Home » The PARIS Forums » PARIS: Main » Neve 33609 Compressor for UAD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Neve 33609 Compressor for UAD [message #72668 is a reply to message #72653] |
Tue, 19 September 2006 00:41   |
Tom Bruhl
Messages: 1368
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0021_01C6DB9D.8E0553A0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Gene and all others with comments,
Is the Neve 33609 even worth the bother?
I want to use the $50 coupon on a plug. I'm strongly considering the =
Precision Multiband.
If it sounds as good as it looks and functions as simply as it appears I =
think it could make
a difference in my lower end mastering projects (the only ones I do). =
Now I'm using Paris EQ,=20
NoLimit, Paris Comp, but no real pristine compression. The Waves =
multiband is average at best=20
to my ear. That's all I've got around here in higher end software. =
I've delved into the Waves Ren Comp=20
a few times too. It's okay. The Sakis method is too involved for my =
limited mastering hours. I typically
have to get a CD done in less than four hours to make it worth the =
client's/my while.
For $200 or less is there a better choice for an easy to use multiband =
comp? Otherwise I might spring for the=20
1073 but I have two Neve pres here in hardware form that I track with =
alot.
Is the UAD 140 way better than the SIR plates? If not I'll pass on that =
too.
I'm thinking the Cambridge EQ (just got that and like it) with the =
Precision Multiband Comp would be a=20
fine addition to a sweeter sounding master and even individual tracks =
here and there. =20
All opinions welcome!
Tom
"gene Lennon" <glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com> wrote in message =
news:450f504d$1@linux...
"Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
>DJ,
>Have you had a chance to hear it yet?
>Tom
Not DJ but...
I had it for a few hours before my temp license timed out prematurely. =
Sounds
nice and fairly close to the real thing. I did a short comparison to =
my Portico5043.
The UAD has a similar flavor and controls the dynamics in a very =
similar
way, but it is missing the creamy sound of the hardware - And I hate =
people
that describe hardware as creamy :=AC)=20
Since the plug requires an entire card or it must be rendered, I don't =
think
I will get it. I might as well render the real thing.
Gene
I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
------=_NextPart_000_0021_01C6DB9D.8E0553A0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Gene and all others with =
comments,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Is the Neve 33609 even worth the=20
bother?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I want to use the $50 coupon on a =
plug. I'm=20
strongly considering the Precision Multiband.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>If it sounds as good as it looks and =
functions as=20
simply as it appears I think it could make</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>a difference in my lower end mastering =
projects=20
(the only ones I do). Now I'm using Paris EQ, </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>NoLimit, Paris Comp, </FONT><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>but no real pristine compression. The Waves multiband is =
average at=20
best </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>to my ear. That's all I've got =
around here in=20
higher end software. I've delved </FONT><FONT face=3DArial =
size=3D2>into the=20
Waves Ren Comp </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>a few times too. It's okay. =
The Sakis=20
method is too involved for my limited mastering hours. I=20
typically</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>have to get a CD done in less than four =
hours to=20
make it worth the client's/my while.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>For $200 or less is there a better =
choice for=20
an easy to use multiband comp? Otherwise I might spring for the=20
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>1073 but I have two Neve </FONT><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>pres here in hardware form that I track with alot.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Is the UAD 140 way better than the SIR=20
plates? If not I'll pass on that too.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I'm thinking the Cambridge EQ (just got =
that and=20
like it) with the Precision Multiband Comp would be a </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>fine addition to a </FONT><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>sweeter sounding master and even individual tracks here and =
there. =20
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>All opinions welcome!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"gene Lennon" <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com">glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com</A>&g=
t;=20
wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:450f504d$1@linux">news:450f504d$1@linux</A>...</DIV><BR>"Tom=
Bruhl"=20
<<A href=3D"mailto:arpegio@comcast.net">arpegio@comcast.net</A>> =
wrote:<BR>><BR>><BR>>DJ,<BR>>Have you had a chance to hear =
it=20
yet?<BR>>Tom<BR><BR>Not DJ but...<BR><BR>I had it for a few hours =
before my=20
temp license timed out prematurely. Sounds<BR>nice and fairly close to =
the=20
real thing. I did a short comparison to my Portico5043.<BR>The UAD has =
a=20
similar flavor and controls the dynamics in a very similar<BR>way, but =
it is=20
missing the creamy sound of the hardware - And I hate =
people<BR>that=20
describe hardware as creamy :=AC) <BR>Since the plug requires an =
entire card or=20
it must be rendered, I don't think<BR>I will get it. I might as well =
render=20
the real thing.<BR>Gene<BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, =
and=20
you?<BR><A=20
href=3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer=
..html</A> </FONT></DIV></BODY ></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0021_01C6DB9D.8E0553A0--
|
|
|
|
| Re: Neve 33609 Compressor for UAD [message #72680 is a reply to message #72668] |
Tue, 19 September 2006 06:35 |
gene lennon
Messages: 565
Registered: July 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
"Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>Gene and all others with comments,
>Is the Neve 33609 even worth the bother?
