The PARIS Forums


Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Trivial BS you guys probably don't care about.....but...........
Trivial BS you guys probably don't care about.....but........... [message #80139] Thu, 15 February 2007 20:29 Go to next message
Deej [4] is currently offline  Deej [4]   BRAZIL
Messages: 1292
Registered: January 2007
Senior Member
I just figured out a relatively (as in , less $$$ than other ways I've
found) to digitally integrate an older outboard FX box with digital I/O that
will only work at 48kHz max sample rates with a DAW running at 88.2 or 96K.
Re: Trivial BS you guys probably don't care about.....but........... [message #80141 is a reply to message #80139] Thu, 15 February 2007 21:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nil is currently offline  Nil
Messages: 245
Registered: March 2007
Senior Member
and that way is........?


"DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote:
>I just figured out a relatively (as in , less $$$ than other ways I've
>found) to digitally integrate an older outboard FX box with digital I/O
that
>will only work at 48kHz max sample rates with a DAW running at 88.2 or 96K.
>
>
>
Re: Trivial BS you guys probably don't care about.....but........... [message #80145 is a reply to message #80141] Thu, 15 February 2007 21:37 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Deej [4] is currently offline  Deej [4]   BRAZIL
Messages: 1292
Registered: January 2007
Senior Member
hehehe!!!!!!! thought you'd never ask..........OK then.........first of all,
but 2 x Behringer SRC 2496 boxes from MF for $129.00 each...then

digital out of DAW at 88.2 to digital in of #1 Behringer SRC 2496>
downsample to 44.1 in #1 SRC 2496 and route 44.1 signal to digital in of
outboard processor, send digital out of processor at 44.1 to digital input
of #2 Behringer SRC 2496 and upsample signal to 88.2, then return upsampled
88.2 signal to DAW running at 88.2.

I have the Behringer boxes here. I haven't tried it yet, but according to
what the F'in'M says, this should work. I'll try it after I get a little
further along in patching together my new world of native
insanity......which now includes two Behringer products......which I'll
probably regret, but the only other box that does this is the RME ADI 8-DD
or the RME ADI 8-192, those cost $800 or 1400.00 each respectively and you
have to have two of them. If the Behringers die, I hope it's before 45
days. I have open rack spaces above and below them in case they catch on
fire.

If this works, I'll bet I could buy 6 more of these at a discount and I
would have all of my old digital signal processors integrated with 88.2
projects for under a grand. Now the question is, WTF would I want to do this
when patching analog would probably sound as good or better once all of the
SRC stuff was said and done?

Well, I just had to see if I could pull it off and since my Yardstick
doesn't have AD/DA converters, the Behringer boxes do and will allow me to
patch
it into higher rez projects using their AD/DA's which are surprisingly good
when they work.which is why I got the Behringers in the first place..

;o)


"Neil" <IUOIU@OIU.com> wrote in message news:45d535b2$1@linux...
>
> and that way is........?
>
>
> "DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote:
>>I just figured out a relatively (as in , less $$$ than other ways I've
>>found) to digitally integrate an older outboard FX box with digital I/O
> that
>>will only work at 48kHz max sample rates with a DAW running at 88.2 or
>>96K.
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Trivial BS you guys probably don't care about.....but........... [message #80146 is a reply to message #80145] Thu, 15 February 2007 23:54 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Neil is currently offline  Neil
Messages: 1645
Registered: April 2006
Senior Member
MORE Behringer?

When is your birthday? Because Christmas is too long to wait
for me to send you a fire extinguisher.

:)


"DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote:
>hehehe!!!!!!! thought you'd never ask..........OK then.........first of
all,
>but 2 x Behringer SRC 2496 boxes from MF for $129.00 each...then
>
>digital out of DAW at 88.2 to digital in of #1 Behringer SRC 2496>
>downsample to 44.1 in #1 SRC 2496 and route 44.1 signal to digital in of

>outboard processor, send digital out of processor at 44.1 to digital input

>of #2 Behringer SRC 2496 and upsample signal to 88.2, then return upsampled

>88.2 signal to DAW running at 88.2.
>
>I have the Behringer boxes here. I haven't tried it yet, but according to

>what the F'in'M says, this should work. I'll try it after I get a little

>further along in patching together my new world of native
>insanity......which now includes two Behringer products......which I'll

>probably regret, but the only other box that does this is the RME ADI 8-DD

>or the RME ADI 8-192, those cost $800 or 1400.00 each respectively and you

>have to have two of them. If the Behringers die, I hope it's before 45

>days. I have open rack spaces above and below them in case they catch on

>fire.
>
>If this works, I'll bet I could buy 6 more of these at a discount and I

>would have all of my old digital signal processors integrated with 88.2

>projects for under a grand. Now the question is, WTF would I want to do
this
>when patching analog would probably sound as good or better once all of
the
>SRC stuff was said and done?
>
>Well, I just had to see if I could pull it off and since my Yardstick
>doesn't have AD/DA converters, the Behringer boxes do and will allow me
to
>patch
>it into higher rez projects using their AD/DA's which are surprisingly good

>when they work.which is why I got the Behringers in the first place..
>
>;o)
>
>
>"Neil" <IUOIU@OIU.com> wrote in message news:45d535b2$1@linux...
>>
>> and that way is........?
>>
>>
>> "DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote:
>>>I just figured out a relatively (as in , less $$$ than other ways I've
>>>found) to digitally integrate an older outboard FX box with digital I/O
>> that
>>>will only work at 48kHz max sample rates with a DAW running at 88.2 or

>>>96K.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
Re: Trivial BS you guys probably don't care about.....but........... [message #80154 is a reply to message #80146] Fri, 16 February 2007 01:48 Go to previous messageGo to next message
rick is currently offline  rick   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1976
Registered: February 2006
Senior Member
you can always send him an empty one 4/01/07...

