Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » No multiple export in cubase 4.1 ;(
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: No multiple export in cubase 4.1 ;( [message #92345 is a reply to message #92341] |
Sat, 03 November 2007 23:17   |
|
|
Good job!! it's funny that Acid has the "Save as >Render> all tracks as "Separate
Files" feature, ANd most so called Pro DAWS don't..
I have to use this plugin http://www.silverspike.com/?Products:TapeIt
Work like a charm, and for 20 bucks it does save time for rendering tracks..
"DJ" <animix _ at _ animas _ dot _ net> wrote:
>Just finished tracking a punk band. we just went balls to the wall 10 drum
>mics, Bass DI'ed and Mic'ed, Lead guitar cab stereo mic'ed with a POD DI,
>rythym guitar stereo mic'ed and a scratch vocal. We didn't stop to create
a
>new song each time. I just "rolled disk" and tracked 12 songs back to back.
>
>Now I've got to split them into separate tracks and render each one
>individually.
>
>This sucks.
>
>One thing that didn't suck though was tracking the drums and bass on a pair
>of Multifacia on my slave comp while tracking vox and guitars on the master
>machine.
>
>Neither comp was breathing hard at all and Systemlink worked like a dream.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: No multiple export in cubase 4.1 ;( [message #92350 is a reply to message #92345] |
Sun, 04 November 2007 03:23 |
emarenot
Messages: 345
Registered: June 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Oh yeah, I've NOTICED that!:-) (and I'm still running Acid
twopointfreakinooh.) Live doesn't do it, Cubase SE doesn't do it. I'm
guessing your observation means Logic and PT won't either. Sonar? I'll
have to check Reaper. Fact is, this sort of feature makes it easy to keep
Paris in the workflow. Render each track as a batch process, import via
Analog X's program and you're there.
MR
"LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote in message news:472d55e4$1@linux...
>
> Good job!! it's funny that Acid has the "Save as >Render> all tracks as
"Separate
> Files" feature, ANd most so called Pro DAWS don't..
>
> I have to use this plugin http://www.silverspike.com/?Products:TapeIt
>
> Work like a charm, and for 20 bucks it does save time for rendering
tracks..
>
> "DJ" <animix _ at _ animas _ dot _ net> wrote:
> >Just finished tracking a punk band. we just went balls to the wall 10
drum
>
> >mics, Bass DI'ed and Mic'ed, Lead guitar cab stereo mic'ed with a POD DI,
>
> >rythym guitar stereo mic'ed and a scratch vocal. We didn't stop to create
> a
> >new song each time. I just "rolled disk" and tracked 12 songs back to
back.
> >
> >Now I've got to split them into separate tracks and render each one
> >individually.
> >
> >This sucks.
> >
> >One thing that didn't suck though was tracking the drums and bass on a
pair
>
> >of Multifacia on my slave comp while tracking vox and guitars on the
master
>
> >machine.
> >
> >Neither comp was breathing hard at all and Systemlink worked like a
dream.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: No multiple export in cubase 4.1 ;( [message #92355 is a reply to message #92341] |
Sun, 04 November 2007 05:40 |
Bill L
Messages: 766
Registered: August 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
DJ, please tell me you at least have separate audio files for each take?
If you just kept it in record for all songs back to back as one long
file, you are living really close to the edge, brother. If you got a
corruption in an audio file or a crash, the whole session could be out
the window.
OTOH, if you did do separate files for each song, you can simply delete
the tracks you don't want and save the song, then undo the deletes and
do the same with the next one, etc.
DJ wrote:
> Just finished tracking a punk band. we just went balls to the wall 10 drum
> mics, Bass DI'ed and Mic'ed, Lead guitar cab stereo mic'ed with a POD DI,
> rythym guitar stereo mic'ed and a scratch vocal. We didn't stop to create a
> new song each time. I just "rolled disk" and tracked 12 songs back to back.
>
> Now I've got to split them into separate tracks and render each one
> individually.
>
> This sucks.
>
> One thing that didn't suck though was tracking the drums and bass on a pair
> of Multifacia on my slave comp while tracking vox and guitars on the master
> machine.
