Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Rendering tracks today
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Rendering tracks today [message #79185 is a reply to message #79178] |
Mon, 29 January 2007 12:34   |
![brandon[2] is currently offline](/theme/PARIS_Forum_Template/images/offline.png "brandon[2] is currently offline")
brandon[2]
Messages: 380
Registered: June 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
I just dont like things to be complicated.
Hmmm... I agree with the sound thing, but I am
tired of PARIS crashing and all the little workarounds.
I just want to turn it on and go.
It kills the vibe for me.
If I sold all me PARIS gear I could get two Motu8pres and a Hammerfall
interface.
Use Cubase SX and be done with it.
I love PARIS ..I just need to get the vibe back and fun back in the process.
To much technical crap gets in the way of that.
I just dont know how I would monitor with the setup I just described.
IS there a cheap conversion box that takes adat and converts it to +4db XLR
for monitoring?
--
Thanks,
Brandon
"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:45be5702$1@linux...
>
> Hey Brandon! If it's about the patch bay, Pro Tools has had an easier to
> use and more logical to use patch bay for years. I don't think that is
> a good reason to leave or stay with Paris. I don't think anybody is going
> to beat the sound of Paris with out spending a lot of money. It is all
about
> the sound.
>
> In a commercial studio environment I can see the need to have a speeded up
> work flow. If your doing a lot of electronic music, I can see having a
more
> modern DAW with todays capabilities. If your mainly cutting instruments
> in a project studio and you already have Paris and Cubase SX, I don't see
> the sense in jumping ship unless you got money to burn.
>
> That's my $0.02
>
> James
>
> "Brandon" <a@a.com> wrote:
> >the biggest reason I am staying with PARIS is because of the IO
capability.
> >I am worried about how easy a patch bay would be in another software.
> >I have an emu sound card and it has the EMU patcher GUI. I hate it...
> >I cant understand it easily.
> >IF I could find an easy interface as flexible and fun to use as paris I
> >would probably
> >dump PARIS as well.
> >
> >--
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Brandon
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@.kc.rr.com> wrote in message
> >news:45be294c$1@linux...
> >>
> >> So DJ...I know there are a LOT of features on Cubase 4 (and most other
> >DAWS
> >> for that matter) that Paris doesn't have, but what features
specifically
> >> made you pull the plug.
> >> "DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote:
> >> >I'm getting some old projects ready for batching in WL so I can import
> >them
> >>
> >> >into my Cubase DAW before I start breaking down my system. Guys, if I
> >didn't
> >>
> >> >need the features in Cubase 4, I would't be doing this. I've been
> >listening
> >>
> >> >to Cubase pretty constantly with the Neve box for the last few days so
> >I'm
> >>
> >> >imprinted on the sound. Listening to Paris again is like a breath of
> >fresh
> >>
> >> >air.....but the other is close enough, I do like the way it sounds and
> >I'm
> >>
> >> >committed. It ain't Paris though. I'm gonna miss this.
> >> >
> >> >Deej
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Rendering tracks today [message #79190 is a reply to message #79185] |
Mon, 29 January 2007 12:51 |
Dedric Terry
Messages: 788
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Brandon - any D/A interface with balanced outs and +4/-10 level select will
run
power monitors, or to an amp. I made my own balanced 1/4" to XLRs using
Canare
cable and Neutrik connectors.
I'm running my 5.1 rig off of my Fireface, balanced 1/4 to XLR, +4dBu -
works great and sounds great.
(The Fireface has -10/+4/Higain settings for outs and ins).
I have Totalmix setup with calibrated reference levels for recall there; and
with
Cubase 4/Nuendo's control room you can control your listening level
with a midi controller or something like faderport and not affect the main
mix bus
(still meter and bounce unaffected).
You can also always add, or use a passive volume control in this config.
Regards,
Dedric
"Brandon" <a@a.com> wrote in message news:45be5ac7@linux...
>I just dont like things to be complicated.
> Hmmm... I agree with the sound thing, but I am
> tired of PARIS crashing and all the little workarounds.
