| What size are you OS partitions? [message #55275] |
Mon, 04 July 2005 22:07  |
Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
t; >>>and Paris creates a prefader send scenario if levels are controlled in
> >>>Paris. Thus, if you lower level of a track that has a reverb processor
> >
> > in
> >
> >>SX
> >>
> >>>the track level goes down, but the reverb level doesn't. The only way
> >>
> >>around
> >>
> >>>this if you want to use Paris for fader levels is to apply reverb as a
> >>>plugin on the SX tracks, so I'm doing my fader automation in SX and
> >>>plugin/EQ automation as well.
> >>>
> >>>Also, when mixing this way, in order to automate pans in Paris, Paris
> >
> > must
> >
> >>>be the master and have a moving timeline or there is no way to automate
> >>
> >>pans
> >>
> >>>in Paris so in this scenario, the DAWs must be timeline locked with
> >
> > Paris
> >
> >>as
> >>
> >>>the master becaus s I said before, cubase can only pan if the chann
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: What size are you OS partitions? [message #55319 is a reply to message #55275] |
Tue, 05 July 2005 18:01  |
Aaron Allen
Messages: 1988
Registered: May 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
has. Duncan wrote:
> Paris People:
>
> Working on a song demo here, several days in... The writer now wishes
> we were up 6 or 8 BPM... Don't want to start over...
>
> Thinking about timeshifting the thing in Wavelab... Question is --
> when? Should I finish rest of tracking ('nother guitar or two -- most
> of the lead vox, bg's, etc...) then drag the mix into WL and hit the
> "go faster" button? Or process existing tracks, bring'em back ino
> Paris and go from there? Whcih way is least screwed up?
>
> (starting to hate having this many choices...) -- Chas.FUD is what I was hoping for, but several users on GearSlutz confirmed it,
and pointed it to -40dB and lower, which just depends on how much
attenuation I'll end up needing I suppose - could be a non-issue. I'll give
one a try and see what happens.
Thanks for the feedback!
Regards,
Dedric
On 7/5/05 10:35 AM, in article 42cab6b3@linux, "EK Sound"
<spamnot.info@eksoundNO.com> wrote:
> One way to check would be to feed a signal through a "Y" cable to the
> input, then invert one of the outputs and sum through another "Y"
> cable. This should effectively cancel the signal. Any audio coming
> through would indicate a left-right imbalance. It's my guess that the
> difference would be less than 1/4 dB. The Central Station that we are
> using has some of the same anomalies... but with the dim button, you
> can get out of the bottom of the taper where the problems exist.
>
> David.
>
> Mr Simplicity wrote:
>> I've been using one for 3 years. Never had these issues at all. This sounds
>> like FUD to me.
>>
>> Deej
>>
>>
>>
>> "Dedric Terry" <dedric@keyofd.net> wrote in message
>> news:BEF00CDF.2B92%dedric@keyofd.net...
>>
>>> I know there has been some past discussion of t
|
|
|
|
| Re: What size are you OS partitions? [message #55321 is a reply to message #55319] |
Tue, 05 July 2005 18:24 |
Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
record your midi data in Vision and that will drive the synth.
>>>Just patch the output of the Synth to the inputs of your PARIS
>>>interface and record. All the info on how to sync Vision with PARIS on
>th
>>>Mac can be found in th PARIS manual from
>>>version1.8 to 3.0. OMS will use the IAC bus to send MTC
>>>to PARIS. When PARIS is set-up as the Master all you do
>>>is hit play and record in PARIS and Vision will follow as if they
>>>were one application.
>>>
>>>You will need a MIDI interface and a MIDI device for inputing
>>>the data. OMS with identify the interface and device..
>>>
>>>hope this helps!
>>>
>>>respect
>>>Nappy
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"Colonel Panic" <Panic@home.nowhere> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>You all have probably all been through this, so maybe you can help me.
>>>>
>>>>How do you record and playback MIDI info in Paris 3.0?
>>>>
>>>>Say you want to sync a Synth box to paris using MIDI clock.
>>>>
>>>>Can this be done? There doesn't appear to be any way to get MIDI signal
>>>>in and out of PARIS.
>>>>
>>>>TIA
>>>>
>>>>Panic
>>>
>>
>Although it is a little more work, I would shift tracks that won't be
re-recorded later before moving on (preferably less critical tracks).
Shifting a mix would sound more obvious with that much of a shift.
I wouldn't mix time shifted with newly recorded material on the same track
(e.g. if you have partial lead vocals - track them all later, don't shift
some, and add more later).
And... a ditto to what David said. N3's time warp is a big time saver and
way easier than time compressing offline.
Regards,
Dedric
On 7/5/05 9:21 PM, in article 42cb4e46@linux, "Dave(EK Sound)"
<audioguy_nospam_@shaw.ca> wrote:
> Got a copy of Nuendo 3 or SX 3?... Time warp tool... simply
> amazing.
>
> David.
>
> Chas. Duncan wrote:
>> Paris People:
>>
>> Working on a song demo here, several days in... The writer now wishes
>> we were up 6 or 8 BPM... Don't want to start over...
>>
>> Thinking about timeshifting the thing in Wavelab... Question is --
>> when? Should I finish rest of tracking ('nother guitar or two -- most
>> of the lead vox, bg's, etc...) then drag the mix into WL and hit the
>> "go faster" button? Or process existing tracks, bring'em back ino
>> Paris and go from there? Whcih way is least screwed up?
>>
>> (starting to hate having this many choices...) -- Chas.Happy Belated Birthday to you.....
--
Martin Harrington
www.lendanear-sound.com
"Nappy" <
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: What size are you OS partitions? [message #55346 is a reply to message #55340] |
Wed, 06 July 2005 23:48 |
erlilo
Messages: 405
Registered: June 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
to:OIUOIU@OIU.com" target="_blank">OIUOIU@OIU.com> wrote in message news:42cd3c28$1@linux...
>
> I remember awhile back there were a couple of you that were
> talking about studio management software. A friend of mine has a
> voice & piano studio, and she's looking for some software for
> mainly basic accounting purposes (for which purposes, Quicken or
> something of that ilk would obviously work just fine, and also
> don't cost very much), but I thought if there was a package that
> would handle accounting & things like scheduling, etc. in the
> same bundle, that would be even better.
>
> I'm going to cruise around the web to see what's available, but
> if any of you know of any apps that do this sort of thing, and
> are reasonably-priced or perhaps even fall into the
> freeware/donationware/shareware category, please let me know.
> (e-mail is: neil.henderson-AT-sbcglobal.net, or just post the
> info here).
>
> Thanks!
>
> NeilEK Sound wrote:
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
