Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » free FTP sight???? or cheap???
| free FTP sight???? or cheap??? [message #57101] |
Sat, 20 August 2005 11:22  |
Rod Lincoln
Messages: 883
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
br />
Wjb+JIWjASGRzjrtzXY/ENnn8B6oAsaKoGVA5HPavPPDShYIzIucpya6qmAV WfvM5/rTpLQ1
v7f9LOU+22kbXp+i6fL9afhPOb5uF6H1pu5RIeeBR/ZFNaXM/wC05Df7avT8 0enufrUcuq6s
x4suvqatCbA7e1L5oOCSR71X9k0dyP7QqPVFFL3WWUqIolz2zTjd+IANpijF PEsa3A44+tWH
vIF
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: free FTP sight???? or cheap??? [message #57176 is a reply to message #57170] |
Tue, 23 August 2005 07:45  |
Rod Lincoln
Messages: 883
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
;
>Oh, and my brother hasn't touched it, so it can't be him... ;o)
>
>Cheers,
>Kim.Anybody got one of the Apogee Mini Me units with USB? I am thinking of
getting one($1,225 at Washington Professional)...I mainly wonder about the
sound of the Mic Pre's.....thanksHi John,
Just curious which Royers your comparing them to.I've got an
SF-12.Comparing them to Royers is pretty impressive especially at
that price.
Pete
"John Macy" <spamlessjohn@johnmacy.com> wrote:
>
>I have a pair of the new 46's and a stock
>23. I am loving the 46's--have used them
>on electric guitars (sound great, equally
>as good as my Royers), acoustic guitars
>(a very nice wood sound), and just used
>them as room mics on a drum kit and they
>killed. I have used the 23 on all of the
>above with similar results. My next step
>is to get the Cinemag transformer for the
>23 and see what that does. I'll leave the
>46's stock.
>
>For that kind of money, they are a steal...
>
>Be sure and tell him you heard of them though
&
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: free FTP sight???? or cheap??? [message #57190 is a reply to message #57178] |
Tue, 23 August 2005 20:13 |
Rod Lincoln
Messages: 883
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Does anyone know of an online (free) ftp sight to post files??
>>>>>>>> It need to have around 300 to 400 meg per file capability.
>>>>>>>> I've been using yousendit...but it's gotten kind of hit and miss
>>>>>>>> lately
>>>>>>
>>>>>> with
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> it's reliability recently.
>>>>>>>> rod
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rod,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've been using www.whalemail.com so far, so good.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Craig M.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>W2k servers makes me a bit nervous. They should be at 2k3 by now, and
there's good reason for that.
http://news.google.com/news?q=windows+2000+vulnerability& ;hl=en&lr=&sa=N&tab=nn&oi=newsr
NOTE: It also mentions that XP users are vulnerable if you are not up to SP2
and have a guest account enabled. ____Patch those holes on your net machine
guys.____
''' Also vulnerable are systems that run Windows XP with SP1 with file and
printer sharing and the Windows guest user account enabled, according to
Microsoft. '''
AA
"W. Mark Wilson" <Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
| Re: free FTP sight???? or cheap??? [message #57191 is a reply to message #57190] |
Tue, 23 August 2005 20:50 |
Craig Mitchell
Messages: 20
Registered: July 2005
|
Junior Member |
|
|
blank">wmarkwilson@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:430bf920@linux...
> Readyhosting.com. Used them for 4 years. Always up, good support, easy
> setup, 99 bucks per year when I was there, 500 megs, no transfer limit,
> w2k servers, unlimited email, Admin and user profiles/priveleges, on and
> on.
>
> W. Mark Wilson
>
> "Craig Mitchell" <camitchell@cfl.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:BF3166B4.150D3%camitchell@cfl.rr.com...
>>
>> Opps, I didn't catch the free part. Sorry.
>>
>> However, $25 a month for 500mb is cheap, IMO, to send files securely with
>> reasonably fast download speeds. Considering it can scale up or down to
>> your
>> needs at the moment, it's not a bad deal....
>>
>> by the way, that is a 500mb file size at a time you can load onto the
>> server, That is not a monthly use limit.
>>
>> However, If you guys come across something cheaper, faster, more reliable
>> and easier to use, I'd love to know about it. Seriously.