> I just want to turn it on and go.
> It kills the vibe for me.
> If I sold all me PARIS gear I could get two Motu8pres and a Hammerfall
> interface.
> Use Cubase SX and be done with it.
> I love PARIS ..I just need to get the vibe back and fun back in the
> process.
> To much technical crap gets in the way of that.
>
> I just dont know how I would monitor with the setup I just described.
>
> IS there a cheap conversion box that takes adat and converts it to +4db
> XLR
> for monitoring?
>
> --
> Thanks,
>
> Brandon
>
>
> "James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:45be5702$1@linux...
>>
>> Hey Brandon! If it's about the patch bay, Pro Tools has had an easier to
>> use and more logical to use patch bay for years. I don't think that is
>> a good reason to leave or stay with Paris. I don't think anybody is
>> going
>> to beat the sound of Paris with out spending a lot of money. It is all
> about
>> the sound.
>>
>> In a commercial studio environment I can see the need to have a speeded
>> up
>> work flow. If your doing a lot of electronic music, I can see having a
> more
>> modern DAW with todays capabilities. If your mainly cutting instruments
>> in a project studio and you already have Paris and Cubase SX, I don't see
>> the sense in jumping ship unless you got money to burn.
>>
>> That's my $0.02
>>
>> James
>>
>> "Brandon" <a@a.com> wrote:
>> >the biggest reason I am staying with PARIS is because of the IO
> capability.
>> >I am worried about how easy a patch bay would be in another software.
>> >I have an emu sound card and it has the EMU patcher GUI. I hate it...
>> >I cant understand it easily.
>> >IF I could find an easy interface as flexible and fun to use as paris I
>> >would probably
>> >dump PARIS as well.
>> >
>> >--
>> >Thanks,
>> >
>> >Brandon
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@.kc.rr.com> wrote in message
>> >news:45be294c$1@linux...
>> >>
>> >> So DJ...I know there are a LOT of features on Cubase 4 (and most other
>> >DAWS
>> >> for that matter) that Paris doesn't have, but what features
> specifically
>> >> made you pull the plug.
>> >> "DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote:
>> >> >I'm getting some old projects ready for batching in WL so I can
>> >> >import
>> >them
>> >>
>> >> >into my Cubase DAW before I start breaking down my system. Guys, if I
>> >didn't
>> >>
>> >> >need the features in Cubase 4, I would't be doing this. I've been
>> >listening
>> >>
>> >> >to Cubase pretty constantly with the Neve box for the last few days
>> >> >so
>> >I'm
>> >>
>> >> >imprinted on the sound. Listening to Paris again is like a breath of
>> >fresh
>> >>
>> >> >air.....but the other is close enough, I do like the way it sounds
>> >> >and
>> >I'm
>> >>
>> >> >committed. It ain't Paris though. I'm gonna miss this.
>> >> >
>> >> >Deej
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Rendering tracks today [message #79195 is a reply to message #79185] |
Mon, 29 January 2007 14:17 |
excelav
Messages: 2130
Registered: July 2005
Location: Metro Detroit
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Brandon, are you running Paris on a PC or Mac?
"Brandon" <a@a.com> wrote:
>I just dont like things to be complicated.
>Hmmm... I agree with the sound thing, but I am
>tired of PARIS crashing and all the little workarounds.
>I just want to turn it on and go.
>It kills the vibe for me.
>If I sold all me PARIS gear I could get two Motu8pres and a Hammerfall
>interface.
>Use Cubase SX and be done with it.
>I love PARIS ..I just need to get the vibe back and fun back in the process.
>To much technical crap gets in the way of that.
>
>I just dont know how I would monitor with the setup I just described.
>
>IS there a cheap conversion box that takes adat and converts it to +4db
XLR
>for monitoring?
>
>--
>Thanks,
>
>Brandon
>
>
>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:45be5702$1@linux...
