| Collected FX Presets [message #57068] |
Fri, 19 August 2005 08:17  |
Dan B
Messages: 54
Registered: June 2005
|
Member |
|
|
nce tried swapping the cards around into the other ones PCI slot
>> > (no
>> > joy). I've also tried disabling one EDS (only) at a time in Device
>Manager
>> > and then launching Paris. I either get Error 2/2 (on one card) or Error
>> > 1/1
>> > (on the other).
>> >
>> > I may have to go back to ME! Although I'd like to run a system with
more
>> > Ram (1.5+ Gb) for plug-ins, and I believe ME can't take advantage of
>this.
>> >
>> >
>> > In the meantime, I may try removing the disabled Oasys cards and putting
>> > the EDS cards in different PCI slots, testing one at a time with the
MEC
>> > to see if the work.
&
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Collected FX Presets [message #57070 is a reply to message #57069] |
Fri, 19 August 2005 08:33  |
Dan B
Messages: 54
Registered: June 2005
|
Member |
|
|
>>Hi all,
>>
>>As promised I've put together a PPJ of collected Paris FX presets - unfortuantely
>>I can't attach it as it's too large (c.1.7Meg) - I'll happily e-mail it
>
> though
>
>>if you drop me an e-mail. I'll also send a copy to Mike Audet as he's got
>>some webspace for this purpose.
>>
>>Most of these have been compiled from other users or the newsgroup or the
>>FX preset updates. There are settings for the Comp, NoLimit, Plate and Room
>>Reverbs, Chorus, and Tap Delay.
>>
>>If anyone has any to add, let us all know. You might also want to contact
>>Mike Audet (mike@mikeFSPAM!audet.com) and myself, as Mike has some webspace
>>(www.mikeaudet.com/paris) set up for Paris FX Presets.
>>
>>Enjoy.
>>
>>Dan B / db
>
>no worries, i'll wait till Mike has them up
dan b wrote:
> P.S.S. (!)
> - Just to reiterate, I don't think there's anything/much new here, but it
> should be a useful compilation.
> - The actual file size is nearer 2.4 meg.
> - John- I'm not having any joy replying to your e-mail address.
> - Mike Audet is posting it up on his webspace fairly soon.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> db
>
> "db" <daniel_burneNOSPAM@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>p.s.
>>Note that: The TubeWarmer comp preset is just the active gain element. The
>>PCM 60 reverb preset requires the BarbQ or FreakQ plug-in as well (search
>>the newsgroup). The UAD 1172LN vocal preset requires about 14db of gain
>
> reduction.
>
>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Collected FX Presets [message #57091 is a reply to message #57068] |
Fri, 19 August 2005 21:02 |
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ank">43065B94.5080F000@his.com...
> > I needed to do some acoustic guitar tracks for a client, and
> > I'm currently set up for a small choir and didn't feel like
> > tearing the the setup apart, so I decided to use the mic pre's
> > in my Mackie 1402 (using the insert outs, of course, so as
> > to bypass extraneous circuitry). I set my trusty old AKG
> > 451's up in an X-Y configuration and moved my '79 Martin
> > M-38 around bit using headphones (Fostex T-20's) to find
> > the sweet spot. I grabbed my new Wegen ($15.00 apiece!)
> > guitar pick and spent about two hours trying out parts until
> > I thought I had a couple of good tracks...
> >
> > And I was amazed at the sound of my guitar! It's a great
> > sounding box, and the Wegen picks, believe it or not, make
> > a big difference in the sound, but the surprise was the fact
> > that I used the Mackie! I have a Presonus M-80, which I
> > mostly use for drums, a Demeter VTMP-2a, a Sytek and an
> > RNP. Maybe one of them would have sounded even better,
> > but for those of you who can't afford "designer" mic pre's
> > I have to say this: If you put a great sounding instrument
> >
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Collected FX Presets [message #57095 is a reply to message #57091] |
Sat, 20 August 2005 05:42 |
Mike Audet
Messages: 294
Registered: December 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
sound of my guitar! It's a great
> > > sounding box, and the Wegen picks, believe it or not, make
> > > a big difference in the sound, but the surprise was the fact
> > > that I used the Mackie! I have a Presonus M-80, which I
> > > mostly use for drums, a Demeter VTMP-2a, a Sytek and an
> > > RNP. Maybe one of them would have sounded even better,
> > > but for those of you who can't afford "designer" mic pre's
> > > I have to say this: If you put a great sounding instrument
> > > in front of a great sounding mic and plug it into a Mackie
> > > it'll probably sound great.
> > >
> > > Just thought I'd put that out there...
> > >
> > > Gantt
> > >
> >
> >
>
>People --
Having unhappy time with midi lately... These days I run Paris and
Cubase SX on separate machines, slaving SX to Paris via ADAT out to
RME in, so this would be a non-Paris topic, I guess... Except as it
possibly relates to sync issues...
Anyway -- Mostly work with VSTi's in SX, which are peachy fine, but
still like to use a couple of older external modules some times, and
that's where unhappines creeps in: Seems to take SX a loooong time to
lock (like 8-10 bars or more) and there's still a bit of drift (I
think) once it does. Alas. My question is: is it the funky older
2x2 usb midi interface? The RME Digi 9652? Some funky preference
setting buried within Cubase's manymanymany menus? Maybe I need more
zinc? (I do need more zinc.)
Seems like such a caveman problem to be having these days -- I mean,
people had this nailed in 1987 -- where did we go wrong? Any solid
|
|
|
|
| Re: Collected FX Presets [message #57161 is a reply to message #57091] |
Mon, 22 August 2005 17:19 |
Craig Mitchell
Messages: 20
Registered: July 2005
|
Junior Member |
|
|
so good.
>>
>>Craig M.
>>
>
>Hi Neil,
All my testing was done with Cakewalk Pro Audio 9, and the Audio being played
back was in PARIS, not in Cakewalk. Systems that do MIDI and audio together
may fare better.
Also, just playing back tracks didn't bog the system down enough to mess
with MIDI timing. It was DX effects (I was testing with 16 DB Audio compressors)
that seemed to shitcan the sync.
Mike
"Neil" <OIUOIU@OIU.com> wrote:
>
>"Mike Audet" <mike@MikeF-SPAMAudet.com> wrote:
>>
>>I did a lot of testing in this area. Here's what I found:
>>
>>Windows XP can do somewhat tight MIDI timing as long as it does nothin
else.
>
>Gonna have to disagree with you there, I'm running SX on XP
>and I can retrack a MIDI track to regenerate a different audio
>track (you know, if I want to change the sound a bit, for
>example) from an existing MIDI track with no perceptible drift.
>Perhaps it has more to do with the type of interface you're
>using in combination with that?
>
>> As soon as the system gets loaded down with say...dxis, you're doomed.
>
>See above.
>
>>PCI cards are twice as good as USB with the system loaded down, but are
>still
>>nowhere near good enough (PCI 10ms drift, USB 20 ms drift)
>
>Is this with more CPU load as well? Because I just set up a USB-
>based (Lexicon Omega) system on a friends computer & it synced
>fine, but we were just testing a MIDI track retriggered through
>the synth she has, plus an audio track triggered by the same
>
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
