The PARIS Forums


Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » worst. president. ever.
worst. president. ever. [message #57751] Sun, 04 September 2005 12:51
justcron is currently offline  justcron   UNITED STATES
Messages: 330
Registered: May 2006
Senior Member
s.compounded" target="_blank">justcron@hydrorecords.compounded> wrote in message
news:431b3644@linux...
> deej is coppin out....
>
> "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote in message
> news:431b359b@linux...
>> no dout man, but this is fun... u got pwned
>>
>> I checked back into this thread because I expected a cheap shot from you.
>> I'm in the process of setting up 10 mics for a tracking session but I'm
>> going to take a second here to clairfy your out - of -context spin of my
>> statement.
>>
>> I said that there is always credibility to a number of new sources
>> *depending on what they are reporting*. The obvious bias of the LA times
>> calls their agenda into question. Had you been at all objective in your
>> thinking, you might have looked to more than one source before showing
>> your
>> ass with something like this.
>>
>> Now, whether you beileve it or not, I've got work to do.
>> C'ya
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "justcron" <justcron@hydrorecords.compounded> wrote in message
>> news:431b30d3$1@linux...
>>>
>>> "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote in message
>>> news:431b300e@linux...
>>> > You want to talk about credibility, yours is
>>> >> being ripped to shreds, by your own logic.
>>> >>
>>> > So my credibility is suspect because I don't cull my information from
>>> > a
>>> > single source?
>>>
>>> I get the feeling you might just be copping out, but since you seem to
>>> be
>>> asking me a question, I guess I can spell it out again.
>>>
>>> You initially dismissed the simple information graph because it said LA
>>> Times on it, then when pressed as to your preferred credible sources,
>>> you
>>> said LA Times *could* be credible, and that all sources need to be
>>> considered and balanced.
>>>
>>> So your initial dismissal of the info was the bogus part.
>>>
>>> > I've got more important things to attend to today.
>>>
>>> no dout man, but this is fun... u got pwned
>>>
>>> > "justcron" <justcron@hydrorecords.compounded> wrote in message
>>> > news:431b2e9d@linux...
>>> >> "DJ" <animix_spam-this-ahole_&
Previous Topic: new political parties
Next Topic: worst. president. ever.
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Jun 27 04:47:13 PDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01269 seconds