Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Attn: Deej! Tascam US-2400 price drop!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Deej! Tascam US-2400 price drop! [message #62683 is a reply to message #62678] |
Sun, 08 January 2006 14:45   |
Chris Wargo
Messages: 45
Registered: November 2005
|
Member |
|
|
Deej, Comments below:
"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>Chris,
>
>Let us know how you like this please. The only thing that's giving me second
>thoughts is that it doesn't have an LCD display.
That was one of the deal breakers for me on the tascam firewire interface
that I owned for a week or two. I think that it is a much bigger deal though
if you are only using 8 faders and flipping around all the time. I almost
never go over 24 audio tracks in my projects. I figure that I will make
a default project (I'm using Cubase SL)with 24 tracks of audio and virtual
instruments from 25+. I suspect that I will work the same way I did when
I was doing analog or Paris, where most of my basic tracks will always be
in the same place. If I want to grab the lead vocal, it's always on track
16, etc. A flip of the bank button and I will be working on my midi/vsti
tracks. I think I can live without the LCD's this way. I'll probably end
up using some masking/drafting tape too.
>Is there a specific Cubase SX driver for the Tascam controller or does it
>use HUI mode?
It works in Mackie universal controler mode, Hui mode, or general midi controller
mode. The latest update claims improve functionality for cubase/nuendo,
but I can't find more info about it. From what I can tell, the latest manual
has the info and that isn't the manual that they have on line. If you hold
the F5 key during boot on the unit, it puts it into a custom Cubase/Mackie
Control mode with keys and key combos customed mapped for that software.
>What is is about the Mackie controller that you don't like (other than
>having only 8 faders)?
I can't say that I have any complaints. In fact, there will be some tradeoffs
going for the 24 faders. The Mackie has the scribble strips. It has more
buttons that are readily availible and labled (without doing funky stuff
like remembering key combos (shift/F2, alt/stop etc). It also had a weighted
flywheel, which the tascam doesn't. If money weren't an option, I think
I'd be better off with the Mackie and two extenders. When I bought the Mackie,
the US2400 had just come out but was selling around $2000. It was worth
it to me to pay $2800 down the road for three Mackies over $2000 for the
Tascam.
Now the price is too good not to go for the US2400. Dang compromises....
;-)
I'll share my findings with the group when I get it going. I need to upgrade
to SL3 from SL1 though before I can put it through the paces. Multiple mackie
control (which is how this works) is only supported after SL/SX 2.2. I'll
order that tomorrow.
-Chris
>Deej
>
>"Chris Wargo" <na@na.na> wrote in message news:43c12da2$1@linux...
>>
>> I just ordered one from 8thstreet. Thanks James. Anyone want to buy a
>Mackie
>> universal control?
>>
>> -Chris
>>
>> rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >hey boots,
>> >
>> >probably getting ready for the post xmas poverty that the gearheads
>> >enjoy this time each year.
>> >
>> >
>> >On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 00:32:38 -0700, "DJ"
>> ><animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >>Yikes!!!! That's cheap. Now I wonder if they're getting ready to
>discontinue
>> >>it.
>> >>
>> >>;o}
>> >>
>> >>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> >>news:43c029b6$1@linux...
>> >>>
>> >>> Hey Deej! You were just talking about the Tascam US-2400, you
>probably
>> >>already
>> >>> know this, there has been a price drop. Last time I checked prices
>they
>> >>> wanted about $1100.00. Check it out.
>> >>>
>> >>>
> http://www.musiciansfriend.com/srs7/g=home/search/detail/bas e_pid/706947/
>> >>>
>> >>> James
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Deej! Tascam US-2400 price drop! [message #62686 is a reply to message #62683] |
Sun, 08 January 2006 15:19 |
Jon Jiles
Messages: 90
Registered: November 2005
|
Member |
|
|
Guys - FYI -
Looks like Tascam has addressed the scribble strip issue:
"New! SoftLCD displays 24 channels of data sent by your DAW app on your computer
monitor just like a giant hardware scribble strip."