>
> Neither comp was breathing hard at all and Systemlink worked like a dream.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: No multiple export in cubase 4.1 ;( [message #92360 is a reply to message #92355] |
Sun, 04 November 2007 09:16 |
DJ
Messages: 1124
Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
I have two backups of the entire project......... something like 1GB each.
They are on two separate 750GB hard drives that I use for backups.
;o)
"Bill L" <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote in message news:472dcd24$1@linux...
> DJ, please tell me you at least have separate audio files for each take?
> If you just kept it in record for all songs back to back as one long file,
> you are living really close to the edge, brother. If you got a corruption
> in an audio file or a crash, the whole session could be out the window.
>
> OTOH, if you did do separate files for each song, you can simply delete
> the tracks you don't want and save the song, then undo the deletes and do
> the same with the next one, etc.
>
> DJ wrote:
>> Just finished tracking a punk band. we just went balls to the wall 10
>> drum mics, Bass DI'ed and Mic'ed, Lead guitar cab stereo mic'ed with a
>> POD DI, rythym guitar stereo mic'ed and a scratch vocal. We didn't stop
>> to create a new song each time. I just "rolled disk" and tracked 12 songs
>> back to back.
>>
>> Now I've got to split them into separate tracks and render each one
>> individually.
>>
>> This sucks.
>>
>> One thing that didn't suck though was tracking the drums and bass on a
>> pair of Multifacia on my slave comp while tracking vox and guitars on the
>> master machine.
>>
>> Neither comp was breathing hard at all and Systemlink worked like a
>> dream.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: No multiple export in cubase 4.1 ;( [message #92363 is a reply to message #92361] |
Sun, 04 November 2007 09:34 |
Dedric Terry
Messages: 788
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
DJ - you can use the record to track function in 4.1 to do this. I can't
recall if audio tracks can be sources for new audio tracks, but I think they
can - if not, just make a group for each track and then create however many
new tracks you need, assign those groups as inputs for the new tracks, set
your range for each song and record them (set the record folder to a new
folder for each song if you want).
Dedric
On 11/4/07 10:19 AM, in article 472e00c1$1@linux, "DJ" <animix _ at _ animas
_ dot _ net> wrote:
> So LaMont,
>
> If I drop one of these as a plugin on each track, I can set a destination
> folder, play the track from POB to POE and it will render new .wav files to
> the destination folder which I can then import into a new project????
>
> Thanks,
>
> Deej
>
> "LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote in message news:472dfdbc$1@linux...
>>
>> Nice, but does let you
>>
>> -render "mono" wav file
>> -Asio
>>
>> "Neil" <OIU@OI.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> "LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Good job!! it's funny that Acid has the "Save as >Render> all tracks as
>>> "Separate
>>>> Files" feature, ANd most so called Pro DAWS don't..
>>>>
>>>> I have to use this plugin http://www.silverspike.com/?Products:TapeIt
>>
>>>>
>>>> Work like a charm, and for 20 bucks it does save time for rendering
>>>> tracks..
>>>
>>>
>>> Free:
>>>
>>> http://www.voxengo.com/product/recorder/
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: No multiple export in cubase 4.1 ;( [message #92367 is a reply to message #92348] |
Sun, 04 November 2007 09:56 |
DJ
Messages: 1124
Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Neil,
Some of this has to do with the actual physical I/O limitations of a MADI
card and the way I am interfacing my outboard hardware. the explanation
would make your head hurt ...but the other (main) reason I have things set
up this way is to use the slave machine for VSTi's or video while using the
master for audio. I'm going to be composing music for videos here shortly
and I'm needing to make sure I've got a dedicated comp for it. Also, for
working with VSTi's, when BFD2 is released, I'll have 18 separate mono (or
whatever combination of stereo) tracks that I can stream digitally from
slave (running BFD) to Master (running my 4 x UAD1 cards).
