The PARIS Forums


Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » OT: Shameless me plug. ;o)
OT: Shameless me plug. ;o) [message #73330] Fri, 29 September 2006 21:24 Go to next message
Kim is currently offline  Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
Senior Member
For anyone who wants to check out some tunes from your favourite newsgroup
host, please check out:

http://www.myspace.com/drschnauberg

I'm in the midst of a work ethic/method revolution, where I try and produce
songs within the space of only a couple of hours. All these tunes are recorded
mostly on my GNX-4 looper, then transferred to Paris and vocals and solos
are added. It's usually about a 2-2.5 hour turnaround for a complete song.

And yes some of the recording methods are dodgy... yes I need to get a pop
filter for the mic, and yes the harmonies in Revision need work, but hey,
it's music, I'm getting it done quickly, and I'm having fun, and I think
the vibe is there. :o)

Tell me what you think...

Cheers,
Kim.
Re: OT: Shameless me plug. ;o) [message #73338 is a reply to message #73330] Fri, 29 September 2006 22:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
LaMont is currently offline  LaMont
Messages: 828
Registered: October 2005
Senior Member
Very nice work. :)

"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>For anyone who wants to check out some tunes from your favourite newsgroup
>host, please check out:
>
>http://www.myspace.com/drschnauberg
>
>I'm in the midst of a work ethic/method revolution, where I try and produce
>songs within the space of only a couple of hours. All these tunes are recorded
>mostly on my GNX-4 looper, then transferred to Paris and vocals and solos
>are added. It's usually about a 2-2.5 hour turnaround for a complete song.
>
>And yes some of the recording methods are dodgy... yes I need to get a
pop
>filter for the mic, and yes the harmonies in Revision need work, but hey,
>it's music, I'm getting it done quickly, and I'm having fun, and I think
>the vibe is there. :o)
>
>Tell me what you think...
>
>Cheers,
>Kim.
Re: OT: Shameless me plug. ;o) [message #73341 is a reply to message #73330] Fri, 29 September 2006 23:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
excelav is currently offline  excelav   
Messages: 2130
Registered: July 2005
Location: Metro Detroit
Senior Member
"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>For anyone who wants to check out some tunes from your favourite newsgroup
>host, please check out:
>
>http://www.myspace.com/drschnauberg
>
>I'm in the midst of a work ethic/method revolution, where I try and produce
>songs within the space of only a couple of hours. All these tunes are recorded
>mostly on my GNX-4 looper, then transferred to Paris and vocals and solos
>are added. It's usually about a 2-2.5 hour turnaround for a complete song.
>
>And yes some of the recording methods are dodgy... yes I need to get a
pop
>filter for the mic, and yes the harmonies in Revision need work, but hey,
>it's music, I'm getting it done quickly, and I'm having fun, and I think
>the vibe is there. :o)
>
>Tell me what you think...
>
>Cheers,
>Kim.

Cool vibes, cool grooves, cool music! Sounds good Kim, keep going. Don't
worry about production values, their good enough. You can worry about perfection
later, just get your music out of you.

Good job!

James
Re: OT: Shameless me plug. ;o) [message #73345 is a reply to message #73341] Sat, 30 September 2006 02:08 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kim is currently offline  Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
Senior Member
"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
> You can worry about perfection
>later, just get your music out of you.

Did another song already this arvo! WOOHOO!!

Expectation now online...

Cheers,
Kim.
Re: OT: Shameless me plug. ;o) [message #73350 is a reply to message #73330] Sat, 30 September 2006 08:48 Go to previous messageGo to next message
gene lennon is currently offline  gene lennon
Messages: 565
Registered: July 2006
Senior Member
"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>For anyone who wants to check out some tunes from your favourite newsgroup
>host, please check out:
>
>http://www.myspace.com/drschnauberg
>
>I'm in the midst of a work ethic/method revolution, where I try and produce
>songs within the space of only a couple of hours. All these tunes are recorded
>mostly on my GNX-4 looper, then transferred to Paris and vocals and solos
>are added. It's usually about a 2-2.5 hour turnaround for a complete song.
>
>And yes some of the recording methods are dodgy... yes I need to get a
pop
>filter for the mic, and yes the harmonies in Revision need work, but hey,
>it's music, I'm getting it done quickly, and I'm having fun, and I think
>the vibe is there. :o)
>
>Tell me what you think...
>
>Cheers,
>Kim.


