR><BR>>>=20
prices,<BR>>> I just may be able to get a pair.<BR>>> Rod=20
<BR>><BR>><BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML >
------=_NextPart_000_0024_01C5A9C8.E3D270E0--Illuminating -- thanks (I wouldn't know how to begin to do a test like
that).
Learned a thing or two in this thread anyway , thanks all.
Chas.
On 23 Aug 2005 09:15:58 +1000, "Mike Audet" <mike@MikeF-SPAMAudet.com>
wrote:
>
>I did a lot of testing in this area. Here's what I found:
>
>Windows XP can do somewhat tight MIDI timing as long as it does nothin else.
> As soon as the system gets loaded down with say...dxis, you're doomed.
>PCI cards are twice as good as USB with the system loaded down, but are still
>nowhere near good enough (PCI 10ms drift, USB 20 ms drift)
>
>Windows 98/Me with WDM MIDI drivers for USB/PCI/ or ISA Midi ports - same
>as Windows XP. Not good enough at all if the PC is doing anything else.
>
>Windows 98/ME with 16 bit drivers - awesome. less than 1ms drift. Unfortunately,
>16 bit drivers come with ISA cards only. It's not the ISA bus that brings
>the magic, it's the 16 bit drivers.
>
>I hope this helps.
>Mike
>
>"Aaron Allen" <nospam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>>
>>"Chas. Duncan" <duncan5199ATsbcglobalDOTnet@> wrote in message
>>news:bkmeg1h5224tb2h7peon47kslmgk3t9vq7@4ax.com...
>>........
>>>
>>> Seems like such a caveman problem to be having these days -- I mean,
>>> people had this nailed in 1987 -- where did we go wrong?
>>
>>We started using USB for midi, that's where we went wrong. IMHO, midi has
>no
>>business at all on that bus. Unfortunately, MS has little regard for the
>
>>sanctity of exact timing, so the PCI bus is not much different, though a
>bit
>>better. Now it's all up to the software to make it work right or not,
>>whereas cards like the infamous MQX-32 were ROCK solid performers.... too
>
>>bad those are all ISA slots, just try finding a place to plant one of these
>
>>(or drivers in Win2k/XP to run it).
>><
|
|
|
|
| Re: XP-Me ethernet slow transfer ! [message #57267 is a reply to message #57256] |
Fri, 26 August 2005 05:28 |
Dimitrios
Messages: 1056
Registered: August 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
/>
>
> > As for IP addresses I chose 192.168.0.1 for Xp and 192.168.0.2 for Me.
>
> What do you have set up for the gateway?
>
> How are you connecting? net mount or folder browsing? If you can see
the
> other machine to begin with, your configuration is probably ok and I would
> focus on whatevers between the two network cards.
>
>Thanks DJ,
For the time you took to analyze this so deep...
Regards,
Dimitrios
"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote in message
news:430f10e7$1@linux...
> I have one in an old computer that is running Win 98 (first edition). this
> computer is also running a Lexicon Core 32. I use this computer as a
> standalone FX processor with the digital and analog I/O of both cards
routed
> to digital/analog patchbays which can be routed to either Paris or my DAW
> running Cubase SX. The DSP/FX card works nicely in this machine. I don't
> know if it will work with Win ME.
>
> The DSP/FX card is a one trick pony in that only one of the many FX can be
> used at the same time. I primarily use this DSP/FX card if I need a pitch
> shifter/harmonizer/chorus. It has some nice ones. It also has a pretty
> aggressive bus limiter and the EQ is decent too.
>
> The only reverb implemented for this card is the *Acoustiverb*. The
> Studioverb (which sounds reminiscent of a Lexicon and is bundled with
their
> DX version) sounds a bit more dense. I like the Acoustiverb OK. though
it's
> a bit *tinny* to my ears. There's definitely a place for this as opposed
to
> the thick/ muddy texture of a Lexicon reverb. This card is discreet stereo
> so that gives it an advantage over older Lexicon units that are mono
> in/stereo out if you're needing discreet stereo.
>
> If I was needing a reverb, didn't need *true* stereo and was going to
choose
> between this old DSP/FX card and an Alesis Wedge (another *dead* reverb
> device I have here that can be purchased for around $100.00 US on EBay)
I'll
> reach for the Wedge just about every time. The Wedge is maybe the biggest
> bargain there is as far as lush sounding reverbs are concerned, IMHO,
though
> it's mono in/stereo out.
>
> I think DSP/FX still sells these, though last time I looked they were
still
> asking $300.00 US for one. For $300.00 US, you can get a lot more
> bang-for-the buck these days. If you're looking for a *high end* hardware
> bargain, I'd spend a little more and find a Sony V77. It's a great piece
of
> work, though, make sure it's got the pigtail for the digital I/O. They
don't
> make them any more and they are *really* hard to find on the after market
> AFAIK.
>
> Deej
>
> Deej
> "Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote in message news:430da9b3@linux...
> > This in 1997 was a better than PCM-80 sounding reverb, anyone ever
worked
> > with it ?
> > Does this work in Me ?
> > Regards,
> > Dimitrios
> >
> >
>
>If your XP drives are formatted NTFS, your ME system will not be able to see
them. I format all drives in my XP machine using the FAT 32 protocall so
that my Paris DAW (running Win ME) can access them.
I'm networking ME and XP. My ME machine has Gigabit LAN, the XP machine has
10/100. The transfer rates don't seem that slow to me but if both machines
were on Gigabit, things would probably be faster.
If I was using Wormhole, I'd be running Gigabit LAN, but then I'd also be
using XP on my Paris rig too since I (theroetically) wouldn't need to be
using ADAT cards to interface with my Cubase SX computer.
Deej
"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote in message news:430f1f17@linux...
> Hi,
> The same setup works fine with two xp's
> As per Gateway ,nothing I don't really know what to do with it...
> The xp computer can browse the Me drives.
> I cannot though explore the Xp drives from within Mellenium, yet...
> Thanks
> Dimitrios
>
> "justcron" <justcron@hydrorecords.compound> wrote in message
> news:430f11f4@linux...
> >
> > "Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote in message news:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Thu Dec 12 20:39:25 PST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02520 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