Tracking this project to two comps was more of an experimet than anything
else, just to see if it would work. I had a template set up on the master
machine that would have been easy to switch to had this turned into a
cluster****. It was pretty cool to do it this way. I think I coul have
probably tracked all 18 tracks at 1.5ms latency without ASIO direct
monitoring with no problem. They're coming back in here at 2:00 for dubs and
I may try this as a quick experiment just to see (if they all show-the
bassist doesn't need to come back so he may not show).
Unfortunately, a couple of months back I had a major crash of the system
drive that had your tracking templates on it and wasn't able to recover
those (and a lot of other stuff ;o(. )
Deej
"Neil" <IOU@OI.com> wrote in message news:472d6835$1@linux...
>
> Questions:
>
> 1.) Why did you feel the need for a slave comp? I'm tracking
> bands at 88.2k/24 bit with more than this many tracks at once,
> using two Multifascia, on one PC that's got less horsepower than
> yours (as I recall), with no issues.
>
> 2.) I noticed in your reply to Rod that you said you had set up
> some tracking templates that made things easier... did any of
> the templates that i sent you awhile back help at all?
>
> Neil
>
>
> "DJ" <animix _ at _ animas _ dot _ net> wrote:
>>Just finished tracking a punk band. we just went balls to the wall 10 drum
>
>>mics, Bass DI'ed and Mic'ed, Lead guitar cab stereo mic'ed with a POD DI,
>
>>rythym guitar stereo mic'ed and a scratch vocal. We didn't stop to create
> a
>>new song each time. I just "rolled disk" and tracked 12 songs back to
>>back.
>>
>>Now I've got to split them into separate tracks and render each one
>>individually.
>>
>>This sucks.
>>
>>One thing that didn't suck though was tracking the drums and bass on a
>>pair
>
>>of Multifacia on my slave comp while tracking vox and guitars on the
>>master
>
>>machine.
>>
>>Neither comp was breathing hard at all and Systemlink worked like a dream.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
|
|
|
|
| Now low latency recording using master/slave [message #92368 is a reply to message #92367] |
Sun, 04 November 2007 10:40 |
DJ
Messages: 1124
Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Actually,
Since the session is still set up with all of the live mics, I just fired up
all the preamps, turned off ASIO Direct Monitoring and set the buffers to
32k (1.5 ms, which is actually 3ms due to some terminology voodoo that RME
has going on-they implement a 32k buffer within the hardware that is not
adjustable so when the control panel states that you are set to 32k, you are
already dealing with a 32k pre-buffer..but anyway). On the slave project, I
had Ivory VST, Halion, Garritan Personal Orchestra, BFD and a couple of
synths set up and loaded as part of it's default. When recording 12 tracks
at 32k, my CPU was running at about 35-40% but I was getting occasional
spikes. After unloading the VSTi's both machines were using about 15% CPU-12
tracks being recorded on the slave and 8 tracks being recorded on the
master.
This is at 44.1. Once this session is done, before I break everything down,
I'll set this stuff up on an 88.2 project and give it a run for the money.
I
'm still not too crazy about the audible latency at 3 (actual) ms. It sounds
phasey to me when compared to ADM.
;o)
"DJ" <animix _ at _ animas _ dot _ net> wrote in message
news:472e095e$1@linux...
> Hi Neil,
>
> Some of this has to do with the actual physical I/O limitations of a MADI
> card and the way I am interfacing my outboard hardware. the explanation
> would make your head hurt ...but the other (main) reason I have things set
> up this way is to use the slave machine for VSTi's or video while using
> the master for audio. I'm going to be composing music for videos here
> shortly and I'm needing to make sure I've got a dedicated comp for it.
> Also, for working with VSTi's, when BFD2 is released, I'll have 18
> separate mono (or whatever combination of stereo) tracks that I can stream
> digitally from slave (running BFD) to Master (running my 4 x UAD1 cards).
>
> Tracking this project to two comps was more of an experimet than anything
> else, just to see if it would work. I had a template set up on the master
> machine that would have been easy to switch to had this turned into a
> cluster****. It was pretty cool to do it this way. I think I coul have
> probably tracked all 18 tracks at 1.5ms latency without ASIO direct
> monitoring with no problem. They're coming back in here at 2:00 for dubs
> and I may try this as a quick experiment just to see (if they all show-the
> bassist doesn't need to come back so he may not show).
