Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » OT: Training a Great Dane
|
Re: Training a Great Dane [message #55176 is a reply to message #55173] |
Sat, 02 July 2005 13:10 ![Go to previous message Go to previous message](/theme/PARIS_Forum_Template/images/up.png) ![Go to next message Go to next message](/theme/PARIS_Forum_Template/images/down.png) |
wmarkwilson
![UNITED STATES UNITED STATES](/images/flags/us.png) Messages: 114 Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
br />
> >
> >
>
>I read your post to Mr. Simlicity, but I'm not completely sure what you're
looking to do.
I downloaded the manual for the box you are looking to buy and searched it
for SMPTE, Clocks, and MTC, and none of them are in the manual. Are you
sure that it can follow MIDI? It looks like it just plays pre-configured
beats over and over to its own internal clock.
If I undestand what you're trying to do right, I'd record this amp simulators
pre-sequenced beat into PARIS on two tracks, and then overdub my guitars
overtop on two other tracks on a second pass. That way, you don't need to
sync anything.
Forgive me if I'm misunderstanding what you're trying to do. I don't know
this Amp simulator at all.
Good luck!
Mike
"Colonel Panic" <Panic@home.nowhere> wrote:
>
>Thanks Mike,
>
>What do you think of the scenario I described to Mr. Simplicity?
>
>Would it work?
>
>Panic
>
>
>"Mike Audet" <mike@....com> wrote:
>>
>>Actually, I doubt that the Smartsync can output MIDI clocks. You'd have
>to
>>be able to tell it the tempo somehow.
>>
>>I'd sync Cakwalk vis MTC and have it generate MIDI clocks if you really
>want
>>to use your keyboard as a sequencer. it would be easier to just use Cakewalk
>>as your sequencer, though.
>>
>>All the best,
>>Mike
>>
>>
>>"Mike Audet" <mike@.....com> wrote:
>>>
>>>Hi Panic,
>>>
>>>It doesn't sound to me like you have a complete undestanding of how to
>synch
>>>2 devices via MIDI.
>>>
>>>You mentioned MIDI clocks, which was a cheap way to synch two devices
for
>>>people who could not afford smpte when MIDI programs had to be synced
to
>>>tape decks. PARIS doesn't support this.
>>>
>>>PARIS can
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Training a Great Dane [message #55181 is a reply to message #55178] |
Sat, 02 July 2005 14:23 ![Go to previous message Go to previous message](/theme/PARIS_Forum_Template/images/up.png) ![Go to next message Go to next message](/theme/PARIS_Forum_Template/images/down.png) |
uptown jimmy
![UNITED STATES UNITED STATES](/images/flags/us.png) Messages: 441 Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>
>>>>>>>Panic
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>Ok, I take it all back. It follows MIDI Clocks (note the capital C that got
missed in my search).
You'll need Cakewalk following SMPTE from PARIS and outputting MIDI clocks.
Then you can record the drums first and have the delay effects in time in
a subsequent pass.
You need:
Cakewalk Professional 5.5 or later and a MIDI interface.
Good luck!
Mike
"Mike Audet" <mike@mikeF-SPAMaudet.com> wrote:
>
>Ok. I read your post again. The problem is that the delay effects need
to
>be in sync with the drums. I get it.
>
>It doesn't look like this box syncs to anything. If it did, I'm sure that
>
>You'll have to track them both at one to have them in sync.
>
>All the best,
>Mike
>
>"Mike Audet" <mike@mikeF-SPAMaudet.com> wrote:
>>
>>I read your post to Mr. Simlicity, but I'm not completely sure what you're
>>looking to do.
>>
>>I downloaded the manual for the box you are looking to buy and searched
>it
>>for SMPTE, Clocks, and MTC, and none of them are in the manual. Are you
>>sure that it can follow MIDI? It looks like it just plays pre-configured
>>beats over and over to its own internal clock.
>>
>>If I undestand what you're trying to do right, I'd record this amp simulators
>>pre-sequenced beat into PARIS on two tracks, and then overdub my guitars
>>overtop on two other tracks on a second pass. That way, you don't need
>to
>>sync anything.
>>
>>Forgive me if I'm misunderstanding what you're trying to do. I don't know
>>this Amp simulator at all.
>>
>>Good luck!