Me like.
I thought I would hear some Ausi-funk :-(
Couldn’t get “Everything You Are” to play.
Gene
Re: OT: Shameless me plug. ;o) [message #73352 is a reply to message #73350] Sat, 30 September 2006 09:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kim is currently offline  Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
Senior Member
"Gene Lennon" <glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com> wrote:
>Me like.

Excellent. :o)

>I thought I would hear some Ausi-funk :-(

Yeh, it's not funk. It's somewhat funk influenced, but not funk.

>Couldn’t get “Everything You Are” to play.

Odd, it's playing now for me. Probably the closest to funk of the bunch...

Cheers,
Kim.

>Gene
>
Re: OT: Shameless me plug. ;o) [message #73353 is a reply to message #73338] Sat, 30 September 2006 09:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kim is currently offline  Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
Senior Member
"LaMont" <jjdpro@ameritech.net> wrote:
>
>Very nice work. :)

Thanks! :o)

Cheers,
Kim.
Re: OT: Shameless me plug. ;o) [message #73355 is a reply to message #73341] Sat, 30 September 2006 09:05 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kim is currently offline  Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
Senior Member
"James McCloskey" <excelsm@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Cool vibes, cool grooves, cool music!

Thanks heaps. Nice things to say and I very much appreciate it.

The production does need improving somewhat, but as you say, it's not that
far wrong. It can be fixed, most of it in the mix. Step one is to get 30
songs done and whittle it down to one good album. So far I've done ten tunes
in about 6 weeks, so three more months and I should have about 30 to choose
from.

Pick the best and go over them with a little more attention to detail and
I should be right to... err... sit in this back room and burn copies of
it for my friends. ;o)

Cheers,
Kim.


> Sounds good Kim, keep going. Don't
>worry about production values, their good enough. You can worry about perfection
>later, just get your music out of you.
>
>Good job!
>
>James
>
Re: OT: Shameless me plug. ;o) [message #73358 is a reply to message #73330] Sat, 30 September 2006 10:37 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Neil is currently offline  Neil
Messages: 1645
Registered: April 2006
Senior Member
Pretty kewl stuff, Kim!

"Good on ya, mate!" :)

Neil



"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>For anyone who wants to check out some tunes from your favourite newsgroup
>host, please check out:
>
>http://www.myspace.com/drschnauberg
>
>I'm in the midst of a work ethic/method revolution, where I try and produce
>songs within the space of only a couple of hours. All these tunes are recorded
>mostly on my GNX-4 looper, then transferred to Paris and vocals and solos
>are added. It's usually about a 2-2.5 hour turnaround for a complete song.
>
>And yes some of the recording methods are dodgy... yes I need to get a
pop
>filter for the mic, and yes the harmonies in Revision need work, but hey,
>it's music, I'm getting it done quickly, and I'm having fun, and I think
>the vibe is there. :o)
>
>Tell me what you think...
>
>Cheers,
>Kim.
Re: Shameless me plug. ;o) [message #73363 is a reply to message #73330] Sat, 30 September 2006 10:56 Go to previous messageGo to next message
animix is currently offline  animix   FRANCE
Messages: 356
Registered: September 2006
Senior Member
Hey man.............that was nice! I'm gonna DL this and play it for my 84
year old mum at "11" in the car. I'm getting ready to take her for her
weekly shopping. I wish I had some big bass drivers in the back and a 1000W
power amp.

;oP

"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:451df184$1@linux...
>
>
> For anyone who wants to check out some tunes from your favourite newsgroup
> host, please check out:
>
> http://www.myspace.com/drschnauberg
>
> I'm in the midst of a work ethic/method revolution, where I try and
produce
> songs within the space of only a couple of hours. All these tunes are
recorded
> mostly on my GNX-4 looper, then transferred to Paris and vocals and solos
> are added. It's usually about a 2-2.5 hour turnaround for a complete song.
>
> And yes some of the recording methods are dodgy... yes I need to get a
pop
> filter for the mic, and yes the harmonies in Revision need work, but hey,
> it's music, I'm getting it done quickly, and I'm having fun, and I think
> the vibe is there. :o)
>
> Tell me what you think...
>
> Cheers,
> Kim.
Re: OT: Shameless me plug. ;o) [message #73373 is a reply to message #73350] Sat, 30 September 2006 13:49 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Nappy is currently offline  Nappy
Messages: 198
Registered: September 2006
Senior Member
What Gene said!
Very nice!