>
> Unfortunately, a couple of months back I had a major crash of the system
> drive that had your tracking templates on it and wasn't able to recover
> those (and a lot of other stuff ;o(. )
>
> Deej
>
>
> "Neil" <IOU@OI.com> wrote in message news:472d6835$1@linux...
>>
>> Questions:
>>
>> 1.) Why did you feel the need for a slave comp? I'm tracking
>> bands at 88.2k/24 bit with more than this many tracks at once,
>> using two Multifascia, on one PC that's got less horsepower than
>> yours (as I recall), with no issues.
>>
>> 2.) I noticed in your reply to Rod that you said you had set up
>> some tracking templates that made things easier... did any of
>> the templates that i sent you awhile back help at all?
>>
>> Neil
>>
>>
>> "DJ" <animix _ at _ animas _ dot _ net> wrote:
>>>Just finished tracking a punk band. we just went balls to the wall 10
>>>drum
>>
>>>mics, Bass DI'ed and Mic'ed, Lead guitar cab stereo mic'ed with a POD DI,
>>
>>>rythym guitar stereo mic'ed and a scratch vocal. We didn't stop to create
>> a
>>>new song each time. I just "rolled disk" and tracked 12 songs back to
>>>back.
>>>
>>>Now I've got to split them into separate tracks and render each one
>>>individually.
>>>
>>>This sucks.
>>>
>>>One thing that didn't suck though was tracking the drums and bass on a
>>>pair
>>
>>>of Multifacia on my slave comp while tracking vox and guitars on the
>>>master
>>
>>>machine.
>>>
>>>Neither comp was breathing hard at all and Systemlink worked like a
>>>dream.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: No multiple export in cubase 4.1 ;( [message #92370 is a reply to message #92350] |
Sun, 04 November 2007 11:51 |
Aaron Allen
Messages: 1988
Registered: May 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
yes, sonar will render tracks. With the greatest of ease :)
AA
"Mike R." <emarenot@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:472d74eb$1@linux...
> Oh yeah, I've NOTICED that!:-) (and I'm still running Acid
> twopointfreakinooh.) Live doesn't do it, Cubase SE doesn't do it. I'm
> guessing your observation means Logic and PT won't either. Sonar? I'll
> have to check Reaper. Fact is, this sort of feature makes it easy to keep
> Paris in the workflow. Render each track as a batch process, import via
> Analog X's program and you're there.
> MR
>
> "LaMont" <jjdpro@gmail.com> wrote in message news:472d55e4$1@linux...
>>
>> Good job!! it's funny that Acid has the "Save as >Render> all tracks as
> "Separate
>> Files" feature, ANd most so called Pro DAWS don't..
>>
>> I have to use this plugin http://www.silverspike.com/?Products:TapeIt
>>
>> Work like a charm, and for 20 bucks it does save time for rendering
> tracks..
>>
>> "DJ" <animix _ at _ animas _ dot _ net> wrote:
>> >Just finished tracking a punk band. we just went balls to the wall 10
> drum
>>
>> >mics, Bass DI'ed and Mic'ed, Lead guitar cab stereo mic'ed with a POD
>> >DI,
>>
>> >rythym guitar stereo mic'ed and a scratch vocal. We didn't stop to
>> >create
>> a
>> >new song each time. I just "rolled disk" and tracked 12 songs back to
> back.
>> >
>> >Now I've got to split them into separate tracks and render each one
>> >individually.
>> >
>> >This sucks.
>> >
>> >One thing that didn't suck though was tracking the drums and bass on a
> pair
>>
>> >of Multifacia on my slave comp while tracking vox and guitars on the
> master
>>
>> >machine.
>> >
>> >Neither comp was breathing hard at all and Systemlink worked like a
> dream.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: No multiple export in cubase 4.1 ;( [message #92371 is a reply to message #92367] |
Sun, 04 November 2007 11:53 |
Aaron Allen
Messages: 1988
Registered: May 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
you need a snap server dude, or a SAN, or maybe even Windows Home Server.
