The PARIS Forums: PARIS: Main » Which new UAD-1 plugin????

Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Which new UAD-1 plugin????

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Which new UAD-1 plugin???? [message #81298]

Thu, 08 March 2007 09:06

Gantt Kushner

Messages: 545
Registered: June 2006
Location: Silver Spring, Maryland, ...

Senior Member

I have the Neve 1073 EQ. Do I want the 33609 comp or the 1081 EQ next?

Help! They're having sale! And I have $75 credit! And I can't afford 'em
both!

Gantt

Gantt Kushner
Gizmo Recording Company
Silver Spring, MD
www.gizmorecording.com

Report message to a moderator

Re: Which new UAD-1 plugin???? [message #81304 is a reply to message #81298]

Thu, 08 March 2007 12:25

Rod Lincoln
Messages: 883
Registered: September 2005

Senior Member

You need both or you will die.

Seriously...since you have the 1073eq, I'd probably go with the 33609 comp....kiks
major booty on Snare. The 1081 is more versatile, since it has more bands,
and you will love it, but since you have an eq, if you can't swing both,
I'd go with the comp.
Rod
"Gantt Kushner" <ganttmann@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>I have the Neve 1073 EQ. Do I want the 33609 comp or the 1081 EQ next?
>
>Help! They're having sale! And I have $75 credit! And I can't afford 'em
>both!
>
>Gantt

Report message to a moderator

Re: Which new UAD-1 plugin???? [message #81310 is a reply to message #81304]

Thu, 08 March 2007 12:23

Deej [4]

Messages: 1292
Registered: January 2007

Senior Member

......and more UAD-1 cards since the compressor will use around 70% of the
resources of a single card.

;o)

"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.com> wrote in message
news:45f06344$1@linux...
>
> You need both or you will die.
>
> Seriously...since you have the 1073eq, I'd probably go with the 33609
> comp....kiks
> major booty on Snare. The 1081 is more versatile, since it has more
> bands,
> and you will love it, but since you have an eq, if you can't swing both,
> I'd go with the comp.
> Rod
> "Gantt Kushner" <ganttmann@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>I have the Neve 1073 EQ. Do I want the 33609 comp or the 1081 EQ next?
>>
>>Help! They're having sale! And I have $75 credit! And I can't afford 'em
>>both!
>>
>>Gantt
>

Report message to a moderator

Re: Which new UAD-1 plugin???? [message #81317 is a reply to message #81310]

Thu, 08 March 2007 15:05

Rod Lincoln
Messages: 883
Registered: September 2005

Senior Member

Well yes...there IS that. They've got the system down, make way cool plugs
that take up so much power that you need more cards. I've got 3, so far.
I think you've got 36 or 37, right?
;-)
Rod
"DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote:
>.....and more UAD-1 cards since the compressor will use around 70% of the

>resources of a single card.
>
>;o)
>
>"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.com> wrote in message
>news:45f06344$1@linux...
>>
>> You need both or you will die.
>>
>> Seriously...since you have the 1073eq, I'd probably go with the 33609

>> comp....kiks
>> major booty on Snare. The 1081 is more versatile, since it has more
>> bands,
>> and you will love it, but since you have an eq, if you can't swing both,
>> I'd go with the comp.
>> Rod
>> "Gantt Kushner" <ganttmann@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>I have the Neve 1073 EQ. Do I want the 33609 comp or the 1081 EQ next?
>>>
>>>Help! They're having sale! And I have $75 credit! And I can't afford
'em
>>>both!
>>>
>>>Gantt
>>
>
>

Report message to a moderator

Re: Which new UAD-1 plugin???? [message #81323 is a reply to message #81317]

Thu, 08 March 2007 17:19

Deej [4]

Messages: 1292
Registered: January 2007

Senior Member

I've got 4...need 6

;o)

"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:45f088b1$1@linux...
>
> Well yes...there IS that. They've got the system down, make way cool
> plugs
> that take up so much power that you need more cards. I've got 3, so far.
> I think you've got 36 or 37, right?
> ;-)
> Rod
> "DJ" <www.aarrrrggghhh!!!.com> wrote:
>>.....and more UAD-1 cards since the compressor will use around 70% of the
>
>>resources of a single card.
>>
>>;o)
>>
>>"Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.com> wrote in message
>>news:45f06344$1@linux...
>>>
>>> You need both or you will die.
>>>
>>> Seriously...since you have the 1073eq, I'd probably go with the 33609
>
>>> comp....kiks
>>> major booty on Snare. The 1081 is more versatile, since it has more
>>> bands,
>>> and you will love it, but since you have an eq, if you can't swing both,
>>> I'd go with the comp.
>>> Rod
>>> "Gantt Kushner" <ganttmann@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>I have the Neve 1073 EQ. Do I want the 33609 comp or the 1081 EQ next?
>>>>
>>>>Help! They're having sale! And I have $75 credit! And I can't afford
> 'em
>>>>both!
>>>>
>>>>Gantt
>>>
>>
>>
>

Report message to a moderator

Re: Which new UAD-1 plugin???? [message #81324 is a reply to message #81323]

Thu, 08 March 2007 22:00

Graham Duncan

Messages: 147
Registered: December 2008

Senior Member

Ha! You could always load up an old machine with 4 more cards and use
FX Teleport over LAN into your main DAW. Cheaper than a Magma and gets
you over the 4 card limit if it works.

