Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Euphonix stuff
Euphonix stuff [message #91826] |
Tue, 23 October 2007 07:51 |
TCB
Messages: 1261 Registered: July 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Anybody know what the 'big deal' is? I think it was Dedric who posted the
link to the teaser on their web site. I'm really looking hard at a control
surface upgrade, and since that's bonus season I might have a little extra
dosh kicking around. Wondering if anyone knows anything, or suspects anything
that might be informative.
TCB
|
|
|
|
Re: Euphonix stuff [message #91841 is a reply to message #91830] |
Tue, 23 October 2007 10:58 |
TCB
Messages: 1261 Registered: July 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Interesting, Dedric. To put together a really usable Mackie control rig is
$3.5k. That will cover the main unit, two extra fader banks, and the rotary
controller. If Euphonix can do something better for a couple of grand more,
then I'm all for it and I'll hold off a bit before buying anything. That
said, it MUST work with Live for me to have any interest, that's a deal breaker
for me.
Thanks again,
TCB
"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>The speculation I'm hearing is either a smaller controller console, or
>smaller edit controller, or both.
>Since Euphonix has the $20k and up markets covered with other products,
the
>guess is it will in fact
>fall in the under $10k market - hopefully $5k or so - better than a Mackie
>Controller, but not as expensive
>as an MC ($16k or so). I would have to guess it's a mix controller for
>$5-$10k.
>
>I'm holding out hope until January, but not necessarily holding my breath
on
>the price range.
>
>
>Regards,
>Dedric
>
>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote in message news:471e0a82$1@linux...
>>
>> Anybody know what the 'big deal' is? I think it was Dedric who posted
the
>> link to the teaser on their web site. I'm really looking hard at a control
>> surface upgrade, and since that's bonus season I might have a little extra
>> dosh kicking around. Wondering if anyone knows anything, or suspects
>> anything
>> that might be informative.
>>
>> TCB
>
|
|
|
Re: Euphonix stuff [message #91849 is a reply to message #91841] |
Tue, 23 October 2007 11:19 |
|
Guys, the Mackie Controller s nver did "It" for me. They just looked and felt
too clinical and dare I say cheesy. And, these new white/meets black paint
jobs, just makes them llok like toys. Even expanded, they Lack the Wow!!
factor.
No, we need the styling of Digi's new C|24 with and better.
"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>
>Interesting, Dedric. To put together a really usable Mackie control rig
is
>$3.5k. That will cover the main unit, two extra fader banks, and the rotary
>controller. If Euphonix can do something better for a couple of grand more,
>then I'm all for it and I'll hold off a bit before buying anything. That
>said, it MUST work with Live for me to have any interest, that's a deal
breaker
>for me.
>
>Thanks again,
>
>TCB
>
>"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>>The speculation I'm hearing is either a smaller controller console, or
>>smaller edit controller, or both.
>>Since Euphonix has the $20k and up markets covered with other products,
>the
>>guess is it will in fact
>>fall in the under $10k market - hopefully $5k or so - better than a Mackie
>
>>Controller, but not as expensive
>>as an MC ($16k or so). I would have to guess it's a mix controller for
>
>>$5-$10k.
>>
>>I'm holding out hope until January, but not necessarily holding my breath
>on
>>the price range.
>>
>>
>>Regards,
>>Dedric
>>
>>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote in message news:471e0a82$1@linux...
>>>
>>> Anybody know what the 'big deal' is? I think it was Dedric who posted
>the
>>> link to the teaser on their web site. I'm really looking hard at a control
>>> surface upgrade, and since that's bonus season I might have a little
extra
>>> dosh kicking around. Wondering if anyone knows anything, or suspects
>>> anything
>>> that might be informative.
>>>
>>> TCB
>>
>
|
|
|
Re: Euphonix stuff [message #91851 is a reply to message #91849] |
Tue, 23 October 2007 11:52 |
TCB
Messages: 1261 Registered: July 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
I agree with you that the wow factor is nearly zero. But it's a Mackie, what
do you expect? I think in terms of usefulness it's awfully close to the C|24,
and most importantly you're not roped into one application for it to control.
And it's about half the cost, so I think that's a reasonable trade.
TCB
"LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>Guys, the Mackie Controller s nver did "It" for me. They just looked and
felt
>too clinical and dare I say cheesy. And, these new white/meets black paint
>jobs, just makes them llok like toys. Even expanded, they Lack the Wow!!
>factor.
>
>No, we need the styling of Digi's new C|24 with and better.
>
>
>
>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>
>>Interesting, Dedric. To put together a really usable Mackie control rig
>is
>>$3.5k. That will cover the main unit, two extra fader banks, and the rotary
>>controller. If Euphonix can do something better for a couple of grand more,
>>then I'm all for it and I'll hold off a bit before buying anything. That
>>said, it MUST work with Live for me to have any interest, that's a deal
>breaker
>>for me.
>>
>>Thanks again,
>>
>>TCB
>>
>>"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>>>The speculation I'm hearing is either a smaller controller console, or
>
>>>smaller edit controller, or both.
>>>Since Euphonix has the $20k and up markets covered with other products,
>>the
>>>guess is it will in fact
>>>fall in the under $10k market - hopefully $5k or so - better than a Mackie
>>
>>>Controller, but not as expensive
>>>as an MC ($16k or so). I would have to guess it's a mix controller for
>>
>>>$5-$10k.
>>>
>>>I'm holding out hope until January, but not necessarily holding my breath
>>on
>>>the price range.