"DJ" <animix _ at _ animas _ dot _ net> wrote in message
news:472e095e$1@linux...
> Hi Neil,
>
> Some of this has to do with the actual physical I/O limitations of a MADI
> card and the way I am interfacing my outboard hardware. the explanation
> would make your head hurt ...but the other (main) reason I have things set
> up this way is to use the slave machine for VSTi's or video while using
> the master for audio. I'm going to be composing music for videos here
> shortly and I'm needing to make sure I've got a dedicated comp for it.
> Also, for working with VSTi's, when BFD2 is released, I'll have 18
> separate mono (or whatever combination of stereo) tracks that I can stream
> digitally from slave (running BFD) to Master (running my 4 x UAD1 cards).
>
> Tracking this project to two comps was more of an experimet than anything
> else, just to see if it would work. I had a template set up on the master
> machine that would have been easy to switch to had this turned into a
> cluster****. It was pretty cool to do it this way. I think I coul have
> probably tracked all 18 tracks at 1.5ms latency without ASIO direct
> monitoring with no problem. They're coming back in here at 2:00 for dubs
> and I may try this as a quick experiment just to see (if they all show-the
> bassist doesn't need to come back so he may not show).
>
> Unfortunately, a couple of months back I had a major crash of the system
> drive that had your tracking templates on it and wasn't able to recover
> those (and a lot of other stuff ;o(. )
>
> Deej
>
>
> "Neil" <IOU@OI.com> wrote in message news:472d6835$1@linux...
>>
>> Questions:
>>
>> 1.) Why did you feel the need for a slave comp? I'm tracking
>> bands at 88.2k/24 bit with more than this many tracks at once,
>> using two Multifascia, on one PC that's got less horsepower than
>> yours (as I recall), with no issues.
>>
>> 2.) I noticed in your reply to Rod that you said you had set up
>> some tracking templates that made things easier... did any of
>> the templates that i sent you awhile back help at all?
>>
>> Neil
>>
>>
>> "DJ" <animix _ at _ animas _ dot _ net> wrote:
>>>Just finished tracking a punk band. we just went balls to the wall 10
>>>drum
>>
>>>mics, Bass DI'ed and Mic'ed, Lead guitar cab stereo mic'ed with a POD DI,
>>
>>>rythym guitar stereo mic'ed and a scratch vocal. We didn't stop to create
>> a
>>>new song each time. I just "rolled disk" and tracked 12 songs back to
>>>back.
>>>
>>>Now I've got to split them into separate tracks and render each one
>>>individually.
>>>
>>>This sucks.
>>>
>>>One thing that didn't suck though was tracking the drums and bass on a
>>>pair
>>
>>>of Multifacia on my slave comp while tracking vox and guitars on the
>>>master
>>
>>>machine.
>>>
>>>Neither comp was breathing hard at all and Systemlink worked like a
>>>dream.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: No multiple export in cubase 4.1 ;( [message #92383 is a reply to message #92360] |
Sun, 04 November 2007 18:16 |
Bill L
Messages: 766
Registered: August 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
But what if it crashed in the middle of the original session while tracking?
DJ wrote:
> I have two backups of the entire project......... something like 1GB each.
> They are on two separate 750GB hard drives that I use for backups.
>
> ;o)
>
> "Bill L" <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote in message news:472dcd24$1@linux...
>> DJ, please tell me you at least have separate audio files for each take?
>> If you just kept it in record for all songs back to back as one long file,
>> you are living really close to the edge, brother. If you got a corruption
>> in an audio file or a crash, the whole session could be out the window.
>>
>> OTOH, if you did do separate files for each song, you can simply delete
>> the tracks you don't want and save the song, then undo the deletes and do
>> the same with the next one, etc.
>>
>> DJ wrote:
>>> Just finished tracking a punk band. we just went balls to the wall 10
>>> drum mics, Bass DI'ed and Mic'ed, Lead guitar cab stereo mic'ed with a
>>> POD DI, rythym guitar stereo mic'ed and a scratch vocal. We didn't stop
>>> to create a new song each time. I just "rolled disk" and tracked 12 songs
>>> back to back.