>>Mike
>>
>>
>>"Colonel Panic" <Panic@home.nowhere> wrote:
>>>
>>>Thanks Mike,
>>>
>>>What do you think of the scenario I described to Mr. Simplicity?
>>>
>>>Would it work?
>>>
>>>Panic
>>>
>>>
>>>"Mike Audet" <mike@....com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Actually, I doubt that the Smartsync can output MIDI clocks. You'd have
>>>to
>>>>be able to tell it the tempo somehow.
>>>>
>>>>I'd sync Cakwalk vis MTC and have it generate MIDI clocks if you really
>>>want
>>>>to use your keyboard as a sequencer. it would be easier to just use
Cakewalk
>>>>as your sequencer, though.
>>>>
>>>>All the best,
>>>>Mike
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Mike Audet" <mike@.....com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>Hi Panic,
>>>>>
>>>>>It doesn't sound to me like you have a complete undestanding of how
to
>>>synch
>>>>>2 devices via MIDI.
>>>>>
>>>>>You mentioned MIDI clocks, which was a cheap way to synch two devices
>>for
>>>>>people who could not afford smpte when
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Training a Great Dane [message #55208 is a reply to message #55185] |
Sun, 03 July 2005 02:02 ![Go to previous message Go to previous message](/theme/PARIS_Forum_Template/images/up.png) ![Go to next message Go to next message](/theme/PARIS_Forum_Template/images/down.png) |
erlilo
![NORWAY NORWAY](/images/flags/no.png) Messages: 405 Registered: June 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
it's worth it.
>>>> >
>>>> > Here's the specs:
>>>> > Compaq Presario - SR 1520 NX
>>>> > AMD Sempron 3100+, 256kb L2 cache (Eeeeew),
>>>> > 512 Meg RAM (ouch) upgradeable to 2 Gig, 160 GB 7200rpm HD,=20
>>>> > 16x DVD +RW drive.
>>>> >
>>>> > Modifications I expect:
>>>> > I'm thinking the C drive may need a new install of OS to clean it
>>
>> up.
>>
>>>> > Isn't that next to impossible with a proprietary Compaq?=20
>>>> >
>>>> > A second Softsynth drive ($20.00 for a 80GIG WD 8 meg cache!)
>>>> >
>>>> > An RME type audio card or some other way to send the synths
>>>> > to PARIS. Size of chassis may prohibit some cards.
>>>> >
>>>> > An outboard Midi card.
>>>> >
>>>> > My application is to use it as an outboard softsynth box. Now I
>>
>> use
>>
>>>> =
>>>> >a stand=20
>>>> > alone Paris rig (3.0 P4) and a stand alone Cubase rig (AMD
>>
>> 1.4mgz). =
>>
>>>> >My budget=20
>>>> > is so low that I really can't afford even the $200 BUT I will if
>>
>> it's
>>
>>>> =
>>>> >going to suffice=20
>>>> > and be better than waiting 4 years for a used/obsolete comp then =
>>>> >maybe.
>>>> >
>>>> > My main concern is Compaq's proprietary setup. Can I, will I need
>>
>> to
>>
>>>> =
>>>> >reinstall
>>>> > Windows on the C drive? After reading specs, these things worry
>>
>> me:
>>
>>>> >
>>>> > 3 PCI slots
>>>> >
>>>> > Onboard graphics chip - No AGP slot!!!
>>>> >
>>>> > Enough onboard 60 day trial software to make it stop and die.
>>>> >
>>>> > 16.54" Depth Room for an RME or equivalent sound card?
>>>> > 15.35" Height " " " " "
>>>> > 7.17" Width " " " " "
>>>> >
>>>> > Is this whole thing stupid to consider? Sale is tomorrow but
>>>> > I don't want something that's going to be a big problem. =20
>>>> >
>>>> > All opinions welcome!
>>>> > Tom=20
>>>
>>
>>probably just one command for mr. double nickel
check out my teeth santa paws...got it...
On Sat, 2 Jul 2005 16:03:57 -0700, "W. Mark Wilson"
<wmarkwilson@verizon.net> wrote:
>So, Deej, if the dogs own you, what does your dog's "Training a Human"
>write-up look like?
>
>Dubya
>
>"Mr Simplicity" <animix_spamless_@animas.net> wrote in message
>news:42c71161@linux...
