Partition big audio drives?????? [message #73799] |
Tue, 10 October 2006 12:35 |
Rod Lincoln
Messages: 883 Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
How many of you guys have large audio drives (160 gig or bigger)that partition
them into, oh, say,2 80 gig partitions. The reason I ask, is, I thought the
seek times might be faster if the whole drive wasn't being scanned. Anybody?
I've got my 160 gig audio drive as 1 big partition.
Rod
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Partition big audio drives?????? [message #73866 is a reply to message #73852] |
Wed, 11 October 2006 15:56 |
Rod Lincoln
Messages: 883 Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
thanks...good to know
rod
"deadmeat" <scott@postmodernblues.com> wrote:
>
>I use very large SATA RAID arrays (over 1TB) and can stream with
>very high chnl counts. I think that IDE drives work a little better when
>cut into smaller partitions, but I have seen
>virtually no diff in the SATA configs.
>
>"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>>Ha, that's one I missed then.....I thought I had an epiphany (or whatever).
>>So it works???
>>"John" <no@no.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>I think that's a well known trick. Make a tiny partition (20gb) and use
>>that
>>>to stream audio onto, then copy the files over to your "storage" partition
>>>when done. Or just have a tiny hard drive for streaming onto.
>>>
>>>John
>>>
>>>"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>How many of you guys have large audio drives (160 gig or bigger)that
partition
>>>>them into, oh, say,2 80 gig partitions. The reason I ask, is, I thought
>>>the
>>>>seek times might be faster if the whole drive wasn't being scanned. Anybody?
>>>>I've got my 160 gig audio drive as 1 big partition.
>>>>Rod
>>>
>>
>
|
|
|