respect
Nappy


"Gene Lennon" <glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com> wrote:
>
>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>For anyone who wants to check out some tunes from your favourite newsgroup
>>host, please check out:
>>
>>http://www.myspace.com/drschnauberg
>>
>>I'm in the midst of a work ethic/method revolution, where I try and produce
>>songs within the space of only a couple of hours. All these tunes are recorded
>>mostly on my GNX-4 looper, then transferred to Paris and vocals and solos
>>are added. It's usually about a 2-2.5 hour turnaround for a complete song.
>>
>>And yes some of the recording methods are dodgy... yes I need to get a
>pop
>>filter for the mic, and yes the harmonies in Revision need work, but hey,
>>it's music, I'm getting it done quickly, and I'm having fun, and I think
>>the vibe is there. :o)
>>
>>Tell me what you think...
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Kim.
>
>
>Me like.
>I thought I would hear some Ausi-funk :-(
>Couldn’t get “Everything You Are” to play.
>Gene
>
Re: Shameless me plug. ;o) [message #73374 is a reply to message #73363] Sat, 30 September 2006 14:11 Go to previous messageGo to next message
TC is currently offline  TC   CANADA
Messages: 327
Registered: September 2005
Senior Member
Hey Kim,

Cool stuff, I like it, it's different.

I'd like to hear it with a bit better blend in the mix, but it's very cool.

Cheers,

TC
Re: OT: Shameless me plug. ;o) [message #73376 is a reply to message #73330] Sat, 30 September 2006 14:44 Go to previous messageGo to next message
macle   
Messages: 47
Registered: July 2006
Member
Sounds great. A very big present sound, especially considering
how fast you did it, plus the MySpace encoding. I think your
ethic/method revolution is a great idea. I'm trying to figure
out something similar, partly why I may switch from Paris. But
your sound is so big and present, makes me think I shouldn't
switch!!

Great job, Kim.

"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>For anyone who wants to check out some tunes from your favourite newsgroup
>host, please check out:
>
>http://www.myspace.com/drschnauberg
>
>I'm in the midst of a work ethic/method revolution, where I try and produce
>songs within the space of only a couple of hours. All these tunes are recorded
>mostly on my GNX-4 looper, then transferred to Paris and vocals and solos
>are added. It's usually about a 2-2.5 hour turnaround for a complete song.
>
>And yes some of the recording methods are dodgy... yes I need to get a
pop
>filter for the mic, and yes the harmonies in Revision need work, but hey,
>it's music, I'm getting it done quickly, and I'm having fun, and I think
>the vibe is there. :o)
>
>Tell me what you think...
>
>Cheers,
>Kim.
Re: Shameless me plug. ;o) [message #73378 is a reply to message #73363] Sat, 30 September 2006 16:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kim is currently offline  Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
Senior Member
"DJ" <notachance@net.net> wrote:
>I wish I had some big bass drivers in the back and a 1000W
>power amp.

Hehe. There's a Juno-60 doing the bass for most of it. When I first designed
my main bass sound and did a mix in the studio, I mixed on my main system,
but then did my final mix test, as I do, on my little wee computer monitors,
just to check that the final MP3 was going to sound half decent on Joe Average's
home computer, when I found I could hear almost no bass. Turns out the frequency
was just too low. Had to stick a big boost in at 250k or something to get
some upper harmonics happening...

....but put that baby on some nice subs and you'll hear the root and sub
oscillators. Mmm... Juno-60... ;o)

Cheers,
Kim.
Re: Shameless me plug. ;o) [message #73379 is a reply to message #73374] Sat, 30 September 2006 16:17 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kim is currently offline  Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
Senior Member
TC <tc@spammetodeathyoubastards.org> wrote:
>I'd like to hear it with a bit better blend in the mix, but it's very cool.

Some of it certainly wants a proper mix process to take place. Basically,
with a couple of exceptions, the process to date has simply been record it,
edit it, and bounce it. Basic effects have been added, but there's almost
no eq on anything, and even actual levels are quite rough for the most part.
I will certainly go back and take a look at that at some point.

Thanks for the feedback. :o)

Cheers,
Kim.



>
>Cheers,
>
>TC
Re: OT: Shameless me plug. ;o) [message #73380 is a reply to message #73376] Sat, 30 September 2006 16:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kim is currently offline  Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
Senior Member
"macle" <Mates9999@cs.com> wrote:
>Sounds great. A very big present sound, especially considering
>how fast you did it, plus the MySpace encoding.

Gee thanks. I must say I'm very happy with the sound myself.