>>
>> Hey Brandon! If it's about the patch bay, Pro Tools has had an easier
to
>> use and more logical to use patch bay for years. I don't think that
is
>> a good reason to leave or stay with Paris. I don't think anybody is going
>> to beat the sound of Paris with out spending a lot of money. It is all
>about
>> the sound.
>>
>> In a commercial studio environment I can see the need to have a speeded
up
>> work flow. If your doing a lot of electronic music, I can see having
a
>more
>> modern DAW with todays capabilities. If your mainly cutting instruments
>> in a project studio and you already have Paris and Cubase SX, I don't
see
>> the sense in jumping ship unless you got money to burn.
>>
>> That's my $0.02
>>
>> James
>>
>> "Brandon" <a@a.com> wrote:
>> >the biggest reason I am staying with PARIS is because of the IO
>capability.
>> >I am worried about how easy a patch bay would be in another software.
>> >I have an emu sound card and it has the EMU patcher GUI. I hate it...
>> >I cant understand it easily.
>> >IF I could find an easy interface as flexible and fun to use as paris
I
>> >would probably
>> >dump PARIS as well.
>> >
>> >--
>> >Thanks,
>> >
>> >Brandon
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@.kc.rr.com> wrote in message
>> >news:45be294c$1@linux...
>> >>
>> >> So DJ...I know there are a LOT of features on Cubase 4 (and most other
>> >DAWS
>> >> for that matter) that Paris doesn't have, but what features
>specifically
>> >> made you pull the plug.
>> >> "DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote:
>> >> >I'm getting some old projects ready for batching in WL so I can import
>> >them
>> >>
>> >> >into my Cubase DAW before I start breaking down my system. Guys, if
I
>> >didn't
>> >>
>> >> >need the features in Cubase 4, I would't be doing this. I've been
>> >listening
>> >>
>> >> >to Cubase pretty constantly with the Neve box for the last few days
so
>> >I'm
>> >>
>> >> >imprinted on the sound. Listening to Paris again is like a breath
of
>> >fresh
>> >>
>> >> >air.....but the other is close enough, I do like the way it sounds
and
>> >I'm
>> >>
>> >> >committed. It ain't Paris though. I'm gonna miss this.
>> >> >
>> >> >Deej
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: Rendering tracks today [message #79196 is a reply to message #79195] |
Mon, 29 January 2007 13:29 |
brandon[2]
Messages: 380
Registered: June 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
pc
--
Thanks,
Brandon
"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:45be6487$1@linux...
>
> Brandon, are you running Paris on a PC or Mac?
>
> "Brandon" <a@a.com> wrote:
> >I just dont like things to be complicated.
> >Hmmm... I agree with the sound thing, but I am
> >tired of PARIS crashing and all the little workarounds.
> >I just want to turn it on and go.
> >It kills the vibe for me.
> >If I sold all me PARIS gear I could get two Motu8pres and a Hammerfall
> >interface.
> >Use Cubase SX and be done with it.
> >I love PARIS ..I just need to get the vibe back and fun back in the
process.
> >To much technical crap gets in the way of that.
> >
> >I just dont know how I would monitor with the setup I just described.
> >
> >IS there a cheap conversion box that takes adat and converts it to +4db
> XLR
> >for monitoring?
> >
> >--
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Brandon
> >
> >
> >"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:45be5702$1@linux...
> >>
> >> Hey Brandon! If it's about the patch bay, Pro Tools has had an easier
> to
> >> use and more logical to use patch bay for years. I don't think that
> is
> >> a good reason to leave or stay with Paris. I don't think anybody is
going
> >> to beat the sound of Paris with out spending a lot of money. It is all
> >about
> >> the sound.
> >>
> >> In a commercial studio environment I can see the need to have a speeded
> up
> >> work flow. If your doing a lot of electronic music, I can see having
> a
> >more
> >> modern DAW with todays capabilities. If your mainly cutting
instruments
> >> in a project studio and you already have Paris and Cubase SX, I don't
> see
> >> the sense in jumping ship unless you got money to burn.