Looks like a free download. Check it out!!!
"http://www.tascam.com/Products/US-2400.html"
Cheers,
Jon
"Chris Wargo" <na@na.na> wrote:
>
>Deej, Comments below:
>
>"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>>Chris,
>>
>>Let us know how you like this please. The only thing that's giving me second
>>thoughts is that it doesn't have an LCD display.
>
>That was one of the deal breakers for me on the tascam firewire interface
>that I owned for a week or two. I think that it is a much bigger deal though
>if you are only using 8 faders and flipping around all the time. I almost
>never go over 24 audio tracks in my projects. I figure that I will make
>a default project (I'm using Cubase SL)with 24 tracks of audio and virtual
>instruments from 25+. I suspect that I will work the same way I did when
>I was doing analog or Paris, where most of my basic tracks will always be
>in the same place. If I want to grab the lead vocal, it's always on track
>16, etc. A flip of the bank button and I will be working on my midi/vsti
>tracks. I think I can live without the LCD's this way. I'll probably end
>up using some masking/drafting tape too.
>
>
>>Is there a specific Cubase SX driver for the Tascam controller or does
it
>>use HUI mode?
>
>It works in Mackie universal controler mode, Hui mode, or general midi controller
>mode. The latest update claims improve functionality for cubase/nuendo,
>but I can't find more info about it. From what I can tell, the latest manual
>has the info and that isn't the manual that they have on line. If you hold
>the F5 key during boot on the unit, it puts it into a custom Cubase/Mackie
>Control mode with keys and key combos customed mapped for that software.
>
>>What is is about the Mackie controller that you don't like (other than
>>having only 8 faders)?
>
>I can't say that I have any complaints. In fact, there will be some tradeoffs
>going for the 24 faders. The Mackie has the scribble strips. It has more
>buttons that are readily availible and labled (without doing funky stuff
>like remembering key combos (shift/F2, alt/stop etc). It also had a weighted
>flywheel, which the tascam doesn't. If money weren't an option, I think
>I'd be better off with the Mackie and two extenders. When I bought the
Mackie,
>the US2400 had just come out but was selling around $2000. It was worth
>it to me to pay $2800 down the road for three Mackies over $2000 for the
>Tascam.
>
>Now the price is too good not to go for the US2400. Dang compromises....
>;-)
>
>I'll share my findings with the group when I get it going. I need to upgrade
>to SL3 from SL1 though before I can put it through the paces. Multiple
mackie
>control (which is how this works) is only supported after SL/SX 2.2. I'll
>order that tomorrow.
>
>-Chris
>
>>Deej
>>
>>"Chris Wargo" <na@na.na> wrote in message news:43c12da2$1@linux...
>>>
>>> I just ordered one from 8thstreet. Thanks James. Anyone want to buy
a
>>Mackie
>>> universal control?
>>>
>>> -Chris
>>>
>>> rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> >hey boots,
>>> >
>>> >probably getting ready for the post xmas poverty that the gearheads
>>> >enjoy this time each year.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 00:32:38 -0700, "DJ"
>>> ><animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >>Yikes!!!! That's cheap. Now I wonder if they're getting ready to
>>discontinue
>>> >>it.
>>> >>
>>> >>;o}
>>> >>
>>> >>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> >>news:43c029b6$1@linux...
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Hey Deej! You were just talking about the Tascam US-2400, you
>>probably
>>> >>already
>>> >>> know this, there has been a price drop. Last time I checked prices
>>they
>>> >>> wanted about $1100.00. Check it out.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>> http://www.musiciansfriend.com/srs7/g=home/search/detail/bas e_pid/706947/
>>> >>>
>>> >>> James
>>> >>
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: Deej! Tascam US-2400 price drop! [message #62688 is a reply to message #62686] |
Sun, 08 January 2006 16:21 |
Chris Wargo
Messages: 45
Registered: November 2005
|
Member |
|
|
I had trouble using that with the Tascam FW inerface. The lables weren't
in line with each channel, and the width of the lables didn't correspond
to the width of the channels. It would be sort of like mixing on an analog
console, but having the scribble tape on you meter bridge, and off the the
right. Better than nothing, but not as good as tape below each channel.