>>
>> Craig
>>
>>
>>
>> in article 430be5df@linux, Rod Lincoln at rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com wrote
>> on
>> 8/23/05 11:13 PM:
>>
>>>
>>> so.....you got any???
>>> Rod
>>> John <no@no.com> wrote:
>>>> yes they are
>>>>
>>>> Rod Lincoln wrote:
>>>>> suggestions are always welcome
>>>>> rod
>>>>> John <no@no.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> 10mb is too small for me personally and $75/year is not cheap
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rod Lincoln wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thanks!
>>>>>>> Craig Mitchell <camitchell@cfl.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> in article 430774d1$1@linux, Rod Lincoln at
>>>>>>>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: free FTP sight???? or cheap??? [message #57193 is a reply to message #57191] |
Tue, 23 August 2005 21:35 |
wmarkwilson
Messages: 114
Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
arget="_blank">wmarkwilson@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:430bf920@linux...
>> Readyhosting.com. Used them for 4 years. Always up, good support, easy
>> setup, 99 bucks per year when I was there, 500 megs, no transfer limit,
>> w2k servers, unlimited email, Admin and user profiles/priveleges, on and
>> on.
>>
>> W. Mark Wilson
>>
>> "Craig Mitchell" <camitchell@cfl.rr.com> wrote in message
>> news:BF3166B4.150D3%camitchell@cfl.rr.com...
>>>
>>> Opps, I didn't catch the free part. Sorry.
>>>
>>> However, $25 a month for 500mb is cheap, IMO, to send files securely
>>> with
>>> reasonably fast download speeds. Considering it can scale up or down to
>>> your
>>> needs at the moment, it's not a bad deal....
>>>
>>> by the way, that is a 500mb file size at a time you can load onto the
>>> server, That is not a monthly use limit.
>>>
>>> However, If you guys come across something cheaper, faster, more
>>> reliable
>>> and easier to use, I'd love to know about it. Seriously.
>>>
>>> Craig
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> in article 430be5df@linux, Rod Lincoln at rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com
>>> wrote on
>>> 8/23/05 11:13 PM:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> so.....you got any???
>>>> Rod
>>>> John <no@no.com> wrote:
>>>>> yes they are
>>>>>
>>>>> Rod Lincoln wrote:
>>>>>> suggestions are always welcome
>>>>>> rod
>>>>>> John <no@no.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 10mb is too small for me personally and $75/year is not cheap
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rod Lincoln wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> thanks!
>>>>>>>> Craig Mitchell <camitchell@cfl.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> in article 430774d1$1@linux, Rod Lincoln at
>>>>>>>>> rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> wrote
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> on 8/20/05 2:22 PM:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Does anyone know of an online (free) ftp sight to post files??
>>>>>>>>>> It need to have around 300 to 400 meg per file capability.
>>>>>>>>>> I've been using yousendit...but it's gotten kind of hit and miss
|
|
|
|
| Re: free FTP sight???? or cheap??? [message #57194 is a reply to message #57193] |
Tue, 23 August 2005 22:51 |
Aaron Allen
Messages: 1988
Registered: May 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>>>>>>>>>> lately
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> it's reliability recently.
>>>>>>>>>> rod
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Rod,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I've been using www.whalemail.com so far, so good.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Craig M.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>2K was never immune to any of the other 300 virii to be released on the net
per month in the last 5 years, not to specifically mention any of the
notoriously malicious ones. Readyhosting never went down and I've never
seen them off the air at any time in 4 years. I'm not certain they are
still 2k servers.... maybe newer now. Check the site.
By the way, and completely OT: cool tip for windows users: type the unique
portion of any known url in the IE url line. Example, >rodlincoln< then
simple hit CTRL+ENTER and IE will add >www.< to the front and >.com< to
the end and send the query. FYI.
Dubya
"Aaron Allen" <nospam@not_here.dude> wrote in message news:430c0d9d@linux...
> More on the ZOTOB and WinXP status:
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/906574.ms px
>
>
>
> "Aaron Allen" <nospam@not_here.dude> wrote in message
> news:430c0afa@linux...
>> W2k servers makes me a bit nervous. They should be at 2k3 by now, and
>> there's good reason for that.