:)

Graham

DJ wrote:
> I've got 4...need 6
>
> ;o)

Report message to a moderator

Re: Which new UAD-1 plugin???? [message #81330 is a reply to message #81324]

Fri, 09 March 2007 07:59

Deej [4]

Messages: 1292
Registered: January 2007

Senior Member

FXT doesn't work with PDC on UAD-1's, or so I've heard. I guess I could get
Cubase SE for my 2nd DAW though.

;o)

"Graham Duncan" <graham@grahamduncan.com> wrote in message
news:45f0f846$1@linux...
> Ha! You could always load up an old machine with 4 more cards and use FX
> Teleport over LAN into your main DAW. Cheaper than a Magma and gets you
> over the 4 card limit if it works.
>
> :)
>
> Graham
>
> DJ wrote:
>> I've got 4...need 6
>>
>> ;o)

Report message to a moderator

Re: Which new UAD-1 plugin???? [message #81334 is a reply to message #81330]

Fri, 09 March 2007 10:39

Gary Flanigan
Messages: 181
Registered: June 2006

Senior Member

">
>"Graham Duncan" <graham@grahamduncan.com> wrote in message
>news:45f0f846$1@linux...
>> Ha! You could always load up an old machine with 4 more cards and use
FX
>> Teleport over LAN into your main DAW.

I don't think the existing authorizations would work on a 2nd box. I wonder
if anyone has asked UA if there is a way around the four card limit?

Report message to a moderator

Re: Which new UAD-1 plugin???? [message #81335 is a reply to message #81330]

Fri, 09 March 2007 09:40

Graham Duncan

Messages: 147
Registered: December 2008

Senior Member

Indeed, that would probably work. :)

Graham

DJ wrote:
> FXT doesn't work with PDC on UAD-1's, or so I've heard. I guess I could get
> Cubase SE for my 2nd DAW though.
>
> ;o)
>
>
> "Graham Duncan" <graham@grahamduncan.com> wrote in message
> news:45f0f846$1@linux...
>> Ha! You could always load up an old machine with 4 more cards and use FX
>> Teleport over LAN into your main DAW. Cheaper than a Magma and gets you
>> over the 4 card limit if it works.
>>
>> :)
>>
>> Graham
>>
>> DJ wrote:
>>> I've got 4...need 6
>>>
>>> ;o)
>
>

Report message to a moderator

Re: Which new UAD-1 plugin???? [message #81337 is a reply to message #81334]

Fri, 09 March 2007 13:47

Deej [4]

Messages: 1292
Registered: January 2007

Senior Member

I did ask them. It's the driver. It could be amended, but at the time I was
told that more than 4 of these cards would overload the bandwidth when
paired with audio interfaces which are aso using bandwidth. Seems like PCIe
would change all that. As far as existing authorizations go, I also asked
them agout this. there was some willingness to look at this at the time but
I never pursued it because I never bought a 5th card. I've seen posts on the
UAD newsgroup since then that this request has been denied to some users
there.

Deej

"Gary Flanigan" <gary_flangian@ce9.uscourts.gov> wrote in message
news:45f19be4$1@linux...
>
> ">
>>"Graham Duncan" <graham@grahamduncan.com> wrote in message
>>news:45f0f846$1@linux...
>>> Ha! You could always load up an old machine with 4 more cards and use
> FX
>>> Teleport over LAN into your main DAW.
>
> I don't think the existing authorizations would work on a 2nd box. I
> wonder
> if anyone has asked UA if there is a way around the four card limit?

Report message to a moderator

Re: Which new UAD-1 plugin???? [message #81572 is a reply to message #81298]

Thu, 15 March 2007 18:27

Gantt Kushner

Messages: 545
Registered: June 2006
Location: Silver Spring, Maryland, ...

Senior Member

How about the Precision Multiband? Anyone using that one? It occurs to me
that a it make make a nice addition to my mastering arsenal...

Gantt

"Gantt Kushner" <ganttmann@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>I have the Neve 1073 EQ. Do I want the 33609 comp or the 1081 EQ next?
>
>Help! They're having sale! And I have $75 credit! And I can't afford 'em
>both!
>
>Gantt

Gantt Kushner
Gizmo Recording Company
Silver Spring, MD
www.gizmorecording.com

Report message to a moderator

Re: Which new UAD-1 plugin???? [message #81573 is a reply to message #81572]

Thu, 15 March 2007 18:35

Rod Lincoln
Messages: 883
Registered: September 2005

Senior Member

It Rocketh mosteth mightlyth. Uses lots of DSP, though. (as does the Neve
comp).
Rod
"Gantt Kushner" <ganttmann@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>How about the Precision Multiband? Anyone using that one? It occurs to
me
>that a it make make a nice addition to my mastering arsenal...
>
>Gantt
>
>"Gantt Kushner" <ganttmann@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>I have the Neve 1073 EQ. Do I want the 33609 comp or the 1081 EQ next?
>>
>>Help! They're having sale! And I have $75 credit! And I can't afford
'em
>>both!
>>
>>Gantt
>

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:	Fatest Mac question - I know it's been said before
Next Topic:	Ahh.. Drummers :)

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sun Dec 15 15:07:32 PST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02912 seconds