Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Footswitch Suppliers?
| Footswitch Suppliers? [message #59001] |
Tue, 11 October 2005 16:27  |
Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
es (most are these
days) you need to do that.
Rod
"Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
>I did have a problem with that!
>
>Thanks Dave,
>Tom
>
> "EK Sound" <spamnot.info@eksoundNO.com> wrote in message =
>news:434c4098@linux...
> Only works with 16 bit .wav's
>
> David.
>
> Tom Bruhl wrote:
> > Rod,
> > Really? I thought I had a problem with that once...
> > Maybe not. I can probably do this now then.
> > Thanks!
> > Tom
> >=20
> > "Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@kc.rr.com <mailto:rlincoln@kc.rr.com>> =
>wrote
> > in message news:434c2b5e$1@linux...
> >=20
> > No, but Paris does that on import (after you set the record =
>path)
> > rod
> > "Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net <mailto:arpegio@comcast.net>> =
>wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >Rod,
> > >Thanks for that. Does it actually separate the interleaved =
>files?
> > >Tom
> > >
> > > "Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com
> > <mailto:rlincoln@nospam.kc.rr.com>> wrote in message =3D
> > >news:434bfc35$1@linux...
> > >
> > > Here it is. It's donation ware.
> > > http://cdexos.sourceforge.net/
> > > "Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@kc.rr.com =
><mailto:rlincoln@kc.rr.com>>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >Tom, you could install a program such as CDex (I think it's
=
>=3D
> > >shareware, but
> > > >I'm not sure)it converts mp3's to waves and vice versa. =
>That's
> > what I
> > =3D
> > >usually
> > > >use.=3D20
> > > >Rod
> > > >"Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net =
><mailto:arpegio@comcast.net>>
> > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>Alright, now I have to reinstall Wavelab...
> > > >>
> > > >> "Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr =
><mailto:musurgio@otenet.gr>>
> > wrote in message =3D3D
> > > >>news:434bd54b@linux...
> > > >> Dear Tom,
> > > >> If you load mp3's on wavelab you can then save them as =
>wave
> > files.
> > > >> It is that simple.
> > > >> Regards,
> > > >> Dimitrios
> > > >> "Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net
> > <mailto:arpegio@comcast.net>> wrote in message =3D3D
> > > >>news:434bd28b@linux...
> > > >> The files are Winamp Media Files which are mp3s. =
>=3D3D20
> > > >> I want to lay guitar tracks over Steely Dan covers for
=
>him. =3D
> > >=3D3D20
> > > >> Can I make them individual wavs with either Paris, =
>strip
> > wav or
> > > >> Wavelab 3.0?
> > > >>
> > > >> He can send me the individual wavs and I can convert =
>those
> > but =3D
> > >we're
> > > >=3D3D
> > > >>
> > > >> trying to save a step for him I guess...
> > > >> Tom
> > > >>
> > > >> PS Don't eat too much roasted garlic at one sitting.
> > > >>
> > > >><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 =
>Transitional//EN">
> > > >><HTML><HEAD>
> > > >><META http-equiv=3D3D3DContent-Type =
>content=3D3D3D"text/html; =3D3D
> > > >>charset=3D3D3Diso-8859-1">
> > > >><META content=3D3D3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" =
>name=3D3D3DGENERATOR>
> > > >><STYLE></STYLE>
> > > >></HEAD>
> > > >><BODY bgColor=3D3D3D#ffffff>
> > > >><DIV><FONT face=3D3D3DArial size=3D3D3D2>Alright, now I =
>have to =3D
> > >reinstall=3D3D20
> > > >>Wavelab...</FONT></DIV>
> > > >><DIV> </DIV>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Footswitch Suppliers? [message #59035 is a reply to message #59001] |
Wed, 12 October 2005 09:25  |
Mark McDermott
Messages: 204
Registered: February 2006
Location: Portland, OR
|
Senior Member |
|
|
;> >>the amp and the speaker cabinet emulation. Unfortunately the =
>>GNX4 is pretty
>> >>much dedicated to emulating only guitar and bass amps, but I =
>>figure there
>> >>must be some in there that are more likely to sound like a =
>>classic keyboard
>> >>amp than others, and I'm sure over the years the odd person =
>>probably used
>> >>a guitar amp with a keyboard anyhow. Problem is a lot of the =
>>amps in this
>> >>list mean nothing to me other than a bunch of characters, =
>>whereas I'm sure
>> >>quite a few of you will be familiar with many of them, and I'm
=
>>also even
>> >>less familiar with actual keyboard amps, so I'm really lost for
>=
>>a place
>> >to
>> >>start other than to push buttons and see how things sound...