It also eats up desktop space. I suspect I won't even download this app.
-Chris
"Jon Jiles" <nope@nono.com> wrote:
>
>Guys - FYI -
>
>Looks like Tascam has addressed the scribble strip issue:
>
>"New! SoftLCD displays 24 channels of data sent by your DAW app on your
computer
>monitor just like a giant hardware scribble strip."
>
>Looks like a free download. Check it out!!!
>
>"http://www.tascam.com/Products/US-2400.html"
>
>Cheers,
>Jon
>
>
>"Chris Wargo" <na@na.na> wrote:
>>
>>Deej, Comments below:
>>
>>"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>>>Chris,
>>>
>>>Let us know how you like this please. The only thing that's giving me
second
>>>thoughts is that it doesn't have an LCD display.
>>
>>That was one of the deal breakers for me on the tascam firewire interface
>>that I owned for a week or two. I think that it is a much bigger deal
though
>>if you are only using 8 faders and flipping around all the time. I almost
>>never go over 24 audio tracks in my projects. I figure that I will make
>>a default project (I'm using Cubase SL)with 24 tracks of audio and virtual
>>instruments from 25+. I suspect that I will work the same way I did when
>>I was doing analog or Paris, where most of my basic tracks will always
be
>>in the same place. If I want to grab the lead vocal, it's always on track
>>16, etc. A flip of the bank button and I will be working on my midi/vsti
>>tracks. I think I can live without the LCD's this way. I'll probably
end
>>up using some masking/drafting tape too.
>>
>>
>>>Is there a specific Cubase SX driver for the Tascam controller or does
>it
>>>use HUI mode?
>>
>>It works in Mackie universal controler mode, Hui mode, or general midi
controller
>>mode. The latest update claims improve functionality for cubase/nuendo,
>>but I can't find more info about it. From what I can tell, the latest
manual
>>has the info and that isn't the manual that they have on line. If you
hold
>>the F5 key during boot on the unit, it puts it into a custom Cubase/Mackie
>>Control mode with keys and key combos customed mapped for that software.
>>
>>>What is is about the Mackie controller that you don't like (other than
>>>having only 8 faders)?
>>
>>I can't say that I have any complaints. In fact, there will be some tradeoffs
>>going for the 24 faders. The Mackie has the scribble strips. It has more
>>buttons that are readily availible and labled (without doing funky stuff
>>like remembering key combos (shift/F2, alt/stop etc). It also had a weighted
>>flywheel, which the tascam doesn't. If money weren't an option, I think
>>I'd be better off with the Mackie and two extenders. When I bought the
>Mackie,
>>the US2400 had just come out but was selling around $2000. It was worth
>>it to me to pay $2800 down the road for three Mackies over $2000 for the
>>Tascam.
>>
>>Now the price is too good not to go for the US2400. Dang compromises....
>>;-)
>>
>>I'll share my findings with the group when I get it going. I need to upgrade
>>to SL3 from SL1 though before I can put it through the paces. Multiple
>mackie
>>control (which is how this works) is only supported after SL/SX 2.2. I'll
>>order that tomorrow.
>>
>>-Chris
>>
>>>Deej
>>>
>>>"Chris Wargo" <na@na.na> wrote in message news:43c12da2$1@linux...
>>>>
>>>> I just ordered one from 8thstreet. Thanks James. Anyone want to buy
>a
>>>Mackie
>>>> universal control?