>
>Tom
>
If I didn’t have the Portico, I might consider it but I am a glutton. I have
many software tools that I have purchased that I use infrequently or never,
and if I only bought what I really needed, I would only have a fraction of
my current tools. Not bragging or proud of this, I’m just a sucker for this
shit. I’ve heard Paris-only tracks that sound great.
I’m on a ten-step program - Right!
Gene
Actually, the only way to significantly improve the native sound of Paris
is with improved converters, hardware and clocking. Plugins always seem to
move the sound “laterally” to me. Not up the scale of quality. A few exceptions,
yes, but not many. The Paris compressors are a weakness so any good plugin
will help, but good hardware is still better.
|
|
|
|
| Re: Neve 33609 Compressor for UAD [message #72696 is a reply to message #72680] |
Tue, 19 September 2006 08:57 |
Tom Bruhl
Messages: 1368
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_005E_01C6DBE2.C58CF900
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Gene,
I have a stereo pair of Distressors and a Demeter VTCL-2
tube comp. I don't think either of these comps are right
for stereo bus work at the mastering level. Is your
experience with the UAD Mastering series plugs less=20
fruitful than my hardware options? I really don't want to
buy a hardware mastering comp.
Tom
"gene lennon" <glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com> wrote in message =
news:450ff20f$1@linux...
"Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>Gene and all others with comments,
>Is the Neve 33609 even worth the bother?
>
>Tom
>
If I didn't have the Portico, I might consider it but I am a glutton. =
I have
many software tools that I have purchased that I use infrequently or =
never,
and if I only bought what I really needed, I would only have a =
fraction of
my current tools. Not bragging or proud of this, I'm just a sucker for =
this
shit. I've heard Paris-only tracks that sound great.
I'm on a ten-step program - Right!
Gene
Actually, the only way to significantly improve the native sound of =
Paris
is with improved converters, hardware and clocking. Plugins always =
seem to
move the sound "laterally" to me. Not up the scale of quality. A few =
exceptions,
yes, but not many. The Paris compressors are a weakness so any good =
plugin
will help, but good hardware is still better.
I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
------=_NextPart_000_005E_01C6DBE2.C58CF900
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Gene,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I have a stereo pair of Distressors and =
a Demeter=20
VTCL-2</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>tube comp. I don't think either =
of these=20
comps are right</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>for stereo bus work at the mastering =
level. =20
Is your</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>experience with the UAD Mastering =
series plugs less=20
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>fruitful than </FONT><FONT face=3DArial =
size=3D2>my=20
hardware options? I really don't want to</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>buy a hardware mastering =
comp.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"gene lennon" <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com">glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com</A>&g=
t;=20
wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:450ff20f$1@linux">news:450ff20f$1@linux</A>...</DIV><BR>"Tom=
Bruhl"=20
<<A href=3D"mailto:arpegio@comcast.net">arpegio@comcast.net</A>> =
wrote:<BR>><BR>>Gene and all others with comments,<BR>>Is the =
Neve=20
33609 even worth the bother?<BR>><BR>>Tom<BR>><BR><BR >If I =
didn't=20
have the Portico, I might consider it but I am a glutton. I =
have<BR>many=20
software tools that I have purchased that I use infrequently or =
never,<BR>and=20
if I only bought what I really needed, I would only have a fraction =
of<BR>my=20
current tools. Not bragging or proud of this, I'm just a sucker for=20
this<BR>shit. I've heard Paris-only tracks that sound great.<BR>I'm on =
a=20
ten-step program - Right!<BR>Gene<BR>Actually, the only way to =
significantly=20
improve the native sound of Paris<BR>is with improved converters, =
hardware and=20
clocking. Plugins always seem to<BR>move the sound "laterally" to me. =
Not up=20
the scale of quality. A few exceptions,<BR>yes, but not many. The =
Paris=20
compressors are a weakness so any good plugin<BR>will help, but good =
hardware=20
is still better.<BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, =
and=20
you?<BR><A=20
href=3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer=
..html</A> </FONT></DIV></BODY ></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_005E_01C6DBE2.C58CF900--
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Neve 33609 Compressor for UAD [message #72722 is a reply to message #72714] |
Tue, 19 September 2006 12:53 |
Tom Bruhl
Messages: 1368
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0017_01C6DC03.D1AA9D70
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Gene,
Thanks for your input. My mastering jobs are definitely on the
low end scale. If I didn't do it, they'd run disks with no attention
to mastering at all. The higher end clients are all going to a select
few mastering houses here in BeanTown.=20
I am familiar with the SSL 2 bus comp sound. How does the Neve
compare to that would you say? I might have to check out the
Neve and Precision and do an A-B test on different style mixes.
I also like to run the 2-bus into my Neve pres for 'that sound' .
To refresh your memory, the Demeter is fairly transparent for a tube box =
but doesn't have the speed to really control wild dynamics. It does =
help=20
glue things together though especially on guitar groups or vocal groups.
As always thanks for the tips!
Tom
"gene Lennon" <glennon@NOSP.com> wrote in message =
news:451033f0$1@linux...
"Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
>Gene,
>I have a stereo pair of Distressors and a Demeter VTCL-2
>tube comp. I don't think either of these comps are right
>for stereo bus work at the mastering level. Is your
>experience with the UAD Mastering series plugs less=3D20
>fruitful than my hardware options? I really don't want to
>buy a hardware mastering comp.
>Tom
>
It's not easy for me to answer. In my case I do apply "mastering" to =
tracks
if I am sending demos out or occasionally for film work. I do not =
consider
myself a Mastering Engineer (capitalized), even though I do have a few =
mastering
credits. For real album work I send tracks to professional mastering =
people.
For me the goal is to get the tracks closer to "album sound" but not =
to do
real mastering.=20
If I did not have the Portico, I would probably pick the UAD 33609 =
over the
UAD Mastering Compressor simply because I have a slight preference for =
the
"Neve-ish" sound.
The best thing is to try the demos yourself. I do agree that the =
Distressor
is not a good choice for a mastering comp. It's been years since I =
used a
Demeter.
Other good software compressor/limiters I have used for "mastering" =
include:
Sony Dynamics and Limiter
Massey Limiter (Pro tools only) - Excellent! And cheap.
The optional limiter for SawStudio (I forget the name)
Waves L3 Multimaximizer (gets crunchy but is very "Radio")
UAD Fairchild (for effect only)
A step down but usable are:
PSP MasterComp, Voxengo, and Roger Nichols Finis=20
Gene
I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
------=_NextPart_000_0017_01C6DC03.D1AA9D70
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Gene,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks for your input. My =
mastering jobs are=20
definitely on the</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>low end scale. If I didn't do it, =
they'd run=20
disks with no attention</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>to mastering at all. The higher =
end clients=20
are all going to a select</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>few mastering houses here in =
BeanTown.=20
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I am familiar with the SSL 2 bus comp =
sound. =20
How does the Neve</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>compare to that would you say? I =
might have=20
to check out the</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Neve and Precision and do an A-B test =
on different=20
style mixes.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I also like to run the 2-bus into my =
Neve pres for=20
'that sound' .</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>To refresh your memory, the Demeter is =
fairly=20
transparent </FONT><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>for a tube box =
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>but doesn't have the speed to really =
control wild=20
dynamics. </FONT><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>It does help =
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>glue things together though especially =
on guitar=20
groups or vocal groups.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>As always thanks for the =
tips!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"gene Lennon" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:glennon@NOSP.com">glennon@NOSP.com</A>> wrote in =
message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:451033f0$1@linux">news:451033f0$1@linux</A>...</DIV><BR>"Tom=
Bruhl"=20
<<A href=3D"mailto:arpegio@comcast.net">arpegio@comcast.net</A>> =
wrote:<BR>><BR>><BR>>Gene,<BR>>I have a stereo pair of =
Distressors=20
and a Demeter VTCL-2<BR>>tube comp. I don't think either of =
these=20
comps are right<BR>>for stereo bus work at the mastering =
level. Is=20
your<BR>>experience with the UAD Mastering series plugs=20
less=3D20<BR>>fruitful than my hardware options? I really =
don't want=20
to<BR>>buy a hardware mastering =
comp.<BR>>Tom<BR>><BR><BR>It's not=20
easy for me to answer. In my case I do apply "mastering" to =
tracks<BR>if I am=20
sending demos out or occasionally for film work. I do not =
consider<BR>myself a=20
Mastering Engineer (capitalized), even though I do have a few=20
mastering<BR>credits. For real album work I send tracks to =
professional=20
mastering people.<BR>For me the goal is to get the tracks closer to =
"album=20
sound" but not to do<BR>real mastering. <BR>If I did not have the =
Portico, I=20
would probably pick the UAD 33609 over the<BR>UAD Mastering Compressor =
simply=20
because I have a slight preference for the<BR>"Neve-ish" sound.<BR>The =
best=20
thing is to try the demos yourself. I do agree that the =
Distressor<BR>is not a=20
good choice for a mastering comp. It's been years since I used=20
a<BR>Demeter.<BR><BR>Other good software compressor/limiters I have =
used for=20
"mastering" include:<BR>Sony Dynamics and Limiter<BR>Massey Limiter =
(Pro tools=20
only) - Excellent! And cheap.<BR>The optional limiter for SawStudio (I =
forget=20
the name)<BR>Waves L3 Multimaximizer (gets crunchy but is very =
"Radio")<BR>UAD=20
Fairchild (for effect only)<BR><BR>A step down but usable are:<BR>PSP=20
MasterComp, Voxengo, and Roger Nichols Finis <BR>Gene</BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, =
and=20
you?<BR><A=20
href=3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer=
..html</A> </FONT></DIV></BODY ></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0017_01C6DC03.D1AA9D70--
|
|
|
|
| Re: Neve 33609 Compressor for UAD [message #72749 is a reply to message #72668] |
Tue, 19 September 2006 18:02 |
Aaron Allen
Messages: 1988
Registered: May 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0042_01C6DC26.7F76D500
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Tom, do you find that the Paris EQ is a little, er... tubby sounding in =
mastering?
AA
"Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote in message =
news:450f9d86@linux...
Gene and all others with comments,
Is the Neve 33609 even worth the bother?