>>>
>>> Now I've got to split them into separate tracks and render each one
>>> individually.
>>>
>>> This sucks.
>>>
>>> One thing that didn't suck though was tracking the drums and bass on a
>>> pair of Multifacia on my slave comp while tracking vox and guitars on the
>>> master machine.
>>>
>>> Neither comp was breathing hard at all and Systemlink worked like a
>>> dream.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: No multiple export in cubase 4.1 ;( [message #92386 is a reply to message #92383] |
Sun, 04 November 2007 18:28 |
DJ
Messages: 1124
Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
I did a save after the end of every song.........then started rolling again.
DJ
"Bill L" <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote in message news:472e7e2c@linux...
> But what if it crashed in the middle of the original session while
> tracking?
>
> DJ wrote:
>> I have two backups of the entire project......... something like 1GB
>> each. They are on two separate 750GB hard drives that I use for backups.
>>
>> ;o)
>>
>> "Bill L" <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote in message
>> news:472dcd24$1@linux...
>>> DJ, please tell me you at least have separate audio files for each take?
>>> If you just kept it in record for all songs back to back as one long
>>> file, you are living really close to the edge, brother. If you got a
>>> corruption in an audio file or a crash, the whole session could be out
>>> the window.
>>>
>>> OTOH, if you did do separate files for each song, you can simply delete
>>> the tracks you don't want and save the song, then undo the deletes and
>>> do the same with the next one, etc.
>>>
>>> DJ wrote:
>>>> Just finished tracking a punk band. we just went balls to the wall 10
>>>> drum mics, Bass DI'ed and Mic'ed, Lead guitar cab stereo mic'ed with a
>>>> POD DI, rythym guitar stereo mic'ed and a scratch vocal. We didn't stop
>>>> to create a new song each time. I just "rolled disk" and tracked 12
>>>> songs back to back.
>>>>
>>>> Now I've got to split them into separate tracks and render each one
>>>> individually.
>>>>
>>>> This sucks.
>>>>
>>>> One thing that didn't suck though was tracking the drums and bass on a
>>>> pair of Multifacia on my slave comp while tracking vox and guitars on
>>>> the master machine.
>>>>
>>>> Neither comp was breathing hard at all and Systemlink worked like a
>>>> dream.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: No multiple export in cubase 4.1 ;( [message #92403 is a reply to message #92386] |
Mon, 05 November 2007 05:50 |
Bill L
Messages: 766
Registered: August 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Phew! You had me worried there.
DJ wrote:
> I did a save after the end of every song.........then started rolling again.
>
> DJ
>
> "Bill L" <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote in message news:472e7e2c@linux...
>> But what if it crashed in the middle of the original session while
>> tracking?
>>
>> DJ wrote:
>>> I have two backups of the entire project......... something like 1GB
>>> each. They are on two separate 750GB hard drives that I use for backups.
>>>
>>> ;o)
>>>
>>> "Bill L" <bill@billlorentzen.com> wrote in message
>>> news:472dcd24$1@linux...
>>>> DJ, please tell me you at least have separate audio files for each take?
>>>> If you just kept it in record for all songs back to back as one long
>>>> file, you are living really close to the edge, brother. If you got a
>>>> corruption in an audio file or a crash, the whole session could be out
>>>> the window.
>>>>
>>>> OTOH, if you did do separate files for each song, you can simply delete
>>>> the tracks you don't want and save the song, then undo the deletes and
>>>> do the same with the next one, etc.
>>>>
>>>> DJ wrote:
>>>>> Just finished tracking a punk band. we just went balls to the wall 10
>>>>> drum mics, Bass DI'ed and Mic'ed, Lead guitar cab stereo mic'ed with a
>>>>> POD DI, rythym guitar stereo mic'ed and a scratch vocal. We didn't stop
>>>>> to create a new song each time. I just "rolled disk" and tracked 12
>>>>> songs back to back.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now I've got to split them into separate tracks and render each one
>>>>> individually.