>>>
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Dedric
>>>
>>>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote in message news:471e0a82$1@linux...
>>>>
>>>> Anybody know what the 'big deal' is? I think it was Dedric who posted
>>the
>>>> link to the teaser on their web site. I'm really looking hard at a control
>>>> surface upgrade, and since that's bonus season I might have a little
>extra
>>>> dosh kicking around. Wondering if anyone knows anything, or suspects
>
>>>> anything
>>>> that might be informative.
>>>>
>>>> TCB
>>>
>>
>
|
|
|
Re: Euphonix stuff [message #91855 is a reply to message #91849] |
Tue, 23 October 2007 12:56 |
Dedric Terry
Messages: 788 Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
I'll take the wow factor of anything Euphonix to Digi controllers - which
works out well
since Euphonix is the one making it (or maybe making something we think is a
controller). :-)
Dedric
"LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote in message news:471e3b40@linux...
>
> Guys, the Mackie Controller s nver did "It" for me. They just looked and
> felt
> too clinical and dare I say cheesy. And, these new white/meets black paint
> jobs, just makes them llok like toys. Even expanded, they Lack the Wow!!
> factor.
>
> No, we need the styling of Digi's new C|24 with and better.
>
>
>
> "TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>
>>Interesting, Dedric. To put together a really usable Mackie control rig
> is
>>$3.5k. That will cover the main unit, two extra fader banks, and the
>>rotary
>>controller. If Euphonix can do something better for a couple of grand
>>more,
>>then I'm all for it and I'll hold off a bit before buying anything. That
>>said, it MUST work with Live for me to have any interest, that's a deal
> breaker
>>for me.
>>
>>Thanks again,
>>
>>TCB
>>
>>"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>>>The speculation I'm hearing is either a smaller controller console, or
>
>>>smaller edit controller, or both.
>>>Since Euphonix has the $20k and up markets covered with other products,
>>the
>>>guess is it will in fact
>>>fall in the under $10k market - hopefully $5k or so - better than a
>>>Mackie
>>
>>>Controller, but not as expensive
>>>as an MC ($16k or so). I would have to guess it's a mix controller for
>>
>>>$5-$10k.
>>>
>>>I'm holding out hope until January, but not necessarily holding my breath
>>on
>>>the price range.
>>>
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Dedric
>>>
>>>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote in message news:471e0a82$1@linux...
>>>>
>>>> Anybody know what the 'big deal' is? I think it was Dedric who posted
>>the
>>>> link to the teaser on their web site. I'm really looking hard at a
>>>> control
>>>> surface upgrade, and since that's bonus season I might have a little
> extra
>>>> dosh kicking around. Wondering if anyone knows anything, or suspects
>
>>>> anything
>>>> that might be informative.
>>>>
>>>> TCB
>>>
>>
>
|
|
|
Re: Euphonix stuff [message #93772 is a reply to message #91855] |
Thu, 20 December 2007 08:40 |
Dedric Terry
Messages: 788 Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
This link is floating around:
http://forums.audiofanzine.com/index,idtopic,316841,forum,ne ws_euphonix_mc_mix.html
Scroll down through the thread. Looks nice - maybe a bit wider than a
Mackie Control, but not as deep - price seems decent, unless you have to buy
Eucon as well ($2k extra). It would fit really well with my setup. Might
have to relegate the Mackie control
to an edit suite. ;-)
"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote in message news:471e5350@linux...
> I'll take the wow factor of anything Euphonix to Digi controllers - which
> works out well
> since Euphonix is the one making it (or maybe making something we think is
> a controller). :-)
>
> Dedric
>
> "LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote in message news:471e3b40@linux...
>>
>> Guys, the Mackie Controller s nver did "It" for me. They just looked and
>> felt
>> too clinical and dare I say cheesy. And, these new white/meets black
>> paint
>> jobs, just makes them llok like toys. Even expanded, they Lack the Wow!!
>> factor.
>>
>> No, we need the styling of Digi's new C|24 with and better.
>>
>>
>>
>> "TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>Interesting, Dedric. To put together a really usable Mackie control rig
>> is
>>>$3.5k. That will cover the main unit, two extra fader banks, and the
>>>rotary
>>>controller. If Euphonix can do something better for a couple of grand
>>>more,
>>>then I'm all for it and I'll hold off a bit before buying anything. That
>>>said, it MUST work with Live for me to have any interest, that's a deal
>> breaker
>>>for me.
>>>
>>>Thanks again,
>>>
>>>TCB
>>>
>>>"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>>>>The speculation I'm hearing is either a smaller controller console, or
>>
>>>>smaller edit controller, or both.
>>>>Since Euphonix has the $20k and up markets covered with other products,
>>>the
>>>>guess is it will in fact
>>>>fall in the under $10k market - hopefully $5k or so - better than a
>>>>Mackie
>>>
>>>>Controller, but not as expensive
>>>>as an MC ($16k or so). I would have to guess it's a mix controller for
>>>
>>>>$5-$10k.
>>>>
>>>>I'm holding out hope until January, but not necessarily holding my
>>>>breath
>>>on
>>>>the price range.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Regards,
>>>>Dedric
>>>>
>>>>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote in message news:471e0a82$1@linux...
>>>>>
>>>>> Anybody know what the 'big deal' is? I think it was Dedric who posted
>>>the
>>>>> link to the teaser on their web site. I'm really looking hard at a
>>>>> control
>>>>> surface upgrade, and since that's bonus season I might have a little
>> extra
>>>>> dosh kicking around. Wondering if anyone knows anything, or suspects
>>
>>>>> anything
>>>>> that might be informative.