>>
>> http://news.google.com/news?q=windows+2000+vulnerability& ;hl=en&lr=&sa=N&tab=nn&oi=newsr
>>
>> NOTE: It also mentions that XP users are vulnerable if you are not up to
>> SP2 and have a guest account enabled. ____Patch those holes on your net
>> machine guys.____
>>
>> ''' Also vulnerable are systems that run Windows XP with SP1 with file
>> and printer sharing and the Windows guest user account enabled, according
>> to Microsoft. '''
>>
>> AA
>>
>> "W. Mark Wilson" <wmarkwilson@verizon.net> wrote in message
>> news:430bf920@linux...
>>> Readyhosting.com. Used them for 4 years. Always up, good support, easy
>>> setup, 99 bucks per year when I was there, 500 megs, no transfer limit,
>>> w2k servers, unlimited email, Admin and user profiles/priveleges, on and
>>> on.
>>>
>>> W. Mark Wilson
>>>
>>> "Craig Mitchell" <camitchell@cfl.rr.com> wrote in message
>>> news:BF3166B4.150D3%camitchell@cfl.rr.com...
>>>>
>>>> Opps, I didn't catch the free part. Sorry.
>>>>
>>>> However, $25 a month for 500mb is cheap, IMO, to send files securely
>>>> with
>>>> reasonably fast download speeds. Considering it can scale up or down to
>>>> your
>>>> needs at the moment, it's not a bad deal....
>>>>
>>>> by the way, that is a 500mb file size at a time you can load onto the
>>>> server, That is not a monthly use limit.
>>>>
>>>> However, If you guys come across something cheaper, faster, more
>>>> reliable
>>>> and easier to use, I'd love to know about it. Seriously.
>>>>
>>>> Craig
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> in article 430be5df@linux, Rod Lincoln at Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
| Re: free FTP sight???? or cheap??? [message #57195 is a reply to message #57194] |
Tue, 23 August 2005 23:02 |
Aaron Allen
Messages: 1988
Registered: May 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
.com" target="_blank">rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com
>>>> wrote on
>>>> 8/23/05 11:13 PM:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> so.....you got any???
>>>>> Rod
>>>>> John <no@no.com> wrote:
>>>>>> yes they are
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rod Lincoln wrote:
>>>>>>> suggestions are always welcome
>>>>>>> rod
>>>>>>> John <no@no.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 10mb is too small for me personally and $75/year is not cheap
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Rod Lincoln wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> thanks!
>>>>>>>>> Craig Mitchell <camitchell@cfl.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> in article 430774d1$1@linux, Rod Lincoln at
>>>>>>>>>> rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wrote
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> on 8/20/05 2:22 PM:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Does anyone know of an online (free) ftp sight to post files??
>>>>>>>>>>> It need to have around 300 to 400 meg per file capability.
>>>>>>>>>>> I've been using yousendit...but it's gotten kind of hit and miss
>>>>>>>>>>> lately
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> it's reliability recently.
>>>>>>>>>>> rod
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Rod,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I've been using www.whalemail.com so far, so good.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Craig M.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>nah.... win2k is still more stable than 2k3... just gotta keep it patched
up... regardless of version
"Aaron Allen" <nospam@not_here.dude> wrote in message news:430c0afa@linux...
> W2k servers makes me a bit nervous. They should be at 2k3 by now, and
> there's good reason for that.
>
> http://news.google.com/news?q=windows+2000+vulnerability& ;hl=en&lr=&sa=N&tab=nn&oi=newsr
>
> NOTE: It also mentions that XP users are vulnerable if you are not up to
> SP2 and have a guest account enabled. ____Patch those holes on your net
> machine guys.____
>
> ''' Also vulnerable are systems that run Windows XP with SP1 with file and
> printer sharing and the Windows guest user account enabled, according to
> Microsoft. '''
>
> AA
>
> "W. Mark Wilson" <wmarkwilson@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:430bf920@linux...
>> Readyhosting.com. Used them for 4 years. Always up, good support, easy
>> setup, 99 bucks per year when I was there, 500 megs, no transfer limit,
>> w2k servers, unlimited email, Admin and user profiles/priveleges, on and
>> on.
>>
>> W. Mark Wilson
>>
>> "Craig Mitchell" <camitchell@cfl.rr.com> wrote in message
>> news:BF3166B4.150D3%camitchell@cfl.rr.com...
>>>
>>> Opps, I didn't catch the free part. Sorry.
>>>
>>> However, $25 a month for 500mb is cheap, IMO, to send files securely
>>> with
>>> reasonably fast download speeds. Considering it can scale up or down to
>>> your
>>> needs at the moment, it's not a bad deal....