=
>>...which
>> >may
>> >>of course be a very good approach, but anyhow...
>> >>
>> >>Amps I have to choose from are:
>> >>'65 Fender Twin Reverb, Matchless DC30, Mesa Dual Rectifier, =
>>Mesa Boogie
>> >>Mark II C, '57 Fender Tweed Deluxe, Vox AC30 Top Boost, "A clean
>=
>>tube combo",
>> >>'78 Marshall Master Volume, "A nice crunchy tube amp combo", "A
>=
>>high gain
>> >>tube amp", "A sweet tube blues tone", Marshall JCM900, "A high
=
>>gain fuzz
>> >>distortion", "Fender Bassman", a HiWatt 50 watt stack, [bass =
>>rigs] - Ampeg
>> >>SVT, Ashdown ABM-C410H, Trace Elliot Commando, Sunn
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Footswitch Suppliers? [message #59054 is a reply to message #59045] |
Wed, 12 October 2005 21:15 |
Aaron Allen
Messages: 1988
Registered: May 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
4da2a8@linux">news:434da2a8@linux</A>...</DIV><BR>"Tom
=
>Bruhl"=20
> <<A href=3D"mailto:arpegio@comcast.net">arpegio@comcast.net</A>> =
>
> wrote:<BR><BR>>DC,<BR>>Are you still head over heels about that =
>guitar=20
> compressor<BR>>pedal? Tone Press? Tell me what it does =
>for your=20
> sound<BR>>besides the obvious.<BR>>Tom<BR><BR><BR>Oh yeah. =
>And I=20
> generally hate pedals.<BR><BR>We always wrestle with compressors for =
>guitar=20
> live. It's hard to get <BR>the compression we want without the =
>life all=20
> going out of the music.<BR><BR>I have a pair of DBX 160 VU's that come
=
>close=20
> to the sound I <BR>want if I keep the ratio really low. =
>Close, but=20
> not perfect.<BR><BR>What I have always wanted to hear is the trick we
=
>do in=20
> the studio <BR>where we mult the return (on tape) or copy the track =
>(in a DAW)=20
> and <BR>squeeze one track and don't squeeze the other. =
>Play with=20
> the <BR>relative levels a bit, and maybe some EQ and you can get=20
> some<BR>sterling tones. (btw, this is not panned left and right, =
>this is=20
> a mono<BR>effect I am speaking of) I used to use my =
>Carl=20
> Martin compressor<BR>this way by using the 4 inputs on a Matchless=20
> DC-30. Run the<BR>guitar into the high gain input, then run a =
>shorty=20
> from the low-gain<BR>input on the same channel to the compressor, then
=
>run the=20
> comp<BR>out to the other channel in. This got the signal =
>to both=20
> channels, <BR>one side compressed and one not compressed. =
>I got=20
> some great<BR>tones, but it was pretty cumbersome to setup and =
>adjusting=20
> the<BR>volume got pretty involved...<BR><BR>The Barber Tone Press, =
>does it all=20
> in one box. You get volume,<BR>blend, and =
>compression. What=20
> I do is run the blend up to full <BR>compressor and then adjust the =
>compressor=20
> knob until I am hearing<BR>quite a bit of squeeze going on, and then =
>pull the=20
> blend back until<BR>I get just the right amount of uncompressed tone =
>going=20
> through.<BR><BR>Sounds flippin' amazing. I generally leave =
>it on=20
> all the time.<BR><BR>BTW, this thing really helps heavy music, it's =
>are not=20
> just for <BR>country like a lot of people think compressors are for=20
> live.<BR>With the Tone Press you can make even metal sounds much more=20
> <BR>massive and studly.<BR><BR>Works equally well on all my guitars =
>and all my=20
> amps. Even the <BR>Hiwatt, and that thing hates =
>pedals.<BR><BR>Oh, and=20<
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Footswitch Suppliers? [message #59058 is a reply to message #59057] |
Thu, 13 October 2005 00:45 |
Aaron Allen
Messages: 1988
Registered: May 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
ront wall) or
overhead.