>>I think that actually, we are owned by two great
|
|
|
Re: Training a Great Dane [message #55211 is a reply to message #55192] |
Sun, 03 July 2005 02:26 ![Go to previous message Go to previous message](/theme/PARIS_Forum_Template/images/up.png) ![Go to next message Go to next message](/theme/PARIS_Forum_Template/images/down.png) |
rick
![UNITED STATES UNITED STATES](/images/flags/us.png) Messages: 1976 Registered: February 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Chris
>>
>>DMorrell wrote:
>>
>>> I've been running Paris on 98SE with very few problems. I'd like to
>>> run a couple of other apps on the same rig - is anyone running Paris
>>> on 2000 Pro? If so, any drawbacks?
>>>
>>> Thanks - Don
>>
>>--
>>Chris Ludwig
>>ADK
>>chrisl@adkproaudio.com <mailto:chrisl@adkproaudio.com>
>>www.adkproaudio.com <http://www.adkproaudio.com/>
>>(859) 635-5762At this point in history, you would be better off going to XP. You'll have
to commit to the new drivers either way.
MEB
DMorrell <don@toneworks.com> wrote:
>I've been running Paris on 98SE with very few problems. I'd like to
>run a couple of other apps on the same rig - is anyone running Paris
>on 2000 Pro? If so, any drawbacks?
>
>Thanks - Donturns out the labs sleeps during the day. at night the lab partys like
Jason Miles :-)
rick wrote:
> to...dat bootiful bro.
>
> On Sat, 02 Jul 2005 18:48:50 -0400, John <no@no.com> wrote:
>
>
>>the pups are in the hood. thank god the lab sleeps :-)
>>
>>John wrote:
>>
>>>hahaha, thanks gang. It's tomorrow !!!
>>>
>>>rick wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>why you old stud you...
>>>>
>>>>On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 07:41:28 -0400, John <no@no.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>That's right. Saturday my wife and I are getting 2 8 week old
>>>>>pups, a lab and a corgi (Bonny and Daisy). Please send presents for
>>>>>the puppy shower to their registry at Sacks Fifth Avenue. I'll have
>>>>>pictures up soon.
>>>>>
>>>>>hehe
>>>>>John
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>Can this help?
erlilo
"Mike Audet" <mike@MikeF-SPAMAudet.com> skrev i en meddelelse
news:42c70e8c$1@linux...
>
> Hi All,
>
> I'm looking for the presets for the Mod pack. Anyone have them?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Mike
;oP ;o)
rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
>perhaps you can ask your brother about this...he's used to getting the
>blame. ;o)
>
>On 3 Jul 2005 18:51:46 +1000, "Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>Far as I can tell the only real difference between PCI 2.2 and PCI 2.3
is
>>that in 2.3 they no longer supply 5V to PCI cards. That's the only difference
>>anyone has really named as far as I can tell.
>>
>>They even still use the 5V slotted PCI connector, and accept 5V signalling,
>>but don't supply 5 volts to the cards.
>>
>>Seems downright stupid to me, or am I missing something?
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Kim.
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
---=_linux42c7dee0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Well, as I understand it...
I grabbed this from the ASUS website, from the manual for the A7V8X.
As I understand it, the EDS cards often have trouble sharing with anything,
so looking at the pic attached, slot 1 only shares with slot 5, so if you
put EDS cards in 1 & 5 together, or an EDS in 1 and nothing in 5 or visa
versa, you'll be fine. Slot 2 & 6 both share with AGP, which is busy, and
apparently problematic, so they are likely trouble for EDS use. Slot 3 shar
|
|
|
Re: Training a Great Dane [message #55223 is a reply to message #55180] |
Sun, 03 July 2005 08:36 ![Go to previous message Go to previous message](/theme/PARIS_Forum_Template/images/up.png) |
Neil
Messages: 1645 Registered: April 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
r />
> Kim.
>
> "Dan B" <danielNOSPAM_burne@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >Ok, I've got an Asus A7V8X and an Asus A7V-600X. Presumably this has the
> PCI
> >sharing issue Mr S describes below. I'm running a dual head G450 AGP, a
> PCI
> >graphics card, 1 x EDS, 1 x Korg Oasys. I may also run another EDS, a UAD
> >(or similar) and/or a PCI controller card or Firewire card. (I also have
> >IDE and SATA hard drives, and occasionally use USB hard-drives / CD-RWs).