>>>
>>> by the way, that is a 500mb file size at a time you can load onto the
>>> server, That is not a monthly use limit.
>>>
>>> However, If you guys come across something cheaper, faster, more
>>> reliable
>>> and easier to use, I'd love to know about it. Seriously.
>>>
>>> Craig
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> in a
|
|
|
|
| Re: free FTP sight???? or cheap??? [message #57196 is a reply to message #57195] |
Wed, 24 August 2005 00:00 |
wmarkwilson
Messages: 114
Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
rticle 430be5df@linux, Rod Lincoln at rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com
>>> wrote on
>>> 8/23/05 11:13 PM:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> so.....you got any???
>>>> Rod
>>>> John <no@no.com> wrote:
>>>>> yes they are
>>>>>
>>>>> Rod Lincoln wrote:
>>>>>> suggestions are always welcome
>>>>>> rod
>>>>>> John <no@no.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 10mb is too small for me personally and $75/year is not cheap
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rod Lincoln wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> thanks!
>>>>>>>> Craig Mitchell <camitchell@cfl.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> in article 430774d1$1@linux, Rod Lincoln at
>>>>>>>>> rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> wrote
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> on 8/20/05 2:22 PM:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Does anyone know of an online (free) ftp sight to post files??
>>>>>>>>>> It need to have around 300 to 400 meg per file capability.
>>>>>>>>>> I've been using yousendit...but it's gotten kind of hit and miss
>>>>>>>>>> lately
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> it's reliability recently.
>>>>>>>>>> rod
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Rod,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I've been using www.whalemail.com so far, so good.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Craig M.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>That's it...It's gone..
Graig West of Crave Music studios made me an offer I couldn't refuse.
Makes sense really.
I haven't used it in well over a year, and when I did, I wasn't really using
it's full potential, only recording Voice overs and mixing to picture.
It's now gone to a new loving home, where hopefully it's full potential will
be unleashed
Good luck with it Craig, put it to good use.
I'll still be here though, checking in as often as before, but only as an
observer, not user
--
Martin Harrington
www.lendanear-sound.comI used readyhosting for a couple of years - however, these days, I believe
that GoDaddy has the best bang for the buck. 500mb for around $38/year. You
can also add 100mb to that for $10 more.
www.godaddy.com
-Carl
"W. Mark Wilson" <wmarkwilson@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:430bf920@linux...
> Readyhosting.com. Used them for 4 years. Always up, good support, easy
> setup, 99 bucks per year when I was there, 500 megs, no transfer limit,
w2k
> servers, unlimited email, Admin and user profiles/priveleges, on and on.
>
> W. Mark Wilson
>
> "Craig Mitchell" <camitchell@cfl.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:BF3166B4.150D3%camitchell@cfl.rr.com...
> >
> > Opps, I didn't catch the free part. Sorry.
> >
> > However, $25 a month for 500mb is cheap, IMO, to send files securely
with
> > reasonably fast download speeds. Considering it can scale up or down to
> > your
> > needs at the moment, it's not a bad deal....
> >
> > by the way, that is a 500mb file size at a time you can load onto the
> > server, That is not a monthly use limit.
> >
> > However, If you guys come across something cheaper, faster, more
reliable
> > and easier to use, I'd love to know about it. Seriously.
> >
> > Craig
> >
> >
> >
> > in article 430be5df@linux, Rod Lincoln at rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com
wrote
> > on
> > 8/23/05 11:13 PM:
> >
> >>
> >> so.....you got any???
> >> Rod
> >> John <no@no.com> wrote:
> >>> yes they are
> >>>
> >>> Rod Lincoln wrote:
> >>>> suggestions are always welcome
> >>>> rod
> >>>> John <no@no.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> 10mb is too small for me personally and $75/year is not cheap
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Rod Lincoln wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> thanks!
> >>>>>> Craig Mitchell <camitchell@cfl.rr.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> in article 430774d1$1@linux, Rod Lincoln at
> >>>>>>> rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com
> >>>>
> >>>> wrote
> >>>>
> >>>>>>> on 8/20/05 2:22 PM:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Does anyone know of an online (free) ftp sight to post files??