>>>>>
>>>>> TCB
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
|
|
|
Re: Euphonix stuff [message #93799 is a reply to message #93772] |
Fri, 21 December 2007 08:02 |
Dedric Terry
Messages: 788 Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Euphonix found out about the pics and had them all removed, well except for
the ones on my desktop. ;-)
Excellent looking controllers - the controller has 4 faders with
switches/knobs for each channel, as well as others, a touch screen, jog
wheel surrounded by buttons. Also an 8-fader unit as well for expansion.
Very nice looking units. Looking forward to the release in January.
Dedric
"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote in message news:476a9be4@linux...
> This link is floating around:
> http://forums.audiofanzine.com/index,idtopic,316841,forum,ne ws_euphonix_mc_mix.html
>
> Scroll down through the thread. Looks nice - maybe a bit wider than a
> Mackie Control, but not as deep - price seems decent, unless you have to
> buy Eucon as well ($2k extra). It would fit really well with my setup.
> Might have to relegate the Mackie control
> to an edit suite. ;-)
>
> "Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote in message news:471e5350@linux...
>> I'll take the wow factor of anything Euphonix to Digi controllers - which
>> works out well
>> since Euphonix is the one making it (or maybe making something we think
>> is a controller). :-)
>>
>> Dedric
>>
>> "LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote in message news:471e3b40@linux...
>>>
>>> Guys, the Mackie Controller s nver did "It" for me. They just looked and
>>> felt
>>> too clinical and dare I say cheesy. And, these new white/meets black
>>> paint
>>> jobs, just makes them llok like toys. Even expanded, they Lack the Wow!!
>>> factor.
>>>
>>> No, we need the styling of Digi's new C|24 with and better.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Interesting, Dedric. To put together a really usable Mackie control rig
>>> is
>>>>$3.5k. That will cover the main unit, two extra fader banks, and the
>>>>rotary
>>>>controller. If Euphonix can do something better for a couple of grand
>>>>more,
>>>>then I'm all for it and I'll hold off a bit before buying anything. That
>>>>said, it MUST work with Live for me to have any interest, that's a deal
>>> breaker
>>>>for me.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks again,
>>>>
>>>>TCB
>>>>
>>>>"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>>>>>The speculation I'm hearing is either a smaller controller console, or
>>>
>>>>>smaller edit controller, or both.
>>>>>Since Euphonix has the $20k and up markets covered with other products,
>>>>the
>>>>>guess is it will in fact
>>>>>fall in the under $10k market - hopefully $5k or so - better than a
>>>>>Mackie
>>>>
>>>>>Controller, but not as expensive
>>>>>as an MC ($16k or so). I would have to guess it's a mix controller for
>>>>
>>>>>$5-$10k.
>>>>>
>>>>>I'm holding out hope until January, but not necessarily holding my
>>>>>breath
>>>>on
>>>>>the price range.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Regards,
>>>>>Dedric
>>>>>
>>>>>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote in message news:471e0a82$1@linux...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anybody know what the 'big deal' is? I think it was Dedric who posted
>>>>the
>>>>>> link to the teaser on their web site. I'm really looking hard at a
>>>>>> control
>>>>>> surface upgrade, and since that's bonus season I might have a little
>>> extra
>>>>>> dosh kicking around. Wondering if anyone knows anything, or suspects
>>>
>>>>>> anything
>>>>>> that might be informative.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> TCB
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
|
|
|
Re: Euphonix stuff [message #93808 is a reply to message #93799] |
Fri, 21 December 2007 11:34 |
TCB
Messages: 1261 Registered: July 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Hey Dedric,
I never manged to get over there to check the pics out. Was out of town a
day or two. Would you mind emailing me the pics? It my initials at thadbrown.com.
I'd muchly appreciate it!
TCB
"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>Euphonix found out about the pics and had them all removed, well except
for
>the ones on my desktop. ;-)
>
>Excellent looking controllers - the controller has 4 faders with
>switches/knobs for each channel, as well as others, a touch screen, jog
>wheel surrounded by buttons. Also an 8-fader unit as well for expansion.
>Very nice looking units. Looking forward to the release in January.
>
>Dedric
>
>"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote in message news:476a9be4@linux...
>> This link is floating around:
>> http://forums.audiofanzine.com/index,idtopic,316841,forum,ne ws_euphonix_mc_mix.html
>>
>> Scroll down through the thread. Looks nice - maybe a bit wider than a
>> Mackie Control, but not as deep - price seems decent, unless you have
to
>> buy Eucon as well ($2k extra). It would fit really well with my setup.
>> Might have to relegate the Mackie control
>> to an edit suite. ;-)
>>
>> "Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote in message news:471e5350@linux...
>>> I'll take the wow factor of anything Euphonix to Digi controllers - which
>>> works out well
>>> since Euphonix is the one making it (or maybe making something we think
>>> is a controller). :-)
>>>
>>> Dedric
>>>
>>> "LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote in message news:471e3b40@linux...
>>>>
>>>> Guys, the Mackie Controller s nver did "It" for me. They just looked
and
>>>> felt
>>>> too clinical and dare I say cheesy. And, these new white/meets black
>>>> paint
>>>> jobs, just makes them llok like toys. Even expanded, they Lack the Wow!!
>>>> factor.