>>>>
>>>> -Chris
>>>>
>>>> rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >hey boots,
>>>> >
>>>> >probably getting ready for the post xmas poverty that the gearheads
>>>> >enjoy this time each year.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 00:32:38 -0700, "DJ"
>>>> ><animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >>Yikes!!!! That's cheap. Now I wonder if they're getting ready to
>>>discontinue
>>>> >>it.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>;o}
>>>> >>
>>>> >>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> >>news:43c029b6$1@linux...
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Hey Deej! You were just talking about the Tascam US-2400, you
>>>probably
>>>> >>already
>>>> >>> know this, there has been a price drop. Last time I checked prices
>>>they
>>>> >>> wanted about $1100.00. Check it out.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>> http://www.musiciansfriend.com/srs7/g=home/search/detail/bas e_pid/706947/
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> James
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: Deej! Tascam US-2400 price drop! [message #62689 is a reply to message #62688] |
Sun, 08 January 2006 16:26 |
excelav
Messages: 2130
Registered: July 2005
Location: Metro Detroit
|
Senior Member |
|
|
"Chris Wargo" <na@na.na> wrote:
>
>I had trouble using that with the Tascam FW inerface. The lables weren't
>in line with each channel, and the width of the lables didn't correspond
>to the width of the channels. It would be sort of like mixing on an analog
>console, but having the scribble tape on you meter bridge, and off the the
>right. Better than nothing, but not as good as tape below each channel.
> It also eats up desktop space. I suspect I won't even download this app.
>
>-Chris
Might as well try it, it may be improved.
>
>"Jon Jiles" <nope@nono.com> wrote:
>>
>>Guys - FYI -
>>
>>Looks like Tascam has addressed the scribble strip issue:
>>
>>"New! SoftLCD displays 24 channels of data sent by your DAW app on your
>computer
>>monitor just like a giant hardware scribble strip."
>>
>>Looks like a free download. Check it out!!!
>>
>>"http://www.tascam.com/Products/US-2400.html"
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Jon
>>
>>
>>"Chris Wargo" <na@na.na> wrote:
>>>
>>>Deej, Comments below:
>>>
>>>"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>>>>Chris,
>>>>
>>>>Let us know how you like this please. The only thing that's giving me
>second
>>>>thoughts is that it doesn't have an LCD display.
>>>
>>>That was one of the deal breakers for me on the tascam firewire interface
>>>that I owned for a week or two. I think that it is a much bigger deal
>though
>>>if you are only using 8 faders and flipping around all the time. I almost
>>>never go over 24 audio tracks in my projects. I figure that I will make
>>>a default project (I'm using Cubase SL)with 24 tracks of audio and virtual
>>>instruments from 25+. I suspect that I will work the same way I did when
>>>I was doing analog or Paris, where most of my basic tracks will always
>be
>>>in the same place. If I want to grab the lead vocal, it's always on track
>>>16, etc. A flip of the bank button and I will be working on my midi/vsti
>>>tracks. I think I can live without the LCD's this way. I'll probably
>end
>>>up using some masking/drafting tape too.
>>>
>>>
>>>>Is there a specific Cubase SX driver for the Tascam controller or does
>>it
>>>>use HUI mode?
>>>
>>>It works in Mackie universal controler mode, Hui mode, or general midi
>controller
>>>mode. The latest update claims improve functionality for cubase/nuendo,
>>>but I can't find more info about it. From what I can tell, the latest
>manual
>>>has the info and that isn't the manual that they have on line. If you
>hold
>>>the F5 key during boot on the unit, it puts it into a custom Cubase/Mackie
>>>Control mode with keys and key combos customed mapped for that software.
>>>
>>>>What is is about the Mackie controller that you don't like (other than
>>>>having only 8 faders)?
