|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Ok, Now the mix is Up -Feedback? [message #96928 is a reply to message #96896] |
Sun, 16 March 2008 20:24 |
Neil
Messages: 1645 Registered: April 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
I'm diggin' it... nice job! I agree with Aaron with regard to
the way a couple of levels catch you by surprise & kinda wreck
the groove, but other than that I think it's very cool!
Neil
Bill L <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote:
>
>
>Rich Lamanna wrote:
>> Awesome, very nice space created in the mix. Nice song, arrangement and
>> feel. The drums seem to fade in and out, I like the effect. Overall it's
>> full of emotion, feeling, lightness and air, but I'm not sure if I would
>> have used so much reverb, but that's personal. I don't think I could have
>> created this type of a mix myself. I'd like to hang out in your studio
and
>> get some pointers :-)
>
>I agree. That's some hip work.
>
>>
>> Rich
>>
>> "Mike R" <emarenot@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:47dd40b1$1@linux...
>>> Sorry about the deadlink earlier.
>>> Any feedback at all is welcome.
>>> MR
>>
>>
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Ok, Now the mix is Up -Feedback? [message #96975 is a reply to message #96876] |
Mon, 17 March 2008 07:39 |
Graham Duncan
Messages: 147 Registered: December 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Mike,
Overall, very nice work. Little things that bugged me:
- Some of the crash samples are a little fake sounding to me. They
didn't seem to tonally meld with the loops/etc. (e.g. 0:39, 0:50, 0:54)
That may just be me though.
- at 0:29 the filter goes too far and the volume chokes the tune away...
and then hits too hard immediately after that. The effect is good, but
I'd want it to be smoother, more like the one at 1:29.
- Check your volume automation at 1:37. I feel you should be back at
100% right there, instead of 1:40 where it seems to jump up, but after
the vocal has returned, which feels odd. Try finishing that fade up
right as the vocal comes back, or just a little before.
- Agree re: the piano being too hot at 3:54.
Again, nice work. What host and instruments are you using? And which
reverb?
Graham
Mike R wrote:
> Sheesh, forgot the link:
> http://www.soundclick.com/bands/default.cfm?bandID=815466
>
> "Mike R" <emarenot@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Sorry about the deadlink earlier.
>> Any feedback at all is welcome.
>> MR
>
|
|
|
Re: Ok, Now the mix is Up -Feedback? [message #97004 is a reply to message #96975] |
Mon, 17 March 2008 19:12 |
emarenot
Messages: 345 Registered: June 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Hey Graham
Thanks for the reply. All the feedback has been really helpful. I pretty
much agree with all the suggestions that have been made. Its funny how that
small still mixer voice was kind of whispering to me about most of them,
but I don't listen when I'm listening. The verbs were all pretty much that
Ambience vst set at "high quality." The delay on the vox was that old Karlette
vst from Steinburg. I really like the bass sound which is a slightly tweaked
patch from the Unifyer vsti "anabass." Most of the pads and keys are from
either my Korg TR or JV1080. There's a small guitar part on the chorus out
-telecaster through that free voxengo booex -I think its called. (By the
way, I've been messin' around with the simuanalog marshall emulation which
sounds pretty damn good.)
Anyhow, thanks again, MR
Graham Duncan <graham@grahamduncan.com> wrote:
>Mike,
>
>Overall, very nice work. Little things that bugged me:
>
>- Some of the crash samples are a little fake sounding to me. They
>didn't seem to tonally meld with the loops/etc. (e.g. 0:39, 0:50, 0:54)
>That may just be me though.
>
>- at 0:29 the filter goes too far and the volume chokes the tune away...
>and then hits too hard immediately after that. The effect is good, but
>I'd want it to be smoother, more like the one at 1:29.
>
>- Check your volume automation at 1:37. I feel you should be back at
>100% right there, instead of 1:40 where it seems to jump up, but after
>the vocal has returned, which feels odd. Try finishing that fade up
>right as the vocal comes back, or just a little before.
>
>- Agree re: the piano being too hot at 3:54.
>
>Again, nice work. What host and instruments are you using? And which
>reverb?
>
>Graham
>
>Mike R wrote:
>> Sheesh, forgot the link:
>> http://www.soundclick.com/bands/default.cfm?bandID=815466
>>
>> "Mike R" <emarenot@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> Sorry about the deadlink earlier.
>>> Any feedback at all is welcome.
>>> MR
>>
|
|
|