> >>
> >> That's my $0.02
> >>
> >> James
> >>
> >> "Brandon" <a@a.com> wrote:
> >> >the biggest reason I am staying with PARIS is because of the IO
> >capability.
> >> >I am worried about how easy a patch bay would be in another software.
> >> >I have an emu sound card and it has the EMU patcher GUI. I hate it...
> >> >I cant understand it easily.
> >> >IF I could find an easy interface as flexible and fun to use as paris
> I
> >> >would probably
> >> >dump PARIS as well.
> >> >
> >> >--
> >> >Thanks,
> >> >
> >> >Brandon
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@.kc.rr.com> wrote in message
> >> >news:45be294c$1@linux...
> >> >>
> >> >> So DJ...I know there are a LOT of features on Cubase 4 (and most
other
> >> >DAWS
> >> >> for that matter) that Paris doesn't have, but what features
> >specifically
> >> >> made you pull the plug.
> >> >> "DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote:
> >> >> >I'm getting some old projects ready for batching in WL so I can
import
> >> >them
> >> >>
> >> >> >into my Cubase DAW before I start breaking down my system. Guys, if
> I
> >> >didn't
> >> >>
> >> >> >need the features in Cubase 4, I would't be doing this. I've been
> >> >listening
> >> >>
> >> >> >to Cubase pretty constantly with the Neve box for the last few days
> so
> >> >I'm
> >> >>
> >> >> >imprinted on the sound. Listening to Paris again is like a breath
> of
> >> >fresh
> >> >>
> >> >> >air.....but the other is close enough, I do like the way it sounds
> and
> >> >I'm
> >> >>
> >> >> >committed. It ain't Paris though. I'm gonna miss this.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Deej
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: Rendering tracks today [message #79201 is a reply to message #79196] |
Mon, 29 January 2007 15:43 |
excelav
Messages: 2130
Registered: July 2005
Location: Metro Detroit
|
Senior Member |
|
|
You shouldn't be having a crashing problem. Post your set up, and what's
happening when your system crashes. Maybe some of the PC guys here can help
you figure out you crashing problem.
James
"Brandon" <a@a.com> wrote:
>pc
>
>--
>Thanks,
>
>Brandon
>
>
>
>"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:45be6487$1@linux...
>>
>> Brandon, are you running Paris on a PC or Mac?
>>
>> "Brandon" <a@a.com> wrote:
>> >I just dont like things to be complicated.
>> >Hmmm... I agree with the sound thing, but I am
>> >tired of PARIS crashing and all the little workarounds.
>> >I just want to turn it on and go.
>> >It kills the vibe for me.
>> >If I sold all me PARIS gear I could get two Motu8pres and a Hammerfall
>> >interface.
>> >Use Cubase SX and be done with it.
>> >I love PARIS ..I just need to get the vibe back and fun back in the
>process.
>> >To much technical crap gets in the way of that.
>> >
>> >I just dont know how I would monitor with the setup I just described.
>> >
>> >IS there a cheap conversion box that takes adat and converts it to +4db
>> XLR
>> >for monitoring?
>> >
>> >--
>> >Thanks,
>> >
>> >Brandon
>> >
>> >
>> >"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> >news:45be5702$1@linux...
>> >>
>> >> Hey Brandon! If it's about the patch bay, Pro Tools has had an easier
>> to
>> >> use and more logical to use patch bay for years. I don't think that
>> is
>> >> a good reason to leave or stay with Paris. I don't think anybody is
>going
>> >> to beat the sound of Paris with out spending a lot of money. It is
all
>> >about
>> >> the sound.
>> >>
>> >> In a commercial studio environment I can see the need to have a speeded
>> up
>> >> work flow. If your doing a lot of electronic music, I can see having
>> a
>> >more
>> >> modern DAW with todays capabilities. If your mainly cutting
>instruments
>> >> in a project studio and you already have Paris and Cubase SX, I don't
>> see
>> >> the sense in jumping ship unless you got money to burn.