>>>
>>>I can't say that I have any complaints. In fact, there will be some tradeoffs
>>>going for the 24 faders. The Mackie has the scribble strips. It has
more
>>>buttons that are readily availible and labled (without doing funky stuff
>>>like remembering key combos (shift/F2, alt/stop etc). It also had a weighted
>>>flywheel, which the tascam doesn't. If money weren't an option, I think
>>>I'd be better off with the Mackie and two extenders. When I bought the
>>Mackie,
>>>the US2400 had just come out but was selling around $2000. It was worth
>>>it to me to pay $2800 down the road for three Mackies over $2000 for the
>>>Tascam.
>>>
>>>Now the price is too good not to go for the US2400. Dang compromises....
>>>;-)
>>>
>>>I'll share my findings with the group when I get it going. I need to
upgrade
>>>to SL3 from SL1 though before I can put it through the paces. Multiple
>>mackie
>>>control (which is how this works) is only supported after SL/SX 2.2.
I'll
>>>order that tomorrow.
>>>
>>>-Chris
>>>
>>>>Deej
>>>>
>>>>"Chris Wargo" <na@na.na> wrote in message news:43c12da2$1@linux...
>>>>>
>>>>> I just ordered one from 8thstreet. Thanks James. Anyone want to buy
>>a
>>>>Mackie
>>>>> universal control?
>>>>>
>>>>> -Chris
>>>>>
>>>>> rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> >hey boots,
>>>>> >
>>>>> >probably getting ready for the post xmas poverty that the gearheads
>>>>> >enjoy this time each year.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 00:32:38 -0700, "DJ"
>>>>> ><animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >>Yikes!!!! That's cheap. Now I wonder if they're getting ready to
>>>>discontinue
>>>>> >>it.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>;o}
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> >>news:43c029b6$1@linux...
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> Hey Deej! You were just talking about the Tascam US-2400, you
>>>>probably
>>>>> >>already
>>>>> >>> know this, there has been a price drop. Last time I checked prices
>>>>they
>>>>> >>> wanted about $1100.00. Check it out.
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>
>>>> http://www.musiciansfriend.com/srs7/g=home/search/detail/bas e_pid/706947/
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> James
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: Deej! Tascam US-2400 price drop! [message #62691 is a reply to message #62689] |
Sun, 08 January 2006 16:41 |
Chris Wargo
Messages: 45
Registered: November 2005
|
Member |
|
|
I think the software was fine, it's more to do with my monitors. I'm using
two CRTs up on the meterbridge of an Argosy desk. So right of the bat, I
have to look up and away from the control unit and figure out what channel
on the screen is the one I have my finger on. There is a 4 inch gap between
my monitors that also makes it tough to get one's bearings. I suppose though
it couldn't hurt to try again. Being Tascam and not Sony, there probably
isn't any malware in the app. ;-) Thanks again or the heads-up James.
-Chris
"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>"Chris Wargo" <na@na.na> wrote:
>>
>>I had trouble using that with the Tascam FW inerface. The lables weren't
>>in line with each channel, and the width of the lables didn't correspond
>>to the width of the channels. It would be sort of like mixing on an analog
>>console, but having the scribble tape on you meter bridge, and off the
the
>>right. Better than nothing, but not as good as tape below each channel.
>> It also eats up desktop space. I suspect I won't even download this app.
>>
>>-Chris
>
>
>Might as well try it, it may be improved.
>
>>
>>"Jon Jiles" <nope@nono.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>Guys - FYI -
>>>
>>>Looks like Tascam has addressed the scribble strip issue:
>>>
>>>"New! SoftLCD displays 24 channels of data sent by your DAW app on your
>>computer
>>>monitor just like a giant hardware scribble strip."
>>>
>>>Looks like a free download. Check it out!!!
>>>
>>>"http://www.tascam.com/Products/US-2400.html"
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>Jon
>>>
>>>
>>>"Chris Wargo" <na@na.na> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Deej, Comments below:
>>>>
>>>>"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>>>>>Chris,
>>>>>
>>>>>Let us know how you like this please. The only thing that's giving me
>>second
>>>>>thoughts is that it doesn't have an LCD display.