This, it turns out, is actually fairly easy to deal with. Put lots of
absorbent material on the front wall, and some on the ceiling. Use a
carpet. See below for more.
Decay Time
Decay time is the amount of time it takes for sound to die away in a
room. In a small room, it is usually pretty short, and so it is
generally not a problem. Nonetheless, youâd like to help the
decay along (itâs called âtighteningâ the room), and youâd like
to encourage the sound to decay equally quickly in ALL audible frequency
ranges.
I like to make the front wall absorbent at ALL frequencies (this can
require some moderate carpentry, building a flexural absorber for low
frequencies and covering it with foam or fiberglass for high
frequencies). Also, make at least the front third of the ceiling
absorbent down to 500 Hz. (4 inches of fiberglass covered with fabric or
any 4â foam panels will do fine). This usually gets the decay time
down to under 150 ms. and with other absorption in the room, it is
possible to get the decay time under 100 ms., which will yield really
good results.
Interestingly, if you do it right, the room will st
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Footswitch Suppliers? [message #59068 is a reply to message #59045] |
Thu, 13 October 2005 11:06 |
simmo
Messages: 9
Registered: October 2005
|
Junior Member |
|
|
ca" target="_blank">dnafe@magma.ca> wrote:
>You might want to pop over to John L Sayers forums and the acoustics forum
>at recording.org. and pose your room dimensions and questions. Good people
>with good practical advice.
>
>I bought 4 bales of 6 panels of 2'X4' - 3" Roxul RXL40 rigid insulation
and
>made four floor to ceiling corner absorbers (2'X8') and nine 2'X4' wall
>panels as well as a single 6' X 4' wall panels framed in cedar that pretty
>well tamed most of the problems but I'm still tweaking
>
>
>DOn
>
>
>"Mike" <spamthis@alltel.net> wrote in message news:434df705@linux...
>> Has anyone analyzed their control room and had success with adjustments?
>> Ive never done this and not sure if its for me.
>>
>> 1) What did you use to analyze it?
>> 2) How did you know what to do to fix problems?
>> 3) What did you do to fix the problems?
>>
>> I guess Im wondering if it is worth it to buy an analyzer like the Rane
>> RA27 or something - or - would I be better off just learning my room as
>> is.
>>
>
>Hi, all.
My buddy Swen abd I have both succesfully clocked our Paris rigs to Lucid
clocks. Yay!
I have not yet tried to route digital signals to external FX boxes, but Swen
has, with no luck. He says that when he patches an FX send to a digital
output in the Paris patchbay, there's no signal on the mixer aux channel.
The same basic patch works with an analog output engaged, just not the
digital.
His Kurzweil KSP8 shows lock to the Lucid, and Paris locks perfectly as
well.
Any knowledge?
JimmySwen has a couple sticky C-16 mute buttons. They work, but they're sticky. I
think a very small amount of splashed beer may be the culprit. It's a
bizarre tale involving a beer that was dropped onto the floor 4-6 feet away
from the mixing area. The beer landed upright, but shot a stream of beer up
into the air, and a few drops landed on the mute buttons on channels 15 &
16.
Any way to easily clean? Spray a little contact cleaner in there?
JimmySteve,
Those are the nicest DIY frames I have ever seen. VERY NICE!!!!
Craig M
in article 434e59bb$1@linux, Steve Helm at shelm@radford.edu wrote on
10/13/05 8:57 AM:
>
> The best thing anyone can do is control and tame the low end refquencies.
> This summer I built two DYI bass traps (based on Ethan Winer's Real Traps,
> and the DYI SuperChuck designs). T he results were outstanding!
>
> I've detailed the project and results at
> http://www.radford.edu/~shelm/acoustics/bass-traps.html
>
> Hope this helps.