>>>>
>>>> No, we need the styling of Digi's new C|24 with and better.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>Interesting, Dedric. To put together a really usable Mackie control
rig
>>>> is
>>>>>$3.5k. That will cover the main unit, two extra fader banks, and the
>>>>>rotary
>>>>>controller. If Euphonix can do something better for a couple of grand
>>>>>more,
>>>>>then I'm all for it and I'll hold off a bit before buying anything.
That
>>>>>said, it MUST work with Live for me to have any interest, that's a deal
>>>> breaker
>>>>>for me.
>>>>>
>>>>>Thanks again,
>>>>>
>>>>>TCB
>>>>>
>>>>>"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>>>>>>The speculation I'm hearing is either a smaller controller console,
or
>>>>
>>>>>>smaller edit controller, or both.
>>>>>>Since Euphonix has the $20k and up markets covered with other products,
>>>>>the
>>>>>>guess is it will in fact
>>>>>>fall in the under $10k market - hopefully $5k or so - better than a
>>>>>>Mackie
>>>>>
>>>>>>Controller, but not as expensive
>>>>>>as an MC ($16k or so). I would have to guess it's a mix controller
for
>>>>>
>>>>>>$5-$10k.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I'm holding out hope until January, but not necessarily holding my
>>>>>>breath
>>>>>on
>>>>>>the price range.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Regards,
>>>>>>Dedric
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote in message news:471e0a82$1@linux...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Anybody know what the 'big deal' is? I think it was Dedric who posted
>>>>>the
>>>>>>> link to the teaser on their web site. I'm really looking hard at
a
>>>>>>> control
>>>>>>> surface upgrade, and since that's bonus season I might have a little
>>>> extra
>>>>>>> dosh kicking around. Wondering if anyone knows anything, or suspects
>>>>
>>>>>>> anything
>>>>>>> that might be informative.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> TCB
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
|
|
|
Re: Euphonix stuff [message #93811 is a reply to message #93808] |
Fri, 21 December 2007 10:55 |
Dedric Terry
Messages: 788 Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Thad,
Just tried to email but it came back saying you are over your quote. Email
me offline
dterry at keyofd dot net if you have another address.
Dedric
"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote in message news:476c0751$1@linux...
>
> Hey Dedric,
>
> I never manged to get over there to check the pics out. Was out of town a
> day or two. Would you mind emailing me the pics? It my initials at
> thadbrown.com.
> I'd muchly appreciate it!
>
> TCB
>
> "Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>>Euphonix found out about the pics and had them all removed, well except
> for
>>the ones on my desktop. ;-)
>>
>>Excellent looking controllers - the controller has 4 faders with
>>switches/knobs for each channel, as well as others, a touch screen, jog
>
>>wheel surrounded by buttons. Also an 8-fader unit as well for expansion.
>
>>Very nice looking units. Looking forward to the release in January.
>>
>>Dedric
>>
>>"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote in message news:476a9be4@linux...
>>> This link is floating around:
>>> http://forums.audiofanzine.com/index,idtopic,316841,forum,ne ws_euphonix_mc_mix.html
>>>
>>> Scroll down through the thread. Looks nice - maybe a bit wider than a
>
>>> Mackie Control, but not as deep - price seems decent, unless you have
> to
>>> buy Eucon as well ($2k extra). It would fit really well with my setup.
>
>>> Might have to relegate the Mackie control
>>> to an edit suite. ;-)
>>>
>>> "Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote in message
>>> news:471e5350@linux...
>>>> I'll take the wow factor of anything Euphonix to Digi controllers -
>>>> which
>
>>>> works out well
>>>> since Euphonix is the one making it (or maybe making something we think
>
>>>> is a controller). :-)
>>>>
>>>> Dedric
>>>>
>>>> "LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote in message news:471e3b40@linux...
>>>>>
>>>>> Guys, the Mackie Controller s nver did "It" for me. They just looked
> and
>>>>> felt
>>>>> too clinical and dare I say cheesy. And, these new white/meets black
>
>>>>> paint
>>>>> jobs, just makes them llok like toys. Even expanded, they Lack the
>>>>> Wow!!
>>>>> factor.
>>>>>
>>>>> No, we need the styling of Digi's new C|24 with and better.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Interesting, Dedric. To put together a really usable Mackie control
> rig
>>>>> is
>>>>>>$3.5k. That will cover the main unit, two extra fader banks, and the
>
>>>>>>rotary
>>>>>>controller. If Euphonix can do something better for a couple of grand
>
>>>>>>more,
>>>>>>then I'm all for it and I'll hold off a bit before buying anything.
> That
>>>>>>said, it MUST work with Live for me to have any interest, that's a
>>>>>>deal
>>>>> breaker
>>>>>>for me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Thanks again,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>TCB
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>The speculation I'm hearing is either a smaller controller console,
> or
>>>>>
>>>>>>>smaller edit controller, or both.