On 16 Feb 2007 17:54:01 +1000, "Neil" <OIUOIU@OIU.com> wrote:

>
>MORE Behringer?
>
>When is your birthday? Because Christmas is too long to wait
>for me to send you a fire extinguisher.
>
>:)
>
>
>"DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote:
>>hehehe!!!!!!! thought you'd never ask..........OK then.........first of
>all,
>>but 2 x Behringer SRC 2496 boxes from MF for $129.00 each...then
>>
>>digital out of DAW at 88.2 to digital in of #1 Behringer SRC 2496>
>>downsample to 44.1 in #1 SRC 2496 and route 44.1 signal to digital in of
>
>>outboard processor, send digital out of processor at 44.1 to digital input
>
>>of #2 Behringer SRC 2496 and upsample signal to 88.2, then return upsampled
>
>>88.2 signal to DAW running at 88.2.
>>
>>I have the Behringer boxes here. I haven't tried it yet, but according to
>
>>what the F'in'M says, this should work. I'll try it after I get a little
>
>>further along in patching together my new world of native
>>insanity......which now includes two Behringer products......which I'll
>
>>probably regret, but the only other box that does this is the RME ADI 8-DD
>
>>or the RME ADI 8-192, those cost $800 or 1400.00 each respectively and you
>
>>have to have two of them. If the Behringers die, I hope it's before 45
>
>>days. I have open rack spaces above and below them in case they catch on
>
>>fire.
>>
>>If this works, I'll bet I could buy 6 more of these at a discount and I
>
>>would have all of my old digital signal processors integrated with 88.2
>
>>projects for under a grand. Now the question is, WTF would I want to do
>this
>>when patching analog would probably sound as good or better once all of
>the
>>SRC stuff was said and done?
>>
>>Well, I just had to see if I could pull it off and since my Yardstick
>>doesn't have AD/DA converters, the Behringer boxes do and will allow me
>to
>>patch
>>it into higher rez projects using their AD/DA's which are surprisingly good
>
>>when they work.which is why I got the Behringers in the first place..
>>
>>;o)
>>
>>
>>"Neil" <IUOIU@OIU.com> wrote in message news:45d535b2$1@linux...
>>>
>>> and that way is........?
>>>
>>>
>>> "DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote:
>>>>I just figured out a relatively (as in , less $$$ than other ways I've
>>>>found) to digitally integrate an older outboard FX box with digital I/O
>>> that
>>>>will only work at 48kHz max sample rates with a DAW running at 88.2 or
>
>>>>96K.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
Re: Trivial BS you guys probably don't care about.....but........... [message #80162 is a reply to message #80139] Fri, 16 February 2007 06:46 Go to previous messageGo to next message
chuck duffy is currently offline  chuck duffy
Messages: 453
Registered: July 2005
Senior Member
I figured out the analog way, it wasn't hard, although the cables cost almost
10 dollars each to make :-)

Chuck
"DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote:
>I just figured out a relatively (as in , less $$$ than other ways I've
>found) to digitally integrate an older outboard FX box with digital I/O
that
>will only work at 48kHz max sample rates with a DAW running at 88.2 or 96K.
>
>
>
Re: Trivial BS you guys probably don't care about.....but........... [message #80168 is a reply to message #80162] Fri, 16 February 2007 07:21 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Deej [4] is currently offline  Deej [4]   BRAZIL
Messages: 1292
Registered: January 2007
Senior Member
heh! yeah! that was what I was going for when I ran across this. One of my
processors only has AES I/O and I needed a way to be able to use it
digitally at 44.1 or to use it analog at higher sample rates. The Behringer
SRC is the only box I could find that I could afford that will allow this.

;o)

"chuck duffy" <c@c.com> wrote in message news:45d5b5b8$1@linux...
>
> I figured out the analog way, it wasn't hard, although the cables cost
> almost
> 10 dollars each to make :-)
>
> Chuck
> "DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote:
>>I just figured out a relatively (as in , less $$$ than other ways I've
>>found) to digitally integrate an older outboard FX box with digital I/O
> that
>>will only work at 48kHz max sample rates with a DAW running at 88.2 or
>>96K.
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Trivial BS you guys probably don't care about.....but........... [message #80188 is a reply to message #80162] Fri, 16 February 2007 17:53 Go to previous message
gene lennon is currently offline  gene lennon
Messages: 565
Registered: July 2006
Senior Member
LOL
Almost every album I’ve ever loved was mixed analog, therefore all I/O connections
to effects were analog…and I never had a patch cord catch on fire.
Gene


"chuck duffy" <c@c.com> wrote:
>
>I figured out the analog way, it wasn't hard, although the cables cost almost
>10 dollars each to make :-)
>
>Chuck
>"DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote:
>>I just figured out a relatively (as in , less $$$ than other ways I've

>>found) to digitally integrate an older outboard FX box with digital I/O
>that
>>will only work at 48kHz max sample rates with a DAW running at 88.2 or
96K.
>>
>>
>>
>
Previous Topic: MEC Dimensions
Next Topic: A question for you Digi 002 users
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Nov 29 16:34:14 PST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00997 seconds