> >
|
|
|
|
| Re: free FTP sight???? or cheap??? [message #57197 is a reply to message #57194] |
Wed, 24 August 2005 00:39 |
justcron
Messages: 330
Registered: May 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
;>>>>>>> It need to have around 300 to 400 meg per file capability.
> >>>>>>>> I've been using yousendit...but it's gotten kind of hit and miss
> >>>>>>>> lately
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> with
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> it's reliability recently.
> >>>>>>>> rod
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Rod,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I've been using www.whalemail.com so far, so good.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Craig M.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >
>
>I'd love to hear what sort of stuff you pick up in this area - a lot of
these thoughts about mixing have also been running through my head.
Cheers
-Markus
"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote in message
news:43040e9f@linux...
> get an education. Glad he's a nice guy. I'll probably be learning a lot
from
> him.
> Lots ot learn.
>
> ;o)
>
>
> "gene lennon" <glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com> wrote in message
> news:43017d6c$1@linux...
> >
> > "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
> > >I'm needing to get pretty anal retentive with this stuff these days...
> > >Deej
> > >
> >
> > Well.
> > I have worked with many producers and mix engineers over the years that
do
> > sweat the details, including sound stage.
> > M/S.
> > Binaural.
> > X/Y.
> > These exist because people consider the stereo imaging and sound stage
> important.
> > Obviously this is not the most critical issue in typical, modern, radio
> driven
> > productions, but that does not equate to being meaningless.
> > I love recording in true stereo (primarily M/S) whenever it seems
> appropriate.
> >
> > Trying to control the sound stage "after the fact" is a completely
> different
> > animal but again, the details do add up.
> > I have been playing around a little with GigaPulse, the convolution
reverb
> > that comes with Giga3, and now available separately. With multiple
> instances,
> > you can create a very controlled and convincing 3D soundstages that you
> actually
> > can adjust during mixdown. This reminds me a little of using the Calrec
> Soundfield
> > (the ultimate mic for post recording control of sound stage.)
> >
> > The new generation of hardware and software phase correction systems
also
> > opens up new possibilities. As an example: If you record a small
acoustic
> > ensemble with M/S, you should be able to add spot mics and "correct" the
> > phase relationship after the fact. I have not had a chance to try this
> yet,
> > but I hope to soon.
> > (PhaseTone from Tritone is out now and free.)
> > http://www.tritonedigital.com/products.htm
> > Gene
> >
>
>Martin, you've been using Nuendo? is that correct?
Rod
"Martin Harrington" <lendan@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>That's it...It's gone..
>
>Graig West of Crave Music studios made me an offer I couldn't refuse.
>
>Makes sense really.
>
>I haven't used it in well over a year, and when I did, I wasn't really using
>it's full potential, only recording Voice overs and mixing to picture.
>
>It's now gone to a new loving home, where hopefully it's full potential
will
>be unleashed
>Good luck with it Craig, put it to good use.
>
>I'll still be here though, checking in as often as before, but only as an
>observer, not user
>--
>Martin Harrington
>www.lendanear-sound.com
>
>Yes, I have Rod
For my purposes, it's ideal, especially for video sync
Also surround facility, which I'm about to expolore.
--
Martin Harrington
www.lendanear-sound.com
"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:430c6c37$1@linux...
>
> Martin, you've been using Nuendo? is that correct?
> Rod
> "Martin Harrington" <lendan@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>>That's it...It's gone..
>>
>>Graig West of Crave Music studios made me an offer I couldn't refuse.
>>
>>Makes sense really.
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: free FTP sight???? or cheap??? [message #57199 is a reply to message #57193] |
Wed, 24 August 2005 02:37 |
Carl Amburn
Messages: 214
Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
br />
>>
>>
>Hey...cool tip! Thanks!
"W. Mark Wilson" <wmarkwilson@verizon.net> wrote:
>2K was never immune to any of the other 300 virii to be released on the
net
>per month in the last 5 years, not to specifically mention any of the
>notoriously malicious ones. Readyhosting never went down and I've never
>seen them off the air at any time in 4 years. I'm not certain they are
>still 2k servers.... maybe newer now. Check the site.
>
>By the way, and completely OT: cool tip for windows users: type the unique
>portion of any known url in the IE url line. Example, >rodlincoln< then
>simple hit CTRL+ENTER and IE will add >www.< to the front and >.com<
to
>the end and send the query. FYI.
>
>Dubya
>
>"Aaron Allen" <nospam@not_here.dude> wrote in message news:430c0d9d@linux...
