|
|
|
|
Re: Congratulation Martin [message #55126 is a reply to message #55124] |
Fri, 01 July 2005 10:54 ![Go to previous message Go to previous message](/theme/PARIS_Forum_Template/images/up.png) ![Go to next message Go to next message](/theme/PARIS_Forum_Template/images/down.png) |
Tony Benson
![UNITED STATES UNITED STATES](/images/flags/us.png) Messages: 453 Registered: June 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
> >
> >Hey everyone,
> >Chris Ludwig talked me out of it.
> >Not good for music.
> >
> >Good to know.
> >Cheers,
> >Tom
> >
> > "Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote in message =
> >news:42c44f8a@linux...
> > As Pete thankfully mentioned in an earlier thread,
> > Comp USA is running a sale tomorrow on this computer.
> > $200 seems pretty cheap if it'll do the job.
> > I'd want to up the ram, add a drive, disable/
> > delete crazy amounts of trial software.
> > The onboard graphics chip may be a limiting
> > factor but for one monitor it seems like it'll do.
> > After reading the specs tell me if you think it's worth it.
> >
> > Here's the specs:
> > Compaq Presario - SR 1520 NX
> > AMD Sempron 3100+, 256kb L2 cache (Eeeeew),
> > 512 Meg RAM (ouch) upgradeable to 2 Gig, 160 GB 7200rpm HD,=20
> > 16x DVD +RW drive.
> >
> > Modifications I expect:
> > I'm thinking the C drive may need a new install of OS to clean it up.
> > Isn't that next to impossible with a proprietary Compaq?=20
> >
> > A second Softsynth drive ($20.00 for a 80GIG WD 8 meg cache!)
> >
> > An RME type audio card or some other way to send the synths
> > to PARIS. Size of chassis may prohibit some cards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Congratulation Martin [message #55284 is a reply to message #55161] |
Tue, 05 July 2005 03:31 ![Go to previous message Go to previous message](/theme/PARIS_Forum_Template/images/up.png) ![Go to next message Go to next message](/theme/PARIS_Forum_Template/images/down.png) |
Martin Harrington
![AUSTRALIA AUSTRALIA](/images/flags/au.png) Messages: 560 Registered: September 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
_blank">42ca0a85@linux...
> > > Deej,
> > >
> > > Why are you recording in paf if you're going to wav anyway? quality
> loss?
> > >
> > > JH
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Mr Simplicity wrote:
> > > > Jeremy,
> > > >
> > > > I think the mojo of this whole thing lies in the tracks being summed
> in
> > > > Paris. I think it would be very easy to set up a number of routing
> > scenarios
> > > > in Sxwhich would use the Paris insert and aux FX as inserts in
cubase
> > and,
> > > > that's something I hadn't really thought about doing. the Paris FX
are
> > very
> > > > good and this would really add a lot of power to SX. I might try
this
> > some
> > > > day.
> > > >
> > > > The setup I have is really easy at this point because I've already
> > created
> > > > the mix templates. It's just a matter of a rendering of all thee
> tracks
> > to a
> > > > folder, a batch processing from .paf to .wav and then adding the
audio
> > files
> > > > to the desired tracks in SX. After that, it's just a matter of
mixing,
> > > > adding insert FX, EQ and send FX in both Paris and SX with lfader
> evels
> > > > being controlled in SX and panning in Paris.
> > > >
> > > > ]The thing that is somewhat inconvenient about it is that I often
tend
> > to to
> > > > start my rough mixes while the tracking and overdubs are still
> > happening.
> > > > The method that I'm using now really works best when all tracking
has
> > been
> > > > finished and the basic editing has been done in Paris. Still, I can
> see
> > > > some projects never leaving Paris at all.
> > > >
> > > > Cool idea about using the Paris channels as inserts in SX though.
> That's
> > > > some original and creative thinking.
> > > >
> > > > ;o)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "Jeremy Luzier" <j.luzier@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > > > news:42c9d095@linux...
> > > >
> > > >>Deej,
|
|
|
|
|