I want to use the $50 coupon on a plug. I'm strongly considering the =
Precision Multiband.
If it sounds as good as it looks and functions as simply as it appears =
I think it could make
a difference in my lower end mastering projects (the only ones I do). =
Now I'm using Paris EQ,=20
NoLimit, Paris Comp, but no real pristine compression. The Waves =
multiband is average at best=20
to my ear. That's all I've got around here in higher end software. =
I've delved into the Waves Ren Comp=20
a few times too. It's okay. The Sakis method is too involved for my =
limited mastering hours. I typically
have to get a CD done in less than four hours to make it worth the =
client's/my while.
For $200 or less is there a better choice for an easy to use multiband =
comp? Otherwise I might spring for the=20
1073 but I have two Neve pres here in hardware form that I track with =
alot.
Is the UAD 140 way better than the SIR plates? If not I'll pass on =
that too.
I'm thinking the Cambridge EQ (just got that and like it) with the =
Precision Multiband Comp would be a=20
fine addition to a sweeter sounding master and even individual tracks =
here and there. =20
All opinions welcome!
Tom
"gene Lennon" <glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com> wrote in message =
news:450f504d$1@linux...
"Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
>DJ,
>Have you had a chance to hear it yet?
>Tom
Not DJ but...
I had it for a few hours before my temp license timed out =
prematurely. Sounds
nice and fairly close to the real thing. I did a short comparison to =
my Portico5043.
The UAD has a similar flavor and controls the dynamics in a very =
similar
way, but it is missing the creamy sound of the hardware - And I =
hate people
that describe hardware as creamy :=AC)=20
Since the plug requires an entire card or it must be rendered, I =
don't think
I will get it. I might as well render the real thing.
Gene
I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
------=_NextPart_000_0042_01C6DC26.7F76D500
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.5296.0" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom, do you find that the Paris EQ is a =
little,=20
er... tubby sounding in mastering?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>AA</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Tom Bruhl" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:arpegio@comcast.net">arpegio@comcast.net</A>> wrote =
in message=20
<A href=3D"news:450f9d86@linux">news:450f9d86@linux</A>...</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Gene and all others with =
comments,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Is the Neve 33609 even worth the=20
bother?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I want to use the $50 coupon on a =
plug. I'm=20
strongly considering the Precision Multiband.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>If it sounds as good as it looks and =
functions as=20
simply as it appears I think it could make</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>a difference in my lower end =
mastering projects=20
(the only ones I do). Now I'm using Paris EQ, </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>NoLimit, Paris Comp, </FONT><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>but no real pristine compression. The Waves multiband =
is average=20
at best </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>to my ear. That's all I've got =
around here=20
in higher end software. I've delved </FONT><FONT face=3DArial =
size=3D2>into=20
the Waves Ren Comp </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>a few times too. It's =
okay. The Sakis=20
method is too involved for my limited mastering hours. I=20
typically</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>have to get a CD done in less than =
four hours to=20
make it worth the client's/my while.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>For $200 or less is there a =
better choice=20
for an easy to use multiband comp? Otherwise I might spring for =
the=20
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>1073 but I have two Neve </FONT><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>pres here in hardware form that I track with =
alot.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Is the UAD 140 way better than the =
SIR=20
plates? If not I'll pass on that too.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I'm thinking the Cambridge EQ (just =
got that and=20
like it) with the Precision Multiband Comp would be a </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>fine addition to a </FONT><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>sweeter sounding master and even individual tracks here and=20
there. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>All opinions welcome!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"gene Lennon" <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com">glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com</A>&g=
t;=20
wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:450f504d$1@linux">news:450f504d$1@linux</A>...</DIV><BR>"Tom=
=20
Bruhl" <<A =
href=3D"mailto:arpegio@comcast.net">arpegio@comcast.net</A>>=20
wrote:<BR>><BR>><BR>>DJ,<BR>>Have you had a chance to =
hear it=20
yet?<BR>>Tom<BR><BR>Not DJ but...<BR><BR>I had it for a few hours =
before=20
my temp license timed out prematurely. Sounds<BR>nice and fairly =
close to=20
the real thing. I did a short comparison to my Portico5043.<BR>The =
UAD has a=20
similar flavor and controls the dynamics in a very similar<BR>way, =
but it is=20
missing the creamy sound of the hardware - And I hate =
people<BR>that=20
describe hardware as creamy :=AC) <BR>Since the plug requires an =
entire card=20
or it must be rendered, I don't think<BR>I will get it. I might as =
well=20
render the real thing.<BR>Gene<BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, =
and=20
you?<BR><A=20
=
href=3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer=
..html</A> </FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE ></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0042_01C6DC26.7F76D500--
|
|
|
|
| Re: Neve 33609 Compressor for UAD [message #72766 is a reply to message #72749] |
Wed, 20 September 2006 00:15 |
Tom Bruhl
Messages: 1368
Registered: June 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0048_01C6DC63.15381DB0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Aaron,
Tubby big time in the low end. I think I'm going to like the
Cambridge possibly in conjunction with the Neve 33609.
