|
Re: rendering EDS ? [message #62107 is a reply to message #62102] |
Fri, 30 December 2005 15:33 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9905e/9905e3060941e31ca22bc3effc223f858dede7ba" alt="Go to previous message Go to previous message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/021e1/021e197d56d1cb040cdb75978a499a5189758755" alt="Go to next message Go to next message" |
Martin Harrington
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac175/ac175249ef1071b69acf31ee5abf050b6da8d2bd" alt="AUSTRALIA AUSTRALIA" Messages: 560 Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
; (sorry),
that
> weren't bought up with analogue.
> They are told that all you need to do is set an optimum level, and then
fix
> it in the mix.....Wrong...........
> You must always try and get the most amount of signal to tape, (disk),
> allowing for dynamics and song type of course.
> Riding record levels was one of the first things we were ever taught, (I
> can't remember being taught it, but I know I was), because if you under
> recorded with tape, all you got was noise when you had to ride the levels
> eventually in the mix, especially vocals.
> That's not to say we didn't limit or compress, but we
|
|
|
|