| Interesting Daniel Weiss Interview [message #77147] |
Sun, 17 December 2006 11:15 |
emarenot
Messages: 345
Registered: June 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C721CC.A4CEA6C0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
http://www.gearslutz.com/board/showthread.php?t=93177
Found this on gearslutz. Weiss has some interesting comments on sampling
rate. He seems to feel that 60khz would be the "ideal" rate. His comments
on 96k vs 88.2 are also interesting. Apparently, his latest product is an
ITB processing unit, like Paris, like the new Fairlight thingy, like
Receptor. I never thought of it this way, but he mentions that his ITB
product (presumably versus some "native" solution) frees up the developer
from being so circumscribed byt the demands of the computer's hardware and
softward. That sounds good, but it seems like six of one, half dozen of the
other. Whenever I hear about scalable architecture I think Roland or Korg,
and how future proof really means one or two years of support/development
after then sale (if that) and on to the next thing.
MR
------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C721CC.A4CEA6C0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1555" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><A=20
href=3D"http://www.gearslutz.com/board/showthread.php?t=3D93177">http://w=
ww.gearslutz.com/board/showthread.php?t=3D93177</A></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Found this on gearslutz. Weiss =
has some=20
interesting comments on sampling rate. He seems to feel that 60khz =
would=20
be the "ideal" rate. His comments on 96k vs 88.2 are also=20
interesting. Apparently, his latest product is an ITB processing =
unit,=20
like Paris, like the new Fairlight thingy, like Receptor. I never =
thought=20
of it this way, but he mentions that his =
ITB product (presumably=20
versus some "native" solution) frees up the developer from being so=20
circumscribed byt the demands of the computer's hardware and softward. =
That=20
sounds good, but it seems like six of one, half dozen of the =
other. =20
Whenever I hear about scalable architecture I think Roland or Korg, and =
how=20
future proof really means one or two years of support/development after =
then=20
sale (if that) and on to the next thing. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>MR</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0009_01C721CC.A4CEA6C0--
|
|
|
|
| Re: Interesting Daniel Weiss Interview [message #77148 is a reply to message #77147] |
Sun, 17 December 2006 09:26  |
Nil
Messages: 245
Registered: March 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Thanks Mike, great read. Gonna go post this link on the 88.2k
thread that DJ started on the Pulsar forum now.
Neil
"Mike R." <emarenot@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>http://www.gearslutz.com/board/showthread.php?t=93177
>
>Found this on gearslutz. Weiss has some interesting comments on sampling
>rate. He seems to feel that 60khz would be the "ideal" rate. His comments
>on 96k vs 88.2 are also interesting. Apparently, his latest product is
an
>ITB processing unit, like Paris, like the new Fairlight thingy, like
>Receptor. I never thought of it this way, but he mentions that his ITB
>product (presumably versus some "native" solution) frees up the developer
>from being so circumscribed byt the demands of the computer's hardware and
>softward. That sounds good, but it seems like six of one, half dozen of
the
>other. Whenever I hear about scalable architecture I think Roland or Korg,
>and how future proof really means one or two years of support/development
>after then sale (if that) and on to the next thing.
>MR
>
>
><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
><HTML><HEAD>
><META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
>charset=3Diso-8859-1">
><META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1555" name=3DGENERATOR>
><STYLE></STYLE>
></HEAD>
><BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><A=20
>href=3D"http://www.gearslutz.com/board/showthread.php?t=3D93177">http://w=
>ww.gearslutz.com/board/showthread.php?t=3D93177</A></FONT ></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Found this on gearslutz. Weiss =
>has some=20
>interesting comments on sampling rate. He seems to feel that 60khz =
>would=20
>be the "ideal" rate. His comments on 96k vs 88.2 are also=20
>interesting. Apparently, his latest product is an ITB processing =
>unit,=20
>like Paris, like the new Fairlight thingy, like Receptor. I never =
>thought=20
>of it this way, but he mentions that his =
>ITB product (presumably=20
>versus some "native" solution) frees up the developer from being so=20
>circumscribed byt the demands of the computer's hardware and softward. =
>That=20
>sounds good, but it seems like six of one, half dozen of the =
>other. =20
>Whenever I hear about scalable architecture I think Roland or Korg, and
=
>how=20
>future proof really means one or two years of support/development after
=
>then=20
>sale (if that) and on to the next thing. </FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>MR</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
>
>
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