>> More on the ZOTOB and WinXP status:
>>
>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/906574.ms px
>>
>>
>>
>> "Aaron Allen" <nospam@not_here.dude> wrote in message
>> news:430c0afa@linux...
>>> W2k servers makes me a bit nervous. They should be at 2k3 by now, and
>>> there's good reason for that.
>>>
>>> http://news.google.com/news?q=windows+2000+vulnerability& ;hl=en&lr=&sa=N&tab=nn&oi=newsr
>>>
>>> NOTE: It also mentions that XP users are vulnerable if you are not up
to
>>> SP2 and have a guest account enabled. ____Patch those holes on your net
>>> machine guys.____
>>>
>>> ''' Also vulnerable are systems that run Windows XP with SP1 with file
>>> and printer sharing and the Windows guest user account enabled, according
>>> to Microsoft. '''
>>>
>>> AA
>>>
>>> "W. Mark Wilson" <wmarkwilson@verizon.net> wrote in message
>>> news:430bf920@linux...
>>>> Readyhosting.com. Used them for 4 years. Always up, good support,
easy
>>>> setup, 99 bucks per year when I was there, 500 megs, no transfer limit,
>>>> w2k servers, unlimited email, Admin and user profiles/priveleges, on
and
>>>> on.
>>>>
>>>> W. Mark Wilson
>>>>
>>>> "Craig Mitchell" <camitchell@cfl.rr.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:BF3166B4.150D3%camitchell@cfl.rr.com...
>>>>>
>>>>> Opps, I didn't catch the free part. Sorry.
>>>>>
>>>>> However, $25 a month for 500mb is cheap, IMO, to send files securely
>>>>> with
>>>>> reasonably fast download speeds. Considering it can scale up or down
to
>>>>> your
>>>>> needs at the moment, it's not a bad deal....
>>>>>
>>>>> by the way, that is a 500mb file size at a time you can load onto the
>>>>> server, That is not a monthly use limit.
>>>>>
>>>>> However, If you guys come across something cheaper, faster, more
>>>>> reliable
>>>>> and easier to use, I'd love to know about it. Seriously.
>>>>>
>>>>> Craig
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> in article Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
| Re: free FTP sight???? or cheap??? [message #57203 is a reply to message #57196] |
Wed, 24 August 2005 05:53 |
Rod Lincoln
Messages: 883
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
g at 2 gig of storage.
Yousendit is great for that, and totally free, but the upload times are pretty
slow and it doesn't always work. Hence the reason for my question.
Rod
Craig Mitchell <camitchell@cfl.rr.com> wrote:
>
>Opps, I didn't catch the free part. Sorry.
>
>However, $25 a month for 500mb is cheap, IMO, to send files securely with
>reasonably fast download speeds. Considering it can scale up or down to
your
>needs at the moment, it's not a bad deal....
>
>by the way, that is a 500mb file size at a time you can load onto the
>server, That is not a monthly use limit.
>
>However, If you guys come across something cheaper, faster, more reliable
>and easier to use, I'd love to know about it. Seriously.
>
>Craig
>
>
>
>in article 430be5df@linux, Rod Lincoln at rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com wrote
on
>8/23/05 11:13 PM:
>
>>
>> so.....you got any???
>> Rod
>> John <no@no.com> wrote:
>>> yes they are
>>>
>>> Rod Lincoln wrote:
>>>> suggestions are always welcome
>>>> rod
>>>> John <no@no.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> 10mb is too small for me personally and $75/year is not cheap
>>>>>
>>>>> Rod Lincoln wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks!
>>>>>> Craig Mitchell <camitchell@cfl.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> in article 430774d1$1@linux, Rod Lincoln at rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com
>>>>
>>>> wrote
>>>>
>>>>>>> on 8/20/05 2:22 PM:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Does anyone know of an online (free) ftp sight to post files??
>>>>>>>> It need to have around 300 to 400 meg per file capability.
>>>>>>>> I've been using yousendit...but it's gotten kind of hit and miss
lately
>>>>>>
>>>>>> with
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> it's reliability recently.
>>>>>>>> rod
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rod,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've been using www.whalemail.com so far, so good.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Craig M.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>The cheapest I've been able to find is http://shieldhost.com/
Quality hosting at a lost cost at http://hostrocket.com (can you say
rollover bandwidth!)