>>>>>>>Since Euphonix has the $20k and up markets covered with other
>>>>>>>products,
>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>guess is it will in fact
>>>>>>>fall in the under $10k market - hopefully $5k or so - better than a
>
>>>>>>>Mackie
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Controller, but not as expensive
>>>>>>>as an MC ($16k or so). I would have to guess it's a mix controller
> for
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>$5-$10k.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I'm holding out hope until January, but not necessarily holding my
>
>>>>>>>breath
>>>>>>on
>>>>>>>the price range.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Regards,
>>>>>>>Dedric
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote in message news:471e0a82$1@linux...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Anybody know what the 'big deal' is? I think it was Dedric who
>>>>>>>> posted
>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>> link to the teaser on their web site. I'm really looking hard at
> a
>>>>>>>> control
>>>>>>>> surface upgrade, and since that's bonus season I might have a
>>>>>>>> little
>>>>> extra
>>>>>>>> dosh kicking around. Wondering if anyone knows anything, or
>>>>>>>> suspects
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> anything
>>>>>>>> that might be informative.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> TCB
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
|
|
|
Re: Euphonix stuff [message #93833 is a reply to message #93808] |
Fri, 21 December 2007 20:31 |
|
Dedric can you post those pics? or send me a email..??Please ..It's christmas..
"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>
>Hey Dedric,
>
>I never manged to get over there to check the pics out. Was out of town
a
>day or two. Would you mind emailing me the pics? It my initials at thadbrown.com.
>I'd muchly appreciate it!
>
>TCB
>
>"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>>Euphonix found out about the pics and had them all removed, well except
>for
>>the ones on my desktop. ;-)
>>
>>Excellent looking controllers - the controller has 4 faders with
>>switches/knobs for each channel, as well as others, a touch screen, jog
>
>>wheel surrounded by buttons. Also an 8-fader unit as well for expansion.
>
>>Very nice looking units. Looking forward to the release in January.
>>
>>Dedric
>>
>>"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote in message news:476a9be4@linux...
>>> This link is floating around:
>>> http://forums.audiofanzine.com/index,idtopic,316841,forum,ne ws_euphonix_mc_mix.html
>>>
>>> Scroll down through the thread. Looks nice - maybe a bit wider than
a
>
>>> Mackie Control, but not as deep - price seems decent, unless you have
>to
>>> buy Eucon as well ($2k extra). It would fit really well with my setup.
>
>>> Might have to relegate the Mackie control
>>> to an edit suite. ;-)
>>>
>>> "Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote in message news:471e5350@linux...
>>>> I'll take the wow factor of anything Euphonix to Digi controllers -
which
>
>>>> works out well
>>>> since Euphonix is the one making it (or maybe making something we think
>
>>>> is a controller). :-)
>>>>
>>>> Dedric
>>>>
>>>> "LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote in message news:471e3b40@linux...
>>>>>
>>>>> Guys, the Mackie Controller s nver did "It" for me. They just looked
>and
>>>>> felt
>>>>> too clinical and dare I say cheesy. And, these new white/meets black
>
>>>>> paint
>>>>> jobs, just makes them llok like toys. Even expanded, they Lack the
Wow!!
>>>>> factor.
>>>>>
>>>>> No, we need the styling of Digi's new C|24 with and better.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Interesting, Dedric. To put together a really usable Mackie control
>rig
>>>>> is
>>>>>>$3.5k. That will cover the main unit, two extra fader banks, and the
>
>>>>>>rotary
>>>>>>controller. If Euphonix can do something better for a couple of grand
>
>>>>>>more,
>>>>>>then I'm all for it and I'll hold off a bit before buying anything.
>That
>>>>>>said, it MUST work with Live for me to have any interest, that's a
deal
>>>>> breaker
>>>>>>for me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Thanks again,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>TCB
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>The speculation I'm hearing is either a smaller controller console,
>or
>>>>>
>>>>>>>smaller edit controller, or both.
>>>>>>>Since Euphonix has the $20k and up markets covered with other products,
>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>guess is it will in fact
>>>>>>>fall in the under $10k market - hopefully $5k or so - better than
a
>
>>>>>>>Mackie
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Controller, but not as expensive
>>>>>>>as an MC ($16k or so). I would have to guess it's a mix controller
>for
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>$5-$10k.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I'm holding out hope until January, but not necessarily holding my
>
>>>>>>>breath
>>>>>>on
>>>>>>>the price range.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Regards,
>>>>>>>Dedric
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote in message news:471e0a82$1@linux...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Anybody know what the 'big deal' is? I think it was Dedric who posted
>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>> link to the teaser on their web site. I'm really looking hard at
>a
>>>>>>>> control
>>>>>>>> surface upgrade, and since that's bonus season I might have a little
>>>>> extra
>>>>>>>> dosh kicking around. Wondering if anyone knows anything, or suspects
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> anything
>>>>>>>> that might be informative.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> TCB
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
|
|
|
Re: Euphonix stuff [message #93842 is a reply to message #93772] |
Fri, 21 December 2007 22:42 |
Deej
Messages: 130 Registered: September 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
You know I will die if I don't see these pictures.......
animix at animas dot net
pleeeeeeezzzzzeeee!!!!!!!
;o)
"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote in message news:476a9be4@linux...
> This link is floating around:
> http://forums.audiofanzine.com/index,idtopic,316841,forum,ne ws_euphonix_mc_mix.html
>
> Scroll down through the thread. Looks nice - maybe a bit wider than a
> Mackie Control, but not as deep - price seems decent, unless you have to
> buy Eucon as well ($2k extra). It would fit really well with my setup.
> Might have to relegate the Mackie control
> to an edit suite. ;-)
>
> "Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote in message news:471e5350@linux...
>> I'll take the wow factor of anything Euphonix to Digi controllers - which
>> works out well
>> since Euphonix is the one making it (or maybe making something we think
>> is a controller). :-)
>>
>> Dedric
>>
>> "LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote in message news:471e3b40@linux...