>>>>
>>>>That was one of the deal breakers for me on the tascam firewire interface
>>>>that I owned for a week or two. I think that it is a much bigger deal
>>though
>>>>if you are only using 8 faders and flipping around all the time. I almost
>>>>never go over 24 audio tracks in my projects. I figure that I will make
>>>>a default project (I'm using Cubase SL)with 24 tracks of audio and virtual
>>>>instruments from 25+. I suspect that I will work the same way I did
when
>>>>I was doing analog or Paris, where most of my basic tracks will always
>>be
>>>>in the same place. If I want to grab the lead vocal, it's always on
track
>>>>16, etc. A flip of the bank button and I will be working on my midi/vsti
>>>>tracks. I think I can live without the LCD's this way. I'll probably
>>end
>>>>up using some masking/drafting tape too.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Is there a specific Cubase SX driver for the Tascam controller or does
>>>it
>>>>>use HUI mode?
>>>>
>>>>It works in Mackie universal controler mode, Hui mode, or general midi
>>controller
>>>>mode. The latest update claims improve functionality for cubase/nuendo,
>>>>but I can't find more info about it. From what I can tell, the latest
>>manual
>>>>has the info and that isn't the manual that they have on line. If you
>>hold
>>>>the F5 key during boot on the unit, it puts it into a custom Cubase/Mackie
>>>>Control mode with keys and key combos customed mapped for that software.
>>>>
>>>>>What is is about the Mackie controller that you don't like (other than
>>>>>having only 8 faders)?
>>>>
>>>>I can't say that I have any complaints. In fact, there will be some
tradeoffs
>>>>going for the 24 faders. The Mackie has the scribble strips. It has
>more
>>>>buttons that are readily availible and labled (without doing funky stuff
>>>>like remembering key combos (shift/F2, alt/stop etc). It also had a weighted
>>>>flywheel, which the tascam doesn't. If money weren't an option, I think
>>>>I'd be better off with the Mackie and two extenders. When I bought the
>>>Mackie,
>>>>the US2400 had just come out but was selling around $2000. It was worth
>>>>it to me to pay $2800 down the road for three Mackies over $2000 for
the
>>>>Tascam.
>>>>
>>>>Now the price is too good not to go for the US2400. Dang compromises....
>>>>;-)
>>>>
>>>>I'll share my findings with the group when I get it going. I need to
>upgrade
>>>>to SL3 from SL1 though before I can put it through the paces. Multiple
>>>mackie
>>>>control (which is how this works) is only supported after SL/SX 2.2.
>I'll
>>>>order that tomorrow.
>>>>
>>>>-Chris
>>>>
>>>>>Deej
>>>>>
>>>>>"Chris Wargo" <na@na.na> wrote in message news:43c12da2$1@linux...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I just ordered one from 8thstreet. Thanks James. Anyone want to buy
>>>a
>>>>>Mackie
>>>>>> universal control?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Chris
>>>>>>
>>>>>> rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >hey boots,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >probably getting ready for the post xmas poverty that the gearheads
>>>>>> >enjoy this time each year.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 00:32:38 -0700, "DJ"
>>>>>> ><animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >>Yikes!!!! That's cheap. Now I wonder if they're getting ready to
>>>>>discontinue
>>>>>> >>it.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>;o}
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> >>news:43c029b6$1@linux...
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> Hey Deej! You were just talking about the Tascam US-2400, you
>>>>>probably
>>>>>> >>already
>>>>>> >>> know this, there has been a price drop. Last time I checked prices
>>>>>they
>>>>>> >>> wanted about $1100.00. Check it out.
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>> http://www.musiciansfriend.com/srs7/g=home/search/detail/bas e_pid/706947/
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> James
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Wed Dec 04 16:11:30 PST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01813 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