The Cambridge seems to have an even nicer top end than=20
Paris. More transparent but still retains character to my ear. =20
I think the low end will be better in a fine tuning way than the=20
Paris eq also.
It's the Neve comp that I know nothing about.
Tom
"Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote in message =
news:4510915d@linux...
Tom, do you find that the Paris EQ is a little, er... tubby sounding =
in mastering?
AA
"Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote in message =
news:450f9d86@linux...
Gene and all others with comments,
Is the Neve 33609 even worth the bother?
I want to use the $50 coupon on a plug. I'm strongly considering =
the Precision Multiband.
If it sounds as good as it looks and functions as simply as it =
appears I think it could make
a difference in my lower end mastering projects (the only ones I =
do). Now I'm using Paris EQ,=20
NoLimit, Paris Comp, but no real pristine compression. The Waves =
multiband is average at best=20
to my ear. That's all I've got around here in higher end software. =
I've delved into the Waves Ren Comp=20
a few times too. It's okay. The Sakis method is too involved for =
my limited mastering hours. I typically
have to get a CD done in less than four hours to make it worth the =
client's/my while.
For $200 or less is there a better choice for an easy to use =
multiband comp? Otherwise I might spring for the=20
1073 but I have two Neve pres here in hardware form that I track =
with alot.
Is the UAD 140 way better than the SIR plates? If not I'll pass on =
that too.
I'm thinking the Cambridge EQ (just got that and like it) with the =
Precision Multiband Comp would be a=20
fine addition to a sweeter sounding master and even individual =
tracks here and there. =20
All opinions welcome!
Tom
"gene Lennon" <glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com> wrote in message =
news:450f504d$1@linux...
"Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
>DJ,
>Have you had a chance to hear it yet?
>Tom
Not DJ but...
I had it for a few hours before my temp license timed out =
prematurely. Sounds
nice and fairly close to the real thing. I did a short comparison =
to my Portico5043.
The UAD has a similar flavor and controls the dynamics in a very =
similar
way, but it is missing the creamy sound of the hardware - And I =
hate people
that describe hardware as creamy :=AC)=20
Since the plug requires an entire card or it must be rendered, I =
don't think
I will get it. I might as well render the real thing.
Gene
I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
------=_NextPart_000_0048_01C6DC63.15381DB0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Aaron,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tubby big time in the low end. I =
think I'm=20
going to like the</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Cambridge possibly in conjunction with =
the Neve=20
33609.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>The Cambridge seems to have an even =
nicer top end=20
than </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Paris. More transparent but still =
retains=20
character to my ear. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I think the low end will </FONT><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>be better in a fine tuning way than the </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Paris eq also.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>It's the Neve comp that I know nothing=20
about.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Aaron Allen" <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:know-spam@not_here.dude">know-spam@not_here.dude</A>> =
wrote in=20
message <A =
href=3D"news:4510915d@linux">news:4510915d@linux</A>...</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom, do you find that the Paris EQ is =
a little,=20
er... tubby sounding in mastering?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>AA</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Tom Bruhl" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:arpegio@comcast.net">arpegio@comcast.net</A>> =
wrote in=20
message <A =
href=3D"news:450f9d86@linux">news:450f9d86@linux</A>...</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Gene and all others with =
comments,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Is the Neve 33609 even worth the=20
bother?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I want to use the $50 coupon on a =
plug. =20
I'm strongly considering the Precision Multiband.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>If it sounds as good as it looks =
and functions=20
as simply as it appears I think it could make</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>a difference in my lower end =
mastering projects=20
(the only ones I do). Now I'm using Paris EQ, </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>NoLimit, Paris Comp, </FONT><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>but no real pristine compression. The Waves multiband =
is=20
average at best </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>to my ear. That's all I've =
got around=20
here in higher end software. I've delved </FONT><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>into the Waves Ren Comp </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>a few times too. It's =
okay. The=20
Sakis method is too involved for my limited mastering hours. I =
typically</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>have to get a CD done in less than =
four hours=20
to make it worth the client's/my while.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>For $200 or less is there a =
better choice=20
for an easy to use multiband comp? Otherwise I might spring =
for the=20
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>1073 but I have two Neve =
</FONT><FONT=20
face=3DArial size=3D2>pres here in hardware form that I track with=20
alot.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Is the UAD 140 way better than the =
SIR=20
plates? If not I'll pass on that too.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I'm thinking the Cambridge EQ (just =
got that=20
and like it) with the Precision Multiband Comp would be a =
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>fine addition to a </FONT><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>sweeter sounding master and even individual tracks here and =
there. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>All opinions welcome!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"gene Lennon" <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com">glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com</A>&g=
t;=20
wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:450f504d$1@linux">news:450f504d$1@linux</A>...</DIV><BR>"Tom=
=20
Bruhl" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:arpegio@comcast.net">arpegio@comcast.net</A>>=20
wrote:<BR>><BR>><BR>>DJ,<BR>>Have you had a chance to =
hear it=20
yet?<BR>>Tom<BR><BR>Not DJ but...<BR><BR>I had it for a few =
hours=20
before my temp license timed out prematurely. Sounds<BR>nice and =
fairly=20
close to the real thing. I did a short comparison to my=20
Portico5043.<BR>The UAD has a similar flavor and controls the =
dynamics in=20
a very similar<BR>way, but it is missing the creamy sound of the=20
hardware - And I hate people<BR>that describe hardware as =
creamy :=AC)=20
<BR>Since the plug requires an entire card or it must be rendered, =
I don't=20
think<BR>I will get it. I might as well render the real=20
thing.<BR>Gene<BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight =
spam, and=20
you?<BR><A=20
=
href=3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer=
..html</A> </FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE ></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY>=
</HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0048_01C6DC63.15381DB0--
|
|
|
|
| Re: Neve 33609 Compressor for UAD [message #72786 is a reply to message #72766] |
Wed, 20 September 2006 10:15 |
animix
Messages: 356
Registered: September 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_004E_01C6DCA6.21483520
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The UAD-1 precision EQ is a very nice mastering tool, but you've gotta =
feel comfortable with twisting knobs rather than using a graphic =
interface.