>>>
>>> Guys, the Mackie Controller s nver did "It" for me. They just looked and
>>> felt
>>> too clinical and dare I say cheesy. And, these new white/meets black
>>> paint
>>> jobs, just makes them llok like toys. Even expanded, they Lack the Wow!!
>>> factor.
>>>
>>> No, we need the styling of Digi's new C|24 with and better.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Interesting, Dedric. To put together a really usable Mackie control rig
>>> is
>>>>$3.5k. That will cover the main unit, two extra fader banks, and the
>>>>rotary
>>>>controller. If Euphonix can do something better for a couple of grand
>>>>more,
>>>>then I'm all for it and I'll hold off a bit before buying anything. That
>>>>said, it MUST work with Live for me to have any interest, that's a deal
>>> breaker
>>>>for me.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks again,
>>>>
>>>>TCB
>>>>
>>>>"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>>>>>The speculation I'm hearing is either a smaller controller console, or
>>>
>>>>>smaller edit controller, or both.
>>>>>Since Euphonix has the $20k and up markets covered with other products,
>>>>the
>>>>>guess is it will in fact
>>>>>fall in the under $10k market - hopefully $5k or so - better than a
>>>>>Mackie
>>>>
>>>>>Controller, but not as expensive
>>>>>as an MC ($16k or so). I would have to guess it's a mix controller for
>>>>
>>>>>$5-$10k.
>>>>>
>>>>>I'm holding out hope until January, but not necessarily holding my
>>>>>breath
>>>>on
>>>>>the price range.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Regards,
>>>>>Dedric
>>>>>
>>>>>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote in message news:471e0a82$1@linux...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anybody know what the 'big deal' is? I think it was Dedric who posted
>>>>the
>>>>>> link to the teaser on their web site. I'm really looking hard at a
>>>>>> control
>>>>>> surface upgrade, and since that's bonus season I might have a little
>>> extra
>>>>>> dosh kicking around. Wondering if anyone knows anything, or suspects
>>>
>>>>>> anything
>>>>>> that might be informative.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> TCB
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
|
|
|
Re: Euphonix stuff [message #93854 is a reply to message #93842] |
Sat, 22 December 2007 02:44 |
rick
Messages: 1976 Registered: February 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
okay put your wad...errmoney back in your pants mister!
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 23:42:39 -0700, "Deej" <noway@jose.org> wrote:
>You know I will die if I don't see these pictures.......
>
>animix at animas dot net
>
>pleeeeeeezzzzzeeee!!!!!!!
>
>;o)
>
>"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote in message news:476a9be4@linux...
>> This link is floating around:
>> http://forums.audiofanzine.com/index,idtopic,316841,forum,ne ws_euphonix_mc_mix.html
>>
>> Scroll down through the thread. Looks nice - maybe a bit wider than a
>> Mackie Control, but not as deep - price seems decent, unless you have to
>> buy Eucon as well ($2k extra). It would fit really well with my setup.
>> Might have to relegate the Mackie control
>> to an edit suite. ;-)
>>
>> "Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote in message news:471e5350@linux...
>>> I'll take the wow factor of anything Euphonix to Digi controllers - which
>>> works out well
>>> since Euphonix is the one making it (or maybe making something we think
>>> is a controller). :-)
>>>
>>> Dedric
>>>
>>> "LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote in message news:471e3b40@linux...
>>>>
>>>> Guys, the Mackie Controller s nver did "It" for me. They just looked and
>>>> felt
>>>> too clinical and dare I say cheesy. And, these new white/meets black
>>>> paint
>>>> jobs, just makes them llok like toys. Even expanded, they Lack the Wow!!
>>>> factor.
>>>>
>>>> No, we need the styling of Digi's new C|24 with and better.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>Interesting, Dedric. To put together a really usable Mackie control rig
>>>> is
>>>>>$3.5k. That will cover the main unit, two extra fader banks, and the
>>>>>rotary
>>>>>controller. If Euphonix can do something better for a couple of grand
>>>>>more,
>>>>>then I'm all for it and I'll hold off a bit before buying anything. That
>>>>>said, it MUST work with Live for me to have any interest, that's a deal
>>>> breaker
>>>>>for me.
>>>>>
>>>>>Thanks again,
>>>>>
>>>>>TCB
>>>>>
>>>>>"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>>>>>>The speculation I'm hearing is either a smaller controller console, or
>>>>
>>>>>>smaller edit controller, or both.
>>>>>>Since Euphonix has the $20k and up markets covered with other products,
>>>>>the
>>>>>>guess is it will in fact
>>>>>>fall in the under $10k market - hopefully $5k or so - better than a
>>>>>>Mackie
>>>>>
>>>>>>Controller, but not as expensive
>>>>>>as an MC ($16k or so). I would have to guess it's a mix controller for
>>>>>
>>>>>>$5-$10k.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I'm holding out hope until January, but not necessarily holding my
>>>>>>breath
>>>>>on
>>>>>>the price range.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Regards,
>>>>>>Dedric
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote in message news:471e0a82$1@linux...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Anybody know what the 'big deal' is? I think it was Dedric who posted
>>>>>the
>>>>>>> link to the teaser on their web site. I'm really looking hard at a
>>>>>>> control
>>>>>>> surface upgrade, and since that's bonus season I might have a little
>>>> extra
>>>>>>> dosh kicking around. Wondering if anyone knows anything, or suspects
>>>>
>>>>>>> anything
>>>>>>> that might be informative.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> TCB
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
|
|
|
Re: Euphonix stuff [message #93864 is a reply to message #93842] |
Sat, 22 December 2007 08:38 |
TCB
Messages: 1261 Registered: July 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Dedric sent me the pics. Looks like really cool stuff. I might be a buyer
depending on my bonus this January.