>> >>
>> >> That's my $0.02
>> >>
>> >> James
>> >>
>> >> "Brandon" <a@a.com> wrote:
>> >> >the biggest reason I am staying with PARIS is because of the IO
>> >capability.
>> >> >I am worried about how easy a patch bay would be in another software.
>> >> >I have an emu sound card and it has the EMU patcher GUI. I hate it...
>> >> >I cant understand it easily.
>> >> >IF I could find an easy interface as flexible and fun to use as paris
>> I
>> >> >would probably
>> >> >dump PARIS as well.
>> >> >
>> >> >--
>> >> >Thanks,
>> >> >
>> >> >Brandon
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@.kc.rr.com> wrote in message
>> >> >news:45be294c$1@linux...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> So DJ...I know there are a LOT of features on Cubase 4 (and most
>other
>> >> >DAWS
>> >> >> for that matter) that Paris doesn't have, but what features
>> >specifically
>> >> >> made you pull the plug.
>> >> >> "DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >I'm getting some old projects ready for batching in WL so I can
>import
>> >> >them
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >into my Cubase DAW before I start breaking down my system. Guys,
if
>> I
>> >> >didn't
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >need the features in Cubase 4, I would't be doing this. I've been
>> >> >listening
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >to Cubase pretty constantly with the Neve box for the last few
days
>> so
>> >> >I'm
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >imprinted on the sound. Listening to Paris again is like a breath
>> of
>> >> >fresh
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >air.....but the other is close enough, I do like the way it sounds
>> and
>> >> >I'm
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >committed. It ain't Paris though. I'm gonna miss this.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Deej
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Rendering tracks today...TapeIT version 2 [message #79307 is a reply to message #79274] |
Wed, 31 January 2007 08:44 |
Rich[3]
Messages: 132
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Thanks Lamont and Neil!
I picked both up and will have to give them a shot. Sounds like a good way
to moove Wav's between SX and Paris....
Don has given me a ton of help with this also (Adat to SX) .
Thanks again for all the help!!
"LaMont" <jjdpro@ameritech.net> wrote:
>
>Hi Rich,
>
>TapeIT is one those little apps that a Must have for working withing multi
>DAWs..
>
>I typically use it in Nuendo to render(bounce)complete (but) indiviual tracks(wavs
>files) to a folder. Then I can call up these wavs and pick my DAW that I
>wan to mix in..
>
>TapeIt is a great way to bounce Vsti's. Yes you can render more than on
track
>at a time. And it can be midi controlled as well..
>
>
>
>
>"Rich" <studiodog_99@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>Lamont:
>>
>> You use Tape It to create a wav from Paris or Cubase for import into one
>>or the other? Will this do a track by track (one to one) and or a submix
>>of say drums with effects etc to R L two track or?? I'll have to take
>>a look... what are you using it for?
>>
>>Thanks
>>
>>
>>"LaMont" <jjdpro@ameritech.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>DJ and others..
>>>
>>>Here is a wayy too cool tool for quick bounces "within" Cubase or Paris..So
>>>you can dothese quick track bounces into a folder, then call up ..Say
Paris
>>>to Mix in..
>>>Only $19.00 bucks..Check it out..
>>>
>>>http://www.silverspike.com/?Products:TapeIt
>>>
>>>This is a must have for those of use who work in multiple DAWS.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote:
>>>>I'm getting some old projects ready for batching in WL so I can import
>>them
>>>
>>>>into my Cubase DAW before I start breaking down my system. Guys, if I
>didn't
>>>
>>>>need the features in Cubase 4, I would't be doing this. I've been listening
>>>
>>>>to Cubase pretty constantly with the Neve box for the last few days so
>>I'm
>>>
>>>>imprinted on the sound. Listening to Paris again is like a breath of
fresh
>>>
>>>>air.....but the other is close enough, I do like the way it sounds and
>>I'm
>>>
>>>>committed. It ain't Paris though. I'm gonna miss this.
>>>>
>>>>Deej
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Dec 23 14:05:03 PST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04735 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