"Carl Amburn" <carlamburn@hotNOSPAMmail.com> wrote in message
news:430c3ecd$1@linux...
>I used readyhosting for a couple of years - however, these days, I believe
> that GoDaddy has the best bang for the buck. 500mb for around $38/year.
> You
> can also add 100mb to that for $10 more.
>
> www.godaddy.com
>
> -Carl
>
> "W. Mark Wilson" <wmarkwilson@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:430bf920@linux...
>> Readyhosting.com. Used them for 4 years. Always up, good support, easy
>> setup, 99 bucks per year when I was there, 500 megs, no transfer limit,
> w2k
>> servers, unlimited email, Admin and user profiles/priveleges, on and on.
>>
>> W. Mark Wilson
>>
>> "Craig Mitchell" <camitchell@cfl.rr.com> wrote in message
>> news:BF3166B4.150D3%camitchell@cfl.rr.com...
>> >
>> > Opps, I didn't catch the free part. Sorry.
>> >
>> > However, $25 a month for 500mb is cheap, IMO, to send files securely
> with
>> > reasonably fast download speeds. Considering it can scale up or down to
>> > your
>> > needs at the moment, it's not a bad deal....
>> >
>> > by the way, that is a 500mb file size at a time you can load onto the
>> > server, That is not a monthly use limit.
>> >
>> > However, If you guys come across something cheaper, faster, more
> reliable
>> > and easier to use, I'd love to know about it. Seriously.
>> >
>> > Craig
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > in article 430be5df@linux, Rod Lincoln at rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com
> wrote
>> > on
>> > 8/23/05 11:13 PM:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> so.....you got any???
>> >> Rod
>> >> John <no@no.com> wrote:
>> >>> yes they are
>> >>>
>> >>> Rod Lincoln wrote:
>> >>>> suggestions are always welcome
>> >>>> rod
>> >>>> John <no@no.com> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> 10mb is too small for me personally and $75/year is not cheap
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Rod Lincoln wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> thanks!
>> >>>>>> Craig Mitchell <camitchell@cfl.rr.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> in article 430774d1$1@linux, Rod Lincoln at
>> >>>>>>> rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com
>> >>>>
>> >>>> wrote
>> >>>>
>> >>>>>>> on 8/20/05 2:22 PM:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Does anyone know of an online (free) ftp sight to post files??
>> >>>>>>>> It need to have around 300 to 400 meg per file capability.
>> >>>>>>>>
|
|
|
|
| Re: free FTP sight???? or cheap??? [message #57205 is a reply to message #57191] |
Wed, 24 August 2005 06:02 |
Rod Lincoln
Messages: 883
Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
them to Royers is pretty impressive especially at
>>>that price.
>>>
>>>Pete
>>>
>>>"John Macy" <spamlessjohn@johnmacy.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>I have a pair of the new 46's and a stock
>>>>23. I am loving the 46's--have used them
>>>>on electric guitars (sound great, equally
>>>>as good as my Royers), acoustic guitars
>>>>(a very nice wood sound), and just used
>>>>them as room mics on a drum kit and they
>>>>killed. I have used the 23 on all of the
>>>>above with similar results. My next step
>>>>is to get the Cinemag transformer for the
>>>>23 and see what that does. I'll leave the
>>>>46's stock.
>>>>
>>>>For that kind of money, they are a steal...
>>>>
>>>>Be sure and tell him you heard of them though
>>>>me :).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@kc.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>John, I was wondering what you thought of the Shiny Box ribbon mics
now,
>>>>after
>>>>>you've had a chance to work with them for a while. Do you have the 23
>>and
>>>>>the 23c??? I'm pretty interested in getting a ribbon mic, and at these
>>>prices,
>>>>>I just may be able to get a pair.
>>>>>Rod
>>>>
>>>
>>
>yeah, I was sort of thinking this was as well, I work wiht mostly garage or
Clash ere style punk bands, Big low end does not seem to be there on some
of the stuff.
Now When I produce this particular bands next CD, I am going to make sure
there is a tight kick and bass team, not a mush of missed hits ghost notes
and flabby bass. Then I think, I can put some of the bottom back,
As it is now, It seems to make more of a mess.
Ah the polishing goes on.
>>
>>
>
>I suppose it just boils down to working methodologies. The stuff I'm
>mixing (rock, metal, hardcore)I beat to death on the low end with EQ.