TCB
"Deej" <noway@jose.org> wrote:
>You know I will die if I don't see these pictures.......
>
>animix at animas dot net
>
>pleeeeeeezzzzzeeee!!!!!!!
>
>;o)
>
>"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote in message news:476a9be4@linux...
>> This link is floating around:
>> http://forums.audiofanzine.com/index,idtopic,316841,forum,ne ws_euphonix_mc_mix.html
>>
>> Scroll down through the thread. Looks nice - maybe a bit wider than a
>> Mackie Control, but not as deep - price seems decent, unless you have
to
>> buy Eucon as well ($2k extra). It would fit really well with my setup.
>> Might have to relegate the Mackie control
>> to an edit suite. ;-)
>>
>> "Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote in message news:471e5350@linux...
>>> I'll take the wow factor of anything Euphonix to Digi controllers - which
>>> works out well
>>> since Euphonix is the one making it (or maybe making something we think
>>> is a controller). :-)
>>>
>>> Dedric
>>>
>>> "LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote in message news:471e3b40@linux...
>>>>
>>>> Guys, the Mackie Controller s nver did "It" for me. They just looked
and
>>>> felt
>>>> too clinical and dare I say cheesy. And, these new white/meets black
>>>> paint
>>>> jobs, just makes them llok like toys. Even expanded, they Lack the Wow!!
>>>> factor.
>>>>
>>>> No, we need the styling of Digi's new C|24 with and better.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>Interesting, Dedric. To put together a really usable Mackie control
rig
>>>> is
>>>>>$3.5k. That will cover the main unit, two extra fader banks, and the
>>>>>rotary
>>>>>controller. If Euphonix can do something better for a couple of grand
>>>>>more,
>>>>>then I'm all for it and I'll hold off a bit before buying anything.
That
>>>>>said, it MUST work with Live for me to have any interest, that's a deal
>>>> breaker
>>>>>for me.
>>>>>
>>>>>Thanks again,
>>>>>
>>>>>TCB
>>>>>
>>>>>"Dedric Terry" <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>>>>>>The speculation I'm hearing is either a smaller controller console,
or
>>>>
>>>>>>smaller edit controller, or both.
>>>>>>Since Euphonix has the $20k and up markets covered with other products,
>>>>>the
>>>>>>guess is it will in fact
>>>>>>fall in the under $10k market - hopefully $5k or so - better than a
>>>>>>Mackie
>>>>>
>>>>>>Controller, but not as expensive
>>>>>>as an MC ($16k or so). I would have to guess it's a mix controller
for
>>>>>
>>>>>>$5-$10k.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I'm holding out hope until January, but not necessarily holding my
>>>>>>breath
>>>>>on
>>>>>>the price range.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Regards,
>>>>>>Dedric
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote in message news:471e0a82$1@linux...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Anybody know what the 'big deal' is? I think it was Dedric who posted
>>>>>the
>>>>>>> link to the teaser on their web site. I'm really looking hard at
a
>>>>>>> control
>>>>>>> surface upgrade, and since that's bonus season I might have a little
>>>> extra
>>>>>>> dosh kicking around. Wondering if anyone knows anything, or suspects
>>>>
>>>>>>> anything
>>>>>>> that might be informative.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> TCB
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
|
|
|
Re: Euphonix stuff..a Little Disapointed [message #93870 is a reply to message #91826] |
Sat, 22 December 2007 11:35 |
|
Dedric sent the pics and I'm not really that impressed. I thought they were
going after the the personal studio owner..Yeah I know..That's a very ambiguous
label(Perosnal Studio)..Bedroom studio all the way to a full blow studio
at home..
But, after loking at those pics, it seems that they are still after the Post
market. It does seems that you wil be able to add 8 or 4 fader pacs at
a time. But, a lot my busines comes from
-1 The Hyped (big) fader console look
-2 Skill..
However, I'll await the official pics from Euphonix to make a final decision..
"TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>
>Anybody know what the 'big deal' is? I think it was Dedric who posted the
>link to the teaser on their web site. I'm really looking hard at a control
>surface upgrade, and since that's bonus season I might have a little extra
>dosh kicking around. Wondering if anyone knows anything, or suspects anything
>that might be informative.
>
>TCB
|
|
|
Re: Euphonix stuff..a Little Disapointed [message #93874 is a reply to message #93870] |
Sat, 22 December 2007 11:13 |
Dedric Terry
Messages: 788 Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
If you need a "big" console to impress clients, that's one thing and there
are a lot of consoles that fit that bill.
But if you need an ergonomic, fast workflow, Euphonix has been doing that
pretty well so far. The new console with the touch screen (which is likely
multimode) would allow you to assign key commands, macros, etc to make
editing, navigating, plugins, etc much much faster. Yes, that may be more
important for post, but I've found key commands and macros more of a
workflow enhancement than a lot of faders.
That's what I'm after. I already have a desk system design in mind to
accomodate this, and fit perfectly for composing.
Also note, there seem to be LCD displays above every fader. Chain the two
units for 12 faders - probably similar to MCU in that you can move banks,
maybe even more easily - we'll have to wait and see.