To let out a little secret, my method has a slightly dodgy side, in that
all the audio runs through two Akai MB-76 "audio mix bays" before getting
to the system, which are busy in there adding noise and reducing clarity.
These things are way cool as they let me just press a footswitch and, for
arguments sake, patch my Juno-60 into my ol' school guitar footpedals, or
into my Quadraverb, or both, or into the GNX-4, or into all three, in whatever
combo I like, and then do the same for the digi piano or for the EPS. It's
way cool functionality wise because I can get any sound I'm likely to want
without any manual patches taking place...

....but I was kinda worried that it would take some sheen off the sound,
so your comments are very much appreciated. :o)

And I'm loving the method. In terms of speed, efficiency, inspiration, and
just sheer fun, it's the best thing since, err... actually I'm struggling
to think of something better. ;o) Paris? ;o)

Cheers,
Kim.

>I think your
>ethic/method revolution is a great idea. I'm trying to figure
>out something similar, partly why I may switch from Paris. But
>your sound is so big and present, makes me think I shouldn't
>switch!!
>
>Great job, Kim.
>
>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>For anyone who wants to check out some tunes from your favourite newsgroup
>>host, please check out:
>>
>>http://www.myspace.com/drschnauberg
>>
>>I'm in the midst of a work ethic/method revolution, where I try and produce
>>songs within the space of only a couple of hours. All these tunes are recorded
>>mostly on my GNX-4 looper, then transferred to Paris and vocals and solos
>>are added. It's usually about a 2-2.5 hour turnaround for a complete song.
>>
>>And yes some of the recording methods are dodgy... yes I need to get a
>pop
>>filter for the mic, and yes the harmonies in Revision need work, but hey,
>>it's music, I'm getting it done quickly, and I'm having fun, and I think
>>the vibe is there. :o)
>>
>>Tell me what you think...
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Kim.
>
Re: OT: Shameless me plug. ;o) [message #73381 is a reply to message #73373] Sat, 30 September 2006 16:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kim is currently offline  Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
Senior Member
"Nappy" <mgrant01@san.rr.com> wrote:
>
>What Gene said!
>Very nice!

Thanks heaps. :o)
Cheers,
Kim.

>
>respect
>Nappy
>
>
>"Gene Lennon" <glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com> wrote:
>>
>>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>For anyone who wants to check out some tunes from your favourite newsgroup
>>>host, please check out:
>>>
>>>http://www.myspace.com/drschnauberg
>>>
>>>I'm in the midst of a work ethic/method revolution, where I try and produce
>>>songs within the space of only a couple of hours. All these tunes are
recorded
>>>mostly on my GNX-4 looper, then transferred to Paris and vocals and solos
>>>are added. It's usually about a 2-2.5 hour turnaround for a complete song.
>>>
>>>And yes some of the recording methods are dodgy... yes I need to get
a
>>pop
>>>filter for the mic, and yes the harmonies in Revision need work, but hey,
>>>it's music, I'm getting it done quickly, and I'm having fun, and I think
>>>the vibe is there. :o)
>>>
>>>Tell me what you think...
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>Kim.
>>
>>
>>Me like.
>>I thought I would hear some Ausi-funk :-(
>>Couldn’t get “Everything You Are” to play.
>>Gene
>>
>
Re: OT: Shameless me plug. ;o) [message #73383 is a reply to message #73330] Sat, 30 September 2006 16:44 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jamie K is currently offline  Jamie K   UNITED STATES
Messages: 1115
Registered: July 2006
Senior Member
Very enjoyable tunes, not to mention filled with great advice!

The GNX4 has also been an inspirational composing tool here, too. I've
written a number of new songs for my solo show that I multi-track live
on stage. Way fun!

Cheers,
-Jamie
http://www.JamieKrutz.com


Kim wrote:
> For anyone who wants to check out some tunes from your favourite newsgroup
> host, please check out:
>
> http://www.myspace.com/drschnauberg
>
> I'm in the midst of a work ethic/method revolution, where I try and produce
> songs within the space of only a couple of hours. All these tunes are recorded
> mostly on my GNX-4 looper, then transferred to Paris and vocals and solos
> are added. It's usually about a 2-2.5 hour turnaround for a complete song.
>
> And yes some of the recording methods are dodgy... yes I need to get a pop
> filter for the mic, and yes the harmonies in Revision need work, but hey,
> it's music, I'm getting it done quickly, and I'm having fun, and I think
> the vibe is there. :o)
>
> Tell me what you think...
>
> Cheers,
> Kim.
Re: OT: Shameless me plug. ;o) [message #73384 is a reply to message #73383] Sat, 30 September 2006 16:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kim is currently offline  Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
Senior Member
Thanks for the comments.

