The PARIS Forums


Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » WTC 7
Re: WTC 7 [message #55888 is a reply to message #55887] Fri, 15 July 2005 14:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
justcron is currently offline  justcron   UNITED STATES
Messages: 330
Registered: May 2006
Senior Member
r /> > >> "DC" <dcicchetti@urs2.net> wrote in message news:42d82613$1@linux...
> >> >
> >> > "justcron" <justcron@hydrorecords.compound> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>I dunno... I dont have any animosity to MM personally, or anyone for
> > that
> >> >
> >> >>matter. Theres literally no journalist or whatever that I would
call
> > out
> >> >
> >> >>by name and say they're 100% full of shite.
> >> >
> >> > You know, you're right. I read the book of "Roger and Me" and
> >> > thought it was about 30% not full of shit. So, cumulatively, adding
> >> >
Re: WTC 7 [message #55889 is a reply to message #55888] Fri, 15 July 2005 14:17 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Deej [1] is currently offline  Deej [1]   UNITED STATES
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
Senior Member
in his most recent work and averaging, Moore is only 93.4%
> >> > full of shit.
> >>
> >> Kinda like the PM article is only 15% full of shit.
> >>
> >> Then again I guess one mans shit is another mans perspective.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>I know your post was well meant, a bad guy would never write about his life
your way as often showing up here. But as I can see it, if you're observing
these conflicts in your mixed up homecountry, how can your land trying to
make peace in the world without understandings at all when observing these
conflicts in metaold roots they have taking with them from their old
homecountries into America? They have the roots of nations-conflicts,
poorness(don't know if it's a correct word) and wars from all over Europe
and other parts of the world deeply anchored in their body and blood
allready when emigrated to America with theyr hopes for the future.

By the way, I was nearly emigrated to Canada, was in love with a wonderful
teenager I met in North Vancouver in '60 with norwegian roots and wrote with
her for three years. But I wasn't enough in love to travel when starting up
with my guitar:-) I was trying to get contact again in the late eighties
with her and talked with her brother on the phone just to get the knowings,
she was killed in a carcrash in the seventies.

erlilo

"Mr Simplicity" <

Report message to a moderator

Re: WTC 7 [message #55890 is a reply to message #55889] Fri, 15 July 2005 14:16 Go to previous messageGo to next message
justcron is currently offline  justcron   UNITED STATES
Messages: 330
Registered: May 2006
Senior Member
amless_@animas.net" target="_blank">animix_spamless_@animas.net> skrev i en meddelelse
news:42d7dbae@linux...
> as far as I can understand but I'm seeing Dejj have learned
>> to do some observations from them about the "new" Americans, that's just
>> seems to be German, French, Scandinavian etc. etc.
>
>
> Erling,
>
> The *only* reason tht I posted all this stuff was that I was trying to
> make
> two points that I don't think I made.
>
> The first one was to try to give some small background of my life that was
> relative to the idea that I had a lot invested in my hopes of how I
> thought
> the world could be and so did these folks from Europe and all over the
> world
> really, though most of them were from Europe and the US.
>
> The second point was that I was absolutely floored when these things were
> being observed and shown to me by people who were about as familiar with
> Europeans and Americans as beings from another planet. I didn't like
> hearing
> this. It certainly didn't fit my picture of how the world should be and
> what
> is really scary about it it that no one but the Indians even recognized
> what
> was going on.
>
> I'm nothing special. Everyone has their own reasons for believing what
> they
> believe. My post was well meant, but in retrospect, it seems sort of silly
> to me and I shouldn't have even wasted my time or anyone else's time on
> this.
>
> Regards,
>
> Deej
>
>
>
> "erlilo" <erlilo@online.no> wrote in message news:42d7c519@linux...
Re: WTC 7 [message #55893 is a reply to message #55873] Fri, 15 July 2005 15:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Mike ClMike Claytor is currently offline  Mike ClMike Claytor
Messages: 52
Registered: July 2005
Member
al(what a word, I don't know if it's correct written
> at
>> all) in America, as far as I can understand but I'm seeing Dejj have
> learned
>> to do some observations from them about the "
Re: WTC 7 [message #55896 is a reply to message #55890] Fri, 15 July 2005 16:30 Go to previous message
Deej [1] is currently offline  Deej [1]   UNITED STATES
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
Senior Member
>> skrev i en meddelelse
>> news:42d758ac$1@linux...
>> >
>> > "DC" <dcicchetti@urs2.net> wrote:
>> >>So, do you think that Rabin had any more hope of success with these
>> >>people than did Clinton or anyone else?
>> >
>> >
>> > yes, absolutely. talk about it all as you will, rabin remains
>> > the ONLY person to ever effectively reduce the terror plague down
>> > there. you obviously missed the part where i stressed
>> > that i do acknowledge that both approaches, both the
>> > deescalation
>> > one and the brute force one can lead to success.
>> > thats what i wrote. nothing about cowboys or some such,
>> > thats only the stuff you projected into my words, because
>> > im a (insert yet another dumbass euro stereotype here).
>> >
>> >
>> > so, yes, i do acknowledge that both roads can lead to success.
>> > do you? it appears you dont, so whos the dogmatic type here?
>> >
>> >
>> >>No it doesn't, or it would have worked with Hussein, Kim Il Sung,
>> >>Hitler and the Branch Davidians. You are not allowing for insanity
>> >>and evil in the world and you are assuming that a rational person's
>> >>version of a more attractive situation will always be accepted.
>> >
>> >
>> > from a palaestinian point of view, israel is the aggressor
>> > that took their land. they dont have the military power,
>> > so they go the terror route. being the frakkingeuropacifistidiotdude
> that
>> > i am, i despise that
>> > just as much, so id prefer it if you dont switch between
>> > calling me a blind pacifist one moment and then a guy
>> > that doesnt criticize palaestina (and thus somewhat supports the use of
>> > terror),
>> > whatever fits the best.
>> >
>> > from their point of view, theyre actually doing exactly
>> > the same thing - use brute force. they dont have planes,
>> > so they use suicide bombers. if you were on their side,
>> > its what you would recommend. and if the enemy threatened to
>> > use more power, youd recommend that the enemy gets a
>&
Previous Topic: Is anybody getting the "why's" of the world...is right here?
Next Topic: I don't believe this conspiracy theory crap one bit!
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat Dec 28 16:37:18 PST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01267 seconds