|
|
|
|
| Re: Quantec Yardstick.......OK....now I get it. [message #71065 is a reply to message #71059] |
Fri, 11 August 2006 06:45   |
cujo
Messages: 285
Registered: July 2005
|
Senior Member |
|
|
So DJ, you use some Haas effect type delays?
I have been wondering if it actually makes things worse. I mean, the musicality
and realism in some vintage rock recordings is pretty great and they never
did that that I know of or did they?
I recently did a mix using some short (not too short) delays panned opposite
the source and put way low i the mix, but I wondered if it just mucked up
the works. Like there was just too much "noise" in the mix.
rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
>sorry but at our age it's not learning it's...D'OH
>
>;o)
>
>On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 00:51:27 -0600, "DJ"
><animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
>
>>I've been using this thing all wrong. I've got a situation configured here
>>where, but interfacing it with Cubase Sx, applying it to every track in
a
>>mix and then returning the tracks to Paris I can use this processor on
every
>>track in a mix. I can adjust the level sent to each track in Cubase.
>>
>>Man this is nice. The way this reverb works pretty much complements normal
>>panning without needing to use mono delays to enhance the L/R positioning
in
>>a mix. Everything sound open and detailed. Not muddy at all. The tracks
just
>>seem to bounce off the walls that are created by the Quantec soundstage
in
>>conjunctiopn with the pan positions. It just sounds right and realistic.
Of
>>course, I've been trying to mix this acoustic project like a rock song
so
>>I'm bummed because i don't get to overprocess my mix now, but hey........I'm
>>learning.
>>
>>;o)
>>
>
|
|
|
|
| Re: Quantec Yardstick.......OK....now I get it. [message #71068 is a reply to message #71065] |
Fri, 11 August 2006 07:11 |
Deej [1]
Messages: 2149
Registered: January 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
I think the delays work better if there is no reverb on the tracks. I'm
using delays on one instrument here without the reverb on that particular
track and it does provide some spatial enhancement.
"Cujo" <chris@nospamapplemanstudio.com> wrote in message
news:44dc89e8$1@linux...
>
>
> So DJ, you use some Haas effect type delays?
> I have been wondering if it actually makes things worse. I mean, the
musicality
> and realism in some vintage rock recordings is pretty great and they never
> did that that I know of or did they?
> I recently did a mix using some short (not too short) delays panned
opposite
> the source and put way low i the mix, but I wondered if it just mucked up
> the works. Like there was just too much "noise" in the mix.
>
>
> rick <parnell68@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >sorry but at our age it's not learning it's...D'OH
> >
> >;o)
> >
> >On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 00:51:27 -0600, "DJ"
> ><animix_spam-this-ahole_@animas.net> wrote:
> >
> >>I've been using this thing all wrong. I've got a situation configured
here
> >>where, but interfacing it with Cubase Sx, applying it to every track in
> a
> >>mix and then returning the tracks to Paris I can use this processor on
> every
> >>track in a mix. I can adjust the level sent to each track in Cubase.
> >>
> >>Man this is nice. The way this reverb works pretty much complements
normal
> >>panning without needing to use mono delays to enhance the L/R
positioning
> in
> >>a mix. Everything sound open and detailed. Not muddy at all. The tracks
> just
> >>seem to bounce off the walls that are created by the Quantec soundstage
> in
> >>conjunctiopn with the pan positions. It just sounds right and realistic.
> Of
> >>course, I've been trying to mix this acoustic project like a rock song
> so
> >>I'm bummed because i don't get to overprocess my mix now, but
hey........I'm
> >>learning.
> >>
> >>;o)
> >>
> >
|
|
|
|
The PARIS Forums
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