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: Footswitch Suppliers? [message #59070 is a reply to message #59068] |
Thu, 13 October 2005 15:44 |
Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
the inputs and outputs are both patched. also, If it's s/pdif,
chances are that he won't see a thing on the meters. None of my spdif
devices show signal on the Paris aux meters. Have him set the device to full
wet and solo the return. That will tell him if anything is happening.
Deej
"uptown jimmy" <johnson314@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:434eff73$1@linux...
> Hi, all.
>
> My buddy Swen abd I have both succesfully clocked our Paris rigs to Lucid
> clocks. Yay!
>
> I have not yet tried to route digital signals to external FX boxes, but
Swen
> has, with no luck. He says that when he patches an FX send to a digital
> output in the Paris patchbay, there's no signal on the mixer aux channel.
> The same basic patch works with an analog output engaged, just not the
> digital.
>
> His Kurzweil KSP8 shows lock to the Lucid, and Paris locks perfectly as
> well.
>
> Any knowledge?
>
> Jimmy
>
>"DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>Gently lick while applying suction.........
Eeeeiiiiwwwwww.... I know we love Paris, but.... but... but Eeeeeiiiiwwww....
;o)The dude who sits behind me is only in the office once or twice a week. The
rest of the time his PC has his screen saver, which was a couple of words
set on that 3D microsoft screensaver where the words dance around all over
the place. Only thing is it was set so fast that it was near impossible to
read.
It seemed to say "Onya [something] robot". I spent a while looking at it
and couldn't make out what was in the middle, or think of what it might mean...
like what was a normal sentence that would start with Onya and end in Robot...
Then today at one point I caught it when the screen saver was only very slightly
shaking the words about, and read what it said...
It said "Onyas Moderobot"... which of course means very little...
....so Micheal the guy next to me suggested that the whole thing was backwards,
so I wrote it out backwards...
"Toboredom sayno".
So there ya go. ;o)Hartley sold out 'eh?
Wow man, never thought I'd see that one.
AA
"EK Sound" <spamnot.info@eksoundNO.com> wrote in message
news:434e7831@linux...
> Which is now owned by Loud Technologies... AKA Mackie.
>
> David.
>
> Aaron Allen wrote:
>> this may sound completely ridiculous, but have you contacted Peavey
>> online?
>> I've had several of their old 70's amps that may have the big chrome
>> switch I think you are looking for dude.
>> Ampeg would be another viable source for this. Ask for replacement parts.
>> Ampeg is owned by St Louis Music now, fyi.
>>
>> AA
>>
>>
>> "Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:434e00fb$1@linux...
>>
>>>"Aaron Allen" <nospam@not_here.dude> wrote:
>>>
>>>>www.partsexpress.com might have something
>>>>www.mcmelectronics.com might have something as well
>>>>www.markertek.com usually has it or can get it
>>>
>>>A fantastic list of stores which are going straight in my favourites for
>>>future refere
|
|
|
|
| Re: Footswitch Suppliers? [message #59079 is a reply to message #59063] |
Thu, 13 October 2005 19:18 |
Aaron Allen
Messages: 1988
Registered: May 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
or something - or - would I be better off just learning my room as is.
>
>>>
>>>and how much do you get paid...now i gets the whole brother thing.
;o)
On 14 Oct 2005 12:16:49 +1000, "Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>The dude who sits behind me is only in the office once or twice a week. The
>rest of the time his PC has his screen saver, which was a couple of words
>set on that 3D microsoft screensaver where the words dance around all over
>the place. Only thing is it was set so fast that it was near impossible to
>read.
>
>It seemed to say "Onya [something] robot". I spent a while looking at it
>and couldn't make out what was in the middle, or think of what it might mean...
> like what was a normal sentence that would start with Onya and end in Robot...
>
>Then today at one point I caught it when the screen saver was only very slightly
>shaking the words about, and read what it said...
>
>It said "Onyas Moderobot"... which of course means very little...
>
>...so Micheal the guy next to me suggested that the whole thing was backwards,
>so I wrote it out backwards...
>
>"Toboredom sayno".
>
>So there ya go. ;o)yes, not as sturdy as the best latching switches usually used
for "true bypass" switching of footpedals, but momentary foot
switches seem to be rarer than duck's teeth lately. Marshall
have some for their TSL amp footswitches, but I've replaced a
few of them for customers over the last couple years, and
they're much more expensive too. They look like conventional
footswitches though, with a metal button and lock nuts for
mounting. I'll find a Marshall part no. and get back to you.