Deej
"Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote in message =
news:4510e8de@linux...
Aaron,
Tubby big time in the low end. I think I'm going to like the
Cambridge possibly in conjunction with the Neve 33609.
The Cambridge seems to have an even nicer top end than=20
Paris. More transparent but still retains character to my ear. =20
I think the low end will be better in a fine tuning way than the=20
Paris eq also.
It's the Neve comp that I know nothing about.
Tom
"Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote in message =
news:4510915d@linux...
Tom, do you find that the Paris EQ is a little, er... tubby sounding =
in mastering?
AA
"Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote in message =
news:450f9d86@linux...
Gene and all others with comments,
Is the Neve 33609 even worth the bother?
I want to use the $50 coupon on a plug. I'm strongly considering =
the Precision Multiband.
If it sounds as good as it looks and functions as simply as it =
appears I think it could make
a difference in my lower end mastering projects (the only ones I =
do). Now I'm using Paris EQ,=20
NoLimit, Paris Comp, but no real pristine compression. The Waves =
multiband is average at best=20
to my ear. That's all I've got around here in higher end =
software. I've delved into the Waves Ren Comp=20
a few times too. It's okay. The Sakis method is too involved for =
my limited mastering hours. I typically
have to get a CD done in less than four hours to make it worth the =
client's/my while.
For $200 or less is there a better choice for an easy to use =
multiband comp? Otherwise I might spring for the=20
1073 but I have two Neve pres here in hardware form that I track =
with alot.
Is the UAD 140 way better than the SIR plates? If not I'll pass =
on that too.
I'm thinking the Cambridge EQ (just got that and like it) with the =
Precision Multiband Comp would be a=20
fine addition to a sweeter sounding master and even individual =
tracks here and there. =20
All opinions welcome!
Tom
"gene Lennon" <glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com> wrote in message =
news:450f504d$1@linux...
"Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
>DJ,
>Have you had a chance to hear it yet?
>Tom
Not DJ but...
I had it for a few hours before my temp license timed out =
prematurely. Sounds
nice and fairly close to the real thing. I did a short =
comparison to my Portico5043.
The UAD has a similar flavor and controls the dynamics in a very =
similar
way, but it is missing the creamy sound of the hardware - And I =
hate people
that describe hardware as creamy :=AC)=20
Since the plug requires an entire card or it must be rendered, I =
don't think
I will get it. I might as well render the real thing.
Gene
I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
------=_NextPart_000_004E_01C6DCA6.21483520
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1106" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>The UAD-1 precision EQ is a very nice =
mastering=20
tool, but you've gotta feel comfortable with twisting knobs rather than =
using a=20
graphic interface.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Deej</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Tom Bruhl" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:arpegio@comcast.net">arpegio@comcast.net</A>> wrote =
in message=20
<A href=3D"news:4510e8de@linux">news:4510e8de@linux</A>...</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Aaron,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tubby big time in the low end. =
I think I'm=20
going to like the</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Cambridge possibly in conjunction =
with the Neve=20
33609.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>The Cambridge seems to have an even =
nicer top end=20
than </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Paris. More transparent but =
still retains=20
character to my ear. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I think the low end will </FONT><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>be better in a fine tuning way than the </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Paris eq also.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>It's the Neve comp that I know =
nothing=20
about.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Aaron Allen" <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:know-spam@not_here.dude">know-spam@not_here.dude</A>> =
wrote=20
in message <A =
href=3D"news:4510915d@linux">news:4510915d@linux</A>...</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom, do you find that the Paris EQ =
is a little,=20
er... tubby sounding in mastering?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>AA</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Tom Bruhl" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:arpegio@comcast.net">arpegio@comcast.net</A>> =
wrote in=20
message <A =
href=3D"news:450f9d86@linux">news:450f9d86@linux</A>...</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Gene and all others with=20
comments,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Is the Neve 33609 even worth the=20
bother?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I want to use the $50 coupon on a =
plug. =20
I'm strongly considering the Precision Multiband.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>If it sounds as good as it looks =
and=20
functions as simply as it appears I think it could =
make</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>a difference in my lower end =
mastering=20
projects (the only ones I do). Now I'm using Paris EQ, =
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>NoLimit, Paris Comp, </FONT><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>but no real pristine compression. The Waves =
multiband is=20
average at best </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>to my ear. That's all I've =