One thing I've learned about the GNX-4, compared to either the GNX3 or the
BNX3, is that it's actually slightly inferior for live looping. On all four
of them, when you are running a loop, you can simply depress the play button
on the unit and it will return to the start of the loop. On the B/GNX-3 this
is an excellent tool live for keeping in sync with a band, as it allows you
to resync the loop at the start of the bar, however unfortunately the GNX-4
has a horrible almost random delay in it when you press play, so if you try
and resync the loop using this method it will end up out of time. On the
B/GNX-3 the response is instant, but on the 4 it's not, rendering the feature
fairly useless.

I suspect it's because the 3 series have onboard memory where I'm suspicious
the "working loops" are stored while in operation. The 4 I think works directly
of the CF card and hence communications is a little slower. I've been meaning
to write to digitech about it in the hope that they can fix it in a firmware
update, but I'm not holding my breath. If you get a moment perhaps you could/should
do the same. The ability to resync the loops in a live scenario would be,
well I don't have to tell you how useful it would be. ;o)

But it's a great tool none the less, and I'm loving it. :o)

Cheers,
Kim.

Jamie K <Meta@Dimensional.com> wrote:
>
>Very enjoyable tunes, not to mention filled with great advice!
>
>The GNX4 has also been an inspirational composing tool here, too. I've
>written a number of new songs for my solo show that I multi-track live
>on stage. Way fun!
>
>Cheers,
> -Jamie
> http://www.JamieKrutz.com
>
>
>Kim wrote:
>> For anyone who wants to check out some tunes from your favourite newsgroup
>> host, please check out:
>>
>> http://www.myspace.com/drschnauberg
>>
>> I'm in the midst of a work ethic/method revolution, where I try and produce
>> songs within the space of only a couple of hours. All these tunes are
recorded
>> mostly on my GNX-4 looper, then transferred to Paris and vocals and solos
>> are added. It's usually about a 2-2.5 hour turnaround for a complete song.
>>
>> And yes some of the recording methods are dodgy... yes I need to get
a pop
>> filter for the mic, and yes the harmonies in Revision need work, but hey,
>> it's music, I'm getting it done quickly, and I'm having fun, and I think
>> the vibe is there. :o)
>>
>> Tell me what you think...
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Kim.
Re: OT: Shameless me plug. ;o) [message #73386 is a reply to message #73384] Sat, 30 September 2006 17:57 Go to previous messageGo to next message
DC is currently offline  DC
Messages: 722
Registered: July 2005
Senior Member
Hey Kim,

I like it. good for you. I want to sound like me too, only more interesting
indeed.


best

DC
Re: OT: Shameless me plug. ;o) [message #73388 is a reply to message #73386] Sat, 30 September 2006 18:20 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kim is currently offline  Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
Senior Member
"DC" <dc@spammersinoz.org> wrote:
>I like it. good for you. I want to sound like me too, only more interesting
>indeed.

Hehe I'd forgotten I put that in there. I guess I should put some proper
influences in there too... ...though I'm not entirely sure how my influences
are for this project.

Thanks for the comments. Appreciated.

Cheers,
Kim.
Re: OT: Shameless me plug. ;o) [message #73389 is a reply to message #73350] Sat, 30 September 2006 18:22 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kim is currently offline  Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
Senior Member
"Gene Lennon" <glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com> wrote:
>Couldn’t get “Everything You Are” to play.

I just noticed that was the only one not enabled for download. Were you trying
to download or play it off the site?

I've enabled it for download anyhow if you wanted a listen...

Cheers,
Kim.
Re: OT: Shameless me plug. ;o) [message #73396 is a reply to message #73389] Sat, 30 September 2006 21:44 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kim is currently offline  Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
Senior Member
"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>I've enabled it for download anyhow if you wanted a listen...