I don't think their point is to compete with a Harrison, SSL, or Neve
console (the Sys5 is there for that market), but for smaller studios, edit
suites, post, composing, etc, it's perfect. Also note that the market is
changing - many people are starting to question the "big is better" mindset
when you don't end up with a better product just because you have more
faders in front of you that you are either going to automate, or hire an
assistant or two to run manually with you.
I'm not the only one seeing a change in the market - I think Euphonix is
filling a gap that will soon begin to define the fringes as well.
Just my .02,
Dedric
On 12/22/07 12:35 PM, in article 476d5905$1@linux, "LaMont"
<jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dedric sent the pics and I'm not really that impressed. I thought they were
> going after the the personal studio owner..Yeah I know..That's a very
> ambiguous
> label(Perosnal Studio)..Bedroom studio all the way to a full blow studio
> at home..
>
> But, after loking at those pics, it seems that they are still after the Post
> market. It does seems that you wil be able to add 8 or 4 fader pacs at
> a time. But, a lot my busines comes from
>
> -1 The Hyped (big) fader console look
> -2 Skill..
>
> However, I'll await the official pics from Euphonix to make a final decision..
>
> "TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>
>> Anybody know what the 'big deal' is? I think it was Dedric who posted the
>> link to the teaser on their web site. I'm really looking hard at a control
>> surface upgrade, and since that's bonus season I might have a little extra
>> dosh kicking around. Wondering if anyone knows anything, or suspects anything
>> that might be informative.
>>
>> TCB
>
|
|
|
Re: Euphonix stuff..a Little Dissapointed [message #93882 is a reply to message #93874] |
Sat, 22 December 2007 13:13 |
|
Hey Dedric, I 100 agree with your post below. This new controller and even
the MC-5 are wonderful products and does fit the need for the new studio..
It's funny, I made that decision to go small back in 1998 with paris and
C-16's..Liek you , I told my wife that this was the future and that I could
make competive mixes with the PAris setup and did not need the big fader
look.
But, In this world of PT LEs, Cubase, Sonar home setups, even in the competitive
advettising market, I've learned that the the over the top racks and faders
get's you work along with quality of course.
I just got a job to mox a alt rock bands single. They cut the tracks at their
home with Korg 32 track unit..They did a really job, but that unit lacked
the tools to make sound like a finished (radio-ready) record. The drummer
is a really good friend of mine and had been referring me. Eventually, he
brought them to the studio They immedialty feel in love with the Soundcraft
Ghost console(56 channels) and all of the racked gear..NOTE:
The board is hardwired to a Alesis HD24 with aot of outboard gear. My co-studio
owner cuz uses that that recoding setup..I have PAris & Nuendo jacked in
via M-Audio Pro Fire Light Bridge..Light-piped into the Alesis HD24(used
as a converted-really nice..very underated converter..)
So I have 32 from the board (Nuendo) to mix...BUT!! Usually onlu summ to
2 tracks...:)
So, the customers are impressed with all the lights and faders..
I need the system5(ish) look and fuctionality..Maybe the Tascam DM4800 is
for me..
Dedric Terry <dterry@keyofd.net> wrote:
>
>If you need a "big" console to impress clients, that's one thing and there
>are a lot of consoles that fit that bill.
>
>But if you need an ergonomic, fast workflow, Euphonix has been doing that
>pretty well so far. The new console with the touch screen (which is likely
>multimode) would allow you to assign key commands, macros, etc to make
>editing, navigating, plugins, etc much much faster. Yes, that may be more
>important for post, but I've found key commands and macros more of a
>workflow enhancement than a lot of faders.
>
>That's what I'm after. I already have a desk system design in mind to
>accomodate this, and fit perfectly for composing.
>
>Also note, there seem to be LCD displays above every fader. Chain the two
>units for 12 faders - probably similar to MCU in that you can move banks,
>maybe even more easily - we'll have to wait and see.
>
>I don't think their point is to compete with a Harrison, SSL, or Neve
>console (the Sys5 is there for that market), but for smaller studios, edit
>suites, post, composing, etc, it's perfect. Also note that the market is
>changing - many people are starting to question the "big is better" mindset
>when you don't end up with a better product just because you have more
>faders in front of you that you are either going to automate, or hire an
>assistant or two to run manually with you.
>
>I'm not the only one seeing a change in the market - I think Euphonix is
>filling a gap that will soon begin to define the fringes as well.
>
>Just my .02,
>Dedric
>
>On 12/22/07 12:35 PM, in article 476d5905$1@linux, "LaMont"
><jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Dedric sent the pics and I'm not really that impressed. I thought they
were
>> going after the the personal studio owner..Yeah I know..That's a very
>> ambiguous
>> label(Perosnal Studio)..Bedroom studio all the way to a full blow studio
>> at home..
>>
>> But, after loking at those pics, it seems that they are still after the
Post
>> market. It does seems that you wil be able to add 8 or 4 fader pacs
at
>> a time. But, a lot my busines comes from
>>
>> -1 The Hyped (big) fader console look
>> -2 Skill..
>>
>> However, I'll await the official pics from Euphonix to make a final decision..
>>
>> "TCB" <nobody@ishere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Anybody know what the 'big deal' is? I think it was Dedric who posted
the
>>> link to the teaser on their web site. I'm really looking hard at a control
>>> surface upgrade, and since that's bonus season I might have a little
extra
>>> dosh kicking around. Wondering if anyone knows anything, or suspects
anything
>>> that might be informative.
>>>
>>> TCB
>>
>
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Thu Nov 28 14:03:47 PST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02118 seconds
|