got around=20
here in higher end software. I've delved </FONT><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>into the Waves Ren Comp </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>a few times too. It's =
okay. The=20
Sakis method is too involved for my limited mastering hours. =
I=20
typically</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>have to get a CD done in less =
than four hours=20
to make it worth the client's/my while.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>For $200 or less is there a =
better=20
choice for an easy to use multiband comp? Otherwise I might =
spring=20
for the </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>1073 but I have two Neve =
</FONT><FONT=20
face=3DArial size=3D2>pres here in hardware form that I track with =
alot.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Is the UAD 140 way better than =
the SIR=20
plates? If not I'll pass on that too.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I'm thinking the Cambridge EQ =
(just got that=20
and like it) with the Precision Multiband Comp would be a =
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>fine addition to a </FONT><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>sweeter sounding master and even individual tracks here =
and=20
there. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>All opinions =
welcome!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"gene Lennon" <<A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com">glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com</A>&g=
t;=20
wrote in message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:450f504d$1@linux">news:450f504d$1@linux</A>...</DIV><BR>"Tom=
=20
Bruhl" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:arpegio@comcast.net">arpegio@comcast.net</A>>=20
wrote:<BR>><BR>><BR>>DJ,<BR>>Have you had a chance =
to hear=20
it yet?<BR>>Tom<BR><BR>Not DJ but...<BR><BR>I had it for a =
few hours=20
before my temp license timed out prematurely. Sounds<BR>nice and =
fairly=20
close to the real thing. I did a short comparison to my=20
Portico5043.<BR>The UAD has a similar flavor and controls the =
dynamics=20
in a very similar<BR>way, but it is missing the creamy sound of =
the=20
hardware - And I hate people<BR>that describe hardware as =
creamy=20
:=AC) <BR>Since the plug requires an entire card or it must be =
rendered, I=20
don't think<BR>I will get it. I might as well render the real=20
thing.<BR>Gene<BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight =
spam, and=20
you?<BR><A=20
=
href=3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer=
..html</A> </FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE ></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCK=
QUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_004E_01C6DCA6.21483520--
|
|
|
|
| Re: Neve 33609 Compressor for UAD [message #72794 is a reply to message #72766] |
Wed, 20 September 2006 13:46 |
excelav
Messages: 2130
Registered: July 2005
Location: Metro Detroit
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Hey Tom! You might want to look in to the iZotope 64-bit Studio Processing
Bundle for mastering. I think it goes for around $350.00 street. I've never
used it but I have heard good things about it.
http://www.m-audio.com/products/en_us/iZotope64bitStudioProc essingBundle-main.html
James
"Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
>Aaron,
>Tubby big time in the low end. I think I'm going to like the
>Cambridge possibly in conjunction with the Neve 33609.
>The Cambridge seems to have an even nicer top end than=20
>Paris. More transparent but still retains character to my ear. =20
>I think the low end will be better in a fine tuning way than the=20
>Paris eq also.
>
>It's the Neve comp that I know nothing about.
>Tom
>
>
> "Aaron Allen" <know-spam@not_here.dude> wrote in message =
>news:4510915d@linux...
> Tom, do you find that the Paris EQ is a little, er... tubby sounding =
>in mastering?
>
> AA
> "Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote in message =
>news:450f9d86@linux...
> Gene and all others with comments,
>
> Is the Neve 33609 even worth the bother?
>
> I want to use the $50 coupon on a plug. I'm strongly considering =
>the Precision Multiband.
> If it sounds as good as it looks and functions as simply as it =
>appears I think it could make
> a difference in my lower end mastering projects (the only ones I =
>do). Now I'm using Paris EQ,=20
> NoLimit, Paris Comp, but no real pristine compression. The Waves =
>multiband is average at best=20
> to my ear. That's all I've got around here in higher end software.
=
>I've delved into the Waves Ren Comp=20
> a few times too. It's okay. The Sakis method is too involved for =
>my limited mastering hours. I typically
> have to get a CD done in less than four hours to make it worth the =
>client's/my while.
>
> For $200 or less is there a better choice for an easy to use =
>multiband comp? Otherwise I might spring for the=20
> 1073 but I have two Neve pres here in hardware form that I track =
>with alot.
>
> Is the UAD 140 way better than the SIR plates? If not I'll pass on
=
>that too.
>
> I'm thinking the Cambridge EQ (just got that and like it) with the =
>Precision Multiband Comp would be a=20
> fine addition to a sweeter sounding master and even individual =
>tracks here and there. =20
>
> All opinions welcome!
> Tom
>
> "gene Lennon" <glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com> wrote in message =
>news:450f504d$1@linux...
>
> "Tom Bruhl" <arpegio@comcast.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> >DJ,
> >Have you had a chance to hear it yet?
> >Tom
>
> Not DJ but...
>
> I had it for a few hours before my temp license timed out =
>prematurely. Sounds
> nice and fairly close to the real thing. I did a short comparison
=
>to my Portico5043.