Having said that I've now removed the song because I just made a new one.
;o)

Cheers,
Kim.
Re: Shameless me plug. ;o) [message #73413 is a reply to message #73330] Sun, 01 October 2006 12:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
emarenot is currently offline  emarenot   UNITED STATES
Messages: 345
Registered: June 2005
Senior Member
Hey Kim,
Nice work. Revolution of the Mind stayed with me throughout the day. Also
nifty was how clear the Paris sound came through. Man, it was like cool
water on my ears.
Cheers,
MR

"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:451df184$1@linux...
>
>
> For anyone who wants to check out some tunes from your favourite newsgroup
> host, please check out:
>
> http://www.myspace.com/drschnauberg
>
> I'm in the midst of a work ethic/method revolution, where I try and
produce
> songs within the space of only a couple of hours. All these tunes are
recorded
> mostly on my GNX-4 looper, then transferred to Paris and vocals and solos
> are added. It's usually about a 2-2.5 hour turnaround for a complete song.
>
> And yes some of the recording methods are dodgy... yes I need to get a
pop
> filter for the mic, and yes the harmonies in Revision need work, but hey,
> it's music, I'm getting it done quickly, and I'm having fun, and I think
> the vibe is there. :o)
>
> Tell me what you think...
>
> Cheers,
> Kim.
Re: Shameless me plug. ;o) [message #73422 is a reply to message #73413] Sun, 01 October 2006 15:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kim is currently offline  Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
Senior Member
Thanks for the comments.

Annoyingly there's only two songs up there at the moment. I have two more
I keep trying to load but Myspace won't load them. Not sure why. I've tried
twice now. First time it came back with errors. This time it's still processing...

But it is astounding how the Paris sound can shine through so much. Especially
I guess on something like that which is barely mixed, and hence has few other
plugs and effects, it's very easy to hear that overall Paris thing in the
sound.

And I do love that. ;o)

Cheers,
Kim.

"Mike R." <emarenot@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Hey Kim,
>Nice work. Revolution of the Mind stayed with me throughout the day. Also
>nifty was how clear the Paris sound came through. Man, it was like cool
>water on my ears.
>Cheers,
>MR
>
>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:451df184$1@linux...
>>
>>
>> For anyone who wants to check out some tunes from your favourite newsgroup
>> host, please check out:
>>
>> http://www.myspace.com/drschnauberg
>>
>> I'm in the midst of a work ethic/method revolution, where I try and
>produce
>> songs within the space of only a couple of hours. All these tunes are
>recorded
>> mostly on my GNX-4 looper, then transferred to Paris and vocals and solos
>> are added. It's usually about a 2-2.5 hour turnaround for a complete song.
>>
>> And yes some of the recording methods are dodgy... yes I need to get
a
>pop
>> filter for the mic, and yes the harmonies in Revision need work, but hey,
>> it's music, I'm getting it done quickly, and I'm having fun, and I think
>> the vibe is there. :o)
>>
>> Tell me what you think...
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Kim.
>
>
Re: Shameless me plug. ;o) [message #73435 is a reply to message #73422] Sun, 01 October 2006 19:27 Go to previous message
Kim is currently offline  Kim
Messages: 1246
Registered: October 2005
Senior Member
The two other new tunes have just appeared...

....finally...

"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>Thanks for the comments.
>
>Annoyingly there's only two songs up there at the moment. I have two more
>I keep trying to load but Myspace won't load them. Not sure why. I've tried
>twice now. First time it came back with errors. This time it's still processing...
>
>But it is astounding how the Paris sound can shine through so much. Especially
>I guess on something like that which is barely mixed, and hence has few
other
>plugs and effects, it's very easy to hear that overall Paris thing in the
>sound.
>
>And I do love that. ;o)
>
>Cheers,
>Kim.
>
>"Mike R." <emarenot@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>Hey Kim,
>>Nice work. Revolution of the Mind stayed with me throughout the day.
Also
>>nifty was how clear the Paris sound came through. Man, it was like cool
>>water on my ears.
>>Cheers,
>>MR
>>
>>"Kim" <hiddensounds@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:451df184$1@linux...
>>>
>>>
>>> For anyone who wants to check out some tunes from your favourite newsgroup
>>> host, please check out:
>>>
>>> http://www.myspace.com/drschnauberg
>>>
>>> I'm in the midst of a work ethic/method revolution, where I try and
>>produce
>>> songs within the space of only a couple of hours. All these tunes are
>>recorded
>>> mostly on my GNX-4 looper, then transferred to Paris and vocals and solos
>>> are added. It's usually about a 2-2.5 hour turnaround for a complete
song.
>>>
>>> And yes some of the recording methods are dodgy... yes I need to get
>a
>>pop
>>> filter for the mic, and yes the harmonies in Revision need work, but
hey,
>>> it's music, I'm getting it done quickly, and I'm having fun, and I think
>>> the vibe is there. :o)
>>>
>>> Tell me what you think...
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Kim.
>>
>>
>
Previous Topic: Disk Clone: aftermath
Next Topic: Anyone up for loaning me some stuff temporarily?
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed Dec 25 11:59:21 PST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02051 seconds