<
|
|
|
|
| Re: Footswitch Suppliers? [message #59086 is a reply to message #59070] |
Fri, 14 October 2005 04:17 |
simmo
Messages: 9
Registered: October 2005
|
Junior Member |
|
|
te
(following links from Steve Helm's post below):
http://www.realtraps.com/info.htm
rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
>http://www.mhlabs.com/
>
>i suppose i should do them all on one post huh...
>
>On 14 Oct 2005 01:46:17 +1000, "Dale" <dalebradleycello@yahoo.com>
>wrote:
>
>>
>>Does anyone know of some room analysis software for a mac?
>>
>>Dale
>>
>>
>>jef knight <thestudio@allknightmusic.com> wrote:
>>>Hey,
>>>
>>>I just spent the last 2 months re-building my studio. The original
>>>layout/design were giving me tons of problems in the low end, and
>>>nothing seemed to make it better. It's just the problem inherent in a
>>>smaller room.
>>>
>>>So, what I did was knock out a couple of walls (that were part of the
>>>studio not the house) so I could turn the gear 90 degrees so the room
is
>>
>>>now wider than it is long. I have 4" wedge foam in 6'x2' panels a foot
>>>apart on the rear wall and just drywall on the front, for the "live
>>>end/dead end" effect. Sounds great in the mix position but is just a tad
>>
>>>boomy outside of that.
>>>
>>>I used the software SMAART to anylize the room but the traps I'd need
>>>would take up too much space. The problem is that the boom goes up as
>>>you get close to the foam wall.
>>>
>>>For me an eq won't help because the mix position is fine, so I think
>>>I'll do some mixes there over the weekend and if they sound fine. Still,
>>
>>>I don't know what I'll do if they are bass-wonky.
>>>
>>>jef
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Mike wrote:
>>>> Has anyone analyzed their control room and had success with adjustments?
>>Ive
>>>> never done this and not sure if its for me.
>>>>
>>>> 1) What did you use to analyze it?
>>>> 2) How did you know what to do to fix problems?
>>>> 3) What did you do to fix the problems?
>>>>
>>>> I guess Im wondering if it is worth it to buy an analyzer like the Rane
>>RA27
>>>> or something - or - would I be better off just learning my room as is.
>>
>>>>
>>>>
>Kim, Marshall TSL / JCM2000 SPDT momentary switch part no. is
SWTP-00047, and latching switch (for your "hold" switches) is
SWTP-00046. These part numbers are from Electric Factory, who
distribute all Marshall and Vox products in Australia. I
recommend that you order thru a retailer who sells a lot of
Marshall amps, such as Venue Music (Sydney), Pro Audio (Canberra)
or a big guitar shop in Melbourne. If you're stuck, I can order
them but may not get delivery until the end of November due to
my small turnover (I am in Darwin N.T.) The momentary has an
additional advantage: it is SPDT, which means it is easier to
wire as an "interrupt" switch with the latching "hold" switches
you mention in your original post. LOL >simmo
"simmo" <simmo@bigfoot.com.au> wrote:
>
>yes, not as sturdy as the best latching switches usually used
>for "true bypass" switching of footpedals, but momentary foot
>switches seem to be rarer than duck's teeth lately. Marshall
>have some for their TSL amp footswitches, but I've replaced a
>few of them for customers over the last couple years, and
>they're much more expensive too. They look like conventional
>footswitches though, with a metal button and lock nuts for
>mounting. I'll find a Marshall part no. and get back to you.
>
> "Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>Hmm... I did already check Jaycar. Didn't see those parts though. Do you
>>think that big rubber one would be ok for foot use? It certainly seems
suitable
>>size and shape wise, but I'm wondering if the plastic would be up to the
>>task of being kicked around. It doesn't mention foot use in the description.