>>>>>
>>>>> This sucks.
>>>>>
>>>>> One thing that didn't suck though was tracking the drums and bass on a
>>>>> pair of Multifacia on my slave comp while tracking vox and guitars on
>>>>> the master machine.
>>>>>
>>>>> Neither comp was breathing hard at all and Systemlink worked like a
>>>>> dream.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: No multiple export in cubase 4.1 ;( [message #92497 is a reply to message #92494] |
Wed, 07 November 2007 21:04 |
Neil
Messages: 1645
Registered: April 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Good advice, but I would still pause between takes & just say
"OK let me get this set up" and then relocate to like five
seconds forward for a new filename & then say "awright.. check
tuning & nail it!" (or whatever)
Better than having each track on 16 songs become a gazillion-
megabyte file to begin with.
Neil
"chuck duffy" <c@c.com> wrote:
>
>1. Record the whole thing as one take, in one project.
>
>2. Afterwords drop locator points between songs. Cut across all tracks at
>the locator points.
>
>3. Save the project using save as, once for each each song in the project.
>
>4. Open individually named song named projects one at a time, delete all
>regions to the left of the song for this named project. Delete all regions
>to the right of the end of the song for this named project. Drag all remaining
>regions left to zero. Save the project.
>
>5. Repeat step 4 until all songs are processed.
>
>Chuck
>
>EK Sound <ask_me@nospam.net> wrote:
>>I think everyone gets the point already...
>>
>>So what would you suggest for someone recording a live show??? Can't
>>exactly stop between songs...
>>
>>David.
>>
>>John wrote:
>>> If it's a brand new band, you may not know all the I/O and channels you'll
>>> use so then just record the first song, save it and then save as a new
>project.
>>> Open the NEW PROJECT, strip out all events and audio from the pool
and
>>> save that as a template. Then your template for THAT band will be ready
>>> to go and you could even already have a bunch of folders made up in advance.
>>> Song1, Song2, etc...under the Cubase_Projects\punkers folder.
>>>
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: No multiple export in cubase 4.1 ;( [message #92516 is a reply to message #92497] |
Thu, 08 November 2007 04:56 |
chuck duffy
Messages: 453
Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi Neil,
I was responding to the questio about recording a live show :-)
Chuck
"Neil" <OIOIU@OIU.com> wrote:
>
>Good advice, but I would still pause between takes & just say
>"OK let me get this set up" and then relocate to like five
>seconds forward for a new filename & then say "awright.. check
>tuning & nail it!" (or whatever)
>
>Better than having each track on 16 songs become a gazillion-
>megabyte file to begin with.
>
>Neil
>
>
>"chuck duffy" <c@c.com> wrote:
>>
>>1. Record the whole thing as one take, in one project.
>>
>>2. Afterwords drop locator points between songs. Cut across all tracks
at
>>the locator points.
>>
>>3. Save the project using save as, once for each each song in the project.
>>
>>4. Open individually named song named projects one at a time, delete all
>>regions to the left of the song for this named project. Delete all regions
>>to the right of the end of the song for this named project. Drag all remaining
>>regions left to zero. Save the project.
>>
>>5. Repeat step 4 until all songs are processed.
>>
>>Chuck
>>
>>EK Sound <ask_me@nospam.net> wrote:
>>>I think everyone gets the point already...
>>>
>>>So what would you suggest for someone recording a live show??? Can't
>>>exactly stop between songs...
>>>
>>>David.
>>>
>>>John wrote:
>>>> If it's a brand new band, you may not know all the I/O and channels
you'll
>>>> use so then just record the first song, save it and then save as a new
>>project.
>>>> Open the NEW PROJECT, strip out all events and audio from the pool
>and
>>>> save that as a template. Then your template for THAT band will be ready
>>>> to go and you could even already have a bunch of folders made up in
advance.
>>>> Song1, Song2, etc...under the Cubase_Projects\punkers folder.
>>>>
>>
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Fri Nov 22 11:25:20 PST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.08792 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