> >
> >
> >If I've got this right, I should run the audio cards in 3, 4, 5 (though
> I'm
> >a little confued as to why, and what about sharing on PCI 3 and 5 with
SATA,
> >Usb, and IDE...? What's wrong with PCI 2...?). This would require putting
> >the graphics cards and any other cards on PCI 1 and 2, but wasn't it
recommended
> >to put the first EDS card in the first free PCI slot? What would the
consequence
> >be of running a fourth audio card in an Asus mobo...?
> >
> >Confused!
> >Daniel
> >
> >
> >
> >"Mr Simplicity" <animix_spamless_@animas.net> wrote:
> >>Alos........my experience with AMI bios was less than thrilling. Award
> Bios
> >>is much better, IMHO. MSImobo's use the AMI bios (or they did last time
> >I
> >>looked). I would check this out before I made the jump.
> >>
> >>Deej
> >>
> >>
> >>"Mr Simplicity" <animix_spamless_@animas.net> wrote in message
> >>news:42c72eda@linux...
> >>> I tried one of these boards before I got my ASUS board. I had some
*major*
> >>> issues with it, though it's been so long ago that I don't remember all
> >of
> >>> them.......and they could have been related to my Matrox video cards
> >>and/or
> >>> my SBS chassis
> >>>
> >>> I think Erling uses this successfully though. He's your man, I think.
> >>>
> >>> Deej
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> "Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:42c7282e$1@linux...
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > I'm guessing this wont fit EDS cards. Can someone who pulls their
system
> >>> > apart often and really knows the size and shape of EDS cards and MBs
> >>> confirm
> >>> > that you will or wont fit EDS cards into slots 1, 2 and maybe 3 on
> this
> >>> board...
> >>> >
> >>> > Cheers,
> >>> > Kim.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>...........errrrr......the Skunkworks plugin folder that is. I just reloaded
Paris on my win ME machine and I need to reload my modpack, NOLimit, etc. I
can't seem to find the link that explains where everything goes.
System directory maybe?
;o}> At this point in history, you would be better off going to XP.
.........as long as he doesn't need more than one ADAT module per MEC and
doesn't need to use Paris for ADAT transfers *ever*.
;o)
"Michael Broyles" <mbroyles@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:42c7cb7c$1@linux...
>
>
> At this point in history, you would be better off going to XP. You'll have
> to commit to the new drivers either way.
>
> MEB
>
> DMorrell <don@toneworks.com> wrote:
> >I've been running Paris on 98SE with very few problems. I'd like to
> >run a couple of other apps on the same rig - is anyone running Paris
> >on 2000 Pro? If so, any drawbacks?
> >
> >Thanks - Don
>I've got this recurring back problem. I'm usually able to deal with this in
a wholistic way, but occasionally it just has to be slammed with drugs to
knock down the pain threshold and allow the muscles to relax once they have
succeeded in going into spasm. I've got some *really* strong meds here for
that purpose. It's been over a year since I took any of these and I don't
take rec.drugs, so I have no tolerance for this stuff at all. Last night I
had to pull out the big guns. Woke up this morning so hung over that I feel
like spoiled meat.
I've got a session tonight and I've been cleaning up the studio today. I
have beel playing some CD tracks for my listening pleasure (Jason Miles-To
Grover With Love) and to get my ears back in tune with the world. I've been
so wierded out because it didn't sound right at all, but I'm so fried that I
have been walking around thinking it was my brain that was doing bizarre
things to my hearing.
I just noticed that my DAW running Wavelab is slaved to one of my MECS which
is turned on and sending 48kHz timecode to my RME card which is playing back
the audio tracks..
Think I'll go for a long walk now and try to clear the cobwebs.
Gawd.........I hate hangovers.
;o}Gol' dern Pillhead!
They got laws down here in Willie County fer tha likes of you!
Now I suppose yer gonna go record some drug music.
"Mr Simplicity" <animix_spamless_@animas.net> wrote:
>I've got this recurring back problem. I'm usually able to deal with this
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Tue Feb 11 01:23:09 PST 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.07384 seconds
|