>>
>>
|
|
|
|
| Re: Footswitch Suppliers? [message #59091 is a reply to message #59086] |
Fri, 14 October 2005 07:18 |
simmo
Messages: 9
Registered: October 2005
|
Junior Member |
|
|
> Richard,
>
> I've bought a used Mac G4 to use with Paris that has more horsepower than
> my previous Mac G3. Now I have to make a decision about displays. The G4
> has two video cards so it can support two monitors. But one of the video
> cards provides a DVI digital connection that, according to Apple, works
> better
> with the newest Apple displays, such as their 20-inch $800 display. My
> local
> Apple salesman claims therefore that the Apple display with the DVI
> connection
> will be superior in quality to any typical PC-world display with a VGA
> connection.
>
> My question: Which is better for monitoring Paris--two 17" or 19" displays
> (costing $1,000 or so together) of decent quality or one 20" display
> (costing
> $800) of marginally better quality?
>
> Many thanks,
> Richard Faylor
>
> RichardFaylor@aol.com
> (208) 343-7681
>I'd be interested in this mod as well since I have two very early models
with low serials.
Dubya
"Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote in message news:43437c2d@linux...
> Dear Rod,
> I will try to send a picture...
> Yes the foam has already been taken out from the very first day !
> Regards,
> Dimitrios
> "Rod Lincoln" <rlincoln@kc.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:43427c04$1@linux...
>>
>> Hey Dimitrios, is there an way you could send me a picture of the
>> specific
>> mod that you did?
>> Rod
>> "Dimitrios" <musurgio@otenet.gr> wrote:
>> >AT4033 is my best female mic !
>> >I have never had any better results using other mic on females with
>> >great
>> >timbre.
>> >I have done though a minor mod on this mic.
>> >I have bypassed output electrolytic cap (a ver good one anyway) with MIT
>> 0.1
>> >polyester cap.
>> >Great great detail....
>> >Regards,
>> >Dimitrios
>> >"Neil" <IOUOIU@OIU.com> wrote in message news:43420979$1@linux...
>> >>
>> >> "cujo" <chris@applemanstudio.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >Nah, this one I really gotta save some penny's for.
>> >> >I was thinking of the Tony Arnold Helios stuff.
>> >> >Neil are you still a big 4033 fan?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I think the 4033's are great mics, although I no longer have my
>> >> pair - awhile ago I got a Kiwi instead that I found on sale,
>> >> and I'm waiting to find another one (at something less than
>> >> street price), and that will then be my main LDC pair.
>> >>
>> >> Neil
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>Can you get enough resolution out of an LCD TV?
"Mike" <spamthis@alltel.net> wrote:
>This is better!
> https://www.bestbuyplasma.com/Plasma/Product.asp_X_sku_Y_LT3 2HV
>
>I just got one and all I can say is WOW! Especially with the DVI!
>
>Then I have an 18" flat panel over to the side for displaying plug-ins
>though really not required.
>
>Mike
>
>"Richard Faylor" <RichardFaylor@aol.com> wrote in message
>news:434fc1ba$1@linux...
>>
>> Richard,
>>
>> I've bought a used Mac G4 to use with Paris that has more horsepower than
>> my previous Mac G3. Now I have to make a decision about displays. The
G4
>> has two video cards so it can support two monitors. But one of the video
>> cards provides a DVI digital connection that, according to Apple, works
>> better
>> with the newest Apple displays, such as their 20-inch $800 display. My
>> local
>> Apple salesman claims therefore that the Apple display with the DVI
>> connection
>> will be superior in quality to any typical PC-world display with a VGA
>> connection.
>>
>> My question: Which is better for monitoring Paris--two 17" or 19" displays
>> (costing $1,000 or so together) of decent quality or one 20" display
>> (costing
>> $800) of marginally better quality?
>>
>> Many thanks,
>> Richard Faylor
>>
>> RichardFaylor@aol.com
>> (208) 343-7681
>>
>
>I would vote for two displays... way more desktop area.
Dave.
Richard Faylor wrote:
> Richard,
>
> I've bought a used Mac G4 to use with Paris that has more horsepower than
> my previous Mac G3. Now I have to make a decision about displays. The G4
> has two video cards so it can support two monitors. But one of the video
> cards provides a DVI digital connection that, according to Apple, works better
> with the newest Apple displays, such as their 20-inch $800 display. My local
> Apple salesman claims therefore that the Apple display with the DVI connection
> wil
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Dec 30 01:49:02 PST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.21222 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
