|
|
|
|
Re: WTC 7 [message #55896 is a reply to message #55890] |
Fri, 15 July 2005 16:30 |
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149 Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>> skrev i en meddelelse
>> news:42d758ac$1@linux...
>> >
>> > "DC" <dcicchetti@urs2.net> wrote:
>> >>So, do you think that Rabin had any more hope of success with these
>> >>people than did Clinton or anyone else?
>> >
>> >
>> > yes, absolutely. talk about it all as you will, rabin remains
>> > the ONLY person to ever effectively reduce the terror plague down
>> > there. you obviously missed the part where i stressed
>> > that i do acknowledge that both approaches, both the
>> > deescalation
>> > one and the brute force one can lead to success.
>> > thats what i wrote. nothing about cowboys or some such,
>> > thats only the stuff you projected into my words, because
>> > im a (insert yet another dumbass euro stereotype here).
>> >
>> >
>> > so, yes, i do acknowledge that both roads can lead to success.
>> > do you? it appears you dont, so whos the dogmatic type here?
>> >
>> >
>> >>No it doesn't, or it would have worked with Hussein, Kim Il Sung,
>> >>Hitler and the Branch Davidians. You are not allowing for insanity
>> >>and evil in the world and you are assuming that a rational person's
>> >>version of a more attractive situation will always be accepted.
>> >
>> >
>> > from a palaestinian point of view, israel is the aggressor
>> > that took their land. they dont have the military power,
>> > so they go the terror route. being the frakkingeuropacifistidiotdude
> that
>> > i am, i despise that
>> > just as much, so id prefer it if you dont switch between
>> > calling me a blind pacifist one moment and then a guy
>> > that doesnt criticize palaestina (and thus somewhat supports the use of
>> > terror),
>> > whatever fits the best.
>> >
>> > from their point of view, theyre actually doing exactly
>> > the same thing - use brute force. they dont have planes,
>> > so they use suicide bombers. if you were on their side,
>> > its what you would recommend. and if the enemy threatened to
>> > use more power, youd recommend that the enemy gets a
>&
|
|
|