>I'll hack bass guitar at 150 if I have to... fundamentals be damned. Make
>it up in the upper octaves with the overtones. I'm learning how to
>*IMPLY* bass energy without actually using the fundamental tones that you
>would say "Hey, that's a low ass note there" while playing it over 12"
>speakers. Take that same material with all the low-end and play it on
>your boom box and it's all, "Hey, where's the bass guitar?"
>
>Same thing with kick. Brutal. Disgusting at times... but when I ref. it
>against popular program material, I'm right in the game.
>
>Anyshit.. enough about me.
>
>-volthauseThis is the first I've heard of these - are they more of a diamond in the
rough than other typical "bargain" mics? The demos sounded good. They at
least sound like a good deal for the money.
Regards,
Dedric
On 8/24/05 7:26 AM, in article 430c7571$
|
|
|
|
| Re: free FTP sight???? or cheap??? [message #57206 is a reply to message #57199] |
Wed, 24 August 2005 06:07 |
justcron
Messages: 330
Registered: May 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
href="mailto:1@linux" target="_blank">1@linux, "cujo"
<chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com> wrote:
>
>
> I too would love to know, have you used em on crunchy marshall?
>
> Hpoefully I can swing for a pair of 46's before my sext big session.
>
>
> "Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'mn trying to decide whether to get the 23c or the stock 23.
>> What would you say the difference between the 23's and 46's are..sound wise.
>> rod
>> "ohn Macy" <spamlessjohn@johnmacy.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I have the 121's...
>>>
>>> "Pete Ruthenburg" <ruthenburg@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi John,
>>>> Just curious which Royers your comparing them to.I've got an
>>>> SF-12.Comparing them to Royers is pretty impressive especially at
>>>> that price.
>>>>
>>>> Pete
>>>>
>>>> "John Macy" <spamlessjohn@johnmacy.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a pair of the new 46's and a stock
>>>>> 23. I am loving the 46's--have used them
>>>>> on electric guitars (sound great, equally
>>>>> as good as my Royers), acoustic guitars
>>>>> (a very nice wood sound), and just used
>>>>> them as room mics on a drum kit and they
>>>>> killed. I have used the 23 on all of the
>>>>> above with similar results. My next step
>>>>> is to get the Cinemag transformer for the
>>>>> 23 and see what that does. I'll leave the
>>>>> 46's stock.
>>>>>
>>>>> For that kind of money, they are a steal...
>>>>>
>>>>> Be sure and tell him you heard of them though
>>>>> me :).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@kc.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> John, I was wondering what you thought of the Shiny Box ribbon mics
> now,
>>>>> after
>>>>>> you've had a chance to work with them for a while. Do you have the 23
>>> and
>>>>>> the 23c??? I'm pretty interested in getting a ribbon mic, and at these
>>>> prices,
>>>>>> I just may be able to get a pair.
>>>>>> Rod
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>Yes, Nuendo 3
The Comp is a P4 running at 2.2 with (at the moment) 768 mg of ram.
--
Martin Harrington
www.lendanear-sound.com
"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:430c6e35$1@linux...
>
> I thought so. What kind of horsepower machine are you using to run that?
> Is
> it Nuendo 3?
> Rod
> "Martin Harrington" <lendan@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>>Yes, I have Rod
>>For my purposes, it's ideal, especially for video sync
>>Also surround facility, which I'm about to expolore.
>>--
>>Martin Harrington
>>www.lendanear-sound.com
>>
>>"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote in message
>>news:430c6c37$1@linux...
>>>
>>> Martin, you've been using Nuendo? is that correct?
>>> Rod
>>> "Martin Harrington" <lendan@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>>>>That's it...It's gone..
>>>>
>>>>Graig West of Crave Music studios made me an offer I couldn't refuse.
>>>>
>>>>Makes sense really.
>>>>
>>>>I haven't used it in well over a year, and when I did, I wasn't really
>
>>>>using
>>>
>>>>it's full potential, only recording Voice overs and mixing to picture.
>>>>
>>>>It's now gone to a new loving home, where hopefully it's full potential
>>> will
>>>>be unleashed
>>>>Good luck with it Craig, put it to good use.
>>>>
>>>>I'll still be here though, checking in as often as before, but on
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat Dec 21 04:44:28 PST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01337 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