> The UAD has a similar flavor and controls the dynamics in a very =
>similar
> way, but it is missing the creamy sound of the hardware - And I =
>hate people
> that describe hardware as creamy :=AC)=20
> Since the plug requires an entire card or it must be rendered, I =
>don't think
> I will get it. I might as well render the real thing.
> Gene
>
>
>
> I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
> http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html
>
><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
><HTML><HEAD>
><META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
>charset=3Diso-8859-1">
><META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400" name=3DGENERATOR>
><STYLE></STYLE>
></HEAD>
><BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Aaron,</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tubby big time in the low end. I =
>think I'm=20
>going to like the</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Cambridge possibly in conjunction with
=
>the Neve=20
>33609.</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>The Cambridge seems to have an even =
>nicer top end=20
>than </FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Paris. More transparent but still =
>retains=20
>character to my ear. </FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I think the low end will </FONT><FONT =
>face=3DArial=20
>size=3D2>be better in a fine tuning way than the </FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Paris eq also.</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>It's the Neve comp that I know nothing=20
>about.</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
><BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
>style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
>BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
> <DIV>"Aaron Allen" <<A=20
> =
>href=3D"mailto:know-spam@not_here.dude">know-spam@not_here.dude</A>> =
>wrote in=20
> message <A =
>href=3D"news:4510915d@linux">news:4510915d@linux</A>...</DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom, do you find that the Paris EQ is
=
>a little,=20
> er... tubby sounding in mastering?</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>AA</FONT></DIV>
> <BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
> style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
>BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
> <DIV>"Tom Bruhl" <<A=20
> href=3D"mailto:arpegio@comcast.net">arpegio@comcast.net</A>> =
>wrote in=20
> message <A =
>href=3D"news:450f9d86@linux">news:450f9d86@linux</A>...</DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Gene and all others with =
>comments,</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Is the Neve 33609 even worth the=20
> bother?</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I want to use the $50 coupon on a =
>plug. =20
> I'm strongly considering the Precision Multiband.</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>If it sounds as good as it looks =
>and functions=20
> as simply as it appears I think it could make</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>a difference in my lower end =
>mastering projects=20
> (the only ones I do). Now I'm using Paris EQ, </FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>NoLimit, Paris Comp, </FONT><FONT =
>face=3DArial=20
> size=3D2>but no real pristine compression. The Waves multiband =
>is=20
> average at best </FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>to my ear. That's all I've =
>got around=20
> here in higher end software. I've delved </FONT><FONT =
>face=3DArial=20
> size=3D2>into the Waves Ren Comp </FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>a few times too. It's =
>okay. The=20
> Sakis method is too involved for my limited mastering hours. I =
>
> typically</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>have to get a CD done in less than
=
>four hours=20
> to make it worth the client's/my while.</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>For $200 or less is there a =
>better choice=20
> for an easy to use multiband comp? Otherwise I might spring =
>for the=20
> </FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>1073 but I have two Neve =
></FONT><FONT=20
> face=3DArial size=3D2>pres here in hardware form that I track with=20
> alot.</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Is the UAD 140 way better than the
=
>SIR=20
> plates? If not I'll pass on that too.</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I'm thinking the Cambridge EQ (just
=
>got that=20
> and like it) with the Precision Multiband Comp would be a =
></FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>fine addition to a </FONT><FONT =
>face=3DArial=20
> size=3D2>sweeter sounding master and even individual tracks here and
=
>
> there. </FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>All opinions welcome!</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <BLOCKQUOTE=20
> style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
>BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
> <DIV>"gene Lennon" <<A=20
> =
>href=3D"mailto:glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com">glennon@NOSPmyrealbox.com</A>&g=
>t;=20
> wrote in message <A=20
> =
>href=3D"news:450f504d$1@linux">news:450f504d$1@linux</A>...</DIV><BR>"Tom=
>=20
> Bruhl" <<A=20
> href=3D"mailto:arpegio@comcast.net">arpegio@comcast.net</A>>=20
> wrote:<BR>><BR>><BR>>DJ,<BR>>Have you had a chance to =
>hear it=20
> yet?<BR>>Tom<BR><BR>Not DJ but...<BR><BR>I had it for a few =
>hours=20
> before my temp license timed out prematurely. Sounds<BR>nice and =
>fairly=20
> close to the real thing. I did a short comparison to my=20
> Portico5043.<BR>The UAD has a similar flavor and controls the =
>dynamics in=20
> a very similar<BR>way, but it is missing the creamy sound of the=20
> hardware - And I hate people<BR>that describe hardware as =
>creamy :=AC)=20
> <BR>Since the plug requires an entire card or it must be rendered,
=
>I don't=20
> think<BR>I will get it. I might as well render the real=20
> thing.<BR>Gene<BR></BLOCKQUOTE>
> <DIV><FONT size=3D2><BR><BR>I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight =
>spam, and=20
> you?<BR><A=20
> =
>href=3D"http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html">http://www.polesoft.com/refer=
>.html</A> </FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY >=
></HTML>
>
>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Fri Sep 20 10:43:53 PDT 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03